| Literature DB >> 34884755 |
Carolina M Perdomo1, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi2,3,4, Sara Becerril2,3,4, Víctor Valentí3,4,5, Rafael Moncada3,4,6, Eva M Fernández-Sáez2, Leire Méndez-Giménez2, Silvia Ezquerro2, Victoria Catalán2,3,4, Camilo Silva1,2,3, Javier Escalada1,2,3, Gema Frühbeck1,2,3,4, Amaia Rodríguez1,2,3.
Abstract
Angiopoietin-like protein 8 (ANGPTL8) is an hepatokine altered in several metabolic conditions, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We sought to explore whether ANGPTL8 is involved in NAFLD amelioration after bariatric surgery in experimental models and patients with severe obesity. Plasma ANGPTL8 was measured in 170 individuals before and 6 months after bariatric surgery. Hepatic ANGPTL8 expression was evaluated in liver biopsies of patients with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery with available liver pathology analysis (n = 75), as well as in male Wistar rats with diet-induced obesity subjected to sham operation, sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 65). The effect of ANGPTL8 on lipogenesis was assessed in human HepG2 hepatocytes under palmitate-induced lipotoxic conditions. Plasma concentrations and hepatic expression of ANGPTL8 were increased in patients with obesity-associated NAFLD in relation to the degree of hepatic steatosis. Sleeve gastrectomy and RYGB improved hepatosteatosis and reduced the hepatic ANGPTL8 expression in the preclinical model of NAFLD. Interestingly, ANGPTL8 inhibited steatosis and expression of lipogenic factors (PPARG2, SREBF1, MOGAT2 and DGAT1) in palmitate-treated human hepatocytes. Together, ANGPTL8 is involved in the resolution of NAFLD after bariatric surgery partially by the inhibition of lipogenesis in steatotic hepatocytes.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; angiopoietin-like protein 8; bariatric surgery; lipogenesis; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34884755 PMCID: PMC8657645 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Clinical characteristics of the participants enrolled in the study.
| Lean | Obese NG | Obese IGT | Obese T2D |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30 | 48 | 47 | 45 | - |
| Sex (male/female) | 16/14 | 17/31 | 17/30 | 20/25 | 0.199 |
| Age (years) | 43 ± 3 | 40 ± 2 | 44 ± 2 | 48 ± 2 b |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 0.5 | 44.5 ± 1.3 a | 43.2 ± 0.9 a | 45.4 ± 1.4 a |
|
| Body fat (%) | 21.2 ± 1.4 | 50.7 ± 0.9 a | 51.0 ± 1.3 a | 50.1 ± 1.2 a |
|
| Waist circumference (cm) | 77 ± 3 | 125 ± 2 a | 125 ± 2 a | 132 ± 3 a |
|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 87 ± 2 | 92 ± 1 | 105 ± 1 a,b | 142 ± 9 a,b |
|
| Glucose 2-h OGTT (mg/dL) | - | 121 ± 4 | 154 ± 5 b | 250 ± 16 b |
|
| Insulin (µU/mL) | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 20.9 ± 2.7 a | 19.6 ± 1.7 a | 26.3 ± 3.1 a |
|
| Insulin 2-h OGTT (µU/mL) | - | 97.0 ± 9.5 | 141.1 ± 12.4 b | 133.3 ± 19.2 b |
|
| HOMA | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 5.2 ± 0.5 a | 9.2 ± 1.7 a,b |
|
| QUICKI | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 a | 0.30 ± 0.01 a,b |
|
| FFA (mmol/L) | 15.7 ± 0.1 | 16.7 ± 1.1 | 22.5 ± 2.2 | 28.9 ± 4.0 a,b |
|
| Glycerol (mg/dL) | 18.2 ± 3.5 | 19.8 ± 2.1 | 22.1 ± 2.5 | 21.9 ± 2.3 | 0.591 |
| Adipo-IR index | 20.2 ± 3.4 | 71.3 ± 7.7 | 98.9 ± 13.7 | 188.4 ± 36.3 a,b |
|
| Triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 70 ± 5 | 111 ± 7 a | 132 ± 11 a | 147 ± 11 a,b |
|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 186 ± 7 | 191 ± 4 | 203 ± 6 | 198 ± 6 | 0.234 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 110 ± 6 | 118 ± 3 | 127 ± 5 | 116 ± 5 | 0.145 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 61 ± 3 | 50 ± 4 | 49 ± 2 a | 44 ± 2 a |
