Resource Resurgence from COVID-19 Waste via Pyrolysis: a Circular Economy Approach.

Since the end of 2019, COVID-19 pandemic has affected 220 countries and currently majority of the world is facing the wrath of the second wave. One of the outcomes of the ongoing pandemic is the generation of huge amount of solid polymeric "COVID-waste" comprising medical waste, personal protective equipment (PPE) waste, packaging waste, and other household waste with potential infectious components residing on it. Thermochemical route is the preferred treatment and effective way of disposal of such infectious polymeric waste. Typically, incineration is employed to ensure complete destruction of the pathogens which is not a resource-efficient method. Pyrolysis is a sustainable alternative which can handle the present COVID-waste stream in short-term and long-term yielding valuable fuel and material products. Recently published literature in this avenue have clearly shown the versatility of this technology in efficiently handling both mono and mixed stream of polymers. Based on facts, we propose a resource resurgence framework that utilizes pyrolysis as the core conversion route for effectively handling COVID-waste streams. Our framework suggests how these plants can be operational and helpful in generation of revenue in post-pandemic times as well. We expect that the conscientious adoption of pyrolysis will certainly lead us towards a circular economy paradigm.

Introduction

Outbreak of the terribly uncontrolled menacing pandemic COVID-19 caused due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus version 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected 220 countries and territories globally, causing 169,648,062 confirmed cases of infection and 3,525,426 confirmed deaths, as of 28th May 2021 [1, 2]. In the beginning months of 2020, a state of emergency was announced worldwide and imposed forthwith by World Health Organisation (WHO). As the primary measure of defence in an absolutely cureless situation, WHO has urged public health authorities in the respective affected countries to contain the spread of the virus within social spheres as small as possible to disrupt the chain of transmission of the outbreak. The virus transmits through micro/macro droplets produced during sneezing or coughing by an infected human [3]. Personal protective equipment (PPE) such as masks, gloves, PPE wearable kits, face shields, and personal hygiene products like alcohol-based sanitizers and surface sterilizers are the primary protections and commodities that were promptly put to compulsory use by the non-homebound people to minimize the risk of infection. This led to a sudden and enormous upsurge in the use of PPEs, majorly in the medical and human transport sectors. Fast forward to May 2021, some vaccines have surfaced such as BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna by AstraZeneca, and COVISHIELD by Serum Institute of India [4-6]. Mass vaccination is slowly taking pace and amidst this, the world is experiencing the tsunami of the second wave, with countries like India being highly affected [7]. These breakthroughs in vaccine development are commendable but recent concerns have emerged with the efficacy related to mutated variations of the virus [8].

Despite all these, the continual use and demand for the PPE are increasing exponentially. As a result of their majorly “single-use” nature, the used and disposed PPEs are adding up to the ever-growing piles of complex anthropogenic solid waste. The overall composition of the solid waste stream has changed strikingly during this pandemic situation. Fear and anxiety have driven unnecessary stockpiling of food and groceries due to nationwide imposition of lockdown and consequent uncertainties have significantly altered the food waste generation dynamics. Considering the dry waste only, several used masks, gloves, PPE, empty sanitizer bottles, used tissue papers, and lots of packaging waste have increased in a typical “urban” waste stream generated in the metros and cities [9]. Another contributor to the rise in the quantity of packaging waste is due to a steep increase in e-commerce shopping, which has become a habit during the lockdown periods and to some extent, fear of contracting the COVID-19 virus [10]. On the embarkment of the COVID-19, medical waste generation reached up to 240 tons per day, in Wuhan city, China [11], whereas there was a 30% increase in medical waste generation in Malaysia by March 2020 [12]. To keep things simple, we term these infectious wastes as “COVID-waste” that includes medical waste, PPE waste, and other household waste with potential infectious components including discarded packaging waste. According to Prata et al. [13], the global monthly demand of gloves was almost 65 billion whereas for facemasks it was 129 billion to tackle COVID-19. The daily usage of facemasks has been estimated to be 7 billion per day [1, 2]. As estimated by Hantoko et al. [14], North America generated nearly 72 kilotons of medical waste; followed by Europe, Asia, and South America with 70 kilotons, 55.6 kilotons, and 37 kilotons respectively, whereas Africa and Oceania are generating least amount of medical waste with 8.3kilotons and 0.12 kilotons respectively, based on facemasks only. The demand in PPE kits is projected to increase by 40% due to COVID-19 by WHO [15]. This article presents discussions on the ongoing thermochemical management efforts of COVID-waste, specifically focusing on conversion through pyrolysis and established a framework for highlighting the resource resurgence potential from the perspective of circular economy.

