| Literature DB >> 34898649 |
Jimin Yoon1, Yangsean Choi1, Jinhee Jang1, Na-Young Shin1, Kook-Jin Ahn1, Bum-Soo Kim1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) has incremental diagnostic value when combined with ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of metastatic cervical lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34898649 PMCID: PMC8668122 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow chart illustrating patient selection process.
Baseline characteristics of study population.
| Variable | n = 102 |
|---|---|
| Sex, female n(%) | 70 (68.6) |
| Age, mean±SD | 46±15 |
| Size of LN, mean±SD (mm) | 7.9±3.9 |
| Pathologic diagnosis | |
| Benign | 53 (52) |
| Metastatic | 49 (48) |
| Cervical level of LN | |
| II | 15 (14.7) |
| III | 33 (32.4) |
| IV | 32 (31.4) |
| V | 4 (3.9) |
| VI | 11 (10.8) |
| Supraclavicular | 6 (5.9) |
| Strap muscle | 1 (1) |
| CTDI volume (mGy), mean±SD | 26.4±3.6 |
| DLP (mGy×cm), mean±SD | 717.7±107.5 |
CTDI = computer tomography dose index; DLP = dose-length product; LN = lymph node; mGy = milligray; SD, standard deviation
Fig 2Axial CT images of arterial phase (a, d), DECT-derived contrast-enhancement (b, e), and Rho/Z (c, f) maps of two patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. A 47-year-old female patient with a benign lymph node at left cervical level II (a, b, c; AUC100keV = 36.7, HUarterial = 0.32, Zeff = 0.91, CM = 0.58, IC = 0.56, λHU = 4.7), and a 53-year-old male patient with a metastatic lymph node at left cervical level IV (d, e, f; AUC100keV = 43.5, HUarterial = 0.41, Zeff = 0.93, CM = 0.62, IC = 0.58, λHU = 5.6).
Comparison of conventional and dual-energy CT findings of benign and metastatic lymph nodes.
| Clinical variables | Benign (n = 68) | Metastatic (n = 65) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean±SD | 46.7±13.4 | 42.8±16.2 | 0.136 |
| Sex, female, n(%) | 50 (73.5) | 43 (66.2) | 0.46 |
| Conventional CT findings | |||
| Degree of enhancement, n(%) | <0.001 | ||
| None | 0 (0) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Mild | 36 (52.9) | 11 (16.9) | |
| Moderate | 28 (41.2) | 14 (21.5) | |
| Strong | 4 (5.9) | 39 (60) | |
| Pattern of enhancement, n(%) | 0.018 | ||
| Homogeneous | 39 (57.4) | 22 (33.8) | |
| Heterogeneous | 29 (42.6) | 43 (66.2) | |
| Cystic component, present n(%) | 0 (0) | 9 (13.8) | 0.005 |
| Calcification, present n(%) | 2 (2.9) | 11 (16.9) | 0.015 |
| Conventional US findings, present n(%) | |||
| Hyperechogenicity | 15 (22.1) | 47 (72.3) | 0.003 |
| Round shape | 17 (25) | 35 (53.8) | 0.005 |
| Microcalcification | 6 (8.8) | 37 (56.9) | 0.003 |
| Cystic component | 0 (0) | 6 (9.2) | 0.038 |
| Homogeneous or peripheral vascularity | 14 (20.6) | 21 (32.3) | 0.227 |
| Dual-energy CT findings, mean±SD (HU) | |||
| HUarterial | 0.25±0.08 | 0.37±0.11 | 0.001 |
| CM | 0.37±0.13 | 0.53±0.21 | 0.001 |
| IC (mg/ml) | 0.36±0.14 | 0.51±0.2 | 0.001 |
| λHU | 2.96±1.22 | 4.11±1.65 | 0.001 |
| Zeff | 0.88±0.04 | 0.91±0.04 | 0.001 |
| AUC100KeV | 31.5±7.7 | 39.1±9.6 | 0.001 |
aAfter false discovery rate correction
AUC100KeV = area under the 100 KeV monoenergetic curve; CM = contrast media; HUarterial = HU measured on arterial phase; IC = iodine concentration; SD = standard deviation; Zeff = effective atomic number; λHU = slope of the HU curve
Interrater agreement of conventional CT and US findings.
| Conventional CT findings | κ |
|---|---|
| Degree of enhancement | 0.846 |
| Pattern of enhancement | 0.781 |
| Presence of cystic component | 0.937 |
| Presence of calcification | 0.857 |
| Conventional US findings | |
| Hyperechogenicity | 0.748 |
| Round shape | 0.767 |
| Microcalcification | 0.892 |
| Cystic component | 0.735 |
| Homogeneous or peripheral vascularity | 0.878 |
*Cohen’s kappa between two raters; all P-values were <0.001
Predictive performance of conventional and dual-energy CT parameters.
| Parameters | AUC | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUarterial | 0.824 (0.751, 0.897) | 71 (58, 83) | 93 (82, 99) | 91 (80, 98) | 77 (70, 85) |
| Zeff | 0.726 (0.638, 0.814) | 63 (40, 86) | 81 (56, 96) | 76 (64, 90) | 70 (61, 82) |
| IC (mg/ml) | 0.727 (0.638, 0.815) | 65 (45, 85) | 79 (56, 94) | 75 (63, 90) | 70 (63, 81) |
| λHU | 0.699 (0.609, 0.789) | 69 (34, 83) | 71 (56, 97) | 70 (61, 91) | 69 (60, 80) |
| CM | 0.754 (0.668, 0.840) | 66 (48, 82) | 84 (71, 97) | 80 (70, 95) | 72 (65, 82) |
| AUC100KeV | 0.747 (0.661, 0.834) | 62 (43, 83) | 85 (63, 97) | 80 (67, 94) | 70 (63, 80) |
*Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals
AUC100KeV = area under the 100 KeV monoenergetic curve; HUarterial = HU measured on arterial phase; IC = iodine concentration; SD = standard deviation; Zeff = effective atomic number; λHU = slope of the HU curve; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value
Fig 3Receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnostic performance in predicting metastatic LNs based on DECT parameters alone (HUarterial, IC, CM, Zeff, AUC100keV) and in combination with suspicious features on US (hyperechogenicity, round shape, cystic component).