|
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 1.1 | 9.5 ± 1.5 a | 8.8 ± 1.8 a |
|
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.2 a | 5.9 ± 0.2 a | 6.0 ± 0.2 a |
|
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 45.4 ± 3.2 a | 48.9 ± 3.6 a | 46.0 ± 5.8 a |
|
| AST (IU/L) | 13 ± 1 | 16 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 0.244 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 10 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 28 ± 2 a | 27 ± 2 a |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) | 86 ± 5 | 68 ± 5 | 77 ± 6 | 73 ± 5 | 0.334 |
| γ-GT (IU/L) | 11 ± 1 | 21 ± 2 | 29 ± 4 a | 30 ± 4 a |
|
| Daily alcohol intake (g) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 2.7 | 4.6 ± 2.7 | 0.576 |
| Antihypertensive therapy, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (23%) | 17 (32%) | 19 (49%) |
|
| Antidiabetic therapy, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4%) | 1 (2%) | 20 (51%) |
|
| Lipid-lowering therapy, n (%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (13%) | 7 (15%) | 11 (28%) | 0.061 |
NG, normoglycemia; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, type 2 diabetes; BMI, body mass index; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; FFA, free fatty acids; Adipo-IR, adipocyte insulin resistance index; CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltransferase. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Scheffe’s test or χ2 test, where appropriate. Bold values denote statistically significant p values. a p < 0.05 vs. normal-weight individuals; b p < 0.05 vs. obese NG patients.
Effect of weight loss induced by bariatric surgery on clinical characteristics of patients with morbid obesity.
| Sleeve Gastrectomy ( | Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Surgery | Post-Surgery |
| Pre-Surgery | Post-Surgery |
| |
| Sex (male/female) | 10/24 | 10/24 | - | 15/26 | 15/26 | - |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 41.0 ± 1.7 | 31.1 ± 1.6 |
| 44.7 ± 0.8 | 31.9 ± 0.6 |
|
| Body fat (%) | 50.9 ± 1.2 | 39.5 ± 1.8 |
| 50.7 ± 0.8 | 38.1 ± 1.0 |
|
| Waist circumference (cm) | 120 ± 3 | 98 ± 3 |
| 127 ± 2 | 100 ± 2 |
|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 106 ± 9 | 92 ± 4 |
| 115 ± 5 | 95 ± 4 |
|
| Insulin (µU/mL) | 30.9 ± 6.6 | 10.0 ± 1.6 |
| 23.0 ± 3.3 | 8.6 ± 1.1 |
|
| HOMA | 8.3 ± 2.1 | 2.1 ± 0.4 |
| 6.2 ± 1.3 | 2.3 ± 0.6 |
|
| QUICKI | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 |
| 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 |
|
| FFA (mmol/L) | 18.8 ± 1.2 | 14.3 ± 1.5 | 0.052 | 21.5 ± 2.2 | 13.2 ± 1.0 |
|
| Glycerol (mg/dL) | 19.4 ± 2.2 | 14.0 ± 0.8 |
| 22.4 ± 2.1 | 12.9 ± 1.3 |
|
| Adipo-IR index | 138.7 ± 40.0 | 32.6 ± 6.3 |
| 91.9 ± 12.7 | 28.7 ± 5.6 |
|
| Triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 110 ± 15 | 98 ± 10 | 0.380 | 136 ± 9 | 90 ± 4 |
|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 185 ± 8 | 186 ± 9 | 0.919 | 199 ± 5 | 158 ± 4 |
|
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 115 ± 7 | 119 ± 7 | 0.576 | 122 ± 5 | 92 ± 3 |
|
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 47 ± 3 | 52 ± 3 | 0.111 | 49 ± 3 | 48 ± 1 | 0.666 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 0.252 | 7.9 ± 1.1 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
|
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 4.7 ± 0.3 | 0.203 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.1 |
|
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 77.0 ± 12.7 | 25.3 ± 5.9 |
| 51.0 ± 4.6 | 16.2 ± 2.5 |
|
| AST (IU/L) | 17 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 0.983 | 18 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 | 0.849 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 22 ± 3 | 19 ± 2 | 0.318 | 27 ± 2 | 26 ± 2 | 0.606 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) | 64 ± 6 | 65 ± 5 | 0.916 | 82 ± 5 | 84 ± 5 | 0.529 |
