| Literature DB >> 34894955 |
Mohamed M Khalifa1, Ahmed A Al-Karmalawy2, Eslam B Elkaeed3, Mohamed S Nafie4, Mohamed A Tantawy5,6, Ibrahim H Eissa1, Hazem A Mahdy1.
Abstract
This research presents the design and synthesis of a novel series of phthalazine derivatives as Topo II inhibitors, DNA intercalators, and cytotoxic agents. In vitro testing of the new compounds against HepG-2, MCF-7, and HCT-116 cell lines confirmed their potent cytotoxic activity with low IC50 values. Topo II inhibition and DNA intercalating activities were evaluated for the most cytotoxic members. IC50 values determination demonstrated Topo II inhibitory activities and DNA intercalating affinities of the tested compounds at a micromolar level. Amongst, compound 9d was the most potent member. It inhibited Topo II enzyme at IC50 value of 7.02 ± 0.54 µM with DNA intercalating IC50 of 26.19 ± 1.14 µM. Compound 9d was then subjected to an in vivo antitumor examination. It inhibited tumour proliferation reducing solid tumour volume and mass. Additionally, it restored liver enzymes, proteins, and CBC parameters near-normal, indicating a remarkable amelioration in their functions along with histopathological examinations.Entities:
Keywords: DNA; Topo II; antitumer; intercalators; phthalazine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34894955 PMCID: PMC8667898 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2021.2007905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Some reported DNA intercalators and topoisomerase II inhibitors showing their common pharmacophoric features.
Figure 2.Molecular hybridisation of triazolo phthalazine moieties with different recommended anticancer moieties based on the basic pharmacophoric features of doxorubicin as DNA intercalator and topoisomerase II inhibitors.
Scheme 1.General procedure for synthesis of target compounds 7a,b, 8a,b and 9a-d; Reagents and conditions: (i) NH2NH2.H2O / EtOH/reflux/5 h, (ii) POCl3/heating/1 h, (iii) NH2NH2.H2O / EtOH/reflux/0.5 h, (iv) Butyric anhydride/reflux/1 h, (v) NH2NH2.H2O / EtOH/reflux/0.5 h, (vi) The appropriate Isocyanates/EtOH/reflux/3 h, (vii) The appropriate Isothiocyanate/EtOH/reflux/3h, (viii) The appropriate Aromatic aldehydes / EtOH / gl. acetic acid / reflux/4h.
Scheme 3.General procedure for synthesis of target compounds 14a-d and 15; Reagents and conditions: (i) 1) CS2/KOH/EtOH/reflux/3 h, 2) HCl, (ii) KOH/absolute EtOH/reflux/0.5 h, (iii) N-Aryl-2-chloroacetamide derivatives 11a-c/DMF/heating/KI/heating/3 h. (iv) Chloroacetamide/DMF/heating over water bath/KI/heating/3 h.
Anti-proliferative activities towards HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cell lines.
| Comp. No. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HepG-2 | HCT-116 | MCF-7 | |
|
| 24.92 ± 0.8 | 23.8 ± 0.81 | 19.45 ± 0.62 |
|
| 44.96 ± 1.1 | 48.58 ± 1.60 | 50.69 ± 1.55 |
|
| 28.86 ± 0.67 | 25.04 ± 0.70 | 16.48 ± 0.43 |
|
| 10.92 ± 0.34 | 13.79 ± 0.44 | 12.54 ± 0.32 |
|
| 25.16 ± 0.70 | 36.29 ± 1.10 | 45.52 ± 1.22 |
|
| 63.86 ± 1.02 | 61.71 ± 1.89 | 35.99 ± 0.98 |
|
| 56.32 ± 1.73 | 78.49 ± 2.04 | 57.76 ± 1.56 |
|
| 5.08 ± 0.17 | 4.74 ± 0.15 | 4.95 ± 0.10 |
|
| 5.65 ± 0.25 | 4.35 ± 0.19 | 4.36 ± 0.20 |
|
| 13.40 ± 0.40 | 12.64 ± 0.45 | 14.94 ± 0.55 |
|
| 24.75 ± 0.88 | 30.99 ± 0.11 | 20.64 ± 0.88 |
|
| 38.63 ± 1.00 | 53.54 ± 1.55 | 26.18 ± 0.77 |
|
| 8.28 ± 0.32 | 9.62 ± 0.50 | 7.67 ± 0.37 |
aIC50 values are the mean ± SD of three separate experiments.
DNA intercalating affinity and IC50 values of the tested compounds against DNA and Topo II, respectively.
| Comp. No. | DNA/methyl green | Topoisomerase II |
|---|---|---|
|
| 37.14 ± 2.0 | NTd |
|
| 36.57 ± 1.82 | NTd |
|
| 29.63 ± 1.41 | 22.28 ± 2.00 |
|
| 34.65 ± 1.10 | 8.91 ± 0.77 |
|
| 43.81 ± 2.22 | 27.66 ± 2-51 |
|
| 49.93 ± 2.53 | NTd |
|
| 62.18 ± 2 .20 | 21.39 ± 1.90 |
|
| 26.19 ± 1.14 | 7.02 ± 0.54 |
|
| 28.74 ± 1.71 | 7.64 ± 0.66 |
|
| 34.35 ± 2.80 | 13.66 ± 1.02 |
|
| 46.34 ± 2.30 | NTd |
|
| 71.15 ± 3.11 | NTd |
|
| 31.27 ± 1.8 | 9.65 ± 0.77 |
aThree independent experiments were performed for each concentration.
b50% Inhibition concentration values of DNA/methyl green assay.
c50% Inhibition of Topo II.
dNot tested.
