PURPOSE: To explore trial-level and patient-level associations between response (complete remission [CR] and CR + CR with incomplete hematologic [CRi] or platelet [CRp] recovery), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) trials of intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: We identified data from eight randomized, active-controlled trials of intensive chemotherapy submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of newly diagnosed AML (N = 4,482). Associations between trial-level odds ratios (ORs) for CR and CR + CRi or CRp, and hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS were analyzed using weighted linear regression models. We performed patient-level responder analyses to compare OS by response using pooled data from all studies. RESULTS: In trial-level analyses, association between HR for OS and OR for CR was moderate (R2 = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.86), as was the association with OR for CR + CRi or CRp (R2 = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.99). For OS versus EFS, a strong association was observed (R2 = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.98) when EFS definitions were harmonized across trials using raw data. In the patient-level responder analyses, patients who achieved CR had better OS compared with CRi or CRp responders (0.73; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.84) and nonresponders (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.37). CONCLUSION: On a trial level, there is a moderate association between OS and CR rate. A strong association between EFS and OS was observed. However, CIs were wide, and results became moderate using alternative definitions for EFS. Patient-level analyses showed CR responders have better OS compared with CRi or CRp responders and nonresponders. A therapy in newly diagnosed AML with benefit in EFS or substantial benefit in CR rate would be likely to have an OS effect.
PURPOSE: To explore trial-level and patient-level associations between response (complete remission [CR] and CR + CR with incomplete hematologic [CRi] or platelet [CRp] recovery), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) trials of intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: We identified data from eight randomized, active-controlled trials of intensive chemotherapy submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of newly diagnosed AML (N = 4,482). Associations between trial-level odds ratios (ORs) for CR and CR + CRi or CRp, and hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS were analyzed using weighted linear regression models. We performed patient-level responder analyses to compare OS by response using pooled data from all studies. RESULTS: In trial-level analyses, association between HR for OS and OR for CR was moderate (R2 = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.86), as was the association with OR for CR + CRi or CRp (R2 = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.99). For OS versus EFS, a strong association was observed (R2 = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.98) when EFS definitions were harmonized across trials using raw data. In the patient-level responder analyses, patients who achieved CR had better OS compared with CRi or CRp responders (0.73; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.84) and nonresponders (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.37). CONCLUSION: On a trial level, there is a moderate association between OS and CR rate. A strong association between EFS and OS was observed. However, CIs were wide, and results became moderate using alternative definitions for EFS. Patient-level analyses showed CR responders have better OS compared with CRi or CRp responders and nonresponders. A therapy in newly diagnosed AML with benefit in EFS or substantial benefit in CR rate would be likely to have an OS effect.
Authors: Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield Journal: Blood Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alan K Burnett; Robert K Hills; Donald Milligan; Lars Kjeldsen; Jonathan Kell; Nigel H Russell; John A L Yin; Ann Hunter; Anthony H Goldstone; Keith Wheatley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xueyan Chen; Hu Xie; Brent L Wood; Roland B Walter; John M Pagel; Pamela S Becker; Vicky K Sandhu; Janis L Abkowitz; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aviva C Krauss; Xin Gao; Liang Li; Michael L Manning; Paresma Patel; Wentao Fu; Kumar G Janoria; Gerlie Gieser; David A Bateman; Donna Przepiorka; Yuan Li Shen; Stacy S Shord; Christopher M Sheth; Anamitro Banerjee; Jiang Liu; Kirsten B Goldberg; Ann T Farrell; Gideon M Blumenthal; Richard Pazdur Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Roland B Walter; Hagop M Kantarjian; Xuelin Huang; Sherry A Pierce; Zhuoxin Sun; Holly M Gundacker; Farhad Ravandi; Stefan H Faderl; Martin S Tallman; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen H Petersdorf; Kenneth J Kopecky; Marilyn Slovak; Cheryl Willman; Thomas Nevill; Joseph Brandwein; Richard A Larson; Harry P Erba; Patrick J Stiff; Robert K Stuart; Roland B Walter; Martin S Tallman; Leif Stenke; Frederick R Appelbaum Journal: Blood Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; John M Bennett; Kenneth J Kopecky; Thomas Büchner; Cheryl L Willman; Elihu H Estey; Charles A Schiffer; Hartmut Doehner; Martin S Tallman; T Andrew Lister; Francesco Lo-Coco; Roel Willemze; Andrea Biondi; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Richard A Larson; Bob Löwenberg; Miguel A Sanz; David R Head; Ryuzo Ohno; Clara D Bloomfield; Francesco LoCocco Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey E Lancet; Geoffrey L Uy; Jorge E Cortes; Laura F Newell; Tara L Lin; Ellen K Ritchie; Robert K Stuart; Stephen A Strickland; Donna Hogge; Scott R Solomon; Richard M Stone; Dale L Bixby; Jonathan E Kolitz; Gary J Schiller; Matthew J Wieduwilt; Daniel H Ryan; Antje Hoering; Kamalika Banerjee; Michael Chiarella; Arthur C Louie; Bruno C Medeiros Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Audrey Mauguen; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Sarah Burdett; Caroline Domerg; David Fisher; Rebecca Paulus; Samithra J Mandrekar; Chandra P Belani; Frances A Shepherd; Tim Eisen; Herbert Pang; Laurence Collette; William T Sause; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Jeffrey Crawford; Mary O'Brien; Steven E Schild; Mahesh Parmar; Jayne F Tierney; Cécile Le Pechoux; Stefan Michiels Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 41.316