Lage Burström1, Tohr Nilsson, Jens Wahlström. 1. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden, lage.burstrom@envmed.umu.se.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the association between whole-body vibration (WBV) and low back pain (LBP) and sciatica with special attention given to exposure estimates. Moreover, the aim was to estimate the magnitude of such an association using meta-analysis and to compare our findings with previous reviews. METHODS: The authors systematically searched the PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda), Nioshtic2 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH, Morgantown), and ScienceDirect (Elsevier, Amsterdam) databases for records up to December 31, 2013. Two of the authors independently assessed studies to determine their eligibility, validity, and possible risk of bias. RESULTS: The literature search gave a total of 306 references out of which 28 studies were reviewed and 20 were included in the meta-analysis. Exposure to WBV was associated with increased prevalence of LBP and sciatica [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-2.91 and OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.38-2.67, respectively]. Workers exposed to high vibration levels had a pooled risk estimate of 1.5 for both outcomes when compared with workers exposed to low levels of vibration. The results also indicate that some publication bias could have occurred especially for sciatica. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that there is scientific evidence that exposure to WBV increases the risk of LBP and sciatica.
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the association between whole-body vibration (WBV) and low back pain (LBP) and sciatica with special attention given to exposure estimates. Moreover, the aim was to estimate the magnitude of such an association using meta-analysis and to compare our findings with previous reviews. METHODS: The authors systematically searched the PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda), Nioshtic2 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH, Morgantown), and ScienceDirect (Elsevier, Amsterdam) databases for records up to December 31, 2013. Two of the authors independently assessed studies to determine their eligibility, validity, and possible risk of bias. RESULTS: The literature search gave a total of 306 references out of which 28 studies were reviewed and 20 were included in the meta-analysis. Exposure to WBV was associated with increased prevalence of LBP and sciatica [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-2.91 and OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.38-2.67, respectively]. Workers exposed to high vibration levels had a pooled risk estimate of 1.5 for both outcomes when compared with workers exposed to low levels of vibration. The results also indicate that some publication bias could have occurred especially for sciatica. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that there is scientific evidence that exposure to WBV increases the risk of LBP and sciatica.
Authors: Keith T Palmer; Clare E Harris; E Claire Harris; Michael J Griffin; James Bennett; Isabel Reading; Madelaine Sampson; David Coggon Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2008-10-14 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Charlotta Nilsen; Alexander Darin-Mattsson; Martin Hyde; Jonas W Wastesson Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Karl Forsell; Helena Eriksson; Bengt Järvholm; Monica Lundh; Eva Andersson; Ralph Nilsson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.015