Literature DB >> 34886915

Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the military: a qualitative systematic review of the literature from the past two decades and a new prioritizing injury model.

Stefan Sammito1,2, Vedran Hadzic3, Thomas Karakolis4, Karen R Kelly5, Susan P Proctor6,7, Ainars Stepens8, Graham White9, Wes O Zimmermann10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal injuries (MSkIs) are a leading cause of health care utilization, as well as limited duty and disability in the US military and other armed forces. MSkIs affect members of the military during initial training, operational training, and deployment and have a direct negative impact on overall troop readiness. Currently, a systematic overview of all risk factors for MSkIs in the military is not available.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out using the PubMed, Ovid/Medline, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2000 to September 10, 2019. Additionally, a reference list scan was performed (using the "snowball method"). Thereafter, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel scored the level of evidence per risk factor, and a classification of modifiable/non-modifiable was made.
RESULTS: In total, 176 original papers and 3 meta-analyses were included in the review. A list of 57 reported potential risk factors was formed. For 21 risk factors, the level of evidence was considered moderate or strong. Based on this literature review and an in-depth analysis, the expert panel developed a model to display the most relevant risk factors identified, introducing the idea of the "order of importance" and including concepts that are modifiable/non-modifiable, as well as extrinsic/intrinsic risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the qualitative systematic review of studies on risk factors for MSkIs in the military that has attempted to be all-inclusive. A total of 57 different potential risk factors were identified, and a new, prioritizing injury model was developed. This model may help us to understand risk factors that can be addressed, and in which order they should be prioritized when planning intervention strategies within military groups.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Injury; Intervention; Military; Musculoskeletal injuries; Prevention; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34886915      PMCID: PMC8662851          DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00357-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med Res        ISSN: 2054-9369


Background

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSkIs) are a leading cause of health care utilization, as well as limited duty and disability in the US military [1] and other armed forces [2-6]. MSkIs affect members of the military during initial training [7], operational training [8], and deployment [9], and have a direct negative impact on overall troop readiness. MSkIs have been shown to make up 50% of disease and non-battle injury (DNBI) casualties, and 43% of DNBI casualties requiring evacuation. Additionally, many service members sustain MSkIs, which are treated conservatively in the theater during deployment, but eventually require surgery following a combat tour [10, 11]. The consequences of MSkIs are reduced individual fitness and health [12], and ultimately discharge from military duty [13, 14]. As such, the prevention of MSkIs is considered a main target area to increase the readiness, performance, and health of military personnel. Approaches include the identification of risk factors and purposeful intervention strategies to reduce MSkIs. In recent decades, hundreds of original studies have been published with the goal of identifying risk factors for MSkIs, including narrative and systematic reviews on specific risk factors [15-26]. However, an overall summary of the published data on risk factors for MSkIs in the military is not available. Further, for several risk factors, such as sex, there is an ongoing debate on whether there is a direct association with an increased risk of MSkIs, or whether the association is indirect via a confounding risk factor [27]. Finally, there is no model that clarifies the relative order of importance of the risk factors for MSkIs in the military. Given the gaps in knowledge identified above and the fact that soldier readiness is of great importance to all allied militaries, the multidisciplinary NATO Science and Technology Organization (STO) Research Task Group (RTG) 283 on “Reducing musculoskeletal injuries” set out to perform a systematic review of risk factors for MSkIs in the military to address and discuss the facilitation of successful interventions.

Methods

A systematic literature search considering the PRISMA guidelines [28] was initiated using the PubMed, Ovid/Medline, and Web of Science databases with the search terms “(military) AND ((injury) OR (trauma)) AND ((basic training) OR (physical training))” with all MeSH terms (see details on Additional file 1) on September 10, 2019. The principal criterion for inclusion was that the study reported on risk factors for MSkIs in a military population. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a language other than English; studies without a risk factor evaluation; and studies published before January 1, 2000. Review articles (without a meta-analysis) were used to find the included original works (see below), but were not included as such in this review. Of the 1794 studies identified (after removing duplicates), 179 were selected for full-text analysis. After full-text analysis, 42 papers were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 19 studies were reviews and did not present new information. So far, a total of 118 original papers and 3 meta-analyses have been included. Moreover, to present a complete overview, a reference list scan (using the “snowball method”) [29] was performed on each of the 179 fully analyzed texts, including each of the 19 review articles. With this approach, an additional 283 studies were identified, of which 87 were excluded due to the publication date being before January 1, 2000. The remaining 196 papers were also read in full to determine relevance. If two studies reported on exactly the same population, only the publication that provided the most details was included. As a result, an additional 58 studies were included in this review, bringing the total to 176 original papers and 3 meta-analyses (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flowchart of the systematic review

Flowchart of the systematic review Once all the literature was identified, a list of all reported risk factors was created. Each original paper and meta-analysis was then assigned to a risk factor. If an original paper described multiple risk factors, it was assigned to every risk factor it reported. In the results section, a general description of all the included publications is provided first, followed by specific descriptions per risk factor. Risk factors were sorted into different groups (in alphabetical order): lifestyle factors, medical factors, occupational factors, physiological factors, social factors, and training factors. For each risk factor, an accompanying table was included that summarizes each aspect of the supporting studies: lead author; year of publication; country of origin; characteristics of the population examined (branch and unit/type of military activity); study type (retrospective or prospective); sample size of the population studied; and whether or not the study concluded that the risk factor was correlated to MSkIs (yes or no). In a number of publications, more than one risk factor was evaluated. Finally, the multidisciplinary expert panel (consisting of all coauthors of this review) classified the evidence supporting the association between a risk factor and MSkI into one of five categories: strong, moderate, weak, insufficient, or no evidence. For this classification, the expert panel took into account the results of the studies, as well as the number of participants and their professional experience in military MSkI injury prevention. In addition, the expert panel included a determination as to whether a risk factor would be considered modifiable or non-modifiable in the military context. A risk factor was defined as modifiable if a service member could influence it (e.g., to be a smoker) or if military authorities could influence it (e.g., by changing the training schedule or by providing other gear). Risk factors classified as non-modifiable are beyond personal control (e.g., the weather). Whether a risk factor is modifiable is a significant determinant for the application of intervention strategies. Based on the literature review and an in-depth analysis, the multidisciplinary expert panel developed a model to classify the different risk factors identified, introducing the concept of “order of importance” and including the notions of modifiable/non-modifiable and extrinsic/intrinsic risk factors.

Results

Of the 176 original papers, 101 came from investigations in the US Armed Forces. Additional investigations were conducted in the armed forces of the UK (19 studies), Israel (18 studies), and Finland (14 studies). Australia and Switzerland produced 4 studies each, China and Greece had 3 studies each, Germany had 2 studies, and Belgium, Denmark, India, Iran, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, and Sweden were represented by 1 study each. A majority of the studies examined risk factors in the army (113 studies), whereas there were considerably fewer studies conducted in the marines (16 studies), the air force (7 studies), the navy (5 studies), and the special operations forces (2 studies). Seven studies explored risk factors, including multiple armed services branches; 4 studies were conducted only among recruits or participants in academy training, and 22 studies did not include descriptions of the particular service branch. More than half of the studies (n = 101) chose a prospective study design, and the remaining 75 papers evaluated data retrospectively. The study populations ranged from 20 subjects [30] to 5,580,875 analyzed person-years [31]. In two studies [32, 33], no information about the underlying size of the population was reported. Less than half of the studies (n = 79) scrutinized populations of less than 1000 participants, while 27 studies had a population greater than 10,000 participants. A number of retrospective studies involved populations with over 100,000 participants [31, 34–51]. A large minority of the studies included both male and female military personnel (n = 51). In 33 studies, only male members were included, whereas 17 studies focused exclusively on women in the military. In most of the studies (n = 75), no specific information was given about the sex of the included participants.

Lifestyle factors

Alcohol intake

Nine studies focused on higher alcohol intake as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). Five studies were conducted in the US Army, 2 within the British Army, and 1 in Finland and in Greece. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 64 to 4139 participants. Three of the 9 studies identified alcohol intake as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 6 did not show a significant association between alcohol intake and MSkIs.
Table 1

Summary of studies that focused on alcohol intake, calcium intake, milk consumption, vegetable consumption, vegetarian diet, sleep time, and smoking as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Alcohol intake
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FNo
 Chatzipapas [53]2008Greecen/aActive dutyR64No
 Cosio-Lima [54]2013USAArmySergeants Major AcademyR149No
 Lappe [55]2005USAArmyRecruits BCTR4139 FYes (F)
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FYes (F)
 Robinson [57]2016UKArmyRecruitsP1810No
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214Yes
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
Calcium intake (low)
 Chatzipapas [53]2008Greecen/aActive dutyR64No
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MNo (M)
 Moran [62]2012IsraelArmyRecruits of elite combat unitP116No
 Moran [63]2012IsraelArmyElite combat unit BCTP74Yes
Milk consumption (low)
 Cosman [64]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP755 M, 136 FNo
 Moran [62]2012IsraelArmyRecruits of elite combat unitP116No
 Sanchez-Santos [652017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MYes (M)
Vegetables consumption
 Robinson [57]2016UKArmyRecruitsP1810No
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MNo (M)
Vegetarian diet
 Dash [66]2012IndiaArmyRecruitsP8570Yes
Sleep time (reduced)
 Kovcan [67]2019SloveniaArmyInfantry, active dutyR118 M, 11 FNo
 Wyss [68]2014SwitzerlandArmyRecruits BCTP1676Yes
Smoking
 Altarac [69]2000USAArmyRecruitsP187 M, 915 FYes
 Anderson [70]2015USAArmyLight Infantry BrigadeR2101Yes
 Anderson [71]2017USAArmyLight InfantryR4384 M, 363 FNo
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MYes
 Bedno [35]2019USAArmyRecruits BCTR238,772Yes
 Brooks [73]2019USAArmyRecruits BCTR1460 M, 540 FYes
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FYes
 Chatzipapas [53]2008Greecen/aActive dutyR64No
 Cosio-Lima [54]2013USAArmySergeants Major AcademyR149No
 Cosman [64]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP755 M, 136 FYes
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FNo
 Cowan [75]2011USAArmyRecruitsP7323Yes
 Davey [76]2015UKMarinesP1090 MYes
 Fallowfield [77]2018UKAir ForceRecruitsP990 M, 203 FYes
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MYes (less)
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfantry brigadesR4236 MNo
 Grier [79]2010USAMultipleR24,177 MYes
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FNo
 Knapik [81]2010USAAir ForceRecruits BCTP1042 M, 375 FYes
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP1838 M, 553 FYes##
 Knapik [83]2013USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P805No
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FYes
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677No
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FYes
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FYes (M), No (F)
 Korvala [89]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP192No
 Lappe [55]2005USAArmyRecruits BCTR4139 FYes
 Kovcan [67]2019SloveniaArmyInfantry, active dutyR118 M, 11 FYes
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FYes
 Lauder [90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 FNo (F)
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MYes
 Nagai [92]2017USAArmyAirborne DivP275Yes
 Pihlajamäki [93]2019Finlandn/aR4029 MNo
 Psaila [94]2017Maltan/aRecruits BCTP114 M, 13 FNo
 Rappole [95]2017USAArmyArmy BrigadeR1099Yes
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181Yes
 Reynolds [97]2002USAArmyConstruction engineers & Combat artillery soldiersP313No
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356Yes
 Robinson [57]2016UKArmyRecruitsP1810No
 Roos [99]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP651 MYes
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MNo
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MNo
 Scheinowitz [101]2017IsraelArmyRecruitsP350 FNo
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214No
 Sharma [102]2019UKArmyInfantry recruitsP562 MYes
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MYes
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
 Taanila [104]2015FinlandArmyConscriptsP1411 MYes
 Trone [105]2014USA

Marine Corp

Air Force

Army

Recruits BCTR900 M, 597 FYes
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MNo
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
 Wunderlin [107]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP230 MYes
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MNo

BCT basis combat training; n/a Not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Former smoking

Summary of studies that focused on alcohol intake, calcium intake, milk consumption, vegetable consumption, vegetarian diet, sleep time, and smoking as risk factors for MskIs Marine Corp Air Force Army BCT basis combat training; n/a Not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Former smoking There is insufficient scientific evidence for alcohol intake as a modifiable risk factor.

