Literature DB >> 34900361

Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Associated Risk Factors among Farmers in Jeju.

Hyun Jung Lee1,2, Jung-Hwan Oh3, Jeong Rae Yoo4, Seo Young Ko5, Jeong Ho Kang5, Sung Kgun Lee5, Wooseong Jeong5, Gil Myeong Seong4, Chul Hoo Kang3, Sung Wook Song5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and its associated agricultural work-related, biomechanical factors among this population.
METHODS: We analyzed initial survey data from the Safety for Agricultural Injury of Farmers cohort study involving adult farmers in Jeju Island. The prevalence of LBP was calculated with associated factors.
RESULTS: In total, 1,209 participants were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of LBP was 23.7%. Significant associations for LBP were the type of farming activity, length of farming career, prior agricultural injury within 1 year, and stress levels. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed three biomechanical factors significantly related to LBP: repetitive use of particular body parts; the inappropriate posture of the lower back and neck.
CONCLUSIONS: Some occupational, and biomechanical risk factors contribute to LBP. Therefore, postural education, injury prevention education, and psychological support will be needed to prevent LBP.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Ergonomics; Farmers; Low back pain; Risk factor

Year:  2021        PMID: 34900361      PMCID: PMC8640578          DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saf Health Work        ISSN: 2093-7911


Introduction

Due to the nature of agriculture, one person may perform various types of work. Biomechanical factors may vary according to the type of agricultural work [1]. Agricultural work is high tension and involves plenty of repetitive labor. Hence, work-related injuries and musculoskeletal disorders are common among farmers [2,3]. Among them, the most common musculoskeletal disorder is low back pain (LBP) [4,5]. In a 2019 study by Kee et al., the rate of musculoskeletal pain among Korean farmers was very high at 97.2%, of which LBP had contributed 58.7% [6]. LBP has been shown to cause serious socioeconomic losses, physical impairment, and harms to mental health [[7], [8], [9]]. Biomechanical risk factors for causing LBP include inappropriate posture of the lower back, heavy lifting, repetitive work, and whole-body vibrations from agricultural machinery [3,[10], [11], [12]]. Psychological factors, in turn, include stress, anxiety, and depression [13,14]. As age increases, the prevalence of LBP increases with continuous exposure to occupational factors and changes in pain perception [[15], [16], [17]]. Korean agriculture varies by region. Among them, Jeju is the southernmost volcanic island. It is very different from other regions in terms of geological characteristics [18,19]. In Jeju Island, the high water permeability of the land precludes rice farming [18]. In addition, due to the subtropical climate, approximately 64% of Jeju farmers focus on citrus cultivation. The rest grow winter vegetables such as carrots, onions, and cabbage [18,20,21]. According to the 2018 Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries Survey, the agricultural population in Jeju Island was 82,751, which was higher at 12.58% than the national agricultural population ratio of 4.5%. Among Jeju farmers, the proportion of older adults aged 65 or older was 32.5%. This is lower than the rate of the older farmers nationwide in Korea, at 44.7%. The majority (57%) of Jeju farmers combine farm work with other jobs, and this rate is higher than the national average (43.2%) for multiple employment [20]. The 1-year prevalence of LBP among farmers has been reported to vary from 26.9% to 63.9% [6,11,22]. Since Jeju Island’s demography and agricultural environment are markedly different from those of other regions, differences in the prevalence of back pain and its risk factors are expected among farmers. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of LBP in Jeju farmers and to analyze the risk factors associated with it.

Materials and methods

Study design and data source

We performed a cross-sectional analysis from survey data from the Safety for Agricultural Injury of Farmers (SAIF) cohort study among Jeju Island farmers. SAIF is a community-based cohort study on occupational and environmental exposures affecting agricultural injuries of farmers in Jeju. A two-stage sampling process was used to select the SAIF cohort participants by selecting primary regional clusters from major agricultural administrative districts of Jeju and selecting sampling populations from a list of all farmers dwelling in the sampled cluster frame. The final SAIF cohort recruited 1,239 adult farmers dwelling in 20 sampled rural villages, who each completed a baseline interview between 2015 and 2019. An interviewer-administered survey was administered using a semi-structured questionnaire by trained personnel of the Center for Farmers’ Safety and Health at Jeju National University Hospital. This retrospective study was approved by the Jeju National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2020-05-002). Written informed consent was obtained from each farmer prior to enrollment with the SAIF cohort.

