Jan Rustemeyer1, Lutz Günther, Andreas Bremerich. 1. Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Plastische Operationen, Spezielle Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany. janrustem@t-online.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: The range of complications after plastic surgical repair of nasal skin defects is not clearly known. The aim of this study was to identify complications after reconstruction of nasal skin defects to determine what typical complications occur after standard surgical options including full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) and local flap plastics (LFP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 210 patients with defects of the nasal tip, the nasal ala or dorsum of the nose (average diameter 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm) surgical skin repair was performed with LFP or FTSG. Complications within 6 months after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Some 41 patients (19.5%) suffered complications; there was no significant difference in total complication rate between LFP (20.5%) and FTSG (18.3%). However, FTSG patients had significantly more infections postoperatively than LFP patients (5.4% vs. 2.6%). LFP patients presented a significantly higher rate of wound or suture dehiscence (FTSG 2.2%, LFP 5.9%). FTSG patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of partial or complete loss (total rate FTSG 8.5%, LFP 5.2%). The LFP technique led to significantly more aesthetic deficits (FTSG 2.1%, LFP 6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: LFP showed advantages with regard to infection and loss rates but with a higher rate of aesthetic deficits compared to FTSG. It remains an individual decision as to which procedure is used to repair defects of the nose, depending on patient and surgical variables.
PURPOSE: The range of complications after plastic surgical repair of nasal skin defects is not clearly known. The aim of this study was to identify complications after reconstruction of nasal skin defects to determine what typical complications occur after standard surgical options including full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) and local flap plastics (LFP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 210 patients with defects of the nasal tip, the nasal ala or dorsum of the nose (average diameter 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm) surgical skin repair was performed with LFP or FTSG. Complications within 6 months after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Some 41 patients (19.5%) suffered complications; there was no significant difference in total complication rate between LFP (20.5%) and FTSG (18.3%). However, FTSG patients had significantly more infections postoperatively than LFP patients (5.4% vs. 2.6%). LFP patients presented a significantly higher rate of wound or suture dehiscence (FTSG 2.2%, LFP 5.9%). FTSG patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of partial or complete loss (total rate FTSG 8.5%, LFP 5.2%). The LFP technique led to significantly more aesthetic deficits (FTSG 2.1%, LFP 6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: LFP showed advantages with regard to infection and loss rates but with a higher rate of aesthetic deficits compared to FTSG. It remains an individual decision as to which procedure is used to repair defects of the nose, depending on patient and surgical variables.
Authors: A Bouhanna; C Bruant-Rodier; S Himy; J-C Talmant; V Bollecker; J Glicksman; J-C Lutz; V Kadoch; A Wilk Journal: Ann Chir Plast Esthet Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 0.660
Authors: Paul van der Eerden; Mark Simmons; Karel Zuur; Harm van Tinteren; Hade Vuyk Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Inge J Veldhuizen; Philip Brouwer; Abdullah Aleisa; Nicholas R Kurtansky; Stephen W Dusza; Kishwer S Nehal; Maarten M Hoogbergen; René R W J van der Hulst; Erica H Lee Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2021-11-14 Impact factor: 2.740