Calcium intake (low)

Four studies focused on low (daily) calcium intake as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). Three studies were conducted in the Israel Defense Force (IDF) and one in the Armed Forces of Greece. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 64 to 2306 participants. Only the study with one of the smallest populations identified low daily calcium intake as a risk factor for MSkIs. The other three studies, including one with more than 2000 participants, did not find a significant association. There is insufficient scientific evidence for low (daily) calcium intake as a modifiable risk factor.

Milk consumption (low)

Three studies focused on milk consumption as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). The research was conducted within the militaries of Israel, the USA, and the UK (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 116 to 1082 participants. Only one study identified low milk consumption as a risk factor for MSkIs; the other two studies did not find a significant association. There is insufficient scientific evidence for low milk consumption as a modifiable risk factor.

Vegetable consumption

Two studies focused on the amount of vegetables eaten (as measured via a self-report questionnaire) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). The research was conducted within different branches of the UK military. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 1082 to 1810 participants. Neither study found a significant association between the amount of vegetable consumption and MSkIs. There is no scientific evidence for the amount of vegetable consumption as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Vegetarian diet

Only one study focused on a vegetarian diet as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). This study was conducted within the Indian Army. In this study, with 8570 participants, a vegetarian diet was identified as a risk factor for stress fractures. There is weak scientific evidence for a vegetarian diet as a modifiable risk factor.

(Reduced) sleep time

Two studies focused on little time for sleep as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). These studies were conducted within the Army of Switzerland and the Army of Slovenia. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 129 to 1676 participants. A larger study identified little time for sleep as a risk factor for MSkIs; however, this was not observed within the smaller study. There is weak scientific evidence for little time for sleep as a modifiable risk factor.

Smoking

Fifty-four studies focused on smoking as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 1). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (32 studies); additional studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK (8 studies), Finland (5 studies), China, Israel, Switzerland (2 studies from each) and Greece, Malta and Slovenia (1 study from each nation). The study populations ranged from 64 to 238,772 participants. Twenty-seven studies identified smoking as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 23 studies did not find a significant association between smoking and MSkI. One study found a significant increase in MSkIs related to a lower level of smoking, and one study found that former smoking habits were a significant risk factor for MSkIs. In one study, the association between smoking and increased risk for MSkIs was found only for males (not for females). A meta-analysis, which included 18 studies, found that smoking increases the risk for MSkIs, for males by 26% (a low level of smoking) up to 84% (a high level of smoking) and for females by 30% (low level of smoking) up to 56% (high level of smoking) [24]. For both sexes together, the increased risk ranges from 27 to 71%. There is strong scientific evidence for smoking as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs. Smoking is associated with a 27–71% increased risk of MSkIs.

Medical factors

Current illness

The term “current illness” was used to describe the situation where an injured person was ill (e.g., with influenza at the time the MSkI occurred). There was only one study on current illness as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). The study was conducted in 2010 in the US Armed Forces. With 24,177 male participants, this study found a significant association between current illness and an increased risk for MSkIs. It must be noted that the risk factor “current illness” may represent a bias. Soldiers with an identified current illness are generally removed from active duty and training. This means that current illness is a risk factor mostly based on retrospective self-report by the service member.
Table 2

Summary of studies that focused on current illness, prior pregnancy, prescription of contraceptives, prescription of NSAIDs, previous MSkIs, serum iron/serum ferritin, and vitamin D status as risk factors for MSkIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Current illness
 Grier [79]2010USAMultipleR24,177 MYes (M)
Prescription of contraceptives
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP571 FNo
 Scheinowitz [101]2017IsraelArmyRecruitsP350 FNo
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo
Prescription of NSAID
 Hughes [50]2019USAArmyActive dutyR120,730Yes
Previous MSkI
 Cameron [110]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP630 M, 84 FYes
 Cosman [64]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP755 M, 136 FNo
 Evans [111]2005USAArmyR1532Yes
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite infantry soldierP77 MNo (M)
 Garnock [113]2018AustraliaNavyRecruitsP95 M, 39 FYes
 George [114]2012USAArmyCombat medicsP1230Yes
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MYes (M) (invers)
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323Yes
 Knapik [81]2010USAAir ForceRecruits BCTP1042 M, 375 FNo
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP1838 M, 553 FYes (M), No (F)
 Knapik [116]2013USAArmyCombat engineer enlisted traineesP1633Yes
 Knapik [83]2013USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P805No
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677Yes
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FNo (M), Yes (F)
 Kovcan [67]2019SloveniaArmyInfantry, active dutyR118 M, 11 FYes
 Kucera [117]2016USAArmyCadetsP9811Yes
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FNo (F)
 Lisman [118]2013USAMarinesOfficer candidate trainingP874Yes
 Monnier [119]2019SwedenMarinesTraining courseP48 M, 5 FYes
 Rice [120]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP147 MYes (M) (invers)
 Robinson [57]2016UKArmyRecruitsP1810Yes
 Roos [99]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP651 MYes (M)
 Roy [121]2014USAArmyActive dutyR625 FYes (F)
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214Yes
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FNo
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo (F)
 Taanila [123]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP944 MYes (M)
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MYes (M)
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660Yes
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MYes## (M)
Prior pregnancy
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP920 FYes
Serum iron/serum ferritin
 Merkel [124]2008IsraelArmyInfantry/non-combatant (medics)P83 M, 355 FYes
 Moran [125]2008IsraelArmyRecruitsP227 FYes (F)
Vitamin D status
 Burgi [126]2011USANavyRecruitsP2300 FYes (F)
 Davey [127]2016UKMarinesP1082 MYes (M)
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MYes (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MNo (M)

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females; NSAID non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Only for fractures

Summary of studies that focused on current illness, prior pregnancy, prescription of contraceptives, prescription of NSAIDs, previous MSkIs, serum iron/serum ferritin, and vitamin D status as risk factors for MSkIs BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females; NSAID non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Only for fractures There is weak scientific evidence for current illness as a non-modifiable risk factor.

The prescription of contraceptives

Four studies focused on the prescription of contraceptives as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (3 studies). An additional study was conducted within the IDF. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 350 to 2962 participants. None of the four studies identified the prescription of contraceptives as a risk factor for MSkIs. There is no scientific evidence for the prescription of contraceptives as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

The prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Only one study focused on the prescription of a NSAID as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). This study was conducted within the US Army. In this retrospective study, with 120,730 participants, the prescription of a NSAID was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs (specifically stress fractures). There may be a bias between NSAID use and increased risk for a stress fracture because with the medication, soldiers may have stayed in training longer and consequently were more likely to suffer a fracture. Therefore, this study also explored the relationship with a subset who were taking NSAIDs for non-pain or injury reasons and found a similar relationship with increased risk for MSkIs. There is weak scientific evidence for prescription for a NSAID as a modifiable risk factor.

Previous MSkIs

Thirty studies focused on previous MSkIs as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (18 studies); the remaining research was conducted within the militaries of the UK (3 studies), Israel and China (2 studies from each), Australia, Finland, Slovenia, Sweden, and Switzerland (1 study from each nation). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 53 to 83,323 participants. Nineteen of the 30 studies identified an earlier MSkI as a risk factor for MSkIs; 7 studies did not find a significant association. Two studies found a significant association only for one sex but not the other. The remaining two studies found that an earlier MSkI reduced the risk for MSkIs. There is strong scientific evidence for earlier MSkIs as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Prior pregnancy

Only one study focused on prior pregnancy as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). This study was conducted within the US Army. In this study, with 920 female participants, prior pregnancy > 7 months prior was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs. There is weak scientific evidence for prior pregnancy as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Serum iron/serum ferritin (lower)

Two studies focused on serum iron/serum ferritin as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). Both studies were conducted within the IDF. The sizes of the study populations were 227 and 438 participants. Both studies identified low serum iron/serum ferritin as a risk factor for MSkIs. There is weak scientific evidence for low serum iron/serum ferritin as a modifiable risk factor.

Vitamin D status [low level of 25(OH)D]

Four studies focused on vitamin D status as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 2). The studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK (2 studies), Israel, and the US (1 study from each country). The sizes of the populations of both UK studies [65, 127] were the same. The study populations ranged from 1082 to 2306 participants. Three studies identified low vitamin D status as a risk factor for MSkIs, while another study did not find a significant association. The two studies from the UK reported different outcomes. Davey et al. [127] reported a significant difference in vitamin D level for participants who have suffered a stress fracture when compared to a group that did not [(64.2 ± 28.2) nmol/L for participants with stress fracture vs. (78.6 ± 35.9) nmol/L for participants without a stress fracture, P = 0.004]. Alternatively, Sanchez-Santos et al. [65] presented the results as odds ratios with a cutoff value for a low level of vitamin D at 50 nmol/L. They found no difference in the likelihood of stress fractures between the groups above and below the vitamin D level cutoff (P = 0.077). In a meta-analysis by Dao et al. [23], it was reported that the mean serum 25(OH)D level was lower in stress fracture cases than in controls at the time of entry into basic training. The mean serum 25(OH)D level was also lower in the stress fracture cases at the time of stress fracture diagnosis. There is moderate scientific evidence for a low level of vitamin D status as a modifiable risk factor.