Current Scenario of COVID-waste Generation

The rapidly changing composition is not only dictating a paradigm shift for the solid waste management (SWM) industry but also indicating the probability of cross-contamination-contraction. The extremely infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus can persist in surfaces of cardboard, plastic, and metals for hours to days (as long as 9-day survival is reported) [16, 17]. Hence, open dumping of COVID-waste carelessly will directly lead to high health risk of ground-level workers, especially in developing nations where rag pickers and waste collectors are not well aware of the viral contraction and are not equipped with PPEs themselves. There are several cases where workers in SWM facilities have tested COVID positive due to cross-contamination, an un-dismissible source of which may be the solid wastes [18]. This way, the medical and domestic fractions of the Covid-induced solid wastes produced globally are posing an ugly threat to the environment. This biohazard-laden plastic waste must be treated through a green route to free the environment from this burden in an eco-friendly manner and abiding by the global agenda of circular economy to contribute to sustainable waste management practices [19].

The commonly practiced plastic recycling and recovery methods were also affected by excessive PPE usage due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which is strongly boosting environmental pollution. As the PPEs include plastics as key constituents, the disposal of them without being recycled enhances the number of hazardous pollutants such as dioxins and toxic metals in the environment [15]. Due to the fast change of composition and characteristics of the generated waste, authorities are finding it difficult to cope up as the built infrastructures are not yet fully adapted and upscaled to efficiently handle such huge volume of PPE waste [20]. The wrath of the second wave of the ongoing pandemic has increased the generation of packaging materials and other medical things. The generation rate is expected to increase by 44.8% and 13.2% respectively due to higher demand of PPE kits and online food and essentials delivery [14]. In the healthcare sector, the demand of different commodities such as face shields, gloves, trash bags, and masks also increases the demand of different types of polymers such as polypropylene (PP), polyvinylchloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [13] which are also creating huge amount of plastic waste. Additionally, with the second wave, the demands of online grocery and food delivery services have increased. While the business giants are trying to seize the opportunity, the resulting waste streams are contributing to more and more COVID-waste.

Available Practices for COVID-waste Management

COVID-waste is infectious and bio-hazardous which needs to be disposed in a controlled environment of thermal treatment to destroy any living pathogen [16]. As the volume of waste surges up, existing capacity of waste treatment may not be enough, which will call for new facility establishment. An intelligent alternative is to utilize the existing MSW incinerators [14]. As proposed by United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP), steam sterilization and microwaving are the two most preferred technologies whereas the incineration of different categories are the secondary preferred [21]. Incineration does kill the pathogens and ensures that all toxic compounds are completely decomposed [22]. However, it is neither resource-efficient nor an eco-friendly technology. In developing countries like India, the increasing amount of packaging waste plastics such as polypropylene (PP), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polystyrene (PS) are creating massive pressure in open dumping yards and landfill sites. Discarded materials including contaminated face masks, gloves, and PPEs can aggravate environmental and health problems, particularly in countries like India, where the solid waste management system is still in the developing phase and yet to attain a fully dedicated stage within the whole chain of waste disposal to recycling.

Biodegradation of plastic waste is still a lingering challenge and only few early laboratory scale reports are available; hence, it cannot be adopted as a measure to treat and manage the highly recalcitrant COVID-waste. The most common approach to the present COVID-waste stream is to incinerate (combustion) the waste. Regarding the ease of operation, incineration is used as an “on-site” treatment of the COVID-waste, which is not so easy with other options like land filling. However, incineration is not a resource-efficient approach of waste management, as it is a route for direct destruction not recovery/recycling. Incineration is also adversely criticized for its huge carbon footprint produced from any type of solid waste (biomass and plastic) being combusted. Keeping in view the huge volume of the COVID-wastes, incineration should be deemed unsuitable as a primary option for treatment.

