Literature DB >> 34898889

Sutureless valves-are we there yet? Evidence from the PERSIST-AVR trial.

Pradeep Narayan1.   

Abstract

Sutur eless valves have emerged as another option for implantation of a biological valve. Several benefits of sutureless valves have been reported in the literature. However, concerns have been raised over increased incidence of para-valvular leak and need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Most of the evidence has been obtained from observational and retrospective single institutional series. The Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement (PERSIST-AVR) trial is the first multicentric randomized control trial to compare sutureless valves with standard bio-prosthesis. Evidence from this trial has been critically analyzed in this review. © Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PERSIST-AVR trial; Perceval valve; Sutureless valves

Year:  2021        PMID： 34898889      PMCID： PMC8630234          DOI： 10.1007/s12055-021-01289-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN： 0970-9134


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of conventional surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and sutureless valves in "real-world" patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate- to high-risk profile.

Authors:  Claudio Muneretto; Ottavio Alfieri; Bruno Mario Cesana; Gianluigi Bisleri; Michele De Bonis; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Carlo Savini; Gianluca Folesani; Lorenzo Di Bacco; Manfredo Rambaldini; Juan Pablo Maureira; Francois Laborde; Maurizio Tespili; Alberto Repossini; Thierry Folliguet
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Borut Gersak; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry A Folliguet; Bart Meuris; Kevin H T Teoh; Simon C Moten; Marco Solinas; Antonio Miceli; Peter J Oberwalder; Manfredo Rambaldini; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michael A Borger; Denis Bouchard; Olivier Bouchot; Stephen C Clark; Otto E Dapunt; Matteo Ferrarini; Guenther Laufer; Carmelo Mignosa; Russell Millner; Philippe Noirhomme; Steffen Pfeiffer; Xavier Ruyra-Baliarda; Malakh Shrestha; Rakesh M Suri; Giovanni Troise; Anno Diegeler; Francois Laborde; Marc Laskar; Hani K Najm; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Rapid deployment or sutureless versus conventional bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suk Ho Sohn; Myoung-Jin Jang; Ho Young Hwang; Kyung Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita; Timm Bauer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Beckmann; Raffi Bekeredjian; Sabine Bleiziffer; Sandra Landwehr; Christian W Hamm; Friedrich W Mohr; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Harringer; Thomas Walther; Christian Frerker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Theodor Fischlein; Thierry Folliguet; Bart Meuris; Malakh L Shrestha; Eric E Roselli; Anna McGlothlin; Utz Kappert; Steffen Pfeiffer; Pierre Corbi; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Direct comparison of rapid deployment versus sutureless aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suk Ho Sohn; Yoonjin Kang; Ji Seong Kim; Jae Woong Choi; Myoung-Jin Jang; Ho Young Hwang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Randomization in clinical studies.

Authors:  Chi-Yeon Lim; Junyong In
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-04-01

8.  Aortic valve replacement in elderly with small aortic root and low body surface area; the Perceval S valve and its impact in effective orifice area.

Authors:  Panagiotis Dedeilias; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Efstathia Prappa; Dimitrios Asvestas; Michalis Argiriou; Christos Charitos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Massimo Meco; Andrea Montisci; Antonio Miceli; Paolo Panisi; Francesco Donatelli; Silvia Cirri; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Lio; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.501
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.