| Literature DB >> 34901040 |
Massimo W Rivolta1, Moira Barbieri2, Tamara Stampalija2,3, Roberto Sassi1, Martin G Frasch4.
Abstract
During labor, uterine contractions trigger the response of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) of the fetus, producing sawtooth-like decelerations in the fetal heart rate (FHR) series. Under chronic hypoxia, ANS is known to regulate FHR differently with respect to healthy fetuses. In this study, we hypothesized that such different ANS regulation might also lead to a change in the FHR deceleration morphology. The hypothesis was tested in an animal model comprising nine normoxic and five chronically hypoxic fetuses that underwent a protocol of umbilical cord occlusions (UCOs). Deceleration morphologies in the fetal inter-beat time interval (FRR) series were modeled using a trapezoid with four parameters, i.e., baseline b, deceleration depth a, UCO response time τ u and recovery time τ r . Comparing normoxic and hypoxic sheep, we found a clear difference for τ u (24.8±9.4 vs. 39.8±9.7 s; p < 0.05), a (268.1±109.5 vs. 373.0±46.0 ms; p < 0.1) and Δτ = τ u - τ r (13.2±6.9 vs. 23.9±7.5 s; p < 0.05). Therefore, the animal model supported the hypothesis that hypoxic fetuses have a longer response time τ u and larger asymmetry Δτ as a response to UCOs. Assessing these morphological parameters during labor is challenging due to non-stationarity, phase desynchronization and noise. For this reason, in the second part of the study, we quantified whether acceleration capacity (AC), deceleration capacity (DC), and deceleration reserve (DR), computed through Phase-Rectified Signal Averaging (PRSA, known to be robust to noise), were correlated with the morphological parameters. DC, AC and DR were correlated with τ u , τ r and Δτ for a wide range of the PRSA parameter T (Pearson's correlation ρ > 0.8, p < 0.05). In conclusion, deceleration morphologies have been found to differ between normoxic and hypoxic sheep fetuses during UCOs. The same difference can be assessed through PRSA based parameters, further motivating future investigations on the translational potential of this methodology on human data.Entities:
Keywords: animal model; electronic fetal monitoring (EFM); fetal heart rate (FHR); fetal hypoxia; heart rate variability (HRV); labor; phase-rectified signal averaging (PRSA)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34901040 PMCID: PMC8655232 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.626450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Example of model fitting along with variable definition. ° refers to FRR values from the beginning of the UCOs.
Figure 2Scatter plot for each pair of the morphological parameters, i.e., (A) τ vs. τ, (B) τ vs. a, (C) τ vs. a, (D) b vs. τ, (E) b vs. τ and (F) b vs. a, for both normoxic (black triangle) and hypoxic fetuses (red circle). Contour plots are also reported (prepared with an assumption of Gaussianity, made for visualization purposes).
Figure 3Example of normalized FRR signals from one normoxic and one hypoxic fetus (a median filter was applied to the signals to enhance the trend). The shaded area corresponds to UCOs.
Figure 4Partial correlation coefficient ρ between τ vs. DC (red line), τ vs. AC (yellow line) and Δτ vs. DR (green line), for different values of T. Coefficients were computed from the (A) normoxic and (B) hypoxic fetuses. It is worth noting that the number of data points available for the computation were 7 and 5 at each T-value. * (p < 0.05) and ▽ (p < 0.1) refer to statistically significant correlations.