David Busse1,2, Philipp Simon3,4, Lisa Schmitt1,2, David Petroff4,5, Christoph Dorn6, Arne Dietrich3, Markus Zeitlinger7, Wilhelm Huisinga8, Robin Michelet1, Hermann Wrigge4,9, Charlotte Kloft10. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstr. 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany. 2. Graduate Research Training Program PharMetrX, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 4. Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 5. Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 6. Institute of Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 7. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 8. Institute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. 9. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Bergmannstrost Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany. 10. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstr. 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany. charlotte.kloft@fu-berlin.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A quantitative evaluation of the PK of meropenem, a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese patients is lacking as of date. The objective of this study was the characterisation of meropenem population pharmacokinetics in plasma and ISF in obese and non-obese patients for identification of adequate dosing regimens via Monte-Carlo simulations. METHODS: We obtained plasma and microdialysate concentrations after administration of meropenem 1000 mg to 15 obese and 15 non-obese surgery patients from a prospective clinical trial. After characterizing plasma- and microdialysis-derived ISF pharmacokinetics via population pharmacokinetic analysis, we simulated thrice-daily (TID) meropenem short-term (0.5 h), prolonged (3.0 h), and continuous infusions. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) analysis based on time unbound concentrations exceeded minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) on treatment day 1 (%fT > MIC) and the sum of PTA weighted by relative frequency of MIC values for infections by pathogens commonly treated with meropenem. To avoid interstitial tissue fluid concentrations below MIC for the entire dosing interval during continuous infusions, a more conservative PK/PD index was selected (%fT > 4 × MIC). RESULTS: Adjusted body weight (ABW) and calculated creatinine clearance (CLCRCG_ABW) of all patients (body mass index [BMI] = 20.5-81.5 kg/m2) explained a considerable proportion of the between-patient pharmacokinetic variability (15.1-31.0% relative reduction). The ISF:plasma ratio of %fT > MIC was relatively similar for MIC ≤ 2 mg/L but decreased for MIC = 8 mg/L over ABW = 60-120 kg (0.50-0.20). Steady-state concentrations were 2.68 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-3.37) higher in plasma than in ISF, supporting PK/PD targets related to four times the MIC during continuous infusions to avoid suspected ISF concentrations constantly below the MIC. A 3000 mg/24 h continuous infusion was sufficient at MIC = 2 mg/L for patients with CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW < 90 kg, whereas 2000 mg TID prolonged infusions were adequate for those with CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW > 90 kg. For MIC = 2 mg/L and %fT> MIC = 95, PTA was adequate in patients over the entire investigated range of body mass and renal function using a 6000 mg continuous infusion. A prolonged infusion of meropenem 2000 mg TID was sufficient for MIC ≤ 8 mg/L and all investigated ABW and CLCRCG_ABW when employing the PK/PD target %fT > MIC = 40. Short-term infusions of 1000 mg TID were sufficient for CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 130 mL/min and distributions of MIC values for Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae but not for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicated a need for higher doses (≥ 2000 mg) and prolonged infusions (≥ 3 h) for obese and non-obese patients at MIC ≥ 2 mg/L. Higher PTA was achieved with prolonged infusions in obese patients and with continuous infusions in non-obese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2012-004383-22.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A quantitative evaluation of the PK of meropenem, a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese patients is lacking as of date. The objective of this study was the characterisation of meropenem population pharmacokinetics in plasma and ISF in obese and non-obese patients for identification of adequate dosing regimens via Monte-Carlo simulations. METHODS: We obtained plasma and microdialysate concentrations after administration of meropenem 1000 mg to 15 obese and 15 non-obese surgery patients from a prospective clinical trial. After characterizing plasma- and microdialysis-derived ISF pharmacokinetics via population pharmacokinetic analysis, we simulated thrice-daily (TID) meropenem short-term (0.5 h), prolonged (3.0 h), and continuous infusions. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) analysis based on time unbound concentrations exceeded minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) on treatment day 1 (%fT > MIC) and the sum of PTA weighted by relative frequency of MIC values for infections by pathogens commonly treated with meropenem. To avoid interstitial tissue fluid concentrations below MIC for the entire dosing interval during continuous infusions, a more conservative PK/PD index was selected (%fT > 4 × MIC). RESULTS: Adjusted body weight (ABW) and calculated creatinine clearance (CLCRCG_ABW) of all patients (body mass index [BMI] = 20.5-81.5 kg/m2) explained a considerable proportion of the between-patient pharmacokinetic variability (15.1-31.0% relative reduction). The ISF:plasma ratio of %fT > MIC was relatively similar for MIC ≤ 2 mg/L but decreased for MIC = 8 mg/L over ABW = 60-120 kg (0.50-0.20). Steady-state concentrations were 2.68 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-3.37) higher in plasma than in ISF, supporting PK/PD targets related to four times the MIC during continuous infusions to avoid suspected ISF concentrations constantly below the MIC. A 3000 mg/24 h continuous infusion was sufficient at MIC = 2 mg/L for patients with CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW < 90 kg, whereas 2000 mg TID prolonged infusions were adequate for those with CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW > 90 kg. For MIC = 2 mg/L and %fT> MIC = 95, PTA was adequate in patients over the entire investigated range of body mass and renal function using a 6000 mg continuous infusion. A prolonged infusion of meropenem 2000 mg TID was sufficient for MIC ≤ 8 mg/L and all investigated ABW and CLCRCG_ABW when employing the PK/PD target %fT > MIC = 40. Short-term infusions of 1000 mg TID were sufficient for CLCRCG_ABW ≤ 130 mL/min and distributions of MIC values for Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae but not for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicated a need for higher doses (≥ 2000 mg) and prolonged infusions (≥ 3 h) for obese and non-obese patients at MIC ≥ 2 mg/L. Higher PTA was achieved with prolonged infusions in obese patients and with continuous infusions in non-obese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2012-004383-22.
Authors: Sarayut Janmahasatian; Stephen B Duffull; Susan Ash; Leigh C Ward; Nuala M Byrne; Bruce Green Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2005 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Todd A Davies; Anne Marie Queenan; Brian J Morrow; Wenchi Shang; Karen Amsler; Wenping He; A Simon Lynch; Chris Pillar; Robert K Flamm Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: P Simon; D Petroff; C Dorn; L Ehmann; C Kloft; C Prettin; A Dietrich; M Zeitlinger; F Kees; H Wrigge Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2019-05-10
Authors: Ivan Chytra; Martin Stepan; Jan Benes; Petr Pelnar; Alexandra Zidkova; Tamara Bergerova; Richard Pradl; Eduard Kasal Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Lisa Ehmann; Michael Zoller; Iris K Minichmayr; Christina Scharf; Barbara Maier; Maximilian V Schmitt; Niklas Hartung; Wilhelm Huisinga; Michael Vogeser; Lorenz Frey; Johannes Zander; Charlotte Kloft Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 9.097