Occupational factors

Branch

Three studies focused on membership in different branches as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Two studies were conducted within the US Armed Forces and 1 within the Army of Finland. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 982 to 423,581 participants. All 3 studies identified membership to different branches as a risk factor for MSkIs.
Table 3

Summary of studies that focused on branch, length of service, load carriage, MOS, previous deployment, and status (active vs. reserve) as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Branch
 Cameron [44]2010USAMultipleActive dutyR423,581Yes
 Owens [128]2009USAArmy, Marines, Navy, Air ForceActive dutyR19,730Yes
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MYes (M)
Length of service
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323Yes
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677Yes
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584Yes
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FNo
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356No
 Schermann [129]2018IsraelArmyInfantry unit vs. female unit working with dogs##R7949Yes
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FYes
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
Load carriage
 Constantini [130]2010IsraelArmyBorder Police InfantryP1423 FYes (F)
 Knapik [83]2013USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P805Yes
 Konitzer [131]2008USAn/aActive duty#R863Yes
 Rappole [132]2018USAArmyActive dutyR368 FNo (F)
 Roy [133]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P246 M, 17 FYes
 Roy [134]2015USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#R536 M, 57 FYes
MOS
 Anderson [71]2017USAArmyLight InfantryR4384 M, 363 FNo
 Darakjy [8]2006USAArmyActive dutyP4101 M, 413 FYes
 Roy [135]2011USAArmyBrigade Combat TeamP3066 patient encountersYes
 Schermann [129]2018IsraelArmyInfantry unit vs. female unit working with dogsR7949Yes
 Schwartz [136]2018IsraelArmyCombat unitsR19,791 MYes (M)
 Sefton [137]2016USAArmyRecruits IETP1788 MYes (M)
 Sharma [138]2017UKArmyRecruitsP5708Yes
Previous deployment
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323Yes
 Konitzer [131]2008USAn/aActive duty#R863Yes
 Roy [121]2014USAArmyActive dutyR625 FYes (F)
 Skeehan [139]2009USAArmy, Marine, NavyActive duty#R3367No
Status (active vs. reserve)
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 f

No (M)

Yes (F)

 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FYes (invers)
 Skeehan [139]2009USAArmy, Marine, NavyActive duty#R3367Yes

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) Risk factor only for females; MOS Military occupational specialty

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##LOS examined in month of service

Summary of studies that focused on branch, length of service, load carriage, MOS, previous deployment, and status (active vs. reserve) as risk factors for MskIs No (M) Yes (F) BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) Risk factor only for females; MOS Military occupational specialty *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##LOS examined in month of service There is strong scientific evidence for branches as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

Length of service

Eight studies focused on the length of service as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Half of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (4 studies), and the remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (2 studies), Israel, and the UK (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 195 to 152,095 participants. Five studies identified that military servicemen and servicewomen with a longer length of service have an increased risk for MSkIs; 3 studies did not find a significant association. Two of the largest studies only examined conscripts (Kuikka et al. [36] and Mattila et al. [38]), with a small range of lengths of service, and found conflicting results. Hill et al. [115] included a broad range of active duty personnel and showed a strong association for military servicemen and women with more than 10 years of service for an increased risk of MSkIs. Reynolds et al. [98] and Wilkinson et al. [60] detected no association, but had only a small range of lengths of service. There is moderate scientific evidence for length of service as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Load carriage

Six studies focused on load carriage as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Most of the research was conducted in the US Armed Forces (5 studies); the remaining study was conducted within the IDF. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 263 to 1423 participants. Five studies identified body-borne load as a risk factor for MSkIs, with 3 of the 5 studies reporting load via self-report. One study found no association between load carriage and the risk for MSkIs. There is strong scientific evidence for body-borne load as a modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

Military occupational specialty (MOS)

Seven studies focused on military occupational specialties (MOS) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). Most of the research was conducted within the US Armed Forces, 2 studies were from the IDF, and only 1 study was from the military of the UK. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 1788 to 19,791 participants. All but one study (with light infantry) identified membership in different MOSs as a risk factor for MSkIs. There is strong scientific evidence for MOS as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

Previous deployment

Four studies focused on previous deployment as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). All 4 studies were conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 625 to 83,323 participants. Three of the 4 studies identified previous deployment as a risk factor for MSkI, and 1 study did not find a significant association. There is moderate scientific evidence for previous deployment as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Status (active vs. reserve)

Three studies focused on status (active vs. reserve) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 3). All 3 studies were conducted within the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 1902 to 3367 participants. All 3 studies identified status as a risk factor for MSkIs: 1 study only for women (when they are in the reserve instead of active duty), 1 for active personnel vs. reserve, and 1 for reserve vs. active personnel. There is no scientific evidence for being part of the reserve (instead of active duty) as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Physiological factors

Age

Sixty-five studies focused on age as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 4). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces, 8 within the military of the UK, and 7 within the military of Finland; the other studies were conducted within the militaries of China (3 studies), Israel (2 studies), Belgium, Greece, Iran, Poland, and Switzerland (1 study for each country). The study populations ranged from 44 to 5,580,875 participants. Thirty-three of the 65 studies identified older age as a risk factor for MSkIs (however, the definitions of older age differ across studies); 30 studies did not find a significant association between age and MSkIs, while 1 study found a significant rise in MSkIs for younger participants when compared to older participants. When only studies with a population of 1400 or more participants were taken into account (this represents 31 of the 65 studies), 23 studies revealed a significant association between age and an increased risk for MSkIs compared to only 8 studies that did not find a significant association. When only studies that had 5000 participants or more were considered, the relationship was 12 (significant association) vs. 1 (no association).
Table 4

Summary of studies that focused on age, ankle dorsiflexion, and balance as risk factors for MskI

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Age
 Anderson [70]2015USAArmyLight Infantry BrigadeR2101Yes
 Anderson [71]2017USAArmyLight InfantryR4384 M, 363 FYes
 Beck [140]2000USAMarinesP624 M, 693 FNo
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MYes (M)
 Cameron [44]2010USAMultipleActive dutyR423,581Yes
 Canham-Chervak [141]2000USAArmyRecruits BCTP655 M, 498 FNo
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FNo
 Cosio-Lima [54]2013USAArmySergeants Major AcademyR149No
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FNo (F)
 Cowan [75]2011USAArmyRecruitsP7323Yes
 Craig [40]2000USAArmyAirborne DivisionR242,949 aircraft existsYes (30 years +)
 Davey [76]2015UKMarinesP1090 MNo (M)
 Dixon [142]2019UKMarinesRecruitsP1065Yes (younger)
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfantry BrigadeR4236 MYes (M)
 Grier [79]2010USAMultipleR24,177 MYes (M)
 Havenetidis [143]2011Greecen/aRecruitsP253Yes
 Henderson [144]2000USAArmyCombat medicP439 M, 287 FYes
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323Yes
 Knapik [47]2012USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes
 Knapik [145]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1174 M, 898 FYes
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP1838 M, 553 FYes
 Knapik [146]2007USAArmyMechanicsR518 M, 43 FNo
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FNo
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677Yes
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FYes
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo
 Korvala [89]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP192Yes
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584Yes
 Lappe [55]2005USAArmyRecruits BCTR4139 FYes (F)
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FYes (F)
 Lauder [90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 FNo (F)
 Ma [147]2016Chinan/aR2479No
 Mahieu [148]2006Belgiumn/aRecruits Royal Military AcademyP69 MNo (M)
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FYes
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MYes (M)
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MNo (M)
 Nye [151]2016USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR67,525Yes
 Owens [152]2007USAn/aActive dutyR4451Yes
 Owens [128]2009USAArmy, Marines, Navy, Air ForceActive dutyR19,730Yes
 Parr [153]2015USAArmySpecial Operations ForcesP106No
 Pihlajamäki [93]2019Finlandn/aFull dutyR4029 MNo (M)
 Rabin [154]2014IsraelArmyRecruitsP70 MNo (M)
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181No
 Reynolds [97]2002USAArmyConstruction engineers & Combat artillery soldiersP313No
 Roos [99]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP651 MNo (M)
 Roy [133]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P246 M, 17 FNo
 Roy [121]2014USAArmyActive dutyR625 FYes (F)
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MNo (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MYes (M)
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214Yes
 Sefton [137]2016USAArmyRecruits IETP1788 MYes (M)
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo (F)
 Sharma [102]2019UKArmyInfantry recruitsP562 MNo (M)
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MNo (M)
 Skeehan [139]2009USAArmy, Marine, NavyActive duty#R3367No
 Sobhani [155]2015Irann/aRecruitsR181 MNo (M)
 Sormaala [39]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsR118,149No
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MYes (M)
 Trybulec [156]2016PolandArmyAirborne BrigadeR162 M, 3 FYes
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MNo (M)
 Waterman [31]2016USAMultipleActive DutyR5,580,875Yes
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660Yes
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MNo (M)
Ankle dorsiflexion (limited)
 Dixon [30]2006UKMarinesRecruitsR20No
 Rabin [154]2014IsraelArmyRecruitsP70 MNo (M)
Balance (low)
 Heebner [157]2017USAArmySpecial Operation ForcesP95No
 Sell [158]2014USASpecial Operation ForcesP226Yes

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment

Summary of studies that focused on age, ankle dorsiflexion, and balance as risk factors for MskI BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment There is moderate scientific evidence for age as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Ankle dorsiflexion (limited)

Only 2 studies focused on limited ankle dorsiflexion as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 4). One study was conducted within the IDF, and one in the armed forces of the UK. The sizes of the study populations were 20 and 70 participants, respectively. In both studies, limited ankle dorsiflexion was not significantly identified as a risk factor for MSkIs. There is no scientific evidence for limited ankle dorsiflexion as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Balance (low)

Two studies focused on low balance as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 4). These studies were conducted within the special operations forces of the US military. In the larger study, poor balance (measured as single-leg balance with the eyes open, and the eyes closed on a force plate) was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs, whereas in the other studies, no association was identified. There is weak scientific evidence for low balance as a modifiable risk factor.

BMI: in general

Fifty-two studies focused on BMI (in general) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). BMI in general means that the studies have looked at BMI without categorization (such as obese, overweight, underweight categories). This makes it very difficult to compare different study outcomes. Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (24 studies); 9 studies within the military of the UK, 6 within the Finnish armed forces, and 5 within the IDF. The remaining studies were conducted in the militaries of Switzerland (3 studies), Greece (2 studies), Australia, Belgium, and Malta (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 238,772 participants. Fourteen of the 52 studies identified BMI as a risk factor for MSkIs. Thirteen studies found that higher BMI was a risk factor; 1 study found that lower BMI was a risk factor. Thirty-five studies did not find a significant association between BMI and MSkIs, and 3 studies found that BMI is a risk factor for men, but not for women.
Table 5

