| Literature DB >> 34893761 |
Katie Hanna1,2, Emma Krzoska1, Abeer M Shaaban3, David Muirhead4, Rasha Abu-Eid1,5, Valerie Speirs6,7.
Abstract
Despite significant improvements in the way breast cancer is managed and treated, it continues to persist as a leading cause of death worldwide. If detected and diagnosed early, when tumours are small and localised, there is a considerably higher chance of survival. However, current methods for detection and diagnosis lack the required sensitivity and specificity for identifying breast cancer at the asymptomatic or very early stages. Thus, there is a need to develop more rapid and reliable methods, capable of detecting disease earlier, for improved disease management and patient outcome. Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive analytical technique that can rapidly provide highly specific information on the biochemical composition and molecular structure of samples. In cancer, it has the capacity to probe very early biochemical changes that accompany malignant transformation, even prior to the onset of morphological changes, to produce a fingerprint of disease. This review explores the application of Raman spectroscopy in breast cancer, including discussion on its capabilities in analysing both ex-vivo tissue and liquid biopsy samples, and its potential in vivo applications. The review also addresses current challenges and potential future uses of this technology in cancer research and translational clinical application.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34893761 PMCID: PMC8661339 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01659-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 9.075
Fig. 1Examples of Raman spectra and peak assignments.
a Extended scan from the Luminal A breast cancer cell line, MCF7 depicting the three main regions of the Raman spectrum: fingerprint, silent and high wavenumber regions are illustrated. Whilst the majority of biologically relevant molecular vibrations exist within the fingerprint, both the silent and high wavenumber regions may also contain molecular vibrations from a limited number of biomolecules. b Representation of the fingerprint region of a cellular Raman spectrum (left) with a variety of peaks that correspond to molecular vibrations of amino acids, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids and carbohydrates. Highlighted are examples of peak assignments from studies centred around the detection of breast cancer based on changes to specific Raman signatures (right). Image kindly provided by Renishaw. c Raman spectrum obtained from normal breast tissue displaying sources of spectral interference including noise, fluorescence and cosmic spikes (arrows).
Fig. 2Schematic representation of the main components found within a typical spontaneous Raman scattering micro-spectroscopy system.
Laser light is guided through a beam expander onto a series of mirrors that focus the light onto the sample through a microscope objective lens. Scattered light is collected with this same objective lens in a 180° backscatter sampling geometry. Rayleigh scattered light is reduced through the use of edge filters and then the Raman scattered light is focused through an entrance slit and dispersed by a diffraction grating onto the detector. Variations in this general setup typically exist between manufacturers.
Examples of Raman variants with applications in breast cancer.
| Raman variants | Basic principles | Advantages | Examples of applications in breast cancer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) | This describes the large Raman signal enhancement provided when molecules are adsorbed onto a roughened metallic surface- typically silver or gold nanoparticles. | This technique provides an increase, in orders of magnitude, of the Raman signal intensity; molecules present only at a low concentration can still be detected. It is also capable of multiplex detection due to its molecularly narrow-band spectra. | Detection and diagnosis through analysing liquid biopsy [ |
| Spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS) [ | Raman scattered light is collected along the sample from areas that are laterally offset from the point of laser excitation. Differences in the chemical composition as a function of depth can be delineated by comparing spectra obtained with no offset (surface) and those collected with an offset (subsurface). As a result of photon diffusion mechanisms, the spectra obtained with offset have different contributions from various depths within the sample. | Raman signals can be retrieved from numerous individual layers within a sample and surface fluorescence signals are reduced, making in vivo measurements possible. | Detection and characterisation of breast microcalcifications buried in tissue at depths up to 10 mm [ |
| Transmission Raman spectroscopy (TRS) | The illumination and collection optics are found on opposites sides of the sample hence the generated spectra are representative of its whole volume. | This technique is insensitive to depth; it is possible to probe structures deep within a particular area without interference from surface Raman and fluorescence signals. TRS thus has potential for non-invasive in vivo applications. | Detection and characterisation of breast microcalcification buried in tissue at depths of 16–40 mm [ |
