| Literature DB >> 34883747 |
Nadezhda A Shavyrkina1,2, Ekaterina A Skiba1,2, Anastasia E Kazantseva1, Evgenia K Gladysheva1, Vera V Budaeva1, Nikolay V Bychin1, Yulia A Gismatulina1, Ekaterina I Kashcheyeva1, Galina F Mironova1, Anna A Korchagina1, Igor N Pavlov1,2, Gennady V Sakovich1.
Abstract
One of the ways to enhance the yield of bacterial cellulose (BC) is by using dynamic aeration and different-type bioreactors because the microbial producers are strict aerobes. But in this case, the BC quality tends to worsen. Here we have combined static culture with aeration in the biosynthesis of BC by symbiotic Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12 for the first time. A new aeration method by feeding the air onto the growth medium surface is proposed herein. The culture was performed in a Binder-400 climate chamber. The study found that the air feed at a rate of 6.3 L/min allows a 25% increase in the BC yield. Moreover, this aeration mode resulted in BC samples of stable quality. The thermogravimetric and X-ray structural characteristics were retained: the crystallinity index in reflection and transmission geometries were 89% and 92%, respectively, and the allomorph Iα content was 94%. Slight decreases in the degree of polymerization (by 12.0% compared to the control-no aeration) and elastic modulus (by 12.6%) are not critical. Thus, the simple aeration by feeding the air onto the culture medium surface has turned out to be an excellent alternative to dynamic aeration. Usually, when the cultivation conditions, including the aeration ones, are changed, characteristics of the resultant BC are altered either, due to the sensitivity of individual microbial strains. In our case, the stable parameters of BC samples under variable aeration conditions are explained by the concomitant factors: the new efficient aeration method and the highly adaptive microbial producer-symbiotic Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12.Entities:
Keywords: Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12; aeration; bacterial cellulose; static culture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34883747 PMCID: PMC8659626 DOI: 10.3390/polym13234241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1(A) Active acidity level and (B) reducing sugar (RS) concentration plotted against different aeration rates. The half-width of the confidence interval for RS concentration was ±0.2 g/L, pH ± 0.1.
Figure 2The bacterial cellulose (BC) yield plotted against the aeration rate.
Bacterial cellulose (BC) yield and proportion of uniform gel-films subject to aeration mode.
| Aeration Rate, L/min | Proportion of Uniform Gel-Films, % | BC Yield, % |
|---|---|---|
| No aeration (control) | 100 | 7.3 ± 0.3 |
| 3.3 | 89.9 ± 1.5 | 7.6 ± 0.3 |
| 6.3 | 72.4 ± 2.2 | 9.1 ± 0.3 |
| 9.2 | 64.9 ± 1.9 | 8.4 ± 0.3 |
| 12.3 | 60.7 ± 2.5 | 7.9 ± 0.3 |
| 16.7 | 53.2 ± 2.6 | 7.2 ± 0.3 |
The structural non-uniformity of BC gel-films limits their application fields.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograms of BC samples obtained at different air flow rates (L/min) (zoom ×3000) (a) 0 (no aeration), (b) 3.3 L/min, (c) 6.3 L/min, (d) 9.2 L/min, (e) 12.3 L/min, (f) 16.7 L/min.
Basic physicochemical characteristics of BC samples obtained at different aeration rates.
| Parameter | Aeration Rate, L/min | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Aeration | 3.3 | 6.3 | 9.2 | 12.3 | 16.7 | |
| Average microfibril width, ±40 nm | 107 | 93 | 81 | 101 | 85 | 97 |
| Degree of polymerization, ±100 | 4300 | 4200 | 3800 | 2550 | 2100 | 950 |
| Young’s modulus, ±10 MPa | 910 | 860 | 795 | 490 | 360 | 315 |
| TGA summary data | ||||||
| Sample weight loss at the first stage, ±0.5% | 4.1 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 2.8 |
| Sample weight loss at the second stage (within sample decomposition range), ±0.1% | 7.8 | 17.9 | 12.4 | 19.5 | 37.4 | 19.1 |
| Onset temperature of decomposition, ±5 °C | 353 | 372 | 374 | 330 | 308 | 297 |
| Sample weight loss at the third stage, ±1.0% | 62.5 | 49.2 | 63.6 | 52.4 | 30.4 | 45.7 |
| Sample weight loss at the fourth stage, ±0.5% | 8.4 | 9.1 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 18.3 |
| Unburnable residue, ±1.0% | 17.2 | 18.9 | 14.3 | 17.6 | 19.1 | 14.2 |
| Concentrations of cellulose allomorphs and crystallinity index as measured by X-ray diffraction | ||||||
| Iα-allomorph, ±5% | 98 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 94 | 97 |
| Iβ-allomorph, ±5% | 2 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Index of crystallinity | 93 | 93 | 89 | 87-90 | 93 | 91 |
| Index of crystallinity | 89 | 95 | 92 | 92 | 93 | 92 |
| Crystallite size of <110>, ±0.5 nm | 7.7 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.7 |