Pyrolysis: a Promising Resource Resurgence Route for COVID-waste

The joint agenda of implementing circular economy and sustainability in all future waste management systems calls for an efficient and suitable technology for COVID-waste handling [23, 24]. Pyrolysis will serve as an alternative and arguably a sustainable technology to handle the present COVID-waste stream in short term and long term. Compared to incineration, pyrolysis is reported to be an eco-friendlier and resource-efficient process [25]. As a well-known green engineering approach, pyrolysis has long been adopted for recycling multiple types of solid waste including both biomass and plastic wastes [26-29]. Definitively, pyrolysis is the decomposition of feedstock in the absence of oxygen, which produces useful products, i.e. pyro-liquid, pyro-gas, and pyro-char or solid residue. Despite production of solid, liquid, and gaseous products, pyrolysis is majorly used for production of the “liquid oil part”. Due to the usefulness of all the products and their collection for further use, unlike incineration, no product stream is directly open to the environment, which makes it a green process. It is reported by multiple previous studies that oil fraction reaches the maximum among all pyro-products when plastic or synthetic polymeric materials are used as feedstock [30, 31]. Operating temperature of pyrolysis plays the key role in the yield of maximum liquid or gas via the pyrolysis process, having a typical range of 623–873K. Configuration of the pyrolysis reactor and use of catalyst also have pronounced effects and need to be considered for better product yield [32]. Different kinds of plastic wastes, including a considerable amount of packaging plastics, being produced during this pandemic period, can be directly converted into fuel via pyrolysis without segregation. It is a very important fact for the COVID-waste that at their site of generation they are appearing as a relatively “source segregated” waste, due to the presence of contagious virus, which makes it un-mixable with other wastes. Segregated waste is always best for maximum resource recovery [25]. Many researchers confirm that pyrolysis of waste plastics yields significant quantity of oil (more than 50% wt. of feedstock) [33, 31]. Hence, it is very well documented that pyrolysis process is considered as an effective and eco-friendly route for handling and converting the plastic or polymeric wastes to useful products since a long time. Therefore, in the context of the present article, the experimental case studies using COVID-19-induced polymeric wastes having similar composition as the pyrolysis feedstocks have been selectively highlighted to indicate its adoption as an efficient treatment technology. In Table 1, the information from latest articles reporting experimental studies on the pyrolysis of the polymeric wastes generated at excessively high rates during the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic are presented. The effectiveness of pyrolysis process in different countries of the world for sustainable disposal of COVID-19 wastes along with recovery of valuable resources is tabulated. From the data represented in Table 1, it can be observed that a good quantity of liquid fuel rich in several hydrocarbon compounds was obtained from the pyrolysis of different polymeric wastes in the form of pyro-oil, which can be used as an alternative source of energy as a blend-in additive. The pyro-gas is also identified as an energy-rich product of pyrolysis.

Table 1

Resource recovery from polymeric waste materials generated during COVID-19 pandemic using pyrolysis

Sl. no.	Type of waste materials	Polymer type	Pyrolysis temperature (K)	Resource recovery	Country	References
1	Face mask, PPE kits, packaging materials	PP	723	92.3% oil, 4.1% gas, and 3.6% char	India	[34]
2.	3-ply face mask	PP	678 - 783	96.6% volatiles, chemical compounds, including pentane, 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene	Lithuania, Russia & Egypt	[35]
3.	Waste face mask		823	80.7% oil yield. with HY zeolite catalyst 67% higher BTEX yield.	Korea	[36]
4.	Disposable face mask	PP & PE	873	Syngas and C1-2 hydrocarbons. Ni/SiO2 catalyst expedites H2 and CH4 generation.	Korea and China	[37]
5.	Mix of gloves and face mask	PP + PVC	673	75% oil, 15% gas, and 10% char.	Ethiopia	[38]

However, use of catalyst may help to bring down the optimum temperature required for the pyrolysis process. There are specific effects of temperature as well as the catalyst on the product distribution [32]. Fine-tuning of these factors controls the percentage of aromatics and other desired chemicals in the pyro-oil and its fuel value (calorific value or higher heating value). Over the last decade, numerous research articles investigated and reported effect of several parameters of pyrolysis of different types of polymeric plastics (PP, LDPE, HDPE, PET, and PS) on the production of pyro-oil [30, 31, 33, 39, 40]). This will drive the adoption of pyrolysis as an efficient COVID-waste management and recycling method and construction of dedicated pyrolysis plants for the said purpose. The generated pyro-oil are used as an alternative fuel in gas turbines, generators, and boiler systems [25]. The fuel value of obtained distilled pyro-oil of packaging waste (PP, LDPE, and HDPE) was close to diesel with long hydrocarbon chains (>C20) which confirms the robustness of the technology [41]. The gaseous or non-condensable part which evolved due to pyrolysis can be fed back for partial heating of the reactor. The final flue gas can be controlled using standard pollution control equipment. The residue or the char is a suitable feedstock for the preparation of sorbent material as well as nanostructured carbon materials [42, 43].

