Literature DB >> 25732155

Relation of clinical response and minimal residual disease and their prognostic impact on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Xueyan Chen1, Hu Xie2, Brent L Wood2, Roland B Walter2, John M Pagel2, Pamela S Becker2, Vicky K Sandhu2, Janis L Abkowitz2, Frederick R Appelbaum2, Elihu H Estey2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Both presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) and achievement of complete remission (CR) with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) rather than CR after induction therapy predict relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These results suggest a correlation between response (peripheral count recovery) and MRD at the time of morphologic remission. Here we examine this hypothesis and whether MRD and response provide independent prognostic information after accounting for other relevant covariates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 245 adults with AML who achieved CR, CRp, or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) after induction therapy. Bone marrow samples were collected on or closest to the first date of blood count recovery, and MRD was determined by 10-color multiparameter flow cytometry.
RESULTS: The 71.0% of patients who achieved CR had MRD less frequently and had lower levels of MRD than the 19.6% of patients achieving CRp and 9.4% achieving CRi. Although pretreatment covariates such as cytogenetics, monosomal karyotype, relapsed or refractory rather than newly diagnosed AML, and FLT3 internal tandem duplication were associated with relapse, their prognostic effect was much lower once MRD and response were taken into account, the univariable statistical effect of which was not materially affected by inclusion of pretreatment covariates.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that post-therapy parameters including MRD status and response are important independent prognostic factors for outcome in patients with AML achieving remission. MRD status and type of response (CR v CRp or CRi) should play important, and perhaps dominant, roles in planning postinduction therapy.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732155     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  82 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow evaluation for diagnosis and monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mary-Elizabeth Percival; Catherine Lai; Elihu Estey; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  FDA Approval Summary: Mylotarg for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Kelly J Norsworthy; Chia-Wen Ko; Jee Eun Lee; Jiang Liu; Christy S John; Donna Przepiorka; Ann T Farrell; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-12

3.  Low platelet count reduces subsequent complete remission rate despite marrow with <5% blasts after AML induction therapy.

Authors:  X Chen; L F Newell; H Xie; R B Walter; J M Pagel; V K Sandhu; P S Becker; P C Hendrie; J L Abkowitz; F R Appelbaum; E H Estey
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

Authors:  Gevorg Tamamyan; Tapan Kadia; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Jorge Cortes; Elias Jabbour; Naval Daver; Maro Ohanian; Hagop Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  How good are we at predicting the fate of someone with acute myeloid leukaemia?

Authors:  E Estey; R P Gale
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Christine M McMahon; Alexander E Perl
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-09-20

7.  Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML.

Authors:  Renato Bassan; Tamara Intermesoli; Arianna Masciulli; Chiara Pavoni; Cristina Boschini; Giacomo Gianfaldoni; Filippo Marmont; Irene Cavattoni; Daniele Mattei; Elisabetta Terruzzi; Lorella De Paoli; Chiara Cattaneo; Erika Borlenghi; Fabio Ciceri; Massimo Bernardi; Anna M Scattolin; Elisabetta Todisco; Leonardo Campiotti; Paolo Corradini; Agostino Cortelezzi; Dario Ferrero; Pamela Zanghì; Elena Oldani; Orietta Spinelli; Ernesta Audisio; Sergio Cortelazzo; Alberto Bosi; Brunangelo Falini; Enrico M Pogliani; Alessandro Rambaldi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-04-09

8.  Prognostic impact of complete remission with MRD negativity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Hind Rafei; Naval Daver; Hyunsoo Hwang; Jing Ning; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Tapan M Kadia; Courtney D DiNardo; Sa A Wang; Elias Jabbour; Uday Popat; Betul Oran; Jorge Cortes; Marina Konopleva; Musa Yilmaz; Ghayas C Issa; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-22

9.  A clinical measure of DNA methylation predicts outcome in de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Phyllis A Gimotty; Catherine Smith; Alison W Loren; Maria E Figueroa; Jenna Harrison; Zhuoxin Sun; Martin S Tallman; Elisabeth M Paietta; Mark R Litzow; Ari M Melnick; Ross L Levine; Hugo F Fernandez; Selina M Luger; Martin Carroll; Stephen R Master; Gerald B W Wertheim
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-06-16

Review 10.  Targeting minimal residual disease: a path to cure?

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Mark A Murakami; Scott R Manalis; David M Weinstock
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.