Literature DB >> 28635139

Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.

Maria Bolsinova1, Jesper Tijmstra2.   

Abstract

By considering information about response time (RT) in addition to response accuracy (RA), joint models for RA and RT such as the hierarchical model (van der Linden, 2007) can improve the precision with which ability is estimated over models that only consider RA. The hierarchical model, however, assumes that only the person's speed is informative of ability. This assumption of conditional independence between RT and ability given speed may be violated in practice, and ignores collateral information about ability that may be present in the residual RTs. We propose a posterior predictive check for evaluating the assumption of conditional independence between RT and ability given speed. Furthermore, we propose an extension of the hierarchical model that contains cross-loadings between ability and RT, which enables one to take additional collateral information about ability into account beyond what is possible in the standard hierarchical model. A Bayesian estimation procedure is proposed for the model. Using simulation studies, the performance of the model is evaluated in terms of parameter recovery, and the possible gain in precision over the standard hierarchical model and an RA-only model is considered. The model is applied to data from a high-stakes educational test.
© 2017 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collateral information; hierarchical model; item response theory; measurement precision; response times

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28635139     DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  8 in total

1.  Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.

Authors:  Maria Bolsinova; Jesper Tijmstra
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Detection of Item Preknowledge Using Response Times.

Authors:  Sandip Sinharay
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-04-13

3.  The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy.

Authors:  Seang-Hwane Joo; Philseok Lee; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-10-11

4.  Modeling Conditional Dependence of Response Accuracy and Response Time with the Diffusion Item Response Theory Model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Paul De Boeck; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.

Authors:  Benjamin Becker; Dries Debeer; Sebastian Weirich; Frank Goldhammer
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-09

6.  Variable Speed Across Dimensions of Ability in the Joint Model for Responses and Response Times.

Authors:  Peida Zhan; Hong Jiao; Kaiwen Man; Wen-Chung Wang; Keren He
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-29

7.  Improving the Precision of Ability Estimates Using Time-On-Task Variables: Insights From the PISA 2012 Computer-Based Assessment of Mathematics.

Authors:  Denise Reis Costa; Maria Bolsinova; Jesper Tijmstra; Björn Andersson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-19

8.  Joint Modeling of Response Accuracy and Time in Between-Item Multidimensional Tests Based on Bi-Factor Model.

Authors:  Xiaojun Guo; Yuyue Jiao; ZhengZheng Huang; TieChuan Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.