Summary of studies that focused on BMI (in general), obesity, being overweight, and being underweight as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
BMI (in general)
 Allsopp [159]2003UKNavyRecruitsR1287 M, 354 FYes
 Beck [140]2000USAMarinesP624 M, 693 FYes (M), no (F)
 Bedno [35]2019USAArmyRecruits BCTR238,772Yes (M), no (F)
 Billings [160]2004USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR2006Yes
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FYes
 Burgi [126]2011USANavyRecruitsP2300 FNo (F)
 Cosio-Lima [54]2013USAArmySergeants Major AcademyR149No
 Davey [76]2015UKMarinesP1090 MNo (M)
 Garnock [113]2018AustraliaNavyRecruitsP95 M, 39 FNo
 George [114]2012USAArmyCombat medicsP1230Yes
 Havenetidis [162]2017GreeceArmyOfficer recruitsP268 MNo (M)
 Havenetidis [143]2011Greecen/aRecruitsP253No
 Jones [34]2017USAArmyRecruits BCTR143,398 M, 41,727 FYes
 Knapik [145]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1174 M, 898 FNo
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP1838 M, 553 FYes
 Knapik [146]2007USAArmyMechanicsR518 M, 43 FYes (M)
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FNo
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677No
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo
 Kodesh [163]2015Israeln/aCombat Fitness Instructor CourseP158 FNo
 Korvala [89]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP192Yes
 Kupferer [164]2014USAAir ForceTraineesR141No
 Lauder [90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 FYes (F)
 Mahieu [148]2006Belgiumn/aRecruits Royal Military AcademyP69 MNo
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FNo
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Moran [63]2012IsraelArmyElite combat unit BCTP74No (M)
 Moran [125]2008IsraelArmyRecruitsP227 FYes (F)
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MNo (M)
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MYes (M)
 Nye [151]2016USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR67,525No
 Parr [153]2015USAArmySpecial Operations ForcesP106No
 Pihlajamäki [93]2019Finlandn/aFull dutyR4029 MNo (M)
 Psaila [94]2017Maltan/aRecruits BCTP114 M, 13 FNo
 Rabin [154]2014IsraelArmyRecruitsP70 MNo (M)
 Rappole [95]2017USAArmyArmy BrigadeR1099Yes
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356No
 Rice [120]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP147 MYes (M, especially lower BMI)
 Roos [99]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP651 MNo (M)
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MNo (M)
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FNo
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo (F)
 Sharma [102]2019UKArmyInfantry recruitsP562 MNo (M)
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MNo (M)
 Sillanpää [51]2008Finlandn/aConscriptsR128,508 MNo (M)
 Sormaala [39]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsR118,149No
 Waterman [165]2010USAMilitary AcademyR10,511 person yearsYes (M), no (F)
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
 Wunderlin [107]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP230 MYes (M)
 Wyss [68]2014SwitzerlandArmyRecruits BCTP1676NO
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)
 Anderson [70]2015USAArmyLight Infantry BrigadeR2101Yes
 AMSA [43]2000USAArmyActive dutyR387,536Yes
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MYes (M)
 Billings [160]2004USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR2006Yes
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FYes
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FNo (F)
 Cowan [75]2011USAArmyRecruitsP7323Yes
 Gundlach [166]2012GermanyArmyActive dutyP410Yes
 Henderson [144]2000USAArmyCombat medicP439 M, 287 FYes
 Hruby [48]2016USAArmyR736,608Yes
 Jones [34]2017USAArmyRecruits BCTR143,398 M, 41,727 FYes
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584Yes
 Ma [147]2016Chinan/aR2479Yes
 Packnett [41]2011USAArmyRecruits BCTR217,468 M, 47,813 FYes
 Rappole [95]2017USAArmyArmy BrigadeR1099Yes
 Taanila [123]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP944 MYes (M)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MYes (M)
Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m2)
 Anderson [70]2015USAArmyLight Infantry BrigadeR2101Yes
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MNo (M)
 Billings [160]2004USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR2006Yes
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1156 M, 746 FYes
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FNo (F)
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfantry BrigadeR4236 MYes (M)
 Gundlach [166]2012GermanyArmyActive dutyP410Yes
 Henderson [144]2000USAArmyCombat medicP439 M, 287 FYes
 Hruby [48]2016USAArmyR736,608Yes
 Knapik [47]2012USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes (M), no (F)
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584No
 Ma [147]2016Chinan/aR2479Yes
 Mattila [37]2007Finlandn/aConscriptsR133,943 M, 2044 FYes
 Rappole [95]2017USAArmyArmy BrigadeR1099 MYes (M)
 Taanila [123]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP944 MYes (M)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2)
 AMSA [43]2000USAArmyActive dutyR387,536Yes
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MYes (M)
 Billings [160]2004USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR2006Yes
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FNo (F)
 Finestone [167]2008IsraelArmyLight Infantry trainingP36 M, 99 FYes
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfantry brigadeR4236 MYes (M)
 Hruby [48]2016USAArmyR736,608Yes
 Jones [34]2017USAArmyRecruits BCTR143,398 M, 41,727 FYes
 Knapik [47]2012USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584No
 Packnett [41]2011USAArmyRecruits BCTR217,468 M, 47,813 FYes
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181Yes
 Taanila [104]2015FinlandArmyConscriptsP1411 MYes (M)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MYes (M)

BMI body mass index; BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R Retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI)

Summary of studies that focused on BMI (in general), obesity, being overweight, and being underweight as risk factors for MskIs BMI body mass index; BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R Retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI) There is insufficient scientific evidence for BMI in general as a modifiable risk factor.

BMI: obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)

Seventeen studies focused on obesity as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (12 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (3 studies), China, and Germany (1 study for each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 410 to 387,536 participants. Sixteen studies identified obesity as a risk factor for MSkIs; only one study, with 1568 participants, did not find a significant association. There is strong scientific evidence for obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

BMI: overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m2)

Sixteen studies focused on being overweight as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (10 studies); the remaining studies were conducted within the Finnish armed forces (4 studies) and within the militaries of China and Germany (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 410 to 736,608 participants. Eleven studies identified being overweight as a risk factor for MSkIs; 4 studies did not find a significant association. One study found an association for men but not for women. It is important to acknowledge that these findings are based on BMI alone; none of the 16 studies analyzed the body composition of the included soldiers in detail (i.e., body fat or muscle mass). There is strong scientific evidence for being overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30 kg/m2) as a modifiable risk factor for MSkI.

BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2)

Fifteen studies focused on being underweight as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 5). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (10 studies); the remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (3 studies), China, and Israel (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 135 to 736,608 participants. Twelve studies identified being underweight as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 3 studies did not find a significant association. There is strong scientific evidence for being underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Body fat (higher)

Eight studies focused on body fat as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 6). The research was conducted within the armies of Greece (2 studies), Iran (1 study), Israel (2 studies), and the US (3 studies); the studies included different methods for measuring body fat (e.g., self-report, circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, 4-site skinfold test). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 583,651 participants. Six of the 8 studies identified a higher percentage of body fat as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 2 studies did not find a significant association. A retrospective study by Knapik et al. [46], with more than a half million participants, showed a relationship between a greater percentage of body fat and a higher risk for MSkIs.
Table 6

Summary of studies that focused on body fat, body height, and body weight as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Body fat (higher)
 Anderson [71]2017USAArmyLight InfantryR4384 M, 363 FYes
 Havenetidis [162]2017GreeceArmyOfficer recruitsP268 MYes (M)
 Havenetidis [143]2011Greecen/aRecruitsP253Yes
 Knapik [46]2018USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes
 Kodesh [163]2015Israeln/aCombat Fitness Instructor CourseP158 FYes (F)
 Krauss [168]2017USAArmyRecruits BCTR1900 FYes (F)
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Sobhani [155]2015Irann/aRecruitsR181 MNo (M)
Body height (higher)
 Beck [140]2000USAMarinesP624 M, 693 FYes (M), no (F)
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FNo
 Cosio-Lima [54]2013USAArmySergeants Major AcademyR149No
 Davey [76]2015UKMarinesP1090 MNo (M)
 Fallowfield [77]2018UKAir ForceRecruitsP990 M, 203 FYes
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite infantry soldierP77 MNo (M)
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MNo (M)
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FYes (F)
 Knapik [47]2012USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes
 Knapik [145]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1174 M, 898 FNo
 Knapik [146]2007USAArmyMechanicsR518 M, 43 FNo
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677No
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo
 Kodesh [163]2015Israeln/aCombat Fitness Instructor CourseP158 FNo
 Korvala [89]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP192Yes
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584No
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FNo (F)
 Ma [147]2016Chinan/aR2479No
 Mahieu [148]2006Belgiumn/aRecruits Royal Military AcademyP69 MNo (M)
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FNo
 Monnier [119]2019SwedenMarinesTraining courseP48 M, 5 FYes
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Moran [63]2012IsraelArmyElite combat unit BCTP74No
 Moran [125]2008IsraelArmyRecruitsP227 FYes (F)
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MNo (M)
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MNo (M)
 Parr [153]2015USAArmySpecial Operations ForcesP106No
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181No
 Reynolds [97]2002USAArmyConstruction engineers & Combat artillery soldiersP313Yes (to be shorter)
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356No
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MNo (M)
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo (F)
 Sharma [102]2019UKArmyInfantry recruitsP562 MNo (M)
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MNo (M)
 Sillanpää [51]2008Finlandn/aConscriptsR128,508 MYes (M)
 Sobhani [155]2015Irann/aRecruitsR181 MNo (M)
 Sormaala [39]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsR118,149No
 Sulsky [42]2018USAArmyRecruits BCTR278,045 M, 55,302 FYes
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
 Trybulec [156]2016PolandArmyAirborne BrigadeR162 M, 3 FNo
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MNo (M)
 Waterman [165]2010USAMilitary AcademyR10,511 person yearsYes
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MNo (M)
Body weight (higher)
 Beck [140]2000USAMarinesP624 M, 693 FYes (M), no (F)
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FNo
 Davey [76]2015UKMarinesP1090 MNo (M)
 Davey [127]2016UKMarinesP1082 MNo (M)
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite infantry soldierP77 MNo (M)
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MYes (M)
 Havenetidis [162]2017GreeceArmyOfficer recruitsP268 MYes (M)
 Hughes [169]2008AustraliaSpecial Operation ForcesActive dutyR554 descentsYes
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FYes (F)
 Knapik [47]2012USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes (invers)
 Knapik [145]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1174 M, 898 FNo
 Knapik [146]2007USAArmyMechanicsR518 M, 43 FYes
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677Yes
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo (M), yes (F)
 Kodesh [163]2015Israeln/aCombat Fitness Instructor CourseP158 FNo (F)
 Korvala [89]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP192Yes
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FYes (F)
 Ma [147]2016Chinan/aR2479No
 Mahieu [148]2006Belgiumn/aRecruits Royal Military AcademyP69 MNo (M)
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Moran [63]2012IsraelArmyElite combat unit BCTP74No
 Monnier [119]2019SwedenMarinesTraining courseP48 M, 5 FNo
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MNo (M)
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MNo (M)
 Parr [153]2015USAArmySpecial Operations ForcesP106No
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181No
 Reynolds [97]2002USAArmyConstruction engineers & Combat artillery soldiersP313Yes
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356No
 Rice [120]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP147 MYes (M) (invers)
 Robinson [57]2016UKArmyRecruitsP1810Yes
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MNo (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MYes (M) (invers)
 Schermann [129]2018IsraelArmyInfantry unit vs. female unit working with dogsR7949Yes
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo (F)
 Sharma [102]2019UKArmyInfantry recruitsP562 MNo (M)
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MNo (M)
 Sillanpää [51]2008Finlandn/aConscriptsR128,508 MYes (M)
 Sobhani [155]2015Irann/aRecruitsR181 MNo (M)
 Sormaala [39]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsR118,149No
 Trybulec [156]2016PolandArmyAirborne BrigadeR162 M, 3 FNo
 Waterman [165]2010USAMilitary AcademyR10,511 person yearsYes
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MNo (M)

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI)

Summary of studies that focused on body fat, body height, and body weight as risk factors for MskIs BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI) There is strong scientific evidence for higher body fat as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Body height (higher)

Forty-six studies focused on body height as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 6). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (18 studies); 8 within the military of the UK, 7 within the military of Finland, and 6 studies within the IDF; the other studies were conducted within the military of China (3 studies), Belgium, Iran, Poland, and Sweden (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 583,651 participants. Eight of the 46 studies identified a taller stature as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 35 studies did not find a significant association. One study found a significant increase in MSkIs associated with a taller stature for men but not for women, and one study found that a shorter stature was a significant risk factor for MSkIs. There is insufficient scientific evidence for body height as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Body weight (higher)

Forty-five studies focused on body weight as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 6). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (16 studies); 11 studies within the military of the UK, and 6 within the IDF. The remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland (4 studies), China (2 studies), Australia, Belgium, Greece, Iran, Poland, and Sweden (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 583,651 participants. Thirteen of the 45 studies identified a higher body weight as a risk factor for MSkIs, 27 did not find a significant association between body weight and MSkIs, and 3 studies found a significant increase in MSkIs for a lower body weight. Two studies found different outcomes regarding the participants’ sex. There is insufficient scientific evidence for higher body weight as a modifiable risk factor.

