Literature DB >> 27798407

Construction of a Species-Level Tree of Life for the Insects and Utility in Taxonomic Profiling.

Douglas Chesters1.   

Abstract

Although comprehensive phylogenies have proven an invaluable tool in ecology and evolution, their construction is made increasingly challenging both by the scale and structure of publically available sequences. The distinct partition between gene-rich (genomic) and species-rich (DNA barcode) data is a feature of data that has been largely overlooked, yet presents a key obstacle to scaling supermatrix analysis. I present a phyloinformatics framework for draft construction of a species-level phylogeny of insects (Class Insecta). Matrix-building requires separately optimized pipelines for nuclear transcriptomic, mitochondrial genomic, and species-rich markers, whereas tree-building requires hierarchical inference in order to capture species-breadth while retaining deep-level resolution. The phylogeny of insects contains 49,358 species, 13,865 genera, 760 families. Deep-level splits largely reflected previous findings for sections of the tree that are data rich or unambiguous, such as inter-ordinal Endopterygota and Dictyoptera, the recently evolved and relatively homogeneous Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Brachycera (Diptera), and Cucujiformia (Coleoptera). However, analysis of bias, matrix construction and gene-tree variation suggests confidence in some relationships (such as in Polyneoptera) is less than has been indicated by the matrix bootstrap method. To assess the utility of the insect tree as a tool in query profiling several tree-based taxonomic assignment methods are compared. Using test data sets with existing taxonomic annotations, a tendency is observed for greater accuracy of species-level assignments where using a fixed comprehensive tree of life in contrast to methods generating smaller de novo reference trees. Described herein is a solution to the discrepancy in the way data are fit into supermatrices. The resulting tree facilitates wider studies of insect diversification and application of advanced descriptions of diversity in community studies, among other presumed applications. [Data integration; data mining; insects; phylogenomics; phyloinformatics; tree of life.].
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27798407      PMCID: PMC5837528          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  102 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.

Authors:  Antonis Rokas; Barry L Williams; Nicole King; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing.

Authors:  Jeet Sukumaran; Mark T Holder
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data.

Authors:  Mark Blaxter; Jenna Mann; Tom Chapman; Fran Thomas; Claire Whitton; Robin Floyd; Eyualem Abebe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Jose Castresana
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Statistical assignment of DNA sequences using Bayesian phylogenetics.

Authors:  Kasper Munch; Wouter Boomsma; John P Huelsenbeck; Eske Willerslev; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography.

Authors:  Shannon M Hedtke; Sébastien Patiny; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Comparative evolutionary diversity and phylogenetic structure across multiple forest dynamics plots: a mega-phylogeny approach.

Authors:  David L Erickson; Frank A Jones; Nathan G Swenson; Nancai Pei; Norman A Bourg; Wenna Chen; Stuart J Davies; Xue-Jun Ge; Zhanqing Hao; Robert W Howe; Chun-Lin Huang; Andrew J Larson; Shawn K Y Lum; James A Lutz; Keping Ma; Madhava Meegaskumbura; Xiangcheng Mi; John D Parker; I Fang-Sun; S Joseph Wright; Amy T Wolf; W Ye; Dingliang Xing; Jess K Zimmerman; W John Kress
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Alan R Lemmon; Jeremy M Brown; Kathrin Stanger-Hall; Emily Moriarty Lemmon
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  HaMStR: profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs.

Authors:  Ingo Ebersberger; Sascha Strauss; Arndt von Haeseler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.

Authors:  Nevin Cullen; Jing Xia; Na Wei; Rainee Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth O'Neill; Rebecca Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Phylogenomic and mitogenomic data can accelerate inventorying of tropical beetles during the current biodiversity crisis.

Authors:  Michal Motyka; Dominik Kusy; Matej Bocek; Renata Bilkova; Ladislav Bocak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.