Figure 3.Methodology and Experimental design of the in vivo study.
Figure 4.Left panel: Bar chart representation of the effect of compound 9d treatment on the proliferation of solid tumour mass in the SEC-bearing mice. Right panel: Morphological representation for the tumour mass volume of A: SEC-group, B: SEC+ 9d, and C: SEC + DOX. Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM values of mice in each group (n = 7). Signs of * and # are values with significant differences in tumour weight and tumour volume, respectively compared to SEC control using an unpaired t-test (P ≤ 0.05) using GraphPad prism.
Biochemical and hematological parameters in the tested groups.
| Parameter/ | Biochemical parameters | Hematological parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT | AST | Total Protein | Albumin | Hb | RBCs count | WBCs count | |
| Normal control | 45.14 ± 2.69 | 53 ± 2.7 | 9.88 ± 0.35 | 5.95 ± 0.44 | 9.09 ± 0.61 | 6.08 ± 0.77 | 4.28 ± 0.44 |
| SEC control | 63.4 ± 4.53 | 64.67 ± 3.6 | 6.13 ± 0.24 | 2.97 ± 0.17 | 5.36 ± 0.41 | 3.33 ± 0.57 | 6.21 ± 0.57 |
| SEC + 9d (5 mg/kg BW) | 42.9#±1.01 | 55.6#±3.1 | 8.04#±0.41 | 6.25#±0.53 | 8.2#±0.31 | 5.37 ± 0.37 | 3.72#±0.46 |
| SEC + DOX (5 mg/kg BW) | 38.67#±1.6 | 48.4#±3.3 | 6.73 ± 0.26 | 6.01#±0.22 | 7.82 ± 0.27 | 5.26 ± 0.38 | 4.11 ± 0.57 |
Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM (n = 7).
#Significant difference between treated groups and SEC control using unpaired t-test (P ≤ 0.05) using the GraphPad prism7.
Figure 5.Histopathological examinations of liver tissues of SEC-bearing mice in different treatments (A) Normal control group that shows the normal structure of central vein surrounded with hepatocytes. (B) SEC control group shows pyknosis (arrows) & karyolysis (arrowhead), hydropic degeneration of hepatocytes, and loss of cell boundaries. (C) SEC group treated with 9d (5 mg/Kg BW) that shows hepatic cells are near normal and show tissue improvement as compared with a little hydropic degeneration. (D) SEC group treated with DOX shows tissue enhancement like normal group, but still, some hydropic degeneration, pyknosis (arrows) and karyolysis (arrowhead) were shown. (H&E stain, magnification ×200).
Figure 6.Superimposition of the co-crystallised ligand (light green) and the docking pose (light yellow) of the same molecule.
Figure 7.Binding of etoposide with DNA-Topo II, the hydrogen bonds are represented in red dashed lines.
Figure 8.Binding of doxorubicin with DNA-Topo II, the hydrogen bonds are represented in red dashed lines.
Figure 9.3D and 2D illustration of compound 9d in the Topo II active site.
Figure 10.3D and 2D illustration of compound 14a in the Topo II active site.
Predicted ADMET profile for the synthesised compounds
| Comp. | BBB levela | Solubility levelb | Absorption levelc | CYP2D6 predictiond | PPB predictione |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4 | 2 | 0 | false | true |
|
| 3 | 2 | 0 | false | true |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | false | true |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | false | true |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | true | true |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | true | true |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | false | false |
|
| 4 | 1 | 1 | false | true |
|
| 4 | 2 | 2 | false | false |
|
| 4 | 1 | 2 | false | false |
|
| 4 | 1 | 2 | false | true |
|
| 3 | 2 | 0 | false | false |
|
| 4 | 2 | 3 | false | false |
aBBB level, blood brain barrier level, 0 = very high, 1 = high, 2 = medium, 3 = low, 4 = very low.
bSolubility level, 1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 = good, 4 = optimal.
cAbsorption level, 0 = good, 1 = moderate, 2 = poor, 3 = very poor.
dCYP2D6, cytochrome P2D6, TRUE = inhibitor, FALSE = non inhibitor.
ePBB, plasma protein binding, FALSE means less than 90%, TRUE means more than 90%.
Figure 11.The expected ADMET study of the target compounds.
Toxicity properties of the synthesised compounds
| Comp. | DTP | Carcinogenic Potency TD50 | Rat Maximum Tolerated Dose | Rat Oral LD50b | Ocular Irritancy | Skin Irritancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Non-Toxic | 0.651 | 0.222 | 0.861 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 19.886 | 0.369 | 2.513 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 34.570 | 0.366 | 0.742 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 0.873 | 0.260 | 0.297 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 2.505 | 0.290 | 0.447 | Mild | Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 2.668 | 0.311 | 0.229 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 20.483 | 0.779 | 0.501 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 1.991 | 0.177 | 0.573 | Mild | Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 25.171 | 0.429 | 2.371 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 5.431 | 0.090 | 1.863 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 22.020 | 0.095 | 12.326 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Non-Toxic | 23.275 | 0.118 | 0.542 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
|
| Toxic | 0.861 | 0.277 | 0.227 | Mild | Non-Irritant |
aUnit: mg/kg body weight/day.
bUnit: g/kg body weight.