Bone (mineral) density (low)

Three studies focused on low bone (mineral) density as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). All 3 studies were conducted in the US Army. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 230 to 891 participants. Two studies identified low bone (mineral) density as a risk factor for MSkIs; one study did not find a significant association.
Table 7

Summary of studies that focused on bone (mineral) density, external rotation of the hip, flexibility, and foot type as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Bone (mineral) density (low)
 Cosman [64]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP755 M, 136 FYes
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FNo
 Lauder[90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 FYes (F)
External rotation of the hip (higher)
 Burne [170]2004AustraliaMilitary AcademyP122 M, 25 FNo
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite infantry soldierP77 MNo (M)
 Garnock [113]2018AustraliaNavyRecruitsP95 M, 39 FYes
 Rauh [171]2010USAMarinesRecruits BCTP748 FYes (F)
 Sobhani [155]2015Irann/aRecruitsR181 MYes (M)
Flexibility (lower)
 Heebner [157]2017USAArmySpecial Operations ForcesP95No
 Keenan [172]2017USAMultipleSpecial ForcesP726Yes#,##
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FNo#
 Nagai [92]2017USAArmyAirborne DivP275No###
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MNo (M)
Foot type
 Esterman [173]2005AustraliaAir ForceRecruitsP230No
 Hetsroni [174]2006IsraelArmyRecruitsP405 MNo&
 Levy [175]2006USAn/aMilitary Academy CadetsR431 M, 73 FYes&&
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MYes (M)&&&,&&&&
 Psaila [94]2017Maltan/aRecruits BCTP114 M, 13 FNo
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356Yes&&&&&
 Rice [120]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP147 MYes (M)&&&
 Yates [176]2004UKNavyRecruitsP84 M, 40 FYes

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Hamstring-flexibility; ##Gastrocnemius-soleus flexibility; ###Several muscle groups (shoulder, trunk rotation, hip extension, active knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantarflexion); &For any type for foot pronation; &&Pes planus; &&&Width malleolar; &&&&Arch index, corrected calf girth; &&&&&Forefoot varus

Summary of studies that focused on bone (mineral) density, external rotation of the hip, flexibility, and foot type as risk factors for MskIs BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Hamstring-flexibility; ##Gastrocnemius-soleus flexibility; ###Several muscle groups (shoulder, trunk rotation, hip extension, active knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantarflexion); &For any type for foot pronation; &&Pes planus; &&&Width malleolar; &&&&Arch index, corrected calf girth; &&&&&Forefoot varus There is insufficient scientific evidence for low bone (mineral) density as a non-modifiable risk factor.

External rotation of the hip (higher)

Five studies focused on external rotation (range of motion) of the hip as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). The research was conducted within the militaries of Australia (2 studies), Iran, Israel, and the US (each 1 study). The range of motion of the hip was measured in different ways across the identified studies. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 77 to 748 participants. Three studies (including the two with the most participants) identified that higher external rotation of the hip is a risk factor for MSkIs; two studies did not find a significant association. There is insufficient scientific evidence for higher external rotation of the hip as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Flexibility (lower)

Five studies focused on flexibility at different anatomical locations as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (4 studies), and 1 study was conducted by armed forces from China. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 95 to 805 participants. Only 1 study identified low flexibility as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association. There is insufficient scientific evidence for lower flexibility as a modifiable risk factor.

Foot type

Eight studies focused on foot type (e.g., anatomic differences such as a pes planus, a wide malleolar or a forefoot varus) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 7). The studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK (3 studies), USA (2 studies), Australia, Israel, and Malta (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 124 to 504 participants. Five studies identified different foot types as a risk factor for MSkI, while 3 studies did not. There is moderate scientific evidence for different foot types as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Genetic factors

Two studies focused on genetic factors as risk factors for MSkIs (Table 8). One study was conducted within the military of China and 1 within the military of Finland. The study populations ranged from 192 to 1398 participants. Both studies identified an association between certain genetic factors and an increased risk for MSkIs. The analyzed genetic factors were different between the 2 studies, so a comparison was not possible. Korvala et al. [89] examined genes involved in bone metabolism and pathology, and Zhao et al. [108] looked at a specific growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) polymorphism between recruits with and without stress fractures.
Table 8

Summary of studies that focused on genetic factors, late menarche, muscular strength, and physical fitness as risk factors for MSkIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Genetic factors
 Korvala [89]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP192Yes
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MYes (M)
Late menarche
 Cosman [64]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP136 FYes
 Knapik [81]2010USAAir ForceRecruits BCTP375 FNo
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP571 FNo
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FNo
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FNo
 Trone [105]2014USAMarine Corp Air Force ArmyRecruits BCTR597 FYes
Muscular strength (lower)
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FNo
 Heebner [157]2017USAArmySpecial Operation ForcesP95Yes
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584Yes
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FYes
 Nagai [92]2017USAArmyAirborne DivP275No
 Parr [153]2015USAArmySpecial Operations ForcesP106No##
 Roy [177]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#R593Yes
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MYes (M)
 Sillanpää [51]2008Finlandn/aConscriptsR128,508 MNo (M)
 Wunderlin [107]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP230 MYes (M)
Physical fitness (low)
 Allsopp [159]2003UKNavyRecruitsR1287 M, 354 FYes
 Anderson [70]2015USAArmyLight Infantry BrigadeR2101Yes
 Anderson [71]2017USAArmyLight InfantryR4384 M, 363 FYes
 Beck [140]2000USAMarinesP624 M, 693 FYes
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MYes (M)
 Bedno [35]2019USAArmyRecruits BCTR238,772No (M), yes (F)
 Bell [27]2000USAArmyRecruitsP861Yes
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FYes
 Brooks [73]2019USAArmyRecruits BCTR1460 M, 540 FYes
 Canham-Chervak [141]2000USAArmyRecruits BCTP655 M, 498 FYes
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1156 M, 746 FYes
 Cosio-Lima [54]2013USAArmySergeants Major AcademyR149No
 Cosman [64]2013USAArmyMilitary AcademyP755 M, 136 FNo
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FYes (F)
 Davey [76]2015UKMarinesP1090 MNo (M)
 Davey [127]2016UKMarinesP1082 MNo (M)
 Fallowfield [77]2018UKAir ForceRecruitsP990 M, 203 FYes
 George [114]2012USAArmyCombat medicsP1230No
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfantry brigadesR4236 MYes (M)
 Grier [178]2011USAArmyOrdinance school studentsP4255Yes (M), no (F)
 Hall [179]2017UKArmyRecruitsR3050 MYes (M)
 Hauret [180]2018USAArmyRecruits BCTP1181Yes (endurance)
 Heller [181]2020USAArmyRecruits BCTR227 FYes (F)
 Jones [34]2017USAArmyRecruits BCTR143,398 M, 41,727 FYes
 Keenan [172]2017USAMultipleSpecial ForcesP726Yes
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FNo (F)
 Knapik [81]2010USAAir ForceRecruits BCTP1042 M, 375 FYes
 Knapik [145]2006USAArmyRecruits BCTP1174 M, 898 FYes
 Knapik [83]2013USAArmyBrigade combat team#P805No
 Knapik [182]2003USAArmyR1414 M, 1166 FYes
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FYes
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677Yes
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FYes
 Knapik [183]2009USAArmyRecruits BCTP2689 M, 1263 FYes
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FYes
 Kodesh [163]2015Israeln/aCombat Fitness Instructor CourseP158 FYes (F) (running)
 Krauss [168]2017USAArmyRecruits BCTR1900 FYes
 Kuikka [36]2013FinlandArmyConscriptsR128,584No
 Kupferer [164]2014USAAir ForceTraineesR141Yes
 Lisman [118]2013USAMarinesOfficer candidate trainingP874Yes (running)
 Martin [184]2018USAArmyLight infantry divisionR6865Yes
 Mattila [37]2007Finlandn/aConscriptsR133,943 M, 2044 FYes (invers)
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FYes
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Müller-Schilling [185]2019GermanyArmyRecruitsP774Yes
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MNo (M)
 Nye [151]2016USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR67,525Yes
 Psaila [94]2017Maltan/aRecruits BCTP114 M, 13 FYes
 Rauh [186]2006USAMarinesP824 FYes (F)
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181Yes
 Reynolds [97]2002USAArmyConstruction engineers & Combat artillery soldiersP313No
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356No
 Robinson [57]2016UKArmyRecruitsP1810Yes (running)
 Rosendal [187]2003Denmarkn/aConscripts BCTP330Yes
 Ruohola [100]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsP756 MYes (M)
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MNo (M)
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214Yes
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FNo
 Sefton [137]2016USAArmyRecruits IETP1788 MYes (M)
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FYes (F)
 Sharma [102]2019UKArmyInfantry recruitsP562 MYes (M)
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MYes (M)
 Sillanpää [51]2008Finlandn/aConscriptsR128,508 MNo (M)
 Sormaala [39]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsR118,149No
 Taanila [123]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP944 MYes (M)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MYes (M)
 Trone [105]2014USA

Marine Corp

Air Force

Army

Recruits BCTR900 M, 597 FYes
 Välimäki [188]2005FinlandArmyConscriptsP179Yes
 Waterman [165]2010USAMilitary AcademyR10,511 person yearsYes (invers)
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
 Wyss [68]2014SwitzerlandArmyRecruits BCTP1676No
 Wyss [189]2012SwitzerlandArmyR459Yes
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MNo (M)

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Shoulder, knee, low back

Summary of studies that focused on genetic factors, late menarche, muscular strength, and physical fitness as risk factors for MSkIs Marine Corp Air Force Army BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Shoulder, knee, low back There is weak scientific evidence for genetic factors as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Late menarche

Seven studies focused on late menarche as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 8). All of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 136 to 3758 participants. Two studies identified late menarche as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association. There is no scientific evidence for late menarche as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Muscular strength (lower)

Eleven studies focused on muscular strength as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 8), although it was measured in different ways depending on the study. Most of the research was conducted within the US Army (5 studies) or the military of Finland (4 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Switzerland and the UK (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 95 to 152,095 participants. Six studies identified low muscular strength as a risk factor for MSkIs, while 5 studies did not find a significant association. Notably, two studies with more than 100,000 participants found an inverse association between muscular strength and the risk for MSkIs, the other study found no association, but this study focused on traumatic patellar luxation. There is moderate scientific evidence for lower muscular strength as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical fitness (low)

Seventy-four studies focused on physical fitness, based on results from physical fitness tests, as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 8). Most of the research was conducted in different branches of the US Armed Forces (45 studies); 12 studies were conducted within the military of the UK, and 9 were conducted within the military of Finland. The remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Israel and Switzerland (2 studies each) as well as China, Denmark, Germany, and Malta (1 study each). The size of the study population ranged from 44 to 238,772 participants. Fifty studies identified low physical fitness as a risk factor for MSkIs. Out of these 50 studies, 4 studies explored low physical endurance. Two studies found an association between low physical fitness and an increased risk for MSkI, but not for both sexes, and 20 studies did not find a significant association. In two studies, there was an inverse effect; high physical fitness was associated with an increased risk for MSkIs. A meta-analysis that included 27 publications found that the relative risk is 2.34 (95% CI 2.02—2.70) for injuries incurred during training, as well as for personnel who perform in the bottom quartile or quintile when compared to their peers in the top quartile or quintile of physical fitness [25]. There is strong scientific evidence for low physical fitness as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs. Low physical fitness has an increased relative risk of 2.34 for MSkIs.

