UNLABELLED: Human copper transporter 1 (CTR1) is overexpressed in a variety of cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the use of (64)CuCl2 as a theranostic agent for PET and radionuclide therapy of malignant melanoma. METHODS: CTR1 expression levels were detected by Western blot analysis of a group of tumor cell lines. Two melanoma cell lines (B16F10 and A375M) that highly expressed CTR1 were then selected to study the uptake and efflux of (64)CuCl2. Mice bearing B16F10 or A375M tumors (n = 4 for each group) were subjected to 5 min of static whole-body PET scans at different time points after intravenous injection of (64)CuCl2. Dynamic scans were also obtained for B16F10 tumor-bearing mice. All mice were sacrificed at 72 h after injection of (64)CuCl2, and biodistribution studies were performed. Mice bearing B16F10 or A375M tumors were further subjected to (64)CuCl2 radionuclide therapy. Specifically, when the tumor size reached 0.5-0.8 cm in diameter, tumor-bearing mice were systemically administered (64)CuCl2 (74 MBq) or phosphate-buffered saline, and tumor sizes were monitored over the treatment period. RESULTS: CTR1 was found to be overexpressed in the cancer cell lines tested at different levels, and high expression levels in melanoma cells and tissues were observed (melanotic B16F10 and amelanotic A375M). (64)CuCl2 displayed high and specific uptake in B16F10 and A375M cells. In vivo (64)CuCl2 PET imaging demonstrated that both B16F10 and A375M tumors were clearly visualized. Radionuclide treatment studies showed that the tumor growth in both the B16F10 and the A375M models under (64)CuCl2 treatment were much slower than that of the control group. CONCLUSION: Both melanotic and amelanotic melanomas (B16F10 and A375M) tested were found to overexpress CTR1. The tumors can be successfully visualized by (64)CuCl2 PET and further treated by (64)CuCl2, highlighting the high potential of using (64)CuCl2 as a theranostic agent for the management of melanoma.
UNLABELLED: Humancopper transporter 1 (CTR1) is overexpressed in a variety of cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the use of (64)CuCl2 as a theranostic agent for PET and radionuclide therapy of malignant melanoma. METHODS:CTR1 expression levels were detected by Western blot analysis of a group of tumor cell lines. Two melanoma cell lines (B16F10 and A375M) that highly expressed CTR1 were then selected to study the uptake and efflux of (64)CuCl2. Mice bearing B16F10 or A375M tumors (n = 4 for each group) were subjected to 5 min of static whole-body PET scans at different time points after intravenous injection of (64)CuCl2. Dynamic scans were also obtained for B16F10tumor-bearing mice. All mice were sacrificed at 72 h after injection of (64)CuCl2, and biodistribution studies were performed. Mice bearing B16F10 or A375M tumors were further subjected to (64)CuCl2radionuclide therapy. Specifically, when the tumor size reached 0.5-0.8 cm in diameter, tumor-bearing mice were systemically administered (64)CuCl2 (74 MBq) or phosphate-buffered saline, and tumor sizes were monitored over the treatment period. RESULTS:CTR1 was found to be overexpressed in the cancer cell lines tested at different levels, and high expression levels in melanoma cells and tissues were observed (melanotic B16F10 and amelanotic A375M). (64)CuCl2 displayed high and specific uptake in B16F10 and A375M cells. In vivo (64)CuCl2PET imaging demonstrated that both B16F10 and A375M tumors were clearly visualized. Radionuclide treatment studies showed that the tumor growth in both the B16F10 and the A375M models under (64)CuCl2 treatment were much slower than that of the control group. CONCLUSION: Both melanotic and amelanotic melanomas (B16F10 and A375M) tested were found to overexpress CTR1. The tumors can be successfully visualized by (64)CuCl2PET and further treated by (64)CuCl2, highlighting the high potential of using (64)CuCl2 as a theranostic agent for the management of melanoma.
Authors: Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey N Bryan; Fang Jia; Huma Mohsin; Geethapriya Sivaguru; Carolyn J Anderson; William H Miller; Carolyn J Henry; Michael R Lewis Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Helen H W Chen; Jiang-Jou Yan; Wen-Chung Chen; Macus Tien Kuo; Yu-Hsuan Lai; Wu-Wei Lai; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Wu-Chou Su Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Yasuhiro Nose; L Kent Wood; Byung-Eun Kim; Joseph R Prohaska; Robert S Fry; Jerry W Spears; Dennis J Thiele Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Han Jiang; Benjamin B Kasten; Hongguang Liu; Shibo Qi; Yang Liu; Mei Tian; Charles L Barnes; Hong Zhang; Zhen Cheng; Paul D Benny Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Tara Mastren; Bernadette V Marquez; Deborah E Sultan; Elizabeth Bollinger; Paul Eisenbeis; Tom Voller; Suzanne E Lapi Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: J Carrasco-Hernández; J Ramos-Méndez; B Faddegon; A R Jalilian; M Moranchel; M A Ávila-Rodríguez Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Jae-Ho Lee; Heejung Kim; Zhengsheng Yao; Sung-Jin Lee; Lawrence P Szajek; Luigi Grasso; Ira Pastan; Chang H Paik Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 2.408