Literature DB >> 33637468

Transfusion of blood products derived from SARS-CoV-2+ donors to patients with hematological malignancies.

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini1, Marco Ruggeri2, Andrea Aroldi3, Rocco Piazza3, Angela Mazzi4, Giustina De Silvestro5, Mauro Krampera6, Francesco Lanza7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33637468      PMCID: PMC7896506          DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci        ISSN: 1473-0502            Impact factor:   1.764


× No keyword cloud information.
Patients with hematological malignancies (HMP) represent a vulnerable population and need special protection. They are frequently immunosuppressed and infections in HMP can have deleterious consequences. In addition, these patients need frequent transfusions, especially of platelet concentrates. The COVID-19 epidemic poses an additional problem for HMP, who face high mortality rates if infected by SARS-CoV-2 [1]; in fact blood donors can show sign of the disease following donations. While plasma and red blood cells can be safely used later than 14 days, which represents the maximum time needed for symptoms development, some blood derivatives (platelet concentrates) must be used shortly after donation (usually within 5 days). We describe here 7 cases of HMP receiving blood derivatives, especially platelet concentrates, from donors who developed symptoms after blood donation and tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 in all but one case (Table 1 ). Transfusions were performed in an inpatient setting in 4 out of 7 cases. Baseline diagnoses included acute myeloid leukemia (3 cases), myelodysplasia (2 cases), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1 case), chronic myeloproliferative disease (1 case).
Table 1

Description of the seven cases of transfusions in HMP patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was assessed by a PCR based method on nasopharyngeal swabs.

Case #Date of donation (2020)Date of symptom developmentDate COVID-19 diagnosisType of transfusionDate of transfusion and setting (in/outpatient)Date and result of COVID-19 test on recipient (2020)
1March 23thMarch 26th, fever, ageusia, anosmiaApril 7thPlateletsMarch 24th inpatientApril 8th, negative
2March 8thMarch 10thMarch 15thPlateletsMarch 9thMarch 16th
Fever, coughoutpatientNegative
April 3rd
Negative
3March 5thMarch 12thFever and myalgiaMarch 15thplateletsMarch 9thMarch 16th, negative
inpatientMarch 23rd, negative
March 30th
negative
4March 3rdMarch 10thTest not performedPlateletsMarch 8thMarch 12th
Fever sore throat, myalgiaoutpatientNegative
April 6
Negative
5February 24thFebruary 28th; flu-like syndrome FeverMarch 8thPlateletsFebruary 28th inpatientMarch 7th Negative
Died on March 18th (DIC; sepsis: urinary tract infection by enterococcus faecalis in cachexia)
6March 11thAsymptomaticMarch 21stRed Blood CellsMarch 17th inpatientMarch 29th, negative
April 7th, Negative
7March 16thMarch 26th flu-like syndrome FeverTest performed after acute phase (see text)Red Blood CellsMarch 27th outpatientMarch 30th
Positive
Description of the seven cases of transfusions in HMP patients. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was assessed by a PCR based method on nasopharyngeal swabs. The time elapsed from donation to the onset of symptoms ranged between 2 and 10 days (median 7 days). In two cases the donor was not tested after symptoms development as the national guidelines of the Italian “Centro Nazionale Sangue” do not require it (http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/news/p3_2_1_1_1.jsp?lingua=italiano&menu=notizie&p=dalministero&id=4107). The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was assessed by a PCR based method on nasopharyngeal swabs. The presence of serum antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (IgG and IgM anti-s1 and anti-s2) was detected by an ELISA based method. The transfusions did not result in the infection of the HMP with SARS-CoV-2 as determined by nasopharyngeal swabs performed up to 14 days post transfusion, with a single exception of a patient (#7) who developed SARS-CoV-2 positivity 2 days after transfusion, concomitantly with cerebral artery thrombosis that developed in spite of the patient being thrombocytopenic. Unfortunately, the donor in this case was tested for COVID-19 only 1 month after developing COVID-like symptoms. The result was negative; a serological test (against SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein) was performed 2 months later and showed a negative result. Therefore, although SARS-CoV-2 infection in this donor was unlikely, the suboptimal timing of testing and the fact that infected individuals can show no sign of serological conversion do not allow to rule out an undiagnosed infection in this case. However the possibility that the patient acquired a community transmitted infection is also possible since the transfusion was performed in an outpatient setting. A similar report from South Korea failed to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in 6 patients (not all HMP), who received transfusions in a situation similar to our series [2]. The risk that a transfusion from a SARS-CoV-2+ donor can transmit the disease to the recipient is currently unknown. A recent report identified SARS-CoV-2 RNA, but no intact infectious virus in 3 plasma samples from French donors; however in 2 out of 3 cases blood products were not transfused and therefore the risk of transfusion could not be evaluated [3]. Another article [4] reports that no trace of the virus was found in the serum of COVID-19+ patients; however, this study did not analyze circulating blood cells, such as endothelial cells and monocytes that are suspected to be a target of the virus and effectors, through sFlt-1 production, of the marked thrombophilia that develops in many patients [5]. Furthermore, the same article [4] reports that the nasopharyngeal viral load of these symptomatic patients showed only a descending phase, thus highlighting how the ascending phase and the peak of positivity probably occurred before the development of symptoms and was therefore lost in already symptomatic patients. Therefore, the viremic phase which characterizes any viral infection could have occurred prior to the observation time in this published study. The asymptomatic phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection could thus represent the critical phase for the safety of blood transfusions. It is worth mentioning that a recent publication documented the presence of viral particles inside endothelial cells obtained from advanced cases of COVID-19 [6] and that increased number of circulating endothelial cells were identified in COVID-19 patients [7]. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest. Acknowledgement This work was supported by Fondazione AIRC per la Ricerca sul Cancro Fondazione AIRC per la Ricerca sul Cancro 2017 (IG #20112) to C.G.-P., and 2018 (IG #22082) to R.P.
  2 in total

1.  SARS-CoV-2 and post-donation information: a one-year experience of the French haemovigilance network.

Authors:  Pierre Cappy; Saadia Legrain-Jbilou; Lila Chabli; Melissa N'Debi; Pierre Gallian; Nadège Brisbarre; Josiane Pillonel; Pascal Morel; Syria Laperche
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.752

2.  SARS-COV-2 screening in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors: Implications for the evaluation process and eligibility.

Authors:  Roberto Crocchiolo; Francesco Alfarano; Elisabetta Volpato; Mariateresa Pugliano; Irene Cuppari; Anna Maria Mazza; Laura Bellio; Diana Fanti; Chiara Vismara; Francesco Scaglione; Nicoletta Sacchi; Simona Pollichieni; Lia Mele; Elisa Diral; Giovanni Grillo; Silvano Rossini
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2021-12-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.