Study participants

All 1,239 farmers of the final SAIF recruitment who were engaged in agricultural work at the time of the baseline survey, including men and women and who were 18 years old or older, were considered eligible for study participation. A total of 30 participants (1 person with undetermined age, 15 with an undetermined or minor type of farm, 17 with total experience in farming < 1 year) were excluded from the analysis, leaving 1,209 participants (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the study.

Flow chart of the study.

Dependent variable

Our dependent variable was self-reported non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain in the low back area over the past 12 months before the baseline survey. It was assessed using the standard questionnaire for musculoskeletal disorders developed by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) [23]. Study participants reported the presence of LBP (no/yes), LBP frequency at least once a month (no/yes), LBP pain duration more than one week (no/yes), numeric rating pain severity (0 to 10), self-assessed agricultural work relevance (no/yes) and seeking medical services due to LBP (no/yes) during the past 12 months. The definition of LBP was satisfied by any of the two following criteria during the past 12 months: (1) the musculoskeletal pain in the low back lasting more than a week or (2) the musculoskeletal pain in the low back occurring at least once a month.

Independent variables

Sociodemographic characteristics

The sociodemographic variables in our analysis included age (years), sex (male/female), marital status (single/married), smoking status (non-smoker, ex-smoker, current), alcohol consumption (no/yes), CAGE scores (0-1, ≥2 points), average sleep duration (hours), self-assessed average daily stress level (rarely, occasional, frequent, almost). Variables also included sadness or despair for more than two weeks (no/yes).

Agricultural work-related conditions

Types of farming work (field, orchard, livestock), the total number of years of farming (1 to 15, 16 to 30, 31 to 45, ≥46 years), average months of farming per year, average hours per day of farming, days off work per month (0 to 8, ≥9 days), possession of agricultural machines (no/yes), possession of vinyl greenhouse (no/yes), and any agricultural injury within a past year (no/yes) were used as variables of agricultural work-related conditions. The type of farming included only three categories, excluding rice farming: dry field farming, orchard farming, and livestock farming; the proportion of rice farming in our population was small (n = 18) considering the environment of Jeju Island.

Agricultural work-related biomechanical factors

The biomechanical factors related to agricultural work were investigated using the questionnaire developed by the Korean Rural Development Administration [24]. The questionnaire, composed of 11 items about agricultural work-related biomechanical factors, asked participants about the frequency of the following per day using a 5-point Likert scale corresponding to rarely, sometimes, usually, often, and always: Lifting heavy objects (>10 kg) or pushing and pulling heavy objects (>30 kg) Shoveling, pickaxing, and hammering Using vibrating agricultural machinery such as cultivators, tractors, rotaries, and mowers Repetitive use of particular body parts, such as hand, wrist, elbows, and shoulders Stretching or twisting the forearm Constant elevation of the arm above the head Bending, twisting, or reclining your back more than 30 degrees Neck flexion or neck twisting more than 20 degrees Kneeling and squatting on the ground (e.g., streaming) Using hands or knees to apply impact like a hammer Uncomfortable posture on the ramp

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, including the prevalence of LBP, were presented as frequencies, and categorical variables were presented as percentages. Continuous variables were presented as means, standard deviations (SD), medians, and interquartile ranges (IQR) depending on the distribution. We compared baseline sociodemographic characteristics and agricultural work-related conditions between the farmers with or without LBP using Student’s t-test, Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. We also calculated the unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) for the association between LBP and each categorical variable in sociodemographic characteristics and agricultural work-related conditions. We used univariate analysis for LBP, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant sociodemographic and agricultural work-related factors. The multivariate logistic model was built using stepwise selection, only including sociodemographic and agricultural work-related variables at p < 0.05. Another multivariate logistic model for LBP was built to compute the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of each 5-point Likert scale of agricultural work-related biomechanical factors after adjusting for a set of significant sociodemographic and agricultural work-related covariates (total years of farming, sex, stress level, type of farming, agricultural injury within a year). We also tested the overall null hypothesis that the association for LBP is equal among each multi-degree of biomechanical factor group after adjusting for a set of significant sociodemographic and agricultural work-related covariates, using the Wald chi-square test. We conducted additional comparisons between each group (sometimes, usually, often, and always) against a reference group (rarely) if the biomechanical factor’s overall null hypothesis was rejected. We calculated the margins, which are statistics calculated from predictions of a previously fit model after adjusting for covariates (total years of farming, sex, stress level, type of farming, agricultural injury within a year). The adjusted marginal differences for each group versus the reference group were plotted with 95% confidence intervals for each difference. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX), utilizing a two-tailed test with a statistical significance level below 0.05.