| γ-GT (IU/L) | 29 ± 6 | 22 ± 4 |
| 24 ± 3 | 14 ± 2 |
|
| Antihypertensive therapy, | 15 (44%) | 12 (34%) |
| 17 (41%) | 9 (22%) |
|
| Antidiabetic therapy, | 8 (24%) | 5 (15%) | 0.085 | 12 (29%) | 4 (10%) |
|
| Lipid-lowering therapy, | 8 (24%) | 3 (9%) | 0.113 | 11 (27%) | 3 (7%) | 0.081 |
BMI, body mass index; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; FFA, free fatty acids; Adipo-IR, adipocyte insulin resistance index; CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltransferase. Differences between groups were analyzed by paired two-tailed Wilcoxon t-test or χ2 test, where appropriate. Bold values denote statistically significant p values.
Figure 1Effect of insulin resistance and NAFLD on plasma concentrations of ANGPTL8 in patients with severe obesity before and after bariatric surgery. Fasting plasma concentrations of ANGPTL8 according to severe obesity and insulin resistance (a) or hepatic function (b). Impact of weight loss achieved 6 months after sleeve gastrectomy (c) or RYGB (d) in plasma ANGPTL8 levels. Statistical differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s test or by a two-tailed paired Student’s t-test, where appropriate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. patients with NG or normal liver.
Figure 2Hepatic ANGPTL8 expression in obesity-associated T2D and NAFLD. Liver sections obtained from patients with severe obesity classified according to their degree of insulin resistance (a) or hepatic function (b) stained with H-E (upper panels) and marked with antibodies against ANGPTL8 (lower panels) (magnification 200×). Bar graphs show the effect of insulin resistance (c), NAFLD (d) and the degree of liver steatosis (e) on hepatic ANGPTL8 transcripts. (f) Correlation between hepatic ANGPTL8 mRNA and NAS score. Statistical differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s test. * p < 0.05 vs. patients with NG, normal liver or 0–5% liver steatosis.
Figure 3Hepatic expression of ANGPTL8 in rats with diet-induced obesity before and after bariatric surgery. Bar graphs show the effect of diet-induced obesity and weight loss achieved 1 month after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on rat liver weight (a,g), AST (b,h) and ALT (c,i) transaminase levels, intrahepatic TG content (d,j) and hepatic Angptl8 transcript levels (e,k). (f) Liver sections stained with H-E (upper panels) and marked with antibodies against ANGPTL8 (lower panels) (magnification 200x). (l) Correlation between post-surgical hepatic mRNA expression of ANGGPTL8 and intrahepatic TG. Statistical differences were analyzed by a Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s test, where appropriate. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. rats fed a ND or sham-operated groups.
Figure 4ANGPTL8 reversed palmitate-induced lipogenesis in human HepG2 hepatocytes. Bar graphs show the (a) intracellular triacylglycerol content and (b) mRNA expression of lipogenic transcription factors and enzymes in HepG2 hepatocytes stimulated with palmitate in the absence or presence of ANGPTL8 for 24 h. Proliferation rate (c) and transcript levels of hepatocyte differentiation transcription factor HNF4A (d) are shown. Statistical differences were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA or a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, if an interaction between factors was detected. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 vs. unstimulated HepG2 cells; † p < 0.05; †† p < 0.01 vs. palmitate-treated HepG2 cells; a p < 0.05 effect of palmitate; b p < 0.05 effect of ANGPTL8.