| Literature DB >> 34898717 |
Himanshu Singla1, Minakshi Duggal Mehta2, Pooja Mehta3.
Abstract
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak has resulted into global devastation. This study attempts to explore the positive phenomenal impact of perceived pandemic anxiety resulting in prosocial behaviour (PB) through the mechanisms of self-awareness and spiritual transformation using terror management theory (TMT). The study also examines the moderating impact of conscious state expansion (CSE) on the self-awareness and spiritual transformation relationship, and the impact of this moderation effect is further tested separately on two gender groups. The data (N = 573) for the study were collected from the Punjab state of India during the ascending phase of outbreak. The results of PLS-SEM analysis reveal the significant influence of variables under study on prosocial behavioural outcomes. Taking insights from the findings of the study it becomes clear that during dreadful situations, when people experience the possibility of loss of life, their self-awareness level increases, which in turn results in their spiritual transformation. Such mechanism is observed more in the people possessing higher spiritual consciousness. The study concludes by recognising the positive role played by spiritual transformation (ST) in the evolution of the attributes of care and compassion for others, resulting in positive social consequences. The discussion, implications, limitations, and future directions are presented and discussed.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34898717 PMCID: PMC8652769 DOI: 10.1111/issj.12290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Soc Sci J ISSN: 0020-8701
FIGURE 1Research Model
Measurement items ‐ Mean, Standard Deviation and Factor Loadings
| Latent Variables |
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PA1 | I am worried about this novel coronavirus | Bults et al. (2011) | 3.01 | 1.454 | .819 |
| PA2 | I am getting fearful for this novel coronavirus | 3.16 | 1.222 | .805 | ||
| PA3 | I am continuously thinking about this novel coronavirus | 3.14 | 1.224 | .835 | ||
|
| SA1 | Right now, I am reflective about my life. | Govern and Marsch (2001) | 3.01 | 1.180 | .764 |
| SA2 | Right now, I am conscious of my inner feelings. | 2.94 | 1.165 | .819 | ||
| SA3 | Right now, I am aware of my innermost thoughts | 2.92 | 1.131 | .831 | ||
|
| CSE1 | I am able to enter higher states of consciousness or awareness. | King and DeCicco (2009) | 2.85 | 1.347 | .763 |
| CSE2 | I can control when I enter higher states of consciousness or awareness. | 2.88 | 1.314 | .807 | ||
| CSE3 | I am able to move freely between levels of consciousness or awareness. | 2.93 | 1.318 | .813 | ||
| CSE4 | I often see issues and choices more clearly while in higher states of consciousness/ awareness. | 2.94 | 1.267 | .775 | ||
| CSE5 | I have developed my own techniques for entering higher states of consciousness or awareness. | 3.02 | 1.295 | .798 | ||
|
| ST1 | I have now developed a stronger spiritual connection with nature and people around | Cole et al. (2008) | 2.91 | 1.381 | .727 |
| ST3 | I now more often think about how blessed I am with a sense of gratitude. | 2.76 | 1.406 | .732 | ||
| ST4 | I pray or meditate more often now. | 2.85 | 1.421 | .764 | ||
| ST5 | I now more often look for a spiritual purpose for my life. | 2.90 | 1.399 | .759 | ||
| ST6 | I have a stronger sense of the Sacred Power directing my life now | 2.81 | 1.465 | .799 | ||
|
| PB1 | I will try to make sad people happier | Pastorelli et al. (1997) | 2.99 | 1.237 | .836 |
| PB2 | I will spend time with my family in daily routine | 3.03 | 1.239 | .830 | ||
| PB3 | I will not share things that I like with others | 3.13 | 1.237 | .813 | ||
| PB4 | I will try to help others | 3.02 | 1.131 | .736 | ||
| PB5 | I will be gentle to others | 2.95 | 1.357 | .849 | ||
Outer Loadings, CR and AVE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CSE1 | 0.807 | 0.877 | 0.589 |
| CSE2 | 0.720 | |||
| CSE3 | 0.837 | |||
| CSE4 | 0.718 | |||
| CSE5 | 0.746 | |||
|
| PA1 | 0.777 | 0.813 | 0.593 |
| PA2 | 0.804 | |||
| PA3 | 0.727 | |||
|
| PB1 | 0.829 | 0.901 | 0.645 |
| PB2 | 0.745 | |||
| PB3 | 0.791 | |||
| PB4 | 0.855 | |||
| PB5 | 0.790 | |||
|
| SA1 | 0.896 | 0.826 | 0.615 |
| SA2 | 0.733 | |||
| SA3 | 0.711 | |||
|
| ST1 | 0.809 | 0.903 | 0.650 |
| ST3 | 0.816 | |||
| ST4 | 0.811 | |||
| ST5 | 0.728 | |||
| ST6 | 0.861 |
HTMT ratios
| CSE | PA | PB | SA | |
| PA | 0.063 | |||
| PB | 0.214 | 0.309 | ||
| SSA | 0.176 | 0.468 | 0.417 | |
| ST | 0.545 | 0.369 | 0.494 | 0.498 |
FL Criterion
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
| –0.055 |
| |||
|
| 0.215 | 0.310 |
| ||
|
| 0.174 | 0.474 | 0.414 |
| |
|
| 0.545 | 0.367 | 0.494 | 0.497 |
|
Note: The values in bold represent square root of AVE.
Results of PLS‐SEM analysis
| Hypothesised Path | ß | t value | p value | r2 | Δr2 | Effect Size (f2) | Q2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 0.474 | 12.505 | 0.000 | 0.225 | 0.290 | medium | 0.109 | |
|
| 0.498 | 11.763 | 0.000 | 0.248 | 0.329 | medium | 0.133 | ||
|
| 0.494 | 12.386 | 0.000 | 0.244 | 0.326 | medium | 0.141 | ||
|
|
| 0.474 | 12.266 | 0.000 | 0.225 | 0.290 | medium | 0.109 | |
|
| 0.387 | 10.033 | 0.000 | 0.516 | 0.268 | 0.297 | medium | 0.289 | |
|
| 0.463 | 12.587 | 0.000 | 0.428 | large | ||||
|
| 0.228 | 6.135 | 0.000 | 0.107 | small | ||||
|
| 0.494 | 12.599 | 0.000 | 0.244 | 0.326 | medium | 0.141 |
FIGURE 2Path Analysis (Model B)
Note: The values on arrow are in form → ß (t statistics); the values in circle represent r2.
FIGURE 3Simple Slope Analysis [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
PLS‐MGA results
| Hypothesis | H5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed path contingent upon gender | SSA*CSE→ ST | |
| Female | ß | 0.263 |
| t statistics | 5.230 | |
| Male | ß | 0.195 |
| t statistics | 3.548 | |
| Female vs Male | | ßFemale–ßMale | | 0.068 |
| p‐value | 0.369 | |
| Decision | Not Supported |