| Literature DB >> 34885290 |
Dominik Maskowicz1, Rafał Jendrzejewski1, Wioletta Kopeć1, Maria Gazda2, Jakub Karczewski2, Paweł Niedziałkowski3, Armin Kleibert4, Carlos A F Vaz4, Yann Garcia5, Mirosław Sawczak1.
Abstract
Prior studies of the thin film deposition of the metal-organic compound of Fe(pz)Pt[CN]4 (pz = pyrazine) using the matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation (MAPLE) method, provided evidence for laser-induced decomposition of the molecular structure resulting in a significant downshift of the spin transition temperature. In this work we report new results obtained with a tunable pulsed laser, adjusted to water resonance absorption band with a maximum at 3080 nm, instead of 1064 nm laser, to overcome limitations related to laser-target interactions. Using this approach, we obtain uniform and functional thin films of Fe(pz)Pt[CN]4 nanoparticles with an average thickness of 135 nm on Si and/or glass substrates. X-ray diffraction measurements show the crystalline structure of the film identical to that of the reference material. The temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy indicates the spin transition in the temperature range of 275 to 290 K with 15 ± 3 K hysteresis. This result is confirmed by UV-Vis spectroscopy revealing an absorption band shift from 492 to 550 nm related to metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (MLCT) for high and low spin states, respectively. Spin crossover is also observed with X-ray absorption spectroscopy, but due to soft X-ray-induced excited spin state trapping (SOXIESST) the transition is not complete and shifted towards lower temperatures.Entities:
Keywords: Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4]; SOXIESST effect; materials characterization; matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation; resonant pulsed laser ablation; temperature-dependent spin crossover
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885290 PMCID: PMC8658641 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4] in the high spin (HS) and low spin (LS) states; (b) scanning electron microscope image of nanocrystals; (c) particle size histogram based on the dimensions calculated from SEM images; (d) macroscopic photograph of the prepared thin film; (e) SEM cross-section of the thin film; (f,g) SEM images of the surface of the thin film; (h) results of profilometry measurement performed on the thin film; (i) particle size histogram of the thin film particle size distribution.
Figure 2(a) X-ray diffraction pattern of the reference and thin film samples indexed to the respective Miller planes; (b) position of major Miller planes of Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4] and visualization of the effect of texture on the diffraction patterns; (c) comparison of wide range Raman spectra of the reference sample and thin film.
Figure 3(a) Comparison of HS (300 K) and LS (250 K) Raman spectra of the reference sample and thin film; (b) hysteresis of the ratio of the intensities of the 1029 to 1233 cm−1 bands for the reference sample and the thin film obtained from temperature-dependent Raman measurements.
Figure 4(a) Evolution of absorption spectra for reference and thin film; (b) hysteresis obtained from absorption spectra for both samples.
Figure 5(a,b) XAS in TEY and TFY detection modes for the reference sample of nanocrystalline Fe(pz)Pt[CN]4 recorded at different temperatures; (c,d) L3-edge relative peak intensity measured at 707.15 eV and 708.57 eV corresponding to peak positions for HS and LS, respectively.
Figure 6XAS in TEY (a,c) and TFY modes (b,d) for the reference and MAPLE-deposited samples measured at two temperatures, 300 K and 65 K.
Comparison of MAPLE deposition of Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4] using 1064 [17,18] and 3080 nm lasers.
| Parameter | 1064 nm Laser | 3080 nm Laser |
|---|---|---|
| Ambient pressure | Near atmospheric pressure required | Deposition in vacuum available |
| Matrix | Deionized H2O | Deionized H2O |
| Interaction laser–matrix | Weak, high laser fluence required to induce ablation (>2 J/cm2) | Strong, low laser fluence required (0.8 J/cm2) |
| Interaction laser–Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4] | Possible decomposition due to poor matrix absorption | Negligible |
| Film quality | Poor uniformity with large clusters | Good uniformity; small, sparse clusters |
| SCO temperature range compared to the reference | Significant downshift | Unchanged (near room temperature) |