| Kerr-gated Raman spectroscopy | Exploits the differential time dependence of Raman signals (femtoseconds or picoseconds) and fluorescence (hundreds of picoseconds to nanoseconds) on short-repeated laser pulses. Kerr-gating can separate these distinct time domains by using excitation with a pico-second pulsed laser combined with ultra-fast gating of the Raman scattered light collected at various time delays. | Surface Raman and fluorescence signals tend to be far more prominent than Raman signals emanating deep within tissue, posing difficulty for depth profiling. The Kerr-gating technique functions to reject the temporally longer fluorescence signal and thus produce enhancement to improve the spectra collected from biological tissue for depth profiling. | Probing the biochemical composition of microcalcifications for early breast cancer detection [ |
| Near-infrared Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy (NIR FT-RS) | A non-dispersive Raman system that uses a Nd:YAG laser emitting at 1064 nm excitation. FT-Raman spectroscopy involves the coupling of the Raman sampling module with a FT-IR instrument, that contains an interferometer, in order to reduce the fluorescence typical of near-infrared excitation. | The use of pre-resonant excitation, where most biomolecules do not have electronic absorption bands, reduces the likelihood of fluorescence interference as well as minimising photodegradation. FT-RS also simultaneously measures the intensity of scattered light at many frequencies thus improving spectral resolution. | Diagnosis of breast cancer through in vivo and ex vivo measurements. [ |
| Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SHINERS) | A monolayer of gold nanoparticle cores, coated with either silica or alumina, are applied to the surface of the sample to be probed. The protective shell prevents direct contact between the plasmonic nanoparticles and the probed surface, which if not present, could lead to structural changes of the biomolecules. | The plasmonic cores induce significant increase of the intensity of the electric field thus leading to a large enhancement of the Raman signal. It can do so without the requirement of a specialised substrate (SERS) and it is also not limited to only studying molecules with a large Raman cross-section (Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy). | Detection of breast pathology [ |
| Shifted excitation Raman difference spectroscopy (SERDS) | A laser employing two slightly different emission wavelengths is used to record two spectra for fluorescence rejection. A slight change to the wavelength of the incident radiation causes a shift in the Raman spectrum, but the fluorescence signal will remain unchanged. The different spectrum, obtained following subtraction of the two raw spectra, is free of fluorescence interference. | This technique is useful for probing samples that exhibit strong autofluorescence. Furthermore, this technique does not require complex sample preparation or experimental setup. As this approach eliminates fluorescence by experimental means rather than computational, the Raman features are not altered. | Classification of normal, benign and cancerous ex vivo breast tissue samples [ |
| Stimulated Raman spectroscopy (SRS) | Two synchronous pulsed lasers (pump beam and Stokes beam) are focused onto a sample. When the frequency difference between the lasers matches a molecular vibrational frequency, stimulated excitation of the vibrational transition occurs. During this excitation, energy of the pump photon is transferred to the chemical bond and thus the emitted Stokes photon has a lower energy. A loss of an incident photon at the pump frequency is paralleled by the generation of a new photon at the Stokes frequency. | SRS is much more efficient than spontaneous Raman as its signal strength is several orders of magnitude greater and it is unaffected by sample fluorescence. | Discrimination of type II microcalcifications [ |
| Coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) | CARS involves the simultaneous interaction of two incident photons, at pump and Stokes frequencies, with the scattering material. This interaction can coherently excite a large proportion of the chemical bonds to excited vibrational states. The excited chemical bonds can exchange energy with a second pump photon leading to the coherent emission of a higher energy anti-stokes photon. | CARS allows detection even in the presence of a strong fluorescent background due to the anti-stokes shift; deep penetration into tissues as there is minimal scattering of NIR excitation beams and limited photodamage due to low absorption of NIR excitation beams. Moreover, CARS methods require a very short time to acquire spectra, which is imperative for in vivo applications. | Characterisation of ex vivo breast tissue [ |
Examples of published data applying Raman spectroscopy in breast cancer, showing lack of uniformity in sample preparation, Raman spectrometer parameters and spectral pre-processing technique.
