| Literature DB >> 34885672 |
Khadija Hassan1,2, Blondelle Matio Kemkuignou1,2, Marc Stadler1,2.
Abstract
In the search for novel anti-infectives from natural sources, fungi, in particular basidiomycetes, have proven to still harbor so much potential in terms of secondary metabolites diversity. There have been numerous reports on isolating numerous secondary metabolites from genus Laetiporus. This study reports on two new triterpenoids, laetiporins C and D, and four known triterpenes from the fruiting body of L. sulphureus. The structures of the isolated compounds were elucidated based on their 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic data in combination with high-resolution electrospray mass spectrometric (HR-ESIMS) data. Laetiporin C exhibited weak antifungal activity against Mucor hiemalis. Furthermore, the compounds showed weak antiproliferative activity against the mouse fibroblast L929 and human cancer cell lines, including KB-3-1, A431, MCF-7, PC-3 and A549.Entities:
Keywords: Laetiporus sp.; antimicrobial; antiproliferative; triterpenoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885672 PMCID: PMC8658958 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1LC–UV/Vis chromatogram of the crude extract from the fruiting body (diode array detection at 200–640 nm). Stationary phase: C18 Acquity UPLC BEH column; for gradient and other details on the experimental setup, see the Experimental section; 1–6: Major metabolites detected (chemical structures see Figure 2) The green diagonal line indicates the gradient (% of acetonitrile).
Figure 2Chemical structures of compounds 1–6 isolated from Laetiporus sulphureus.
13C and 1H-NMR spectroscopic data (1H 700 MHZ, 13C 175 MHZ in DMSO-d6, δ in ppm) for compounds 1 and 2.
| Pos. | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35.2, CH2 | α:1.10 (m) a | 35.4, CH2 | α: 1.52 (m) a |
| 2 | 27.6, CH2 | 1.48 (m) a | 34.0, CH2 | α: 2.52(m) b |
| 3 | 76.7, CH | 3.00 (br dd), | 216.3, C | - |
| 4 | 38.5, C | - | 46.6, C | - |
| 5 | 50.0, CH | 0.92 (m) a | 50.5, CH | 1.50, m |
| 6 | 17.9, CH2 | α:1.41 (m) a | 19.0, CH2 | α:1.50 (m) a |
| 7 | 26.5, CH2 | 2.11 (m)a | 26.4, CH2 | 2.15 (m) a |
| 8 | 133.9, C | - | 134.7, C | - |
| 9 | 134.0, C | - | 132.7, C | - |
| 10 | 36.6, C | - | 36.5, C | - |
| 11 | 20.1, CH2 | α: 1.87 (m) a | 20.2, CH2 | 1.94 (m) a |
| 12 | 29.0, CH2 | α:1.29 (m) a | 29.1, CH2 | α:1.28 (m) a |
| 13 | 44.1, C | - | 44.1, C | - |
| 14 | 50.8, C | - | 50.9, C | - |
| 15 | 71.0, CH | 4.01, (dd), | 71.0, CH | 4.04, (br dd), |
| 16 | 37.7, CH2 | α: 1.82 (m) a | 37.7, CH2 | α: 1.84 (m) a |
| 17 | 45.3, CH | 2.01 (m) a | 45.3, CH | 2.03 (m) a |
| 18 | 15.8, CH3 | 0.70 (s) | 16.2, CH3 | 0.74 (s) |
| 19 | 18.9, CH3 | 0.90 (s) | 18.3, CH3 | 1.02 (s) |
| 20 | 48.1, CH | 2.02 (m) a | 48.0, CH | 2.04 (m) a |
| 21 | 176.8,C | - | 176.8,C | - |
| 22 | 29.9, CH | 2.15 (m) a | 29.9, CH | 2.15 (m) a |
| 23 | 120.6, CH | 5.09 (t), | 120.6, CH | 5.11 (t), |
| 24 | 146.3, C | - | 146.4, C | - |
| 25 | 31.4, CH | 2.36 (sep) | 31.4, CH | 2.36 (m) |
| 26 | 21.9, CH3 | 0.94 (d), | 21.9, CH3 | 0.94 (d) |
| 27 | 21.8, CH3 | 0.94 (d), | 21.8, CH3 | 0.94 (d) J = 6.71 |
| 28 | 57.5, CH2 | 3.98 (br d), | 57.5, CH2 | 3.99 (dd) |
| 29 | 28.1, CH3 | 0.90 (s) | 26.1, CH3 | 1.00 (s) |
| 30 | 15.8, CH3 | 0.70 (s) | 20.9, CH3 | 0.96 (s) |
| 31 | 17.4, CH3 | 0.81 (s) | 17.5, CH3 | 0.85 (s) |
| 3-OH | - | 4.30 (d) | - | - |
| 15-OH | - | 4.30 (d) | - | 4.34 (d) |
a Signals partially obscured, b Overlapping with solvent peak.
Figure 3HMBC, COSY, and ROESY correlations of compound 1.