Proposed Resource Resurgence Framework for COVID-waste Management

On the basis of the foregoing facts, we propose a resource resurgence framework that utilizes pyrolysis as the core conversion route for effectively handling COVID-waste streams. We assume a significant amount of waste is source segregated. As shown in Figure 1, waste collection from households and curb side is executed by the trained Urban Local Bodies (ULB). Biomedical waste management companies carry out the collection from hospitals through proper channel maintaining all safety protocols administered by WHO. Collected waste containing synthetic polymeric fraction is fed to the optimally designed pyrolysis process and produces pyro-oil, pyro-char, and pyro-gas through the thermochemical conversion. We recommend in-situ utilization of pyro-gas in the reactor itself, while the other two products can be helpful in revenue generation. A treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) handles any hazardous fraction that is generated as side stream from the core unit of process plant. The framework is also applicable for COVID-waste collected from public places, eateries, and shops as well those that generate a substantial quantity of disposables and other polymeric waste. This will allow the resource to be circulated along the value chain in a “closed flow”, conforming to the circular economy principles [44]. In the post-pandemic time, the plant will continue to serve as a primary waste management facility for treating all other synthetic polymeric city-wastes generated in future.

Fig. 1

Suggestive framework showing waste management scheme utilizing pyrolysis as a potential technology for resource resurgence. Waste collected from households, curb side, and hospitals is subjected to pyrolysis. Pyro-oil and pyro-char can be used for revenue generation while there is in situ utilization of the pyro-gas for heating purpose

Pyrolysis is slowly getting momentum in the large-scale processing of plastics to fuel scenario. In India, there are a few pilot plants converting plastics to fuel. Rudra Environmental Solutions India Limited is one of the benchmark pyrolysis plants in Pune, India. The plant was set up in 2010 with a capacity of 50kg per day and now a third-generation plant is operating since 2016 with a capacity of 500 kg per day [45]. A group of researchers at IIT Delhi have patented the technology for conversation of plastics to fuel range products [46] They are planning to use the installed laboratory facility for treatment plastics collected by South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) (IIT [47]). A future full-scale plant is expected down the line. Pyrolysis has also been tested with multi-layered packaging (MLP) waste using commercial zeolite catalyst in pilot scale, which suggests that biaxial oriented polypropylene MLPs can produce more than 70% oil [48]. Jectec, a Japan-based company, is also implementing pyrolysis for treatment of cable wires [49]. Sparta group in Canada is also implementing pyrolysis for converting non-recyclable plastics into fuel [50]. The proposed framework (Figure 1) can be extended towards developing benchmark practices considering other non-COVID-waste streams such as plastic waste, e-waste, agro-waste, and municipal waste.

Implementation of the concept of circular economy begun at various industries, as they are identified as the largest producers of solid waste in a global scenario [44]. In the developing countries, it is still at the initial level of implementation, due to less awareness. It is expected that waste-less industries will rise with circular economy as a guiding principle, which will ultimately lead towards sustainable development [51]. As discussed earlier, the proposed framework illustrated in Figure 1 may serve as a “prototype” for designing models of resource recovery plants handling multiple wastes including COVID-19 waste as pyrolysis feedstocks in accordance with the circular economy criterion. The discussions presented in the preceding sections have highlighted the resource potential of the COVID-waste and its recovery through pyrolysis process following circular economy. Further increase in circularity is possible with higher public awareness and better policy control and monitoring at the national level. This will facilitate realization and preservation of resource value of the COVID-waste by avoiding mixing and channelization of feedstock towards the processing plant as much as possible. Pyrolysis, being a resource-efficient process, is expected that in near future, the demand for pyrolysis plant as COVID-waste handling and valorization units will only increase. These units can serve as a common resource recovery facility (CRRF) for waste coming from multiple waste-sorting facilities, similar to common effluent treatment plants. Hence, this is not a one-stop solution, rather a beginning towards closing the loop.

Conclusion

In recent times, the whole world is confronting numerous challenges for revitalizing the economic breakdown caused due to the pandemic. The proposed resource resurgence strategy of utilizing pyrolysis as the core waste management route (for COVID-waste and other wastes) will not only reduce the extreme environmental burden but also will ensure resource circulation, thereby promoting circular economy. Pyrolysis will efficiently contribute towards creating a sustainable and resource-efficient treatment technology via the production of liquid fuel from various waste plastics and PPE kits. A balanced socio-economic growth, along with the environmental benefits, will help to reduce the future crisis to some extent. Researchers, private companies, entrepreneurs, and policymakers should come forward with joint effort to solve the issue of waste reduction by considering the current pandemic as an opportunity of developing new sustainable business models, rather than treating it just as an environmental concern. Development of COVID-waste treatment and valorization frameworks as the one proposed in this article will instigate the awareness and deployment of circular economy approach in the present and post-COVID era. We expect that the conscientious adoption of sustainable technologies, such as pyrolysis, will affirmatively lead us towards a circular economy paradigm.