Secondary amenorrhea

Eight studies focused on having no menses in the last months (secondary amenorrhea) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). All of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 86 to 2962 participants. Three studies identified secondary amenorrhea as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association.
Table 9

Summary of studies that focused on secondary amenorrhea, sex, plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait), range of tibial rotation, tibia length, and waist circumference as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Secondary amenorrhea
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP746 FNo
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FNo
 Knapik [81]2010USAAir ForceRecruits BCTP375 FNo
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP553 FYes
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP571 FNo
 Rauh [186]2006USAMarinesP824 FYes
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FYes
Sex (female)
 Allsopp [159]2003UKNavyRecruitsR1287 M, 354 FYes
 Anderson [71]2017USAArmyLight InfantryR4384 M, 363 FNo
 Bell [27]2000USAArmyRecruitsP861No
 Billings [160]2004USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR2006Yes
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FYes
 Bulathsinhala [49]2017USAArmyActive dutyR1,299,332Yes
 Burne [170]2004AustraliaMilitary AcademyP122 M, 25 FYes
 Canham-Chervak [141]2000USAArmyRecruits BCTP655 M, 498 FYes
 Craig [40]2000USAArmyAirborne DivisionR242,949 aircraft exitsYes
 Darakjy [8]2006USAArmyActive dutyP4101 M, 413 FYes
 Fallowfield [77]2018UKAir ForceRecruitsP990 M, 203 FYes
 Finestone [167]2008IsraelArmyLight infantry trainingP36 M, 99 FNo
 Finestone [190]2014IsraelArmyCadetsP78 M, 227 FYes
 Gam [191]2005Israeln/aRecruitsP375 M, 138 FYes
 Garnock [113]2018AustraliaNavyRecruitsP95 M, 39 FYes
 Gemmell [192]2002UKArmyRecruitsR11,907 M, 1483 FYes
 George [114]2012USAArmyCombat medicsP1230Yes
 Havenetidis [143]2011Greecen/aRecruitsP253Yes
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323No
 Itskoviz [32]2011IsraelArmyRecruitsRn/aYes
 Knapik [81]2010USAAir ForceRecruits BCTP1042 M, 375 FNo
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP1838 M, 553 FYes
 Knapik [83]2013USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P805Yes (to be male)
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FYes
 Knapik [46]2018USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes
 Kupferer [164]2014USAAir ForceTraineesR141Yes
 Mattila [37]2007Finlandn/aConscriptsR133,943 M, 2044 FYes
 Mattila [38]2007FinlandArmyConscriptsP149,750 M, 2345 FYes
 Montain [45]2013USAArmyRecruits BCTR421,461 M, 90,141 FYes
 Nye [151]2016USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR67,525Yes
 Owens [128]2009USAArmy, Marines, Navy, Air ForceActive dutyR19,730Yes
 Roy [133]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P246 M, 17 FYes
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FNo
 Snedecor [193]2000USAAir ForceRecruitsR8656 M, 5250 FYes
 Sormaala [39]2006Finlandn/aRecruitsR118,149No
 Waterman [165]2010USAMilitary AcademyR10,511 person yearsYes
 Waterman [31]2016USAMultipleActive DutyR5,580,875Yes
 Yates [176]2004UKNavyRecruitsP84 M, 40 FYes
Plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait)
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite infantry soldierP77 MNo (M)
 Mahieu [148]2006Belgiumn/aRecruits Royal Military AcademyP69 MYes (M)
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MNo (M)
 Rice [120]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP147 MYes$ (M)
 Sharma [103]2011UKArmyInfantry recruitsP468 MYes (M)
Range of tibial rotation during running (lower)
 Nunns [150]2016UKMarinesRecruitsP160 MYes (M)
Tibia length (shorter)
 Beck [140]2000USAMarinesP624 M, 693 FYes
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite infantry soldierP77 MYes (M)
 Goss [194]2006USAMilitary AcademyCadetsR1100No##
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44No
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MNo (M)###
Waist circumference (higher)
 Kupferer [164]2014USAAir ForceTraineesR141No
 Nye [151]2016USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR67,525No
 Taanila [123]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP944 MYes (M)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
 Taanila [104]2015FinlandArmyConscriptsP1411 MYes (M)

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Limb length inequality; ###Leg length; $Pressure on digital V

Summary of studies that focused on secondary amenorrhea, sex, plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait), range of tibial rotation, tibia length, and waist circumference as risk factors for MskIs BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Deployment; ##Limb length inequality; ###Leg length; $Pressure on digital V There is insufficient scientific evidence for secondary amenorrhea as a modifiable risk factor.

Sex (female)

Thirty-eight studies focused on sex as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (24 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Israel and the UK (4 studies each), Finland (3 studies), Australia (2 studies), and Greece (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 124 to 5,580,875 participants. Twenty-nine studies identified being female as a risk factor for MSkIs (when compared to males), 8 studies did not find a significant association between sex and MSkIs, and 1 study found a significant increase in MSkIs for males when compared to females. There is strong scientific evidence that being female is a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait)

Five studies focused on plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the UK military (3 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Belgium and Israel (1 study from each country). The study populations ranged from 69 to 468 participants. All studies included males only. Two studies identified a particular foot pressure pattern while walking as a risk factor for MSkIs, and two studies did not find a significant association. In one study, this association was only found for a pressure pattern involving the little toe (digitus V). There is insufficient scientific evidence for specific plantar pressure patterns during walking as a modifiable risk factor.

Range of tibial rotation during running (lower)

Only one study focused on the range of tibial rotation (calculated as the difference between peak internal and external rotation) during running as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). This study was conducted within the UK Marines. In this prospective study with 160 male participants, a lower range of tibial rotation during running (the difference between peak internal and external lower leg segment rotation) was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs. There is weak scientific evidence for a lower range of tibial rotation during running as a modifiable risk factor.

Tibia length (shorter)

Four studies focused on tibia length as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). The research was conducted within the IDF (2 studies) and within the US Marines (1 study) and within the army of China (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 44 to 1398 participants. Two studies identified a shorter tibia length as a risk factor for MSkIs, and the two studies did not find a significant association. Hence, one of these studies reported leg length, not tibia length. There is insufficient scientific evidence for shorter tibia length as a modifiable risk factor.

Waist circumference (higher)

Five studies focused on high circumference as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 9). Three studies were conducted within the military of Finland, and two were carried out within the US Air Force. The size of the study populations ranged from 141 to 67,525 participants. Two studies from Finland identified high circumference as a risk factor for MSkIs, while the other 3 studies did not find a significant association. Especially, the retrospective study by Nye et al. [151], with 67,525 participants, found no association between high waist circumference and an increased risk for MSkIs. There is insufficient scientific evidence for a high waist circumference as a modifiable risk factor.

Social factors

Education (lower)

Thirteen studies focused on education as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). Nearly half of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (6 studies); the others were conducted within the militaries of Finland (4 studies), the UK (2 studies), and Israel (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 205 to 4029 participants. Five of the 13 studies identified a lower level of education as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 8 studies did not find a significant association between lower education and MSkIs. The definitions of lower education are different among the studies examined.
Table 10

Summary of studies that focused on education, marital status, race/ethnicity, rank, season of the year, and UV index as risk factors for MskIs

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Education (lower)
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FYes
 Fallowfield [77]2018UKAir ForceRecruitsP990 M, 203 FYes
 George [114]2012USAArmyCombat medicsP1230No
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MNo (M)
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FNo
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo
 Munnoch [91]2007UKMarinesP1115 MNo (M)
 Pihlajamäki [93]2019Finlandn/aFull dutyR4029 MNo (M)
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356Yes
 Taanila [123]2010Finlandn/aConscriptsP944 MYes (M)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MYes (M)
 Taanila [104]2015FinlandArmyConscriptsP1411 MNo (M)
Marital status
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FNo
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323Yes
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FNo
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FYes#
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214No
Race/ethnicity
 Bedno [72]2013USAArmyIETP8456 MNo (M)1
 Billings [160]2004USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR2006Yes2
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FYes3
 Bulathsinhala [49]2017USAArmyActive dutyR1,299,332Yes4
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FNo5
 Cowan [74]2012USAArmyTraineesP1568 FNo (F)1
 Cowan [75]2011USAArmyRecruitsP7323No1
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MNo (M)6
 Grier [79]2010USAMultipleR24,177 MYes7
 Hughes [50]2019USAArmyActive dutyR120,730Yes8
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FYes9
 Knapik [47]2012USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes10
 Knapik [146]2007USAArmyMechanicsR518 M, 43 FNo11
 Knapik [46]2018USAArmyRecruits BCTR475,745 M, 107,906 FYes10
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FNo12
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FNo13
 Lappe [55]2005USAArmyRecruits BCTR4139 FYes14
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FYes15
 Lauder [90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 FNo (F)16
 Montain [45]2013USAArmyRecruits BCTR421,461 M, 90,141 FYes17
 Owens [152]2007USAn/aActive dutyR4451Yes18
 Owens [128]2009USAArmy, Marines, Navy, Air ForceActive dutyR19,730Yes19
 Reynolds [96]2009USAArmyInfantryP181Yes20
 Reynolds [97]2002USAArmyConstruction engineers & Combat artillery soldiersP313Yes21
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356Yes22
 Waterman [31]2016USAMultipleActive DutyR5,580,875Yes19
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No23
Rank (lower)
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 FNo
 Craig [40]2000USAArmyAirborne DivisionR242,949 aircraft exitsYes
 Darakjy [8]2006USAArmyActive dutyP4101 M, 413 FYes
 Grier [79]2010USAMultipleR24,177 MNo (M)
 Hill [115]2013USAArmyActive dutyR83,323Yes
 Lauder [90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 FNo (F)
 Owens [128]2009USAArmy, Marines, Navy, Air ForceActive dutyR19,730Yes
 Reynolds [98]2000USAMarinesWinter mountain trainingP356Yes
 Roy [133]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat Team##P246 M, 17 FNo
 Skeehan [139]2009USAArmy, Marine, NavyActive duty##R3367Yes
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
Season of the year (summer time)
 Jones [33]2008USAArmyOrdinance school studentsPn/aYes$
 Knapik [195]2002USAArmyRecruits BCTR1543 M, 1025 FYes$
 Mattila [196]2006Finlandn/aP213,500 person yearsYes$$
 Taanila [197]2009FinlandArmyConscriptsP955 MYes (M)$
UV index (higher)
 Montain [45]2013USAArmyRecruits BCTR421,461 M, 90,141 FYes

BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

*Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Divorced or widowed; ##Deployment; $Summer; $$Summer and autumn

1White vs. Black vs. other; 2Other > African American > Hispanic > Caucasian; 3Caucasian > others; 4Non-Hispanic white > Hispanic > American Indian/Native Alaskan > Asian > Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander > Non-Hispanic Black > others; 5White vs. Black vs. Hispanic; 6Ashkenazi vs. non-Ashkenazi; 7Black > (Native, Causasian, Asian, Hispanic, other); 8White > Black (and Asian, American Indian, other); 9Hispanic and Asian and other > white and African American; 10White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, other > Black; 11Caucasian vs. African American vs. other; 12White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Black and others; 13White, Hispanic, Black, Other; 14Hispanic and White > Black, American Indians, Asian; 15All others races and White > Black; 16Hispanic and Asian > African-American or Caucasian; 17White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, others > Black; 18Black vs. White and others; 19White > others > Black; 20Caucasian > African-American, Hispanic, others; 21Caucasian was identified as a risk factor; 22White was identified as a risk factor; 23White vs. others

