| Literature DB >> 34904081 |
Rui-Hua Chen1, Bing-Fei Li2, Jian-Hua Wen3, Chun-Lan Zhong4, Ming-Ming Ji4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a syndrome characterized by transient, rigid, paroxysmal, and repetitive central nervous system dysfunction. Prevention, control, and improvement of cognitive and behavioral dysfunction are of great significance for improving the patients' intellectual development and quality of life. Electroencephalograms (EEG) can predict an accelerated decline in cognitive function. AIM: To determine the clinical and EEG characteristics and treatment results of benign epilepsy in spiking children.Entities:
Keywords: Benign epilepsy; Centrotemporal spikes; Children; Electroencephalogram; Therapeutic effect
Year: 2021 PMID: 34904081 PMCID: PMC8638062 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i33.10116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Electroencephalogram characteristics of children
|
|
|
|
| Discharge period | ||
| Awake and sleep periods | 70 | 66.04 |
| Sleep period | 36 | 33.96 |
| Spine/spike discharge | ||
| Unilateral | 86 | 81.13 |
| Bilateral | 20 | 18.87 |
| Discharge generalization | 33 | 31.13 |
Comparison of electroencephalogram characteristics of children of different sexes and ages
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gender | ||||
| Man | 66 | 42 (63.64) | 55 (83.33) | 19 (28.79) |
| Woman | 40 | 28 (70.00) | 31 (77.50) | 14 (35.00) |
|
| 0.450 | 0.554 | 0.448 | |
|
| 0.502 | 0.457 | 0.503 | |
| Age | ||||
| ≤ 7 yr | 34 | 25 (73.53) | 26 (76.47) | 11 (32.35) |
| > 7 yr | 72 | 45 (62.50) | 60 (83.33) | 22 (30.56) |
|
| 1.253 | 0.711 | 0.035 | |
|
| 0.263 | 0.399 | 0.852 | |
Comparison of clinical data of children with and without effective treatment, n (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gender | 0.554 | 0.457 | ||
| Man | 11 (55.00) | 55 (63.95) | ||
| Woman | 9 (45.00) | 31 (36.05) | ||
| Age (yr) | 7.15 ± 1.98 | 7.15 ± 1.80 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Discharge period | 0.883 | 0.347 | ||
| Awake and sleep periods | 15 (75.00) | 55 (63.95) | ||
| Sleep period | 5 (25.00) | 31 (36.05) | ||
| Spike/sharp wave discharge | 2.081 | 0.149 | ||
| Unilateral | 19 (95.00) | 67 (77.91) | ||
| Bilateral | 1 (5.00) | 19 (22.09) | ||
| Discharge generalization | 8 (40.00) | 25 (29.07) | 0.904 | 0.342 |
| Low age onset (< 5 yr) | 8 (40.00) | 6 (6.98) | 12.690 | 0.000 |
| Seizure frequency | 9.582 | 0.002 | ||
| > 3 times/half a year | 12 (60.00) | 21 (24.42) | ||
| ≤ 3 times/half a year | 8 (40.00) | 65 (75.58) | ||
| Discharge index (%) | 65.05 ± 7.74 | 73.28 ± 9.17 | -3.714 | 0.000 |
| Gesell scale | ||||
| Gross motor (points) | 85.70 ± 6.62 | 85.28 ± 7.29 | 0.236 | 0.814 |
| Fine motor (points) | 88.60 ± 5.99 | 86.62 ± 8.00 | 1.040 | 0.301 |
| Adaptability (points) | 87.60 ± 7.02 | 86.08 ± 7.20 | 0.854 | 0.395 |
| Language (points) | 88.15 ± 7.13 | 86.33 ± 7.92 | 0.942 | 0.348 |
| Individual-social ability (points) | 85.40 ± 8.61 | 85.99 ± 8.22 | -0.287 | 0.775 |
Results of correlation analysis
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Gross motor | -0.014 | 0.887 |
| Fine motor | -0.274 | 0.005 |
| Adaptability | -0.068 | 0.488 |
| Language | -0.247 | 0.011 |
| Individual-social ability | 0.098 | 0.316 |
Figure 1Correlation analysis. A: Fine motion; B: Language.
Results of multivariate analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Incidence at a young age (< 5 yr) | 2.425 | 0.696 | 12.131 | 0.000 | 11.304 (2.888-44.251) |
| Attack frequency | 1.755 | 0.593 | 8.760 | 0.003 | 5.784 (1.809-18.490) |
| Constant term | -2.686 | 0.480 | 31.254 | 0.000 | - |
OR: Odds ratio.
Comparison of discharge index and Gesell scale scores between treatment-effective and treatment-ineffective children before and after treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge index (%) | ||||
| Before treatment | 65.05 ± 7.74 | 73.28 ± 9.17 | -3.714 | 0.000 |
| After treatment | 40.15 ± 5.36 | 34.47 ± 10.02 | 2.449 | 0.016 |
|
| 11.828 | 26.498 | ||
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| Gross motor (points) | ||||
| Before treatment | 85.70 ± 6.62 | 85.28 ± 7.29 | 0.236 | 0.814 |
| After treatment | 85.90 ± 5.47 | 86.20 ± 6.47 | -0.192 | 0.848 |
|
| -0.104 | -0.875 | ||
|
| 0.918 | 0.383 | ||
| Fine motor (points) | ||||
| Before treatment | 88.60 ± 5.99 | 86.62 ± 8.00 | 1.040 | 0.301 |
| After treatment | 91.20 ± 2.69 | 89.24 ± 5.29 | 1.605 | 0.111 |
|
| -1.771 | -2.533 | ||
|
| 0.085 | 0.012 | ||
| Adaptability (points) | ||||
| Before treatment | 87.60 ± 7.02 | 86.08 ± 7.20 | 0.854 | 0.395 |
| After treatment | 88.50 ± 5.04 | 88.26 ± 5.38 | 0.182 | 0.856 |
|
| -0.466 | -2.249 | ||
|
| 0.644 | 0.026 | ||
| Language (points) | ||||
| Before treatment | 88.15 ± 7.13 | 86.33 ± 7.92 | 0.942 | 0.348 |
| After treatment | 89.35 ± 6.02 | 88.55 ± 5.99 | 0.537 | 0.592 |
|
| -0.575 | -2.073 | ||
|
| 0.569 | 0.040 | ||
| Personal-social ability (points) | ||||
| Before treatment | 85.40 ± 8.61 | 85.99 ± 8.22 | -0.287 | 0.775 |
| After treatment | 86.95 ± 6.78 | 87.91 ± 6.27 | -0.607 | 0.545 |
|
| -0.633 | -1.722 | ||
|
| 0.531 | 0.087 |