Literature DB >> 8067772

Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during continuous and intermittent infusion of ceftazidime in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

J W Mouton1, J G den Hollander.   

Abstract

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model mimicking human serum drug concentrations, based on a dialyzer unit, was developed to study the efficacies of continuous infusion and intermittent administration of ceftazidime over a period of 36 h. The daily dose of ceftazidime was 300 mg/liter/24 h given either as a continuous infusion or as three bolus doses. The intermittent dosing regimen yielded peak and trough concentrations after the fourth dose of 92.3 (standard deviation, 8.0) and 1.4 (standard deviation, 0.9) mg/liter, respectively. Continuous administration yielded concentrations of approximately 20 mg/liter. To study efficacy, three Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, ATCC 27853, CF4, and CF16, were used. The MICs of ceftazidime for these strains were 1, 4, and 16 mg/liter, respectively. Strain CF16 was killed initially during both regimens and then started to regrow. At the end of the fourth dosing interval, i.e., after 32 h, viable counts showed no difference between the regimens. Strains ATCC 27853 and CF4 were killed initially during both dosing schedules, and after the first dosing interval viable counts were similar. However, after the fourth interval, there was a marked difference between bacterial counts during continuous and intermittent infusion, being 2.2 and 2.8 log10, respectively, demonstrating a greater efficacy during continuous infusion. The results indicate that, in the absence of other factors, a sustained level of ceftazidime around or slightly above the MIC is not high enough to maintain efficacy over more than one (8-h) dosing interval. When sustained concentrations higher than four times the MIC are employed, continuous administration in this model is more efficacious than intermittent dosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8067772      PMCID: PMC188129          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.5.931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

Review 1.  Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  W A Craig; S C Ebert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro model simulating the form of exposure of bacteria to antimicrobial drugs encountered in infection.

Authors:  M J Al-Asadi; D Greenwood; F O'Grady
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  [Bactericidal activity of aminosides in a static system and in a dynamic model].

Authors:  H B Drugeon; B Maurisset; A L Courtieu
Journal:  Nouv Presse Med       Date:  1979-10-31

4.  An artificial capillary in vitro kinetic model of antibiotic bactericidal activity.

Authors:  S H Zinner; M Husson; J Klastersky
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Bacterial elimination and therapeutic effectiveness under different schedules of amoxicillin administration.

Authors:  U Klaus; W Henninger; P Jacobi; B Wiedemann
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.544

6.  New in vitro kinetic model for evaluating bactericidal efficacy of antibiotics.

Authors:  T Murakawa; H Sakamoto; T Hirose; M Nishida
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review.

Authors:  W A Craig; S C Ebert
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1990

8.  Bacterial growth in an in vitro system simulating conditions in the urinary bladder.

Authors:  F O'Grady; J H Pennington
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1966-04

9.  New in vitro model to study the effect of antibiotic concentration and rate of elimination on antibacterial activity.

Authors:  S Grasso; G Meinardi; I de Carneri; V Tamassia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Bactericidal activity of cefadroxil, cephalexin, and cephradine in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  F Leitner; R A Goodhines; R E Buck; K E Price
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  84 in total

Review 1.  Combination therapy as a tool to prevent emergence of bacterial resistance.

Authors:  J W Mouton
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of ceftazidime continuous infusion vs intermittent bolus injection in septicaemic melioidosis.

Authors:  B J Angus; M D Smith; Y Suputtamongkol; H Mattie; A L Walsh; V Wuthiekanun; W Chaowagul; N J White
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases.

Authors:  P S McKinnon; S L Davis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Prolonged Versus Intermittent Infusion of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Bacterial Killing in Preclinical Infection Models.

Authors:  Sofie Dhaese; Aaron Heffernan; David Liu; Mohd Hafiz Abdul-Aziz; Veronique Stove; Vincent H Tam; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Continuous vs. intermittent cefotaxime administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory tract infections: pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, bacterial susceptibility and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  A R H van Zanten; M Oudijk; M K E Nohlmans-Paulssen; Y G van der Meer; A R J Girbes; K H Polderman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 3-hour infusion or bolus injection.

Authors:  Sutep Jaruratanasirikul; Somchai Sriwiriyajan; Jarurat Punyo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Development and qualification of a pharmacodynamic model for the pronounced inoculum effect of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Jenny C Yang; Alan Forrest; William J Jusko; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Novel concentration-killing curve method for estimation of bactericidal potency of antibiotics in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  Y Q Liu; Y Z Zhang; P J Gao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.