Literature DB >> 34892859

A review of long-branch attraction.

Johannes Bergsten1.   

Abstract

The history of long-branch attraction, and in particular methods suggested to detect and avoid the artifact to date, is reviewed. Methods suggested to avoid LBA-artifacts include excluding long-branch taxa, excluding faster evolving third codon positions, using inference methods less sensitive to LBA such as likelihood, the Aguinaldo et al. approach, sampling more taxa to break up long branches and sampling more characters especially of another kind, and the pros and cons of these are discussed. Methods suggested to detect LBA are numerous and include methodological disconcordance, RASA, separate partition analyses, parametric simulation, random outgroup sequences, long-branch extraction, split decomposition and spectral analysis. Less than 10 years ago it was doubted if LBA occurred in real datasets. Today, examples are numerous in the literature and it is argued that the development of methods to deal with the problem is warranted. A 16 kbp dataset of placental mammals and a morphological and molecular combined dataset of gall waSPS are used to illustrate the particularly common problem of LBA of problematic ingroup taxa to outgroups. The preferred methods of separate partition analysis, methodological disconcordance, and long branch extraction are used to demonstrate detection methods. It is argued that since outgroup taxa almost always represent long branches and are as such a hazard towards misplacing long branched ingroup taxa, phylogenetic analyses should always be run with and without the outgroups included. This will detect whether only the outgroup roots the ingroup or if it simultaneously alters the ingroup topology, in which case previous studies have shown that the latter is most often the worse. Apart from that LBA to outgroups is the major and most common problem; scanning the literature also detected the ill advised comfort of high support values from thousands of characters, but very few taxa, in the age of genomics. Taxon sampling is crucial for an accurate phylogenetic estimate and trust cannot be put on whole mitochondrial or chloroplast genome studies with only a few taxa, despite their high support values. The placental mammal example demonstrates that parsimony analysis will be prone to LBA by the attraction of the tenrec to the distant marsupial outgroups. In addition, the murid rodents, creating the classic "the guinea-pig is not a rodent" hypothesis in 1996, are also shown to be attracted to the outgroup by nuclear genes, although including the morphological evidence for rodents and Glires overcomes the artifact. The gall wasp example illustrates that Bayesian analyses with a partition-specific GTR + Γ + I model give a conflicting resolution of clades, with a posterior probability of 1.0 when comparing ingroup alone versus outgroup rooted topologies, and this is due to long-branch attraction to the outgroup. © The Willi Hennig Society 2005.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 34892859     DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cladistics        ISSN: 0748-3007            Impact factor:   5.254


  26 in total

1.  Phylogenomic analysis of the Erwiniaceae supports reclassification of Kalamiella piersonii to Pantoea piersonii comb. nov. and Erwinia gerundensis to the new genus Duffyella gen. nov. as Duffyella gerundensis comb. nov.

Authors:  Craig D Soutar; John Stavrinides
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Fundamental evolution of all Orthocoronavirinae including three deadly lineages descendent from Chiroptera-hosted coronaviruses: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Denis Jacob Machado; Rachel Scott; Sayal Guirales; Daniel A Janies
Journal:  Cladistics       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.714

Review 3.  Lipid biomarkers: molecular tools for illuminating the history of microbial life.

Authors:  Roger E Summons; Paula V Welander; David A Gold
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Different phylogenomic methods support monophyly of enigmatic 'Mesozoa' (Dicyemida + Orthonectida, Lophotrochozoa).

Authors:  Marie Drábková; Kevin M Kocot; Kenneth M Halanych; Todd H Oakley; Leonid L Moroz; Johanna T Cannon; Armand Kuris; Ana Elisa Garcia-Vedrenne; M Sabrina Pankey; Emily A Ellis; Rebecca Varney; Jan Štefka; Jan Zrzavý
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Assessing Confidence in Root Placement on Phylogenies: An Empirical Study Using Nonreversible Models for Mammals.

Authors:  Suha Naser-Khdour; Bui Quang Minh; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.160

6.  Divergent evolutionary trajectories of bryophytes and tracheophytes from a complex common ancestor of land plants.

Authors:  Brogan J Harris; James W Clark; Dominik Schrempf; Gergely J Szöllősi; Philip C J Donoghue; Alistair M Hetherington; Tom A Williams
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 19.100

7.  Construction of a Species-Level Tree of Life for the Insects and Utility in Taxonomic Profiling.

Authors:  Douglas Chesters
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Confronting Sources of Systematic Error to Resolve Historically Contentious Relationships: A Case Study Using Gadiform Fishes (Teleostei, Paracanthopterygii, Gadiformes).

Authors:  Adela Roa-Varón; Rebecca B Dikow; Giorgio Carnevale; Luke Tornabene; Carole C Baldwin; Chenhong Li; Eric J Hilton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  The phylogenetic relationship between Astigmata and Oribatida (Acari) as indicated by molecular markers.

Authors:  Katja Domes; Max Althammer; Roy A Norton; Stefan Scheu; Mark Maraun
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Toward a Self-Updating Platform for Estimating Rates of Speciation and Migration, Ages, and Relationships of Taxa.

Authors:  Alexandre Antonelli; Hannes Hettling; Fabien L Condamine; Karin Vos; R Henrik Nilsson; Michael J Sanderson; Hervé Sauquet; Ruud Scharn; Daniele Silvestro; Mats Töpel; Christine D Bacon; Bengt Oxelman; Rutger A Vos
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.