Literature DB >> 34901751

SARS-COV-2 screening in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors: Implications for the evaluation process and eligibility.

Roberto Crocchiolo1, Francesco Alfarano2, Elisabetta Volpato2, Mariateresa Pugliano2, Irene Cuppari2, Anna Maria Mazza2, Laura Bellio2, Diana Fanti2, Chiara Vismara2, Francesco Scaglione2, Nicoletta Sacchi3, Simona Pollichieni3, Lia Mele4, Elisa Diral2, Giovanni Grillo2, Silvano Rossini2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Soon after the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, viral screening by nasopharyngeal swab became mandatory for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor eligibility.
METHODS: We described our monocenter experience with allogeneic HSC donors from February 1 to the October 31, 2020 to verify whether the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 screening altered the donor eligibility and/or entailed a prolongation of the evaluation process.
RESULTS: A total of 21 allogeneic HSC donors were screened during the above-mentioned period upon request by the local transplant physicians or by the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry; among the HSC donors (n = 17) who completed the eligibility process and further received the nasopharyngeal swab, all but one were negative for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. The positive donor remained asymptomatic for the whole duration of the infection, which lasted six weeks. However, he was temporarily excluded from donation. The median duration of the evaluation process was not significantly different, compared to the same period of 2019 (p-value = 0.11).
CONCLUSION: The mandatory SARS-CoV-2 screening in allogeneic HSC donors allowed for the detection of 6% positivity in this monocenter series over a 9-month period. Despite the inconvenience of this unexpected non-eligibility, the exclusion of a SARS-CoV-2 positive donor represented an important safety measure for the donor, with respect to a new and still partially unknown virus. The screening did not alter the length of the donor evaluation and thus, did not cause a delay in the eligibility process.
© 2021 Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donors; Eligibility; Hematopoietic stem cells; Sars-cov-2; Screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 34901751      PMCID: PMC8648663          DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2021.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther        ISSN: 2531-1379


Introduction

Soon after the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, viral screening by nasopharyngeal swab became mandatory for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor eligibility in Italy, both for related and unrelated ones. The measure was conceived as a precaution for the health of both HSC donor and recipient, as on one hand, the impact of the mobilization regimen or bone marrow harvest is unknown among SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals, albeit asymptomatic, and on the other hand, the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through HSC donation cannot be formally excluded; in March 2020 the information about what soon became a deadly virus across the world was quite limited and therefore, a cautionary approach seemed the most reasonable. Later on, and so far, no evidence of viral transmission through blood donation came from the clinical experience,; nonetheless, a SARS-CoV-2-negative screening result is still recommended for the eligibility of HSC donors. To the best of our knowledge, although mobilization and donation did not seem to adversely impact the course of infection in the asymptomatic donors who have been reported so far,, any detrimental effect of mobilization or bone marrow harvest (including general anesthesia, decrease of hemoglobin level, donation-related pain and fatigue) on the donor's health cannot be formally excluded, with respect to a still partially unknown virus. According to the indications from the Italian Centro Nazionale Trapianti released on the March 3, 2020, a SARS-CoV-2-specific nasopharyngeal swab by the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) had to be added to the already established blood, urine and imaging exams during the work-up, but its exact timing was not defined, as long as it were performed before initiating the patient conditioning regimen, being negative for the donor eligibility. In addition, graft cryopreservation was intended to further enhance the process safety. Herein we describe our monocentric experience with allogeneic HSC donors who were evaluated for donation from the March 1 to October 31, 2020 in order to verify whether the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 screening altered the donor eligibility or entailed a prolongation of the evaluation process.

Methods

We performed the SARS-CoV-2-specific nasopharingeal swab after having completed all the eligibility tests, i.e., one or two days before the planned initiation of mobilization by the Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, but we did not receive any request for bone marrow harvest in this period; this choice was made because an earlier SARS-CoV-2 screening would have required a second test in 5 - 7 days, given the incubation period and the high number of infected people in our region in the first wave of March/April 2020. The same timing was maintained onwards and up to the time of writing. The test was performed by the RT-PCR (GeneFinder™ COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit, ELITech; Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay, Seegene) on nasopharyngeal swab samples collected by three different physicians from the Apheresis team in the cited period; results were available within the 24 h following its execution. Informed consent for the HSC donation was obtained from all the donors; the study was exempt from approval by an ethics board.

Results

During the above-mentioned nine-month period, a total of 21 allogeneic HSC donors were screened at the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy and started the suitability and eligibility evaluation process upon request by the local transplant physicians or by the Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry (IBR), this latter in favor of unrelated patients. There were HLA-identical siblings (n = 7), haploidentical related donors (n = 12) and unrelated ones (n = 2); the median age was 37 years (range: 20 - 64) and the male/female ratio was 13:8. Among the HSC donors (n = 17) who completed the eligibility process and further received the nasopharyngeal swab, all but one were negative for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and proceeded to donation. As of March 2021, no signs or symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection emerged during their post-donation follow-up. Figure 1 shows the evaluation process together with the causes of unsuitability or non-eligibility of the HSC donors. The only SARS-CoV-2 positive donor was a 20-year-old male, an unrelated donor, who thus was temporarily excluded from donation; he remained asymptomatic for the whole duration of the infection, lasting six weeks from the positive swab up to the two consecutive negative ones that proved the clearance of infection. After that time, his exclusion was confirmed due to the elapsed time to transplant for the current recipient, but he remains available for future donations on behalf of the IBMDR. The median duration of the entire evaluation process for the 16 donors was 35 days (range: 10 - 123) and was not significantly different, when compared to the 14 donations during the same period of 2019, for which a median of 57 days (range: 23 - 124) was recorded (p-value by the Mann-Whitney U test = 0.11).
Figure 1

Evaluation process with the causes of unsuitability or non-eligibility of the HSC donors.

Evaluation process with the causes of unsuitability or non-eligibility of the HSC donors.

Discussion

Herein we report our experience with 21 consecutive allogeneic HSC donors who underwent SARS-CoV-2 screening by nasopharyngeal swab before the eligibility to donate and found one asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive donor; despite the exclusion of this donor due to the detected infection, no delay in the evaluation process for all the donors was observed and the duration of the entire process was not significantly different, with respect to the year before. It is noteworthy that the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 positive test in 6% of our HSC donor series (one in the 17 donors who received the nasopharyngeal swab) is consistent with the seroprevalence of 5.2% (95% CI: 2.4 - 9.0) among the healthy blood donors in our area. Although we cannot exclude false-negative findings among our 16 asymptomatic donors due to the well-known intrinsic limitations of the technical procedure or operator-related issues, the lack of evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during their follow-up, especially in the immediate post-donation period, appears to be reassuring in this sense. Furthermore, two recent reports on HSC transplantation from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors did not mention any unfavorable infection outcome among the donors, nor any viral transmission through the HSCs,.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the mandatory SARS-CoV-2 screening in allogenic HSC donors allowed for the detection of a 6% positivity (n = 1 donor) in this monocentric series over a nine-month period. Despite the inconvenience of such a non-eligibility, we believe that the exclusion of the SARS-CoV-2 positive donor represented a safety measure for the donor himself, with respect to a new and still partially unknown virus. Importantly, the SARS-CoV-2 screening did not alter the length of donor evaluation and thus did not cause a delay in the eligibility process.

Authorship contributions

R.C.: conceptualization, investigation and writing - original draft; F.A., E.V., M.P., I.C., AM.M., L.B., N.S., S.P., L.M. and S.R.: investigation and writing - review & editing; D.F., C.V. and F.S.: resources; E.D. and G.G.: writing - review & editing.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  9 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of COVID-19 and hematopoietic cell transplantation; EBMT recommendations for management of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, their donors, and patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.

Authors:  Per Ljungman; Malgorzata Mikulska; Rafael de la Camara; Grzegorz W Basak; Christian Chabannon; Selim Corbacioglu; Rafael Duarte; Harry Dolstra; Arjan C Lankester; Mohamad Mohty; Silvia Montoto; John Murray; Régis Peffault de Latour; John A Snowden; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Bregje Verhoeven; Nicolaus Kröger; Jan Styczynski
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence trends in healthy blood donors during the COVID-19 outbreak in Milan.

Authors:  Luca Valenti; Annalisa Bergna; Serena Pelusi; Federica Facciotti; Alessia Lai; Maciej Tarkowski; Angela Lombardi; Alessandra Berzuini; Flavio Caprioli; Luigi Santoro; Guido Baselli; Carla Della Ventura; Elisa Erba; Silvano Bosari; Massimo Galli; Gianguglielmo Zehender; Daniele Prati
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an infected SARS-CoV2 donor sibling.

Authors:  Usanarat Anurathapan; Nopporn Apiwattanakul; Samart Pakakasama; Pongpak Pongphitcha; Arunee Thitithanyanont; Ekawat Pasomsub; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Negative Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs Do Not Rule Out COVID-19.

Authors:  Poramed Winichakoon; Romanee Chaiwarith; Chalerm Liwsrisakun; Parichat Salee; Aree Goonna; Atikun Limsukon; Quanhathai Kaewpoowat
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Transfusion of blood products derived from SARS-CoV-2+ donors to patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Marco Ruggeri; Andrea Aroldi; Rocco Piazza; Angela Mazzi; Giustina De Silvestro; Mauro Krampera; Francesco Lanza
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 1.764

6.  Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors.

Authors:  Mathieu Leclerc; Slim Fourati; Dehbia Menouche; Dominique Challine; Sébastien Maury
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 18.959

7.  Graft Cryopreservation Does Not Impact Overall Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Mehdi Hamadani; Mei-Jie Zhang; Xiao-Ying Tang; Mingwei Fei; Claudio Brunstein; Saurabh Chhabra; Anita D'Souza; Filippo Milano; Rachel Phelan; Wael Saber; Bronwen E Shaw; Daniel Weisdorf; Steven M Devine; Mary M Horowitz
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Claudia Alteri; Valeria Cento; Maria Antonello; Luna Colagrossi; Marco Merli; Nicola Ughi; Silvia Renica; Elisa Matarazzo; Federica Di Ruscio; Livia Tartaglione; Jacopo Colombo; Chiara Grimaldi; Stefania Carta; Alice Nava; Valentino Costabile; Chiara Baiguera; Daniela Campisi; Diana Fanti; Chiara Vismara; Roberto Fumagalli; Francesco Scaglione; Oscar Massimiliano Epis; Massimo Puoti; Carlo Federico Perno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transfusion transmission despite RNA detection in blood donors showing symptoms after donation.

Authors:  Pierre Cappy; Daniel Candotti; Virginie Sauvage; Quentin Lucas; Laure Boizeau; Johanna Gomez; Vincent Enouf; Lila Chabli; Josiane Pillonel; Pierre Tiberghien; Pascal Morel; Syria Laperche
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 25.476

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.