Literature DB >> 34898744

The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy.

Seang-Hwane Joo1, Philseok Lee2, Stephen Stark3.   

Abstract

Collateral information has been used to address subpopulation heterogeneity and increase estimation accuracy in some large-scale cognitive assessments. The methodology that takes collateral information into account has not been developed and explored in published research with models designed specifically for noncognitive measurement. Because the accurate noncognitive measurement is becoming increasingly important, we sought to examine the benefits of using collateral information in latent trait estimation with an item response theory model that has proven valuable for noncognitive testing, namely, the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM). Our presentation introduces an extension of the GGUM that incorporates collateral information, henceforth called Explanatory GGUM. We then present a simulation study that examined Explanatory GGUM latent trait estimation as a function of sample size, test length, number of background covariates, and correlation between the covariates and the latent trait. Results indicated the Explanatory GGUM approach provides scoring accuracy and precision superior to traditional expected a posteriori (EAP) and full Bayesian (FB) methods. Implications and recommendations are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chain Monte Carlo; collateral information; explanatory item response theory; ideal point; latent regression

Year:  2021        PMID: 34898744      PMCID: PMC8655467          DOI: 10.1177/01466216211051717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  10 in total

1.  An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales.

Authors:  W C Borman; D E Buck; M A Hanson; S J Motowidlo; S Stark; F Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-10

2.  Formulating latent growth using an explanatory item response model approach.

Authors:  Mark Wilson; Xiaohui Zheng; Leah McGuire
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2012

3.  Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow; Bruce A Williams
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-01

4.  Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.

Authors:  Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Stephen Stark; Fritz Drasgow; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2007-03

5.  Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal?

Authors:  Louis Tay; Fritz Drasgow; James Rounds; Bruce A Williams
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-09

6.  Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.

Authors:  Maria Bolsinova; Jesper Tijmstra
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Confirmatory Multidimensional IRT Unfolding Models for Graded-Response Items.

Authors:  Wen-Chung Wang; Shiu-Lien Wu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM.

Authors:  Seang-Hwane Joo; Philseok Lee; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-11-04

9.  Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.

Authors:  Yoon Soo Park; Kuan Xing; Young-Sun Lee
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-11-16

10.  Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model.

Authors:  Seang-Hwane Joo; Seokjoon Chun; Stephen Stark; Olexander S Chernyshenko
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-04-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.