Literature DB >> 34903490

Nasal skin reconstruction: Time to rethink the reconstructive ladder?

Inge J Veldhuizen1, Philip Brouwer2, Abdullah Aleisa3, Nicholas R Kurtansky3, Stephen W Dusza3, Kishwer S Nehal3, Maarten M Hoogbergen2, René R W J van der Hulst4, Erica H Lee5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasal scarring can compromise aesthetics and function given its complex three-dimensional structure and central location. This study aimed to measure patients' satisfaction after reconstruction for nasal defects following Mohs micrographic surgery.
METHODS: Patients presenting with nasal nonmelanoma skin cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, USA and Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Netherlands from April 2017 to November 2019 were asked to participate. Reconstruction type, complications, and patients satisfaction were assessed. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer - Satisfaction with Facial Appearance scale (preoperative and 1-year postoperative) and the Appraisal of Scars scale (1-year postoperative).
RESULTS: A total of 128 patients completed the preand postoperative scales. There were 35 (27%) surgical defects repaired with primary closures, 71 (55.5%) with flaps, and 22 (17.2%) with full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG). Patients that underwent a flap or FTSG reconstruction had higher scar satisfaction scores than primary closures (p = 0.03). A trend was seen with patients following flap reconstructions scoring 7.8 points higher than primary closures and patients with upper nose defects scoring 6.4 points higher than lower nose defects. Males were significantly more satisfied than females. No significant difference was observed in the preoperative and postoperative facial appearance scores between the three groups (p = 0.39).
CONCLUSION: Patients are more satisfied in the long term with their scars after flap reconstructions compared to primary closures. Therefore, nasal skin reconstruction may not follow the traditional reconstructive ladder and more complex approaches may lead to higher long-term scar satisfaction.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flaps; Grafts; Nose; Primary closure; Reconstruction; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34903490      PMCID: PMC8976754          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  29 in total

1.  Reconstruction of small soft tissue nasal defects.

Authors:  Erik M Wolfswinkel; William M Weathers; David Cheng; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q.

Authors:  Berend van der Lei; Theo Bouman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Principles of scar camouflage.

Authors:  A F Borges
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Toral S Vaidya; Shoko Mori; Stephen W Dusza; Anthony M Rossi; Kishwer S Nehal; Erica H Lee
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 5.  Importance of physical appearance in patients with skin cancer.

Authors:  Joseph F Sobanko; David B Sarwer; Zinta Zvargulis; Christopher J Miller
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.398

6.  Complications after nasal skin repair with local flaps and full-thickness skin grafts and implications of patients' contentment.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Lutz Günther; Andreas Bremerich
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-03

Review 7.  Basal cell carcinoma of the outer nose: overview on surgical techniques and analysis of 312 patients.

Authors:  Uwe Wollina; Annett Bennewitz; Dana Langner
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-07

Review 8.  A Review of the Literature of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of Invasive Squamous Cells Carcinoma.

Authors:  Concetta Potenza; Nicoletta Bernardini; Veronica Balduzzi; Luigi Losco; Alessandra Mambrin; Anna Marchesiello; Ersilia Tolino; Sara Zuber; Nevena Skroza; Ilaria Proietti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Reconstruction of nasal ala and tip following skin cancer resection.

Authors:  Young Ji Park; Gyu Hyeon Kwon; Jun Oh Kim; Woo Sang Ryu; Kyung Suk Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-12-20

10.  Forehead flap in nasal reconstruction.

Authors:  M Friduss; P Dagum; A Mandych; A Reppucci
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.591

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.