| Literature DB >> 34885536 |
Mahnoush Beygisangchin1,2, Suraya Abdul Rashid1, Suhaidi Shafie2,3, Amir Reza Sadrolhosseini4.
Abstract
The effects of different dopants on the synthesis, optical, electrical and thermal features of polyaniline were investigated. Polyaniline (PANI) doped with p-toluene sulfonic acid (PANI-PTSA), camphor sulphonic acid (PANI-CSA), acetic acid (PANI-acetic acid) and hydrochloric acid (PANI-HCl) was synthesized through the oxidative chemical polymerization of aniline under acidic conditions at ambient temperature. Fourier transform infrared light, X-ray diffraction, UV-visible spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, photoluminescence spectroscopy and electrical analysis were used to define physical and structural features, bandgap values, electrical conductivity and type and degree of doping, respectively. Tauc calculation reveals the optical band gaps of PANI-PTSA, PANI-CSA, PANI-acetic acid and PANI-HCl at 3.1, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.9 eV, respectively. With the increase in dopant size, crystallinity is reduced, and interchain separations and d-spacing are strengthened. The estimated conductivity values of PANI-PTSA, PANI-CSA, PANI-acetic acid and PANI-HCl are 3.84 × 101, 2.92 × 101, 2.50 × 10-2, and 2.44 × 10-2 S·cm-1, respectively. Particularly, PANI-PTSA shows high PL intensity because of its orderly arranged benzenoid and quinoid units. Owing to its excellent synthesis, low bandgap, high photoluminescence intensity and high electrical features, PANI-PTSA is a suitable candidate to improve PANI properties and electron provider for fluorene-detecting sensors with a linear range of 0.001-10 μM and detection limit of 0.26 nM.Entities:
Keywords: CSA; HCl; PANI; PTSA; XRD; acetic acid; conductivity; dopant; fluorene; four-point probe; photoluminescence; polyaniline; sensor
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885536 PMCID: PMC8658293 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Synthesis of PANI by using different acids as dopants.
Preparation of PANI samples.
| Sample Name | Aniline Monomer Concentration (mL) | APS as Oxidant Monomer (g) | Different Acids (0.4 M) | Weight of the PANI (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANI-PTSA | 2.75 | 1.7 | PTSA | 0.2 |
| PANI-CSA | 2.75 | 1.7 | CSA | 0.18 |
| PANI-Acetic acid | 2.75 | 1.7 | Acetic acid | 0.15 |
| PANI-HCl | 2.75 | 1.7 | HCl | 0.19 |
Preparation of PANI-PTSA with fluorene concentrations.
| Sample Name | Amount of PANI* (μL) | Amount of Fluorene (μL) | Fluorene Concentrations (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANI-PTSA-fluorene-1 | 2900 | 100 | 0.001 |
| PANI-PTSA-fluorene-2 | 2900 | 100 | 0.01 |
| PANI-PTSA-fluorene-3 | 2900 | 100 | 0.1 |
| PANI-PTSA-fluorene-4 | 2900 | 100 | 1 |
| PANI-PTSA-fluorene-5 | 2900 | 100 | 10 |
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of synthesized PANI samples.
Comparison of functional group peaks in the FT-IR spectra of the PANI samples.
| Assignment | PANI-PTSA [ | PANI-CSA [ | PANI-Acetic Acid [ | PANI-HCl [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symmetric and asymmetric stretching | NH2 and NH | 3422 | - | 3400 | - |
| Aromatic aniline ring | C–H and CH2 | 2970 | 2960 | - | - |
| Quinoid ring stretching | C = C | 1501 | 1589 | 1576 | 1589 |
| Benzonoid ring stretching | N–B–N | 1496 | 1433 | 1499 | 1433 |
| C-N stretching of benzenoid ring | C–N | 1321 | 1300 | 1327 | 1246 |
| In-plane bending vibration of C-H | C–H | 1136 | 1139 | 1139 | 1139 |
| Ortho substitutions, 1,2 disubstitution in benzene ring | C–H | 832,591 | 841 | 846 | 841 |
Figure 3XRD spectra of synthesized PANI samples.
Crystallite size, d-spacing and interchain division of PANI samples exposed over various shots of ES reflection (measured from XRD).
| Sample Name | Peak Sign | d-Spacing (Å) | FWHM (B) | Crystallite Size (nm) | Inter-Chain Separation (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANI-PTSA-1 | A | 15.71429 | 0.006 | 241.750167 | 19.64285714 |
| PANI-PTSA-2 | B | 4.695122 | 0.044 | 33.36713996 | 5.868902439 |
| PANI-PTSA-3 | C | 3.484163 | 0.017 | 87.33634992 | 4.35520362 |
| PANI-CSA-1 | A | 14.25926 | 0.008 | 181.3126253 | 17.82407407 |
| PANI-CSA-2 | B | 4.723926 | 0.051 | 28.78733644 | 5.904907975 |
| PANI-CSA-3 | C | 3.494163 | 0.027 | 59.56613339 | 4.36520362 |
| PANI-Acetic acid-1 | A | 14.5283 | 0.004 | 362.6252505 | 18.16037736 |
| PANI-ACETIC acid-2 | B | 5.099338 | 0.02 | 72.5250501 | 6.374172185 |
| PANI-ACETIC acid-3 | C | 3.615023 | 0.0249 | 54.98955366 | 4.375 |
| PANI-HCl-1 | A | 16.04167 | 0.037 | 39.20272978 | 20.05208333 |
| PANI-HCl-3 | B | 5.968992 | 0.091 | 16.05216176 | 7.46124031 |
| PANI-HCl-5 | C | 3.5 | 0.107 | 13.87586868 | 4.518779343 |
Features of synthesized PANI samples and comparison with other research.
| Sample Name | Crystallite Size (nm) | d-Spacing (Å) | Inter-Chain Separation (A˚) | Bandgap | Conductivity (S·cm−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANI-PTSA | 47 | 3.50 | 4.37 | 4.50 | 4.8 × 10−2 | [ |
| 13.8 | 3.51 | 4.39 | 4.196 | 1 × 10−2 | [ | |
| 29 | 4.6 | - | - | 12 × 10−2 | [ | |
| 87 | 3.48 | 4.35 | 3.1 | 3.84 × 101 | Current study | |
| PANI-CSA | - | 3.52 | - | 3.8 | 11 × 10−2 | [ |
| 65 | 4.9 | - | - | 21 × 10−2 | [ | |
| 56 | - | - | - | 2.7× 101 | [ | |
| 59 | 3.49 | 4.36 | 3.5 | 2.92 × 101 | Current study | |
| PANI-Acetic acid | 49 | - | - | - | 6.5× 10−2 | [ |
| - | - | - | - | 4.21 × 10−2 | [ | |
| - | - | - | - | 6.5 × 10−5 | [ | |
| 55 | 3.6 | 4.37 | 3.6 | 2.50 × 10−2 | Current study | |
| PANI-HCl | 59 | 3.49 | 4.36 | 4.48 | 1.6 × 10−1 | [ |
| - | - | - | 2.40 | 54 × 10−2 | [ | |
| 38.3 | 3.9 | - | 3.85 | - | [ | |
| 14 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 2.44 × 10−2 | Current study |
Figure 4UV-vis spectra of synthesized PANI samples.
Comparison of the absorbance values of the PANI samples.
| Π–π* | Polaron to π* | π to Polaron | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANI-Samples | Wavelength (nm) | PANI-Samples | Wavelength (nm) | PANI-Samples | Wavelength (nm) |
| PANI-PTSA | 207 | PANI-PTSA | 321 | PANI-PTSA | 578 |
| PANI-CSA | 253 | PANI-CSA | 338 | PANI-CSA | 785 |
| PANI-Acetic acid | 283 | PANI-Acetic acid | - | PANI-Acetic acid | 630 |
| PANI-HCl | 317 | PANI-HCl | - | PANI-HCl | 579 |
Figure 5Bandgap curves as optical properties of the PANI samples.
Figure 6FE-SEM patterns and EDS point analysis of (a) PANI-PTSA, (b) PANI-CSA, (c) PANI-acetic acid and (d) PANI-HCl.
Figure 7TGA spectra of synthesized PANI samples.
Figure 8PL spectra of synthesized PANI samples. (a) Excitation photoluminescence peaks. (b) Emission photoluminescence peaks.
Electrical data of PANI samples.
| Sample Name | Conductivity (Ω·cm)–1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANI-PTSA | 9.98 × 10−1 | 8.84 | 2.61 × 10−2 | 3.84 × 101 |
| PANI-CSA | 1.31 × 10−1 | 1.16 | 3.42 × 10−2 | 2.92 × 101 |
| PANI-Acetic acid | 1.53 × 103 | 1.36 × 104 | 4.00 × 10−2 | 2.50 × 10−2 |
| PANI-HCl | 1.57 × 103 | 1.39 × 104 | 4.10 × 101 | 2.44 × 10−2 |
Figure 9(a) Excitation photoluminescence peaks. (b) Emission photoluminescence peaks of fluorene in concentrations of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 μM upon interaction with PANI*. (c) Variation of intensity peaks when PANI* interacted with fluorene.
Comparison of fluorene sensors with different detection techniques according to fluorescence obtained during experimental measurements.
| No. | Fluorescent Sensor Methods | Linear Range (μM) | LOD (nM) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eu(III)-(CCA)2 probe | 0.1–1.9 | 0.43 | [ |
| 2 | Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) | - | 0.5 | [ |
| 3 | 1,3-bis(cyanomethoxy)-tert-butylcalix[4]arene (CAD) onto CdSe quantum dots (QDs) CAD@CdSe | 0–20 | 0.8 | [ |
| 4 | PANI doped PTSA | 0.001–10 | 0.26 | Current study |