Results

Distribution of association among sociodemographic characteristics of farmers by LBP (Table 1)

Among the 1,209 respondents who participated in the SAIF cohort from 2015 to 2019, the overall prevalence of LBP was 23.7% (N = 287). Farmers with LBP were older than farmers without LBP (median age 61 vs. 65; p < 0.001). The LBP prevalence trend tended to increase with age: 17.6% in those <50 years old, 17.1% among the 50s, 24.2% among the 60s, and 32.4% in those >70 years (p for trend < 0.001). LBP was more likely to occur in women than in men (30.8% vs. 20.3%). Distribution of association among sociodemographic characteristics of farmers by LBP LBP, low back pain; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CAGE, cut-annoyed-guilty-eye questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were presented as medians (25percentile, 75percentile) for continuous variables. Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Chi-square test‡ The farmers with LBP’s sleep duration were significantly shorter than those without LBP (median 6 hours vs. 7 hours; P = 0.031). As the stress level in daily life increased, the LBP prevalence also increased [rarely (16.8%), occasional (22.9%), frequent (33.0%), almost (51%)]. The LBP prevalence was higher among farmers who experienced sadness or despair for more than two weeks (40.8% vs. 21.9%; p < 0.001). The uORs between LBP and each sociodemographic categorical variable yielded significance for age group, sex, smoking status, stress level, and sadness or despair for more than two weeks.

Distribution of association among agricultural work-related conditions of farmers by LBP (Table 2)

The prevalence of LBP was significantly different with the type of farming. Its prevalence, in descending order, is field, orchard, and livestock farming. The total number of years of farming was significantly longer in farmers with LBP than without LBP (median 30 vs. 39; p < 0.001), and the trend of LBP prevalence tended to increase with the duration of farming career (P for trend < 0.001). There was no significant difference based on the average number of farming months per year (p = 0.810), the average number of farming hours per day (p = 0.962), and the number of days off per month (p = 0.838). Distribution of association among agricultural work-related conditions of farmers by LBP LBP, low back pain; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Fisher’s exact test. Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Chi-square test. Descriptive statistics were presented as medians (25th percentile, 75th percentile) for continuous variables. The LBP prevalence was significantly lower in farmers owning agricultural machinery than those who do not (22.6% vs. 30.6; p = 0.024). The difference was not significant based on whether the farmer owns a vinyl greenhouse (22.2% vs. 25.1%; p = 0.236). LBP was significantly more prevalent among farmers who sustained occupational injuries within the last year than those who did not (35.1% vs. 22.8; p = 0.007). The uORs between LBP and each categorical variable for agricultural work-related conditions indicated that the type of farming, the total duration of the farming career, the possession of agricultural machinery, and a recent prior history of agricultural injury, within a year, were significant.

Association with sociodemographic and agricultural work-related factors with LBP from multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 3)

Our multivariate logistic analysis revealed that LBP prevalence was significantly higher with increasing stress levels in daily life (occasional: aOR, 1.455; 95% CI, 1.038 to 2.040; frequent: aOR, 2.118; 95% CI, 1.376 to 3.261; almost: aOR, 3.289, 95% CI; 1.683 to 6.430). The same holds true for increasing total duration of farming career (31 to 45: aOR, 1.592; 95% CI, 1.042 to 2.430; ≥46: aOR, 1.934; 95% CI, 1.246 to 3.000), and whether the worker had recent prior occupational injury (aOR, 1.861; 95% CI, 1.160 to 2.988). Association with sociodemographic and agricultural work-related factors with LBP from multivariate logistic regression LBP, low back pain; OR, odds ratio. Adjusted for the total number of years of farming, type of farming, sex, smoking, stress level, agricultural machine, and agricultural injury within a year.