Summary of studies that focused on education, marital status, race/ethnicity, rank, season of the year, and UV index as risk factors for MskIs BCT basis combat training; IET initial entry training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI); #Divorced or widowed; ##Deployment; $Summer; $$Summer and autumn 1White vs. Black vs. other; 2Other > African American > Hispanic > Caucasian; 3Caucasian > others; 4Non-Hispanic white > Hispanic > American Indian/Native Alaskan > Asian > Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander > Non-Hispanic Black > others; 5White vs. Black vs. Hispanic; 6Ashkenazi vs. non-Ashkenazi; 7Black > (Native, Causasian, Asian, Hispanic, other); 8White > Black (and Asian, American Indian, other); 9Hispanic and Asian and other > white and African American; 10White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, other > Black; 11Caucasian vs. African American vs. other; 12White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Black and others; 13White, Hispanic, Black, Other; 14Hispanic and White > Black, American Indians, Asian; 15All others races and White > Black; 16Hispanic and Asian > African-American or Caucasian; 17White, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, others > Black; 18Black vs. White and others; 19White > others > Black; 20Caucasian > African-American, Hispanic, others; 21Caucasian was identified as a risk factor; 22White was identified as a risk factor; 23White vs. others There is weak scientific evidence for a lower level of education as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Marital status

Six studies focused on marital status as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). All of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (mostly in the army). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 205 to 83,323 participants. Only one study (with the largest number of participants examined) identified being married as a risk factor for MSkI. Another study identified being divorced or widowed as a risk factor for MSkIs. The remaining 4 studies did not find a significant association between marital status and MSkIs. There is insufficient scientific evidence for marital status as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Race/ethnicity

Twenty-seven studies focused on race/ethnicity as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (24 studies); 2 studies were conducted within the militaries of the UK, and 1 was conducted in Israel. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 86 to 5,580,875 participants. Seventeen studies identified race/ethnicity as a risk factor for MSkIs, while 10 studies did not find a significant association. When only studies with more than 10,000 participants were taken into account (9 studies, total: 8,640,581 participants), all studies found an association between race/ethnicity and the risk for MSkIs, but the findings were contradictory in that there was no clear association as to which race/ethnicity was at the highest risk. There is strong scientific evidence for race/ethnicity as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Rank (lower)

Eleven studies focused on rank as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). All except one of the studies were conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces, and the exception was conducted within the British Army. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 230 to 242,949 participants or aircraft exits. Six studies identified as having a lower rank as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 5 studies did not find a significant association between rank and MSkIs (3 of the 5 had less than 1000 participants). There is weak scientific evidence for lower rank as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Seasons of the year (summertime)

Four studies focused on the seasons of the year as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). Two studies were conducted within the Finnish armed forces and two within the US Army. The study populations ranged from 955 to 2568 participants, and one study examined 213,500 person-years. All 4 studies identified the effect of the season of the year as a risk factor for MSkIs, with a higher risk in the summer months. There is strong scientific evidence for the season of the year (summertime) as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

UV index (higher)

Only one study focused on the UV index (a surrogate for vitamin D exposure) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 10). This study was conducted within the US Army. In this retrospective study, with 511,602 participants, a higher UV index at a recruit’s home before basic combat training (BCT) was identified as a risk factor for MSkIs during BCT. The relative risk reduction for a lower UV index was small (0.92 and 0.89 vs. 1.00, P < 0.01). There is weak scientific evidence for a higher UV index as a non-modifiable risk factor.

Training factors

Equipment: running shoes

Only one study focused on running shoes as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). This study was conducted within the US Armed Forces. In this prospective study, with 827 participants, no association between the kinds of running shoes and an increased risk for MSkIs could be identified.
Table 11

Summary of studies that focused on running shoes, participation in sports before military service, time available and participation rate in physical training, personal non-military training, unit training, training program content, and site as risk factors for MSkI

StudyPublication yearCountryBranchesUnit/trainingStudy typenRisk factor*
Running shoes
 Helton [198]2019USAMilitary AcademyCadetsP827No
Participation in sport before military service (no or low)
 Canham-Chervak [52]2006USAArmyRecruitsP1156 M, 746 fYes
 Dash [66]2012IndiaArmyRecruitsP8570Yes
 Finestone [112]2011IsraelArmyElite Infantry soldierP77 MYes (only for ball sports)
 Garnock [113]2018AustraliaNavyRecruitsP95 M, 39 FNo (running)
 Kelly [80]2000USANavyRecruits BCTR86 FNo (F)
 Knapik [82]2013USAArmyArmy military police trainingP1838 M, 553 FYes
 Knapik [116]2013USAArmyCombat engineer enlisted traineesP1633Yes
 Knapik [85]2001USAArmyRecruitsP182 M, 168 FNo
 Knapik [87]2008USAArmyRecruits BCTP2147 M, 920 FYes (M), no (F)
 Knapik [88]2009USAMarinesRecruits BCTP840 M, 571 FYes (M), no (F)
 Lappe [55]2005USAArmyRecruits BCTR4139 FYes (F)
 Lappe [56]2001USAArmyRecruits BCTP3758 FYes (F)
 Lisman [118]2013USAMarinesOfficer candidate trainingP874Yes
 Monnier [119]2019SwedenMarinesTraining courseP48 M, 5 FNo
 Pihlajamäki [93]2019Finlandn/aFull dutyR4029 MYes (M)
 Rauh [186]2006USAMarinesP824 FYes (F)
 Rosendal [187]2003Denmarkn/aConscripts BCTP330Yes
 Sanchez-Santos [65]2017UKMarinesRecruitsP1082 MYes (M) (invers)
 Scheinowitz [101]2017IsraelArmyRecruitsP350 FNo (F)
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FNo
 Taanila [104]2015FinlandArmyConscriptsP1411 MYes (M)
 Trone [105]2014USA

Marine Corp

Air Force

Army

Recruits BCTR900 M, 597 FYes
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MYes (M)
 Zhao [108]2016ChinaArmyRecruitsP1398 MYes (M)
Time available for taking part in physical training (low)
 Knapik [86]2008USAArmyParatrooper trainingR1677No
 Wyss [68]2014SwitzerlandArmyRecruits BCTP1676Yes
Participation rate in physical training (low)
 Knapik [84]2007USAArmyBandR159 M, 46 FYes
 Martin [184]2018USAArmyLight Infantry divisionR6865Yes
 Roy [133]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat Team#P246 M, 17 FNo
 Roy [121]2014USAArmyActive dutyR625 FYes (F)
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FNo
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No
Personal non-military training (high amounts)
 George [114]2012USAArmyCombat medicsP1230No
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfantry brigadeR4236 MYes (M) (invers)
 Lisman [118]2013USAMarinesOfficer candidate trainingP874No
 Moran [62]2012IsraelArmyRecruits of elite combat unitP116Yes
 Rappole [132]2018USAArmyActive dutyR368 FYes (F) (invers)
 Shaffer [109]2006USAMarinesRecruits BCTR2962 FYes (F)
 Taanila [59]2012FinlandArmyConscriptsP982 MNo (M)
 Wyss [68]2014SwitzerlandArmyRecruits BCTP1676Yes
Unit training (high amounts)
 Grier [78]2017USAArmyInfatery brigadesR4236 MYes (M)
 Knapik [199]2011USAArmyRecruits BCTP2072Yes
 Lauder [90]2000USAArmyActive dutyP230 (F)Yes (F)
 Lisman [118]2013USAMarinesOfficer candidate trainingP874No
 Moran [149]2013IsraelArmyRecruitsP44Yes
 Nye [151]2016USAAir ForceRecruits BCTR67,525Yes
 Roos [99]2015SwitzerlandArmyRecruitsP651 MYes (M)
 Roy [177]2012USAArmyBrigade Combat TeamR593No
 Schuh [200]2017USAArmyInfantry soldiersR831Yes
 Scott [122]2015USAArmyReserve Officer TrainingR165 M, 30 FYes
 Wang [106]2003Chinan/aMilitary Police Forces TrainingR805 MNo (M)
Training program content
 Knapik [201]2005USAArmyRecruits BCTP1142 M, 825 FYes
 Kovcan [67]2019SloveniaArmyInfantry, active dutyR118 M, 11 FNo
 Rappole [132]2018USAArmyActive dutyR368 FYes1
 Waterman [165]2010USAMilitary Academy StudentsR10,511 person yearsYes
Training site
 Blacker [161]2008UKArmyRecruitsR11,937 M, 1480 FYes
 Givon [61]2000Israeln/aP2306 MNo (M)
 Grier [79]2010USAMultipleR24,177 MYes (M)
 Jones [33]2008USAArmyOrdinance school studentsPn/aYes
 Schneider [58]2000USAArmyAirborne DivR1214No
 Wilkinson [60]2009UKArmyInfantryP660No

BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females

#Deployment; 1Unit resistance training was associated with higher risk of MSkI; *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI)

Summary of studies that focused on running shoes, participation in sports before military service, time available and participation rate in physical training, personal non-military training, unit training, training program content, and site as risk factors for MSkI Marine Corp Air Force Army BCT basis combat training; n/a not available; R retrospective study; P prospective study; M male; F female; (M) risk factor only for males; (F) risk factor only for females #Deployment; 1Unit resistance training was associated with higher risk of MSkI; *Risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries (MSkI) There is no scientific evidence for the kinds of running shoes as a modifiable risk factor.

Participation in sports before military service (no or low)

Twenty-four studies focused on a history of participation in sports before military service as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted among recruits or those new to military service within different branches of the US Armed Forces (13 studies). The militaries of China, Finland, and Israel conducted 2 studies each; the remaining studies were conducted within the militaries of Australia, Denmark, India, Sweden, and the UK (1 study each). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 53 to 8570 participants. Fifteen studies identified no or low participation in sports before military service time as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 6 studies (all with fewer than 350 participants) did not find a significant association. In two studies, an association was found only for men, and in another study, an inverse association was found (higher participation in a sport before military service was a risk factor for MSkIs). There is strong scientific evidence for no or low participation in sports before military service time as a non-modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Physical training: available participation time (low)

Two studies focused on the amount of time available to take part in physical training as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). The research was conducted within the US Army (1 study) and the army of Switzerland (1 study). The sizes of the study populations were 1677 and 1676 participants. The study from Switzerland found an association between having little time for physical training and an increased risk for MSkIs, while the study from the US military did not show a significant association. There is insufficient scientific evidence for having little time available for taking part in physical training as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical training: participation rate (low)

Six studies focused on participation in physical training as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (5 studies). An additional study was conducted within the military of the UK. The study populations ranged from 195 to 6865 participants. Three studies identified a low participation rate in physical training as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 3 studies did not find a significant association. There is insufficient scientific evidence for the participation rate in physical training as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical training: personnel, non-military training (high amounts)

Eight studies focused on high amounts of training during free time (non-military training) as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted within the army and the Marines Corp of the US Armed Forces (5 studies in total). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of Finland, Israel, and Switzerland (1 study from each country). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 116 to 4236 participants. Three studies identified a high amount of personal training during free time as a risk factor for MSkIs, and 3 studies did not find a significant association. Two studies found an inverse effect; a low amount of personal training was associated with an increased risk of MSkIs. There is insufficient scientific evidence for high amounts of personnel training during free time as a modifiable risk factor.

Physical training: unit training (high amount)

Eleven studies focused on physical training during unit training as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Most of the research was conducted within different branches of the US Armed Forces (8 studies). Additional studies were conducted within the militaries of China, Israel, and Switzerland (1 study from each). The study populations ranged from 44 to 67,525 participants. Eight studies identified a high amount of training during unit training as a risk factor for MSkIs, whereas 3 studies did not find a significant association. There is strong scientific evidence for high amounts of training during unit training as a modifiable risk factor for MSkIs.

