| Literature DB >> 34897158 |
Eiji Naito1, Kohei Nakata2, Hiroki Sakai1, Osamu Yamato3, Md Shafiqul Islam3, Sadatoshi Maeda1,2, Hiroaki Kamishina1,2.
Abstract
Canine degenerative myelopathy (DM) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of the spinal cord. The diagnosis is based on the observation of clinical signs, genetic testing, and exclusion of other spinal cord diseases, and a definitive diagnosis of DM can only be confirmed by postmortem histopathological findings. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic ability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for DM. Eight DM-affected Pembroke Welsh Corgis, thirteen dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniation (IVDH), and six healthy control dogs were included. All dogs were scanned using a 3.0-T MRI system. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were calculated for each intervertebral disk level slice between T8-T9 and L2-L3 intervertebral disk levels, and the entire area of the thoracolumbar spinal cord between T8-T9 and L2-L3 intervertebral disk levels (T8-L3 region). The ADC and FA values of the T8-L3 region were significantly lower in the DM group than in the IVDH group. The ADC values for the T8-L3 region had a moderate negative correlation with clinical duration (rs= -0.723, P=0.043); however, the FA values of other intervertebral disk levels and T8-L3 region had no correlation with clinical durations. The measurement of DTI indices can be used to quantitatively assess neurodegeneration and may have diagnostic value for DM. In particular, the ADC value of the T8-L3 region may aid in making a non-invasive premortem diagnosis of DM.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; degenerative myelopathy; diffusion tensor imaging; dog; thoracolumbar spinal cord
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34897158 PMCID: PMC8920728 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.21-0370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Fig. 1.Fiber tractography and placement of regions of interest (ROI) in the thoracolumbar spinal cord. (Dog #5). (a) Eight ROIs were placed manually on transverse T2-weighted images on each intervertebral disk level slice from T8–T9 through L2–L3. (b) The axonal bundles of the spinal cord are string-like and appear mainly in blue due to the craniocaudal direction of water diffusion. Axonal bundles were tracked from T8-T9 through to the L2–L3 intervertebral level. (c) The T12–T13 intervertebral level slice is shown on a transverse FA map. (d) The region of interest is placed on T12–T13 spinal cord area.
Characteristics of dogs
| Dog number | Diagnosis | Breed | Age (year) | Body weight (kg) | Gender | Location(s) of IVDH | Clinical duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DM-confirmed | PWC | 13.0 | 10.2 | CM | T12–T13, T13–L1, L2–L3 | 3.0 years |
| 2 | DM-confirmed | PWC | 15.2 | 10.1 | CM | L1–L2 | 3.5 years |
| 3 | DM-confirmed | PWC | 14.1 | 14.6 | IF | None | 3.3 years |
| 4 | DM-confirmed | PWC | 15.9 | 14.6 | CM | T13–L1 | 3.0 years |
| 5 | DM-suspected | PWC | 14.1 | 11.8 | CM | T13–L1 | 2 months |
| 6 | DM-suspected | PWC | 12.7 | 13.6 | CM | T12–T13, T13–L1 | 3 months |
| 7 | DM-suspected | PWC | 11.0 | 12.3 | SF | None | 7 months |
| 8 | DM-suspected | PWC | 10.8 | 16.8 | SF | None | 2 months |
| 9 | IVDH | CB | 11.7 | 3.4 | CM | T12–T13 | 5 days |
| 10 | IVDH | Pug | 11.6 | 6.3 | SF | T11–T12, T12–T13, L5–L6, L6–L7 | 3 months |
| 11 | IVDH | MD | 3.5 | 5.2 | IF | T13–L1 | 3 days |
| 12 | IVDH | MD | 5.0 | 4.2 | CM | T13–L1 | 7 days |
| 13 | IVDH | MD | 10.8 | 4.5 | SF | T13–L1, L2–L3 | 4 days |
| 14 | IVDH | MD | 10.9 | 5.8 | IF | L2–L3, L3–L4 | 1 month |
| 15 | IVDH | TP | 5.1 | 6.7 | IM | L1–L2 | 11 days |
| 16 | IVDH | MD | 10.7 | 8.0 | IM | L2–L3 | 10 days |
| 17 | IVDH | CB | 11.9 | 5.6 | IM | T13–L1 | 1 month |
| 18 | IVDH | MD | 9.8 | 10.7 | IM | T13–L1 | 5 days |
| 19 | IVDH | MP | 4.7 | 4.8 | CM | T11–T12, T12–T13, L2–L3 | 5 days |
| 20 | IVDH | MD | 8.9 | 5.3 | IM | L2–L3 | 3 days |
| 21 | IVDH | MD | 10.1 | 7.1 | CM | T12–T13, T13–L1, L1–L2, L2–L3, L4–L5 | 1 month |
| 22 | Hearthy | Beagle | 4.0 | 13.5 | SF | None | |
| 23 | Hearthy | Beagle | 4.0 | 18.4 | CM | None | |
| 24 | Hearthy | Beagle | 5.0 | 14.0 | CM | None | |
| 25 | Hearthy | Beagle | 5.5 | 12.3 | SF | None | |
| 26 | Hearthy | PWC | 10.7 | 10.7 | SF | None | |
| 27 | Hearthy | Crossbreed | 2.8 | 10.6 | CM | None |
DM, degenerative myelopathy; IVDH, intervertebral disc herniation; PWC, pembroke Welsh Corgi; CB, cross–bred; MD, Miniature Dachshund; TP, Toy Poodle; MP, Miniature Pinscher; CM, castrated male; IM, intact male; SF, spayed female; IF, intact female.
Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values among degenerative myelopathy (DM), intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH), and healthy control groups
| Intervertebral level | Control | DM | IVDH | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | 3 groups | Control vs. DM | Control vs. IVDH | DM vs. IVDH | ||
| ADC (×10−3 mm2/sec) | T8–T9 | 1.096 | 0.239–1.567 | 0.575 | 0.198–2.287 | 1.065 | 0.732–2.457 | 0.123 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.091 |
| T9–T10 | 1.338 | 0.617–1.578 | 0.536 | 0.194–1.958 | 1.162 | 0.615–1.952 | 0.134 | 0.540 | 1.000 | 0.230 | |
| T10–T11 | 1.360 | 0.913–1.787 | 0.780 | 0.107–1.348 | 1.324 | 0.605–2.023 | 0.024* | 0.038* | 1.000 | 0.060 | |
| T11–T12 | 1.339 | 0.982–2.059 | 0.836 | 0.579–1.422 | 1.263 | 0.542–1.902 | 0.062 | 0.060 | 1.000 | 0.360 | |
| T12–T13 | 1.445 | 1.243–1.763 | 0.857 | 0.519–1.280 | 1.183 | 0.746–1.946 | 0.007* | 0.004* | 0.537 | 0.091 | |
| T13–L1 | 1.285 | 0.984–1.428 | 0.748 | 0.393–1.437 | 1.305 | 0.682–1.733 | 0.027* | 0.041* | 1.000 | 0.060 | |
| L1–L2 | 1.325 | 0.896–1.473 | 0.915 | 0.261–1.171 | 1.317 | 0.408–1.603 | 0.017* | 0.038* | 1.000 | 0.038* | |
| L2–L3 | 1.360 | 1.252–1.728 | 0.892 | 0.246–1.431 | 1.116 | 0.544–2.188 | 0.007* | 0.024* | 0.109 | 0.110 | |
| T8–L3 | 1.408 | 1.048–1.627 | 0.713 | 0.440–0.840 | 1.279 | 0.767–1.767 | <0.001* | 0.002* | 0.969 | 0.001* | |
| FA | T8–T9 | 0.574 | 0.443–0.614 | 0.547 | 0.323–0.673 | 0.548 | 0.419–0.813 | 0.901 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| T9–T10 | 0.557 | 0.427–0.646 | 0.475 | 0.352–0.726 | 0.554 | 0.388–0.827 | 0.385 | 0.820 | 1.000 | 0.710 | |
| T10–T11 | 0.520 | 0.489–0.612 | 0.446 | 0.310–0.750 | 0.489 | 0.394–0.843 | 0.139 | 0.088 | 1.000 | 0.804 | |
| T11–T12 | 0.520 | 0.417–0.562 | 0.460 | 0.332–0.860 | 0.552 | 0.366–0.700 | 0.145 | 0.730 | 1.000 | 0.230 | |
| T12–T13 | 0.522 | 0.460–0.602 | 0.452 | 0.341–0.686 | 0.525 | 0.361–0.677 | 0.236 | 0.430 | 1.000 | 0.480 | |
| T13–L1 | 0.587 | 0.481–0.626 | 0.457 | 0.364–0.669 | 0.471 | 0.360–0.633 | 0.109 | 1.000 | 0.053 | 1.000 | |
| L1–L2 | 0.603 | 0.476–0.666 | 0.506 | 0.340–0.751 | 0.468 | 0.421–0.810 | 0.195 | 1.000 | 0.086 | 1.000 | |
| L2–L3 | 0.486 | 0.275–0.593 | 0.459 | 0.356–0.783 | 0.525 | 0.359–0.769 | 0.350 | 1.000 | 0.550 | 1.000 | |
| T8–L3 | 0.544 | 0.489–0.576 | 0.449 | 0.417–0.550 | 0.575 | 0.418–0.701 | 0.004* | 0.024* | 1.000 | 0.006* | |
*P<0.05.