| Reference | Sample | Instrument settings | Spectral pre-processing | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue / cells | Preparation | Substrate | Laser intensity | Laser wavelength | Microscope | Other | ||
| [ | IDC and adjacent normal tissue. Number nor specified | 6 | Not defined | 10 mW | 532 nm; spot size 650 nm | ×50 objective | N/A | Spectra were processed (background subtraction, cosmic ray removal, spectral de-mixing) using WITEC Project Plus software (Ulm, Germany). |
| [ | Normal ( | Snap frozen. Spectra acquired using thawed tissue stored in PBS | Not required | 100–150 mW | 830 nm; spot size 100 | ×63, water immersion objective Numerical aperture 0.9 | Integration time 10–30 s Spectral resolution 8 cm-1 | Spectra were Raman shift frequency-calibrated using known spectral lines of toluene. Fluorescence background was removed by fitting the spectrum to a fifth-order polynomial and then subtracting this polynomial from the spectrum. Cosmic rays were removed using a derivative filter. |
| [ | Ductal epithelial hyperplasia ( | 6 μm FFPE sections | MgF2 slides | 100–150 mW | 830 nm; spot size 2 μm | ×63 objective Numerical aperture 0.9 | Integration time- 60 s Spectral resolution- 8 cm−1 | See ref. [ |
| [ | MCF7; MDA-MB-436; MCF-10A cell lines | 20 | Glass slides | 10 mW | 532 nm | ×50 objective | Spectrograph aperture; 50 μm pinhole Exposure time and accumulations; 50 s with 5 accumulations | Baseline corrections and Unit Vector Normalisation were performed on spectra prior to analysis. |
| [ | HMEC; HMLE; HMLE-Twist; HMLE-Ras; BT-474; T47D; MDA-MB-231 cell lines | Unfixed or fixed in methanol/acetone (1:1) | MgF2 coverslips | 28 mW | 785 nm; spot size 6µm2 | ×50 objective. Numerical aperture 0.5 | Diffraction grating 1200 groves/mm Acquisition time: Live cells: 25 s Fixed cells: 15 s | Origin version-8.5 software (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for pre-processing. 10-point and 3-point baseline correction methods were applied to spectra in the low and high wavenumber regions, respectively. Spectral noise was reduced using a Savitsky–Golay filter. Spectra were normalised by dividing each point by the norm of the whole spectrum. |
| [ | No preparation required- in vivo measurement of breast tissue- normal, fibrocystic change, fibroadenoma and infiltrating carcinoma | 82–125 mW | 830 nm | Not applicable | 1 s exposure | Following spectral acquisition, calibration data (spectrum of 4-acetamidophenol) was collected for spectral corrections. Chromatic intensity variations were corrected by collecting the spectrum of a tungsten white light source diffusely scattered by a reflectance standard (BaSO4). Background signals, generated in the optical fibres, were removed by collecting the scattered excitation light from a roughened aluminium surface and then optimally subtracted from the data in an iterative loop by using a scaling factor related to the tissues’ optical properties. Tissue fluorescence background was modelled with a 6th order polynomial. | ||
| [ | BT-474; MCF-10A cell lines | Cell pellets | Quartz microscope slide | 30 mW | 785 nm | ×50 objective Numerical aperture 0.75 | 30 s exposure and 2 accumulations Spectral resolution- 3 cm−1 | Background spectrum of the quartz slide was subtracted from sample spectrum using an automatic spectral subtraction function (GRAMS/AI spectroscopy software- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts). Fluorescence background was subtracted using an automated modified polynomial fitting method (MATLAB, MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts). Spectra were normalised to the mean intensity in the fingerprint range (700–1750 cm−1) |
| [ | DCIS ( | FFPE 20 | Glass slides | Low- value not specified | 786 nm | Not specified | 4 exposures, 16 scans 4 cm−1 spectral resolution | Not specified |
| [ | Normal ( | Stored in saline | Not specified | 150 mW | 785 nm | Not specified | 30 s integration time, 20 accumulations | Spectra were calibrated with a cubic fit to known frequencies of Tylenol. Baseline correction, smoothing, calibration, and normalization was carried out based on the ΔCH2 band using algorithms of Grams 32 (Galactic Industries Corporation, Salem, NH, USA). |
| [ | 4T1 mouse breast cancer cell line | Mice were injected with a suspension of 4T1 cells (1 × 105) and developed tumour nodules at injection site. Mice were sacrificed and tumour, adjacent breast tissue, contralateral mammary gland and its adjacent lymph nodes were removed. | Not required | 50 mW | 785 nm | 20x objective | 3 exposures, 10 s exposure time 4 cm−1 spectral resolution | MATLAB (version 6.5) was used to pre-process data. A median filter was applied to the spectra to remove cosmic rays or spikes. Noise was filtered using wavelets. Background fluorescence was subtracted from the denoised spectra using a modified cubic spline algorithm. The spectrum was then normalised so that the minimum and maximum values of the spectrum were 0 and 1, respectively. |
| [ | Tissue microarray of normal ( | 5um thick and 0.6 mm diameter | Not specified | 10 mW | 532 nm | ×50 long work distance objective | Not specified | Spectra were fluorescence-corrected by employing a six-polynomial algorithm (OmnicTM, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Pre-processing (baseline correction; Savitzky-Golay smoothing and standard normal variate corrections) was performed using the Unscrambler X 10.2TM software (Camo software, Oslo, Norway) |
IDC invasive ductal cancer, PBS phosphate buffered saline, MCS Monckeberg medial calcific sclerosis, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, FFPE formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded.