| Literature DB >> 31979286 |
Abstract
ConducEntities:
Keywords: PANI; composites; electrochemical energy storage and conversion; fuel cell; rechargeable battery; supercapacitor
Year: 2020 PMID: 31979286 PMCID: PMC7040733 DOI: 10.3390/ma13030548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Ragone plot for various supercapacitors, batteries and fuel cells [2] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 2Molecular structure of polyaniline (PANI).
Figure 3The architecture of this review.
Figure 4Schematics of an electrostatic double-layer capacitor (EDLC) (a) and pseudocapacitor; (b) [2] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 5SEM images: (a) nonporous PANI and (b) porous PANI and TEM images: (c) nonporous PANI and (d) porous PANI [33] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 6Schematic of PANI/C-ACs synthesis procedure [36] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 7Schematic demonstration of the synthesis process of PANI/GO nanocomposite. (reprinted with permission from previous literature [50] © 2012 American Chemical Society).
Figure 8Schematic diagram of preparation of SnO and SnO2@PANI nanocomposite (reproduced from [67] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 9Schematic illustration of the formation of MoS2/PANI hollow microspheres [69] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 10Schematic diagram of the synthesis of PANI/PPy double-walled nanotube arrays (DNTAs; reprinted with permission from previous literature [75] © 2014 American Chemical Society).
Figure 11Schematic illustration of synthesis of ZnO@MOF@PANI nanoarrays on carbon cloth (CC) [84] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
The preparation method and electrochemical performance of some typical PANI based supercapacitor electrode materials.
| Materials | Preparation Method | Maximum Specific Capacitance | Cycle Stability |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| interfacial polymerization | 554 F g−1 at 10 mA g−1 | 57 F g−1 after 1000 cycles |
|
| electrochemical polymerization | 180 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 | 163 F g−1 after 1000 cycles |
|
| selective surface dissolution (SSD) method | 765 F g−1 at 1 A/g | 91% after 5000 cycles |
|
| chemical oxidative polymerization | 90.4% after 1000 cycles | |
|
| in situ chemical oxidative polymerization | 435 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 | 60% after 2000 cycles |
|
| chemical oxidative polymerization | 320 F g−1 at 10 mA g−1 | 8% after 50 cycles |
|
| deposition of PANI on the surface of CNTs | 183 F g−1 at 10 mA g−1 | |
|
| high temperature treatment | 163 F g−1 at 700 °C and 0.1 A g−1 | |
|
| spray-printing method | 355.5 F g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 | 87.2% after 5000 cycles |
|
| vacuum filtration the mixed dispersions | 210 F g−1 at 0.3 A g−1 | 94% after 1000 cycles |
|
| in situ polymerization | 480 F/g at 0.1 A/g | 70% after 1000 cycles |
|
| in situ polymerization | 425 F/g at 0.2 A/g | 83% after 500 cycles |
|
| a soft chemical route | 531 F/g at 0.2 A/g | |
|
| in situ polymerization | 1045 F/g at 0.1 A/g | 97% after 1000 cycles |
|
| sol–gel and electrospinning method | 234 F/g at 0.1 A/g | 90% after 1000 cycles |
|
| pulse electrodeposition | 810 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 86.3% after 1000 cycles |
|
| interfacial chemical polymerization | 765 F/g at 1 mA/cm2 | 85.1% after 400 cycles |
|
| surface initiated polymerization | 386 F/g with the potential window range from 0 to 0.6 V | 79.5% after 800 cycles |
|
| in situ polymerization | 286.35 F/g at 20 mV/s | |
|
| in situ oxidative polymerization | 425 F/g at 1 mA/cm2 | |
|
| in situ polymerization | 572 F/g at 0.5 A/g | 82% over 5000 cycles |
|
| in situ oxidative polymerization | 335.5 F/g at 0.1 A/g | no capacitance decay after 1000 cycles |
|
| in situ oxidative polymerization | 626 F/g at 10 mV/s | |
|
| template-assisted technique | 364 F/g at 5 mV/s | 84.3% after 8000 cycles |
|
| electrodeposition technique | 1064 F/g at 1 A/g | 95% after 200 cycles |
|
| PPy coated onto the PANI | 693 F/g at 5 mV/s | 92.4% over 1000 cycles |
|
| Ag nanoparticles dispersed onto the surface of PANI | 553 F/g at 1 A/g | 90% after 1000 cycles |
|
| in situ chemical polymerization | 241 F/g at 0.5 mA/cm2 | 100% after 5000 cycles |
|
| electro-polymerization | 1181 F/g at 1 A/g | 89.1% after 1000 cycles |
|
| spray drying method | 684 F/g at 1 A/g | 92% after 6000 cycles |
|
| pulsed potential electro-deposition | 621 F/g and 800 F/g at 1 A/g from CV and CD respectively | 83% after 750 cycles |
|
| hydrothermal treatment with addition of in situ polymerization process | 188.3 F/g at 10 mV/s | 94% after 8000 cycles |
Figure 12Schematic illustration of the working mechanism of LIBs.
Figure 13Reactions of protonated PANI with residual lithium compounds like Li2CO3 (a) and LiOH (b) and (c) schematic illustration of preparation of PANI-coated Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 cathode material.
Figure 14(a) Schematic illustration of preparation of PANI/SiOx/CNTs and (b) digital photographics of PANI/SiOx/CNTs [116] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 15(a) Rate capabilities of the SnO2@PANI/rGO nanocomposites, SnO2@PANI, SnO2/RGO and SnO2 respectively; (b) cyclic behaviors of the SnO2@PANI/rGO composites, SnO2/rGO, SnO2@PANI and SnO2 at the current density of 100 mA/g and (c) a schematic illustration of the preparation of the PANI/SnO2/RGO nanocomposite [120] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 16Electrochemical comparison of NiO nanoflake arrays and NiO/PANI core/shell arrays. (a) Rate capability and (b) cycling stability at 0.1 A/g [126] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 17Schematic illustration of forming of Fe3O4@PANI yolk–shell micro-nanoarchitecture [128] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 18SEM images of the 3D hierarchical MoS2/PANI nanoflowers (a,b) and MoS2/C nanoflowers (d,e). Photographs of two types of Chinese roses (c,f). Schematic illustration of synthesis of MoS2/PANI and MoS2/C nanoflowers (g; reprinted with permission from previous literature [131] © 2014 American Chemical Society).
Figure 19Schematic illustration of the hollow sphere PANI/S composite during the charge/discharge process. (a) The initial PANI-S composite, (b) the cycled PANI-S composite, (c) the lithiated PANI-S composite and (d) the schematic illustration of integrity of the hollow PANI-S cathode with severe volume change during charge/discharge process (reproduced from [139] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 20(A) Schematic illustration of formation of 3D porous graphene@C and (B) long-term cycling behavior of the 3D porous graphene@C composite at 1000 mA/g [155] (reproduced with permission from Elsevier).
The preparation method and electrochemical performance of some typical PANI modified rechargeable batteries electrode materials.
| Materials | Preparation Method | Maximum Specific Capacity | Cycle Stability |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Pickering emulsion route | 136 mAh/g | |
|
| coating C-LFP with PANI-CAS in m-cresol solution | 165.3 mAh/g | |
|
| 125.3 mAh/g | 95.7% after 100 cycles | |
|
| oxidative polymerization | 95% after 55 cycles | |
|
| solution method | 193.8 mAh/g | 96.25% after 80 cycles |
|
| 86% after 40 cycles | ||
|
| chemical oxidative polymerization | 159.83 mAh/g | 119.79 mAh/g retained after 100 cycles |
|
| 1392 mAh/g | 62.2% after 95 cycles | |
|
| 1954 mAh/g | 727 mAh/g retained after 100 cycles | |
|
| 1156 mAh/g | 728 mAh/g retained after 60 cycles | |
|
| 1178 mAh/g | 725 mAh/g retained after 60 cycles | |
|
| dip-coating of PANI@SnO2 and graphene dispersion on Cu foam | 772 mAh/g | 749 mAh/g retained after 100 cycles |
|
| solvothermal method followed by in-situ oxidative polymerization | 1021 mAh/g | 408 mAh/g retained after 100 cycles |
|
| 888 mAh/g | 527 mAh/g retained after 150 cycles | |
|
| 1335 mAh/g | 435 mAh/g after 250 cycles | |
| PANI/FE2O3 [ | solvothermal technique followed by a post-coating process | 366 mAh/g at 2.0 C | 412.1 mAh/g retained after 150 cycles at 0.2 C |
| FE3O4@PANI [ | 997 mAh/g | 982 mAh/g retained after 50 cycles | |
|
| 1214 mAh/g | 86% after 50 cycles | |
| SNS2@PANI [ | 968.7 mAh/g | 75.4% after 80 cycles | |
|
| in situ chlorinated substitution and vulcanization reactions | 750 mAh/g | 89.7% after 200 cycles |
|
| microemulsion method | 140.2 mAh/g | 134.4 mAh/g retained after 120 cycles |
|
| 83.3% after 3000 cycles | ||
|
| 340 mAh/g | 94% after 3000 cycles |
Figure 21Molecular interaction in the prepared Pt-PANI/CNT catalyst (reprinted with permission from previous literature [168] © 2011 American Chemical Society).
Figure 22Schematic illustration of synthesis of the PDMC (reprinted with permission from previous literature [170] © 2013 American Chemical Society).
Figure 23Half-wave potential vs. RHE and current density of M-PANI/C-Mela catalysts in 0.1 M KOH (reprinted with permission from previous literature [173] © 2014 American Chemical Society).