Fig. 2.Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among degenerative myelopathy (DM), intervertebral disk herniation (IVDH), and healthy control groups. The ADC values at T10–T11, T12–T13, T13, L1, L1–L2, L2–L3 intervertebral disk levels, and T8–L3 region were significantly lower in the DM group than in the control group (P=0.038, 0.004, 0.041, 0.038, 0.024, and 0.002, respectively). The ADC values at L1–L2 intervertebral disk level and T8–L3 region were significantly lower in the DM group than in the IVDH group (P=0.038 and P<0.001). Horizontal bars indicate medians within groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Post hoc comparisons used Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. *P<0.05.
Fig. 3.Comparison of fractional anisotropy (FA) values among degenerative myelopathy (DM), intervertebral disk herniation (IVDH), and healthy control groups. The FA value of the T8–L3 region were significantly lower in the DM group than in the control and IVDH group (P=0.024 and 0.006). Horizontal bars indicate medians within groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Post hoc comparisons used Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. *P<0.05.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters in degenerative myelopathy (DM) stage 1 and DM stage 4
| Intervertebral level | DM stage 1 | DM stage 4 | Correlation between the clinical duration of DM and DTI parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Range | Median | Range | |||||
| ADC | T8–T9 | 1.018 | 0.426–2.287 | 0.417 | 0.198–0.792 | –0.711 | 0.048* | |
| T9–T10 | 1.076 | 0.482–1.958 | 0.448 | 0.194–0.832 | –0.711 | 0.048* | ||
| T10–T11 | 0.916 | 0.627–1.348 | 0.611 | 0.107–1.047 | –0.470 | 0.240 | ||
| T11–T12 | 1.097 | 0.649–1.422 | 0.696 | 0.579–0.867 | –0.711 | 0.048* | ||
| T12–T13 | 0.930 | 0.662–1.280 | 0.727 | 0.519–1.046 | –0.313 | 0.450 | ||
| T13–L1 | 0.916 | 0.808–1.437 | 0.594 | 0.393–0.688 | –0.873 | 0.011* | ||
| L1–L2 | 1.016 | 0.917–1.171 | 0.683 | 0.261–0.913 | –0.783 | 0.022* | ||
| L2–L3 | 1.016 | 0.889–1.431 | 0.818 | 0.246–0.894 | –0.747 | 0.033* | ||
| T8–L3 | 0.781 | 0.754–0.840 | 0.541 | 0.440–0.672 | –0.723 | 0.043* | ||
| FA | T8–T9 | 0.488 | 0.323–0.555 | 0.618 | 0.476–0.673 | –0.819 | 0.013* | |
| T9–T10 | 0.522 | 0.424–0.726 | 0.464 | 0.352–0.540 | –0.325 | 0.432 | ||
| T10–T11 | 0.485 | 0.398–0.750 | 0.412 | 0.310–0.451 | –0.518 | 0.188 | ||
| T11–T12 | 0.486 | 0.380–0.860 | 0.409 | 0.332–0.496 | –0.446 | 0.268 | ||
| T12–T13 | 0.452 | 0.433–0.686 | 0.422 | 0.341–0.516 | –0.036 | 0.932 | ||
| T13–L1 | 0.457 | 0.404–0.669 | 0.459 | 0.364–0.645 | 0.084 | 0.843 | ||
| L1–L2 | 0.512 | 0.386–0.751 | 0.480 | 0.340–0.739 | –0.133 | 0.754 | ||
| L2–L3 | 0.448 | 0.356–0.572 | 0.459 | 0.444–0.783 | 0.253 | 0.545 | ||
| T8–L3 | 0.456 | 0.420–0.550 | 0.426 | 0.417–0.454 | –0.446 | 0.268 | ||
*P<0.05; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; FA, fractional anisotropy.