Agricultural work-related biomechanical factors with LBP from multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 4)

Table 4 shows the aORs and p-values for the overall null hypothesis test (Wald chi-square test) for LBP against each of the Likert scales for agricultural work-related biomechanical factors, adjusting for a set of significant sociodemographic and agricultural work-related covariates (total years of farming, sex, stress level, type of farming, agricultural injury within a year).
Table 4

Adjusted OR∗ for LBP using the 5-point Likert scale of agricultural work-related biomechanical factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis

Rarely (0–24%)Sometimes (25–49%)Usually (50%)Often (51–74%)Always (75–100%)p-value
1Lifting or pushing and pulling heavy objects10.963 (0.647–1.433)1.243 (0.803–1.925)1.259 (0.831–1.907)1.288 (0.846–1.960)0.509
2Shoveling, pickaxing, and hammering11.045 (0.733–1.489)0.670 (0.377–1.188)1.174 (0.700–2.970)1.422 (0.837–2.417)0.363
3Using vibrating agricultural machinery10.800 (0.530–1.207)1.114 (0.707–1.755)0.949 (0.589–1.528)1.130 (0.712–1.793)0.692
4Repetitive use of particular body parts10.650 (0.388–1.087)0.840 (0.523–1.351)1.400 (0.932–2.104)1.515 (1.012–2.267)0.002
5Stretching or twisting the forearm10.899 (0568–1.425)1.345 (0.890–2.035)1.066 (0.696–1.632)1.667 (1.112–2.498)0.053
6Constant elevation of the arm above the head10.877 (0.566–1.361)1.400 (0.914–2.144)1.297 (0.841–1.999)1.337 (0.891–2.007)0.214
7Bending, twisting, or reclining your back10.607 (0.366–1.007)1.246 (0.798–1.945)1.103 (0.713–1.707)1.527 (1.020–2.288)0.003
8Neck flexion or neck twisting10.669 (0.417–1.073)1.075 (0.704–1.641)1.199 (0.789–1.823)1.374 (0.931–2.028)0.049
9Kneeling and squatting on the ground11.175 (0.771–1.791)1.312 (0.850–2.026)1.048 (0.676–1.625)1.551 (1.045–2.300)0.218
10Using hands or knees to apply impact like a hammer10.830 (0.563–1.223)1.306 (0.819–2.083)0.825 (0.439–1.551)0.699 (0.340–1.436)0.432
11Uncomfortable posture on the ramp10.762 (0.506–1.148)1.099 (0.726–1.663)1.028 (0.618–1.709)0.955 (0.542–1.684)0.693

OR, odds ratio; LBP; low back pain.

Multivariate logistic model was used to compute the adjusted odds ratio of each 5-point Likert level of agricultural work-related biomechanical factors after adjusting for a set of covariates (total years of farming, gender, stress level, type of farming, agricultural injury within a year).

Wald chi-square test.

Adjusted OR∗ for LBP using the 5-point Likert scale of agricultural work-related biomechanical factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis OR, odds ratio; LBP; low back pain. Multivariate logistic model was used to compute the adjusted odds ratio of each 5-point Likert level of agricultural work-related biomechanical factors after adjusting for a set of covariates (total years of farming, gender, stress level, type of farming, agricultural injury within a year). Wald chi-square test. The results of the multivariate analysis indicated that three agricultural work-related biomechanical factors were significantly associated with LBP: 1) repetitive use of body parts, such as hands, wrists, elbows, and shoulders (p = 0.002), 2) bending, twisting, or reclining the lower back by more than 30 degrees (p = 0.003) and 3) neck flexion or neck rotation by more than 20 degrees (p = 0.049). Fig. 2 illustrates an overview of the adjusted marginal differences for each group versus the reference group (rarely) with 95% confidence intervals for each difference.
Fig. 2

Adjusted marginal prediction for each group versus the reference group in biomechanical factors.

Adjusted marginal prediction for each group versus the reference group in biomechanical factors. The contrasts of adjusted marginal prediction for the always group versus the rare group in (1) “repetitive use of particular body parts, such as hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder” and (2) “bending, twisting, or reclining the lower back by more than 30 degrees” is 0.076 (95% CI; 0.003 to 0.149, p = 0.001) and 0.078 (95% CI; 0.005 to 0.151, p = 0.037), respectively. The 95% confidence excludes zero, indicating that this difference from the reference group (rarely) is significant at the 5% level (Fig. 2) (Supplementary Table A).

