OBJECTIVE: To examine the combined and individual utility of 2 screening tools in prediction of depression and PTSD one-month post traumatic injury. METHOD: 484 Level I Trauma Center patients were administered the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and Injured Trauma Survivor Screen (ITSS). Approximately 30 days post-injury, patients completed the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves for the PDI suggested a cutoff score of 17.5 predicting PTSD (Sensitivity = 70%; Specificity = 62%) and depression (Sensitivity = 74%; Specificity = 64%). For the ITSS, ROC curves suggested a cutoff score of 1.5 to predict PTSD (Sensitivity = 72%; Specificity = 60%) and depression (Sensitivity = 67%; Specificity = 62%). Inclusion of both instruments in regression analyses accounted for 2.4%-6.8% greater variance than 1 measure alone in predicting PCL-5 and PHQ-8 scores. CONCLUSIONS: The ITSS and PDI each demonstrated significant clinical utility in practice. Use of both measures, versus either alone, likely does not produce sufficient added clinical benefit. Follow-up screening and/or ongoing symptom monitoring is recommended as an adjunct to brief bedside screening. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: To examine the combined and individual utility of 2 screening tools in prediction of depression and PTSD one-month post traumatic injury. METHOD: 484 Level I Trauma Center patients were administered the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and Injured Trauma Survivor Screen (ITSS). Approximately 30 days post-injury, patients completed the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves for the PDI suggested a cutoff score of 17.5 predicting PTSD (Sensitivity = 70%; Specificity = 62%) and depression (Sensitivity = 74%; Specificity = 64%). For the ITSS, ROC curves suggested a cutoff score of 1.5 to predict PTSD (Sensitivity = 72%; Specificity = 60%) and depression (Sensitivity = 67%; Specificity = 62%). Inclusion of both instruments in regression analyses accounted for 2.4%-6.8% greater variance than 1 measure alone in predicting PCL-5 and PHQ-8 scores. CONCLUSIONS: The ITSS and PDI each demonstrated significant clinical utility in practice. Use of both measures, versus either alone, likely does not produce sufficient added clinical benefit. Follow-up screening and/or ongoing symptom monitoring is recommended as an adjunct to brief bedside screening. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Richard A Bryant; Angela Nickerson; Mark Creamer; Meaghan O'Donnell; David Forbes; Isaac Galatzer-Levy; Alexander C McFarlane; Derrick Silove Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Katherine E Guess; Matthew Fifolt; Raeanna C Adams; Eric W Ford; Lisa C McCormick Journal: J Trauma Nurs Date: 2019 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 1.010
Authors: Kenneth J Ruggiero; Tatiana M Davidson; Margaret T Anton; Brian Bunnell; Jennifer Winkelmann; Leigh E Ridings; Olivia Bravoco; Bruce Crookes; James McElligott; Samir M Fakhry Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Corina Benjet; Evelyn J Bromet; Graça Cardoso; Louisa Degenhardt; Giovanni de Girolamo; Rumyana V Dinolova; Finola Ferry; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Yueqin Huang; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Sing Lee; Jean-Pierre Lepine; Daphna Levinson; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Marina Piazza; José Posada-Villa; Kate M Scott; Dan J Stein; Margreet Ten Have; Yolanda Torres; Maria Carmen Viana; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Karestan C Koenen Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol Date: 2017-10-27