Training program content

Four studies focused on different training program content as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). Three studies were conducted within the US Armed Forces and 1 in the Army of Slovenia. The sizes of the study populations ranged from 129 to 1967 participants. One study included a total of 10,511 person-years. Three studies identified that different training program content could be a risk factor for MSkIs, and the smallest study found no association. There is weak scientific evidence for training program content as a modifiable risk factor.

Training site

Six studies focused on the training site as a risk factor for MSkIs (Table 11). The studies were conducted within the militaries of the US Armed Forces (3 studies), the UK (2 studies), and Israel (1 study). The sizes of the study populations ranged from 660 to 24,177 participants. Three studies identified the training site as a risk factor for MSkIs (two of these studies had more than 10,000 participants), and 3 studies did not find a significant association between the training site and MSkIs. It should be taken into account that the training site is a combination of many different factors (e.g., training situation, climate, infrastructure, etc.), so it is very difficult to identify the true factor that influenced the MSkI risk. There is weak scientific evidence for training sites as a possibly modifiable risk factor.

Risk factor classification

In sum, 57 potential risk factors for MSkIs in the military were identified. Twenty-one factors were classified as risk factors with a strong or moderate association with an increased risk for MSkIs. For 14 other potential risk factors, an association was possible, but the evidence in the scientific literature was considered weak. For the final 22 potential risk factors, the evaluation showed either insufficient evidence or no evidence. As such, they cannot be classified as risk factors for an increased risk for MSkIs at this time (Table 12).
Table 12

Summary of all factors and categorization in five scientific evidence grades (sorted alphabetically)

StrongModerateWeakInsufficientNo
Body fat (higher) (m)Age (nm)Balance (low) (m)Alcohol intake (m)Ankle dorsiflexion (limited) (nm)
Branch (nm)Foot type (nm)Current illness (nm)Available participation time (low) (m)Body height (higher) (nm)
Load carriage (m)Length of service (nm)Genetic factors (nm)BMI in general (m)Equipment: running shoes (m)
Military occupational specialty (nm)Muscular strength (lower) (m)Prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (m)Body weight (higher) (m)Late menarche (nm)
Obesity (m)Previous deployment (nm)Prior pregnancy (nm)Bone (mineral) density (low) (nm)Prescription of contraceptive (m)
Overweight (m)Vitamin D status (low) (m)Range of tibial rotation during running (lower) (m)Calcium intake (low) (m)Status (active vs. reserve) (nm)
Participation in sports before military service (no or low) (nm)Rank (lower) (nm)Education (lower) (nm)Vegetables consumption (m)
Physical fitness (low) (m)Serum iron/serum ferritin (lower) (m)External rotation of hip (higher) (nm)
Previous MSkI (nm)Sleep time (reduced) (m)Flexibility (lower) (m)
Race/ethnicity (nm)Training program content (m)Marital status (nm)
Season of the year (summer time) (nm)Training site (m)Milk consumption (low) (m)
Sex (female) (nm)UV index (higher) (nm)Participation rate in physical training (m)
Smoking (m)Vegetarian diet (m)Personal non-military training (high amounts) (m)
Underweight (m)Waist circumference (higher) (m)Plantar pressure assessment (of walking gait)
Unit training (high amount) (m)Secondary amenorrhoe (m)
Tibial length (shorter) (m)

m modifiable; nm non-modifiable

Summary of all factors and categorization in five scientific evidence grades (sorted alphabetically) m modifiable; nm non-modifiable Based on this systematic literature review and an in-depth analysis, the NATO HFM-283 Research Task Group developed a model to classify the different risk factors identified. The classification model was based upon the rationale that some risk factors directly increase MSkI risk, whereas others merely increase the risk for MSkIs indirectly as a cofactor. As an example of a direct factor (1st order), high amounts of training during unit training increase the total volume of load placed upon the biological tissues of the soldier, directly resulting in injury. Alternatively, as an example of a cofactor, low vitamin D levels may lead to lower bone density, which may result in lower tissue resilience, which in turn may cause an MSkI due to the training load now exceeding the soldier’s reduced tissue capacity. The term “order” was used to classify how close each risk factor was to a direct cause of injury. A 1st-order risk factor was thought to be most closely related to injury, whereas a 3rd-order factor was thought to follow a path through multiple cofactors. Table 12 shows all risk factors categorized as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd order of importance. Additionally, the model includes the established concepts of modifiable/non-modifiable and extrinsic/intrinsic risk factors. This prioritizing classification model may guide the planning and implementation of intervention strategies, introducing the notion that a larger risk reduction can likely be achieved if risk factors in a higher order are targeted (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Injury model with a classification in 1st, 2nd and 3rd order

Injury model with a classification in 1st, 2nd and 3rd order

Discussion

This review is the qualitative systematic review of studies on risk factors for MSkIs in the military that has attempted to be all-inclusive. With a total of 179 original papers and 3 meta-analyses from the past two decades, a very large number of studies on MSkIs in the military were included. A total of 57 different risk factors were identified and evaluated. The approach used in this study identified more risk factors for MSkIs in the military than previously reported [15-26]. The aim was to have an overview of all risk factors in one place. Further, the project is one of the first to include the classification of risk factors for MSkIs in the military into modifiable or non-modifiable categories. This additional distinction (modifiable vs. non-modifiable) helps us to understand which risk factors can be addressed and which ones cannot be addressed when an intervention is planned. In addition to listing all potential risk factors, the members of the multidisciplinary expert panel assessed the combined evidence presented for each risk factor on a five-grade scale (strong evidence to no evidence). The number of participants (e.g., > 10,000 subjects) significantly influenced the evaluation of available evidence. Some classifications of available evidence had to be made based on a small number of studies with a small number of participants. The final rating also included the subjective professional experience (opinion) of the experts on the panel. This review introduces a new injury model for the military, incorporating the established principles of modifiable vs. non-modifiable and intrinsic vs. extrinsic risk factors. The model clearly illustrates differences between risk factors; some increase the risk for MSkIs directly (1st order), whereas others influence the injury risk only indirectly (2nd or 3rd order). The model may explain why many of the interventions that have been attempted over the past decades to reduce MSkIs were not successful. In fact, a systematic review of successful interventions in reducing MSkIs in the military [6] shows that the only successful interventions are those that target 1st- and 2nd-order modifiable risk factors (i.e., in the upper half of the model). Hence, most of the scientific publications are from the US Armed Forces, with studies conducted by other countries much less frequently. As such, the findings may not be generalizable across all nations. In addition, most studies focused on one branch of the armed forces—the army—which might not be representative of all service branches. Transferring the information from one country to another or from one military branch to another must be done with great caution. Even with the very broad systematic approach used in this review, no studies on psychological, cognitive, and/or behavioral risk factors for MSkIs in the military could be identified. In civilian sports, these risk factors have been reported for several years [202, 203]. It is possible that the search terms used in this review did not allow for psychological factors to be identified or the psychosocial aspects of injuries. This review has several limitations. First, the method used is a variation of the strict PRISMA protocol for systematic reviews. The group of coauthors decided that the topic at hand deserved a broad approach, including all possible risk factors and all military studies, even those with a potentially poor scientific design. In addition, it was decided to include the multidisciplinary, professional experience of the group as a subjective element in assessing the level of evidence per risk factor reported. Second, all studies before 2000 were excluded. This was decided because training schedules and conditions in the militaries have changed significantly over the past two decades and anticipated that including studies from before 2000 would not yield additional, currently relevant insights. Third, this review did not include studies on risk factors for MSkIs in civilian sports activities. Although some of the risk factors for civilian sports injuries are the same, the military training environment has many unique aspects that make risk factors for MSkIs not comparable to civilian sports. Fourth, differences in how the risk factors were measured (e.g., self-report vs. direct measurements) or the potential interrelationships between risk factors (e.g., that the strong evidence for sex as a risk factor may be related to differences in the percentage of body fat or previous physical activity before service between the sexes) were not considered when assigning the level of evidence for each risk factor. However, these issues were taken into account when depicting the 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-order level of the risk factors in the model. Fifth, this review did not include calculated effect sizes or a meta-analysis of every risk factor. Of course, this could further enhance the scientific value of the current work. The authors propose that future scientific evaluations can now be done, concentrating on the risk factors that have been identified as high order and modifiable in this work.

Conclusions

This systematic review presents an all-inclusive, graded overview of risk factors for MSkIs in the military. Experts with a multidisciplinary background, from a total of seven nations as part of the NATO Research Task Group, introduced a new prioritizing injury model for the military. The model provides a foundation for understanding which risk factors would be most important to address and in which order when an intervention is planned. Additional file 1. MESH search term.
  193 in total

1.  Comparison of injury rates between cadets with limb length inequalities and matched control subjects over 1 year of military training and athletic participation.

Authors:  Donald Lee Goss; Josef H Moore; Erin M Slivka; Brian S Hatler
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Injuries and injury risk factors among members of the United States Army Band.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Sarah B Jones; Salima Darakjy; Keith G Hauret; Remington Nevin; Tyson Grier; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Cigarette smoking and exercise-related injuries among young men and women.

Authors:  M Altarac; J W Gardner; R M Popovich; R Potter; J J Knapik; B H Jones
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Stress fracture risk factors in basic combat training.

Authors:  J Knapik; S J Montain; S McGraw; T Grier; M Ely; B H Jones
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Risk factors associated with self-reported training-related injury before arrival at the US army ordnance school.

Authors:  T L Grier; J J Knapik; S Canada; M Canham-Chervak; B H Jones
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  Biomechanical and lifestyle risk factors for medial tibia stress syndrome in army recruits: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jagannath Sharma; Jim Golby; Julie Greeves; Iain R Spears
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  A description of injuries in men and women while serving in Afghanistan.

Authors:  Tanja C Roy; Bradley M Ritland; Marilyn A Sharp
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Injury and fitness outcomes during implementation of physical readiness training.

Authors:  J J Knapik; K G Hauret; S Arnold; M Canham-Chervak; A J Mansfield; E L Hoedebecke; D McMillian
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Self-reported smoking and musculoskeletal overuse injury among male and female U.S. Marine Corps recruits.

Authors:  Daniel W Trone; Daniel J Cipriani; Rema Raman; Debra L Wingard; Richard A Shaffer; Carol A Macera
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Regular physical exercise before entering military service may protect young adult men from fatigue fractures.

Authors:  Harri Pihlajamäki; Mickael Parviainen; Heikki Kyröläinen; Hannu Kautiainen; Ilkka Kiviranta
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  4 in total

1.  International society of sports nutrition position stand: tactical athlete nutrition.

Authors:  Drew E Gonzalez; Matthew J McAllister; Hunter S Waldman; Arny A Ferrando; Jill Joyce; Nicholas D Barringer; J Jay Dawes; Adam J Kieffer; Travis Harvey; Chad M Kerksick; Jeffrey R Stout; Tim N Ziegenfuss; Annette Zapp; Jamie L Tartar; Jeffery L Heileson; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Douglas S Kalman; Bill I Campbell; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.948

2.  Do we even lift, bros?

Authors:  Mihai Ciocîrlan
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Effects of Copenhagen Adduction Exercise on Muscle Architecture and Adductor Flexibility.

Authors:  Diego Alonso-Fernández; Rosana Fernández-Rodríguez; Yaiza Taboada-Iglesias; Águeda Gutiérrez-Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Assessment of the Level of Physical Activity and Body Mass Index of Soldiers of the Polish Air Force.

Authors:  Andrzej Tomczak; Anna Anyżewska; Jerzy Bertrandt; Tomasz Lepionka; Artur Kruszewski; Agata Gaździńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.