Discussion

This cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the overall prevalence of LBP and the sociodemographic and occupational risk factors using the SAIF cohort data. First, the prevalence of LBP in Jeju Island was 23.7%, which was relatively lower than other regions of Korea [6,11,25]. Due to the subtropical climate of Jeju Island, orchard farming and field crop farming are at almost equal proportions; most of the fruit farming consists of citrus farming [18,21]. Due to the volcanic topography [22], Jeju farmers cultivate specialty wintering crops rather than rice which grows on land [18,20,21]. Among biomechanical factors associated with farming, the most associated risk factors were the excessive movement of the low back or the neck, which are common in rice farming [1]. In citrus farming, the constant elevation of the hands over the shoulders for thinning out the fruits is the action sustained over time. The prevalence of LBP may be lower due to these factors. Studies conducted so far have yielded conflicting findings on the association between type of farming and LBP [2,11,22,25]. In 2009, Kim et al. compared the rate of musculoskeletal pain between apple, pear, peach, grape, and citrus farming. Among them, the prevalence of LBP in citrus farming was 47.2%, which was the lowest among fruit crops, especially when compared to the average prevalence of LBP of 58% in orchard farming. This may be due to relatively fewer working hours compared to other types of fruit farming [22]. More certain associations can be identified by examining farmers engaged in citrus farming in the future. In addition, since farming in Jeju Island is performed on small and medium-sized farms, there are not many farmers who require repeated tractor use with exposure to strong vibrations. Tractors are a known risk factor for LBP, and this probably lowered the prevalence of back pain [12,18,20,21]. Compared with previous domestic studies, where the average age of the study participants was mostly between 55 and 57 years old, the average age of the SAIF cohort participants in the current study was 62 [6,25]. In general, LBP increases with age [15,16]. Although Jeju Island’s agricultural conditions can minimize the prevalence of back pain, it is worth noting that the average age in Jeju Island is higher than in previous reports. Other factors such as climate and dietary habits may also have an effect on LBP; further research is needed to clarify this. Second, we identified the individual sociodemographic and occupational conditions associated with LBP. In our multivariate analysis, the type of farming, duration of the career in farming, recent prior occupational injury within a year, and stress levels were significantly associated with LBP prevalence. As the farming career increases in duration, movements affecting muscles or ligaments are repeatedly performed, accumulating over time; this leads to LBP [15]. In addition, a high risk of back pain exists if there was a recent prior occupational injury within one year. Due to the small and medium-scale nature of agriculture, it is difficult for others to replace workers in case of any injuries [21]. Consequently, even if farmers suffer agricultural injuries, they return to work before full recovery. This potentially leads to working with less appropriate posture. This can lead to a cycle that exacerbates damage [26]. Among individual factors, the highest risk factor for LBP was the high stress level. Farmers are known to experience high levels of stress, depression, and anxiety, as well as a high risk of suicide due to rapidly changing crop prices, economic problems, and interrelationships among workers [[27], [28], [29], [30]]. Therefore, to lower the risk of LBP among farmers, psychological support remains paramount. Third, this study identified the effect of occupational biomechanical factors on LBP, even after adjusting for individual and occupational factors. Biomechanical factors associated with LBP were repetitive use of a body part: bending, twisting, or reclining the back and neck flexion or neck twisting. This is consistent with previous findings, which found that workers who mainly bent forward or sideways reported LBP due to unstable posture and excessive workload [11,31,32]. Another risk factor, neck flexion or twisting, occurs almost simultaneously with the motion or flexion of the lower back because tasks that cause the motion of the lower back or neck are often performed simultaneously in framing work [1]. Repetitive flexural movements of the spine cause excessive tension and damage to the intervertebral disc or ligament, which in turn cause musculoskeletal pain [33]. For preventing LBP, it is important to educate farmers on safe posture or pre-work exercise to prevent occupational injury. This study has limitations. First, this cross-sectional study used cohort data surveys; we could not identify the sequential or causal relationship between LBP and farmers’ biomechanical factors and individual factors. Second, because LBP was defined as self-reported, non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain, it was difficult to identify risk factors by their difference in pathological mechanisms. Third, detailed characteristics that cause stress or despair in farmers were not investigated using factor analysis. Therefore, studies including the pathophysiology of LBP and the detailed characteristics of related factors are required in the future. LBP affects nearly a quarter of Jeju farmers. Biomechanical, occupational, and clinical risk factors promote LBP. Posture education, injury prevention, and psychological support are to play important roles in preventing LBP.

Funding sources

No funding was received in support of this work.

Ethical considerations and disclosures

This study was approved by the Jeju National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2020-05-002). Written informed consent was obtained from each farmer when entering the SAIF cohort.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.
Table 1

Distribution of association among sociodemographic characteristics of farmers by LBP

CharacteristicsLBP
p-valueUnadjusted OR95% CI
No (n = 922)Yes (n = 287)
Age in years61 (52, 70)65 (56, 74)<0.001
 <50173 (82.4%)37 (17.6%)<0.0011
 50–59248 (82.9%)51 (17.1%)0.9620.604–1.532
 60–69257 (75.8%)82 (24.2%)1.4920.967–2.301
 ≥70244 (67.6%)117 (32.4%)2.2421.476–3.405
Sex<0.001
 Male646 (79.8%)164 (20.3%)1
 Female276 (69.2%)123 (30.8%)1.7551.336–2.306
Marital status0.552
 Single14 (82.4%)3 (17.7%)1
 Married908 (76.2%)284 (23.8%)1.4600.416–5.115
Smoking<0.001
 Non-smoker448 (71.2%)181 (28.8%)1
 Ex-smoker254 (81.7%)57 (18.3%)0.5550.397–0.777
Current220 (81.8%)49 (18.2%)0.5510.387–0.786
 Alcohol drink0.065
 No229 (72.5%)87 (27.5%)1
 Yes693 (77.6%)200 (22.4%)0.7600.567–1.018
CAGE scores0.385
 0–1 point815 (75.9%)259 (24.1%)1
 ≥2 points107 (79.3%)28 (20.7%)0.8230.531–1.277
Sleep duration (hours)7 (6, 8)6 (5, 7)0.031
Stress level<0.001
 Rarely336 (83.2%)68 (16.8%)1
 Occasional427 (77.1%)127 (22.9%)1.4701.059–2.039
 Frequent134 (67.0%)66 (33.0%)2.4341.642–3.607
 Almost25 (49.0%)26 (51.0%)5.1392.799–9.436
Sadness or despair (≥2 weeks)<0.001
 No851 (78.2%)238 (21.9%)1
 Yes71 (59.2%)49 (40.8%)2.4681.669–3.650

LBP, low back pain; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CAGE, cut-annoyed-guilty-eye questionnaire.

Descriptive statistics were presented as medians (25percentile, 75percentile) for continuous variables.

Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Chi-square test‡

Table 2

Distribution of association among agricultural work-related conditions of farmers by LBP

CharacteristicsLBP
p-valueUnadjusted OR95% CI
No (n = 922)Yes (n = 287)
Type of farming0.003
 Field322 (70.9%)132 (29.1%)1
 Orchard539 (79.3%)141 (20.7%)0.6380.485–0.840
 Livestock61 (81.3%)14 (18.7%)0.5600.303–1.036
Total number of years of farming§30 (16, 44)39 (23, 49)<0.001
 1–15226 (82.8%)47 (17.2%)0.0011
 16–30238 (78.6%)65 (21.5%)1.3130.865–1.993
 31–45250 (75.1%)83 (24.9%)1.5961.070–2.383
 ≥46208 (69.3%)92 (30.7%)2.1271.428–3.169
Average months of farming per year§12 (9, 12)12 (9, 12)0.810
Average hours per day of farming (usual season)§6 (4, 8)6 (4, 8)0.962
Average hours per day of farming (busy season)§10 (8, 11)10 (8, 12)0.838
Day off work per month0.848
 ≤8 days609 (76.2%)190 (23.8%)1
 ≥9 days313 (76.7%)95 (23.3%)0.9730.734–1.289
Agricultural machine0.024
 No118 (69.4%)52 (30.6%)1
 Yes803 (77.4%)235 (22.6%)0.6640.465–0.949
Vinyl greenhouse0.236
 No496 (74.9%)166 (25.1%)1
 Yes425 (77.8%)121 (22.2%)0.8510.651–1.112
Agricultural injury within a year0.007
 No861 (77.2%)254 (22.8%)1
 Yes61 (64.9%)33 (35.1%)1.8341.174–2.865

LBP, low back pain; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Fisher’s exact test.

Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Chi-square test.

Descriptive statistics were presented as medians (25th percentile, 75th percentile) for continuous variables.

Table 3

Association with sociodemographic and agricultural work-related factors with LBP from multivariate logistic regression

Adjusted OR95% CI
Sex
 Male1
 Female1.1460.804–1.634
Smoking
 Non-smoker1
 Ex-smoker0.6340.424–0.946
 Current0.6590.433–1.003
Alcohol drink
 No1
 Yes1.2530.882–1.780
Sleep duration (hours)0.9550.872–1.046
Stress level
 Rarely1
 Occasional1.4551.038–2.040
 Frequent2.1181.376–3.261
 Almost3.2891.683–6.430
 Sadness or despair (≥2 weeks)
 No1
 Yes1.4230.906–2.235
Type of farming
 Field1
 Orchard0.6680.502–0.890
 Livestock0.5680.294–1.098
Total number of years of farming
 1–151
 16–301.3160.856–2.025
 31–451.5921.042–2.430
 ≥461.9341.246–3.000
Agricultural machine
 No1
 Yes0.8710.576–1.315
Agricultural injury within a year
 No1
 Yes1.8611.160–2.988

LBP, low back pain; OR, odds ratio.

Adjusted for the total number of years of farming, type of farming, sex, smoking, stress level, agricultural machine, and agricultural injury within a year.

Table A.

Contrasts of adjusted marginal predictions for LBP of three agricultural work-related biomechanical factors

Sometimes (25–49%) vs. rarely (0–24%)Usually (50%) vs. rarely (0–24%)Often (51–74%) vs. rarely (0–24%)Always (75–100%) vs. rarely (0–24%)
4Repetitive use of particular body parts, such as hand, wrist, elbows, and shoulders−0.063−0.136 to 0.010 (p = 0.091)−0.027−0.101 to 0.047 (p = 0.470)0.060−0.012 to 0.133 (p = 0.103)0.0760.003 to 0.149 (p = 0.001)
7Bending, twisting, or reclining your back by more than 30 degrees−0.072−0.143 to −0.001 (p = 0.048)0.039−0.040 to 0.117 (p = 0.334)0.017−0.058 to 0.091 (p = 0.659)0.0780.005 to 0.151 (p = 0.037)
8Neck flexion or neck twisting more than 20 degrees−0.061−0.131 to 0.009 (p = 0.086)0.013−0.061 to 0.086 (p = 0.739)0.032−0.043 to 0.107 (p = 0.399)0.058−0.013 to 0.130 (p = 0.111)

The cell of table expressed as contrasts of adjusted marginal predictions with 95% confidence interval and p-value.

Contrasts of adjusted marinal predictions were calculated after adjusting for a set of covariates (total years of farming, sex, stress level, type of farming, and agricultural injury within a year).

LBP, low back pain.

  23 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

Authors:  Tamar Pincus; A Kim Burton; Steve Vogel; Andy P Field
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The mental health of farmers.

Authors:  A Gregoire
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 3.  Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among farmers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aoife Osborne; Catherine Blake; Brona M Fullen; David Meredith; James Phelan; John McNamara; Caitriona Cunningham
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in agriculture workers in Korea and preventative interventions.

Authors:  Dohyung Kee; Roger Haslam
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture.

Authors:  Fadi A Fathallah
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Identifying risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders on Korean farms.

Authors:  Susan E Kotowski; Kermit G Davis; Hyocher Kim; Kyung-Suk Lee
Journal:  Work       Date:  2014

7.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; Kristi Randhawa; Hainan Yu; Pierre Côté; Scott Haldeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Musculoskeletal Disorders and Agricultural Risk Factors Among Korean Farmers.

Authors:  Mo-Yeol Kang; Myeong-Jun Lee; HweeMin Chung; Dong-Hee Shin; Kan-Woo Youn; Sang-Hyuk Im; Hye Seon Chae; Kyung Suk Lee
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Stress in farmers.

Authors:  N J Booth; K Lloyd
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2000

Review 10.  Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions.

Authors:  Arnold Yl Wong; Jaro Karppinen; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-04-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal Model for Assessing Firefighters' Internal Forces and Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders During Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Carriage.

Authors:  Shitan Wang; Yunyi Wang
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2022-03-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.