BACKGROUND: The posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is among few validated measures of PTSD severity in line with the DSM-5. Validation efforts among veteran samples have recommended cut scores of 33 and 38 to indicate PTSD; cut scores vary across populations depending on factors such as trauma type. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of and identify optimal cut scores for the PCL-5 in relation to the gold standard Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) among traumatically injured individuals 6 months after discharge from a level I trauma center. METHODS: A total of 251 participants completed the PCL-5 and CAPS-5 6 months after discharge from a level I trauma center following traumatic injury. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses detailed diagnostic accuracy of the PCL-5 and identified the optimal cut score via Youden's J index. Cut scores were also broken down by intentional versus nonintentional injury. RESULTS: The PCL-5 produces satisfactory diagnostic accuracy, with adequate sensitivity and specificity, in a traumatically injured population. Estimates indicate the optimal cut score as >30; the optimal cut score for intentional injuries was >34 and >22 for nonintentional injuries. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides support for the PCL-5 in detection of PTSD among injured individuals 6 months after discharge from a level I trauma center. PCL-5 specificity and sensitivity suggest clinicians working with this population can feel confident in using this measure over more onerous structured interviews (e.g., CAPS-5). This study signifies a move toward ensuring those experiencing mental health difficulties after traumatic injury are identified and connected to resources.
BACKGROUND: The posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is among few validated measures of PTSD severity in line with the DSM-5. Validation efforts among veteran samples have recommended cut scores of 33 and 38 to indicate PTSD; cut scores vary across populations depending on factors such as trauma type. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of and identify optimal cut scores for the PCL-5 in relation to the gold standard Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) among traumatically injured individuals 6 months after discharge from a level I trauma center. METHODS: A total of 251 participants completed the PCL-5 and CAPS-5 6 months after discharge from a level I trauma center following traumatic injury. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses detailed diagnostic accuracy of the PCL-5 and identified the optimal cut score via Youden's J index. Cut scores were also broken down by intentional versus nonintentional injury. RESULTS: The PCL-5 produces satisfactory diagnostic accuracy, with adequate sensitivity and specificity, in a traumatically injured population. Estimates indicate the optimal cut score as >30; the optimal cut score for intentional injuries was >34 and >22 for nonintentional injuries. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides support for the PCL-5 in detection of PTSD among injured individuals 6 months after discharge from a level I trauma center. PCL-5 specificity and sensitivity suggest clinicians working with this population can feel confident in using this measure over more onerous structured interviews (e.g., CAPS-5). This study signifies a move toward ensuring those experiencing mental health difficulties after traumatic injury are identified and connected to resources.
Authors: Douglas Zatzick; Gregory J Jurkovich; Frederick P Rivara; Jin Wang; Ming-Yu Fan; Jutta Joesch; Ellen Mackenzie Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Charles W Hoge; Rachel Yehuda; Carl A Castro; Alexander C McFarlane; Eric Vermetten; Rakesh Jetly; Karestan C Koenen; Neil Greenberg; Arieh Y Shalev; Sheila A M Rauch; Charles R Marmar; Barbara O Rothbaum Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Frank W Weathers; Michelle J Bovin; Daniel J Lee; Denise M Sloan; Paula P Schnurr; Danny G Kaloupek; Terence M Keane; Brian P Marx Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2017-05-11
Authors: Douglas Zatzick; Frederick Rivara; Gregory Jurkovich; Joan Russo; Sarah Geiss Trusz; Jin Wang; Amy Wagner; Kari Stephens; Chris Dunn; Edwina Uehara; Megan Petrie; Charles Engel; Dimitri Davydow; Wayne Katon Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Casey B Azuero; Jesse R Fann; Donald D Kautz; J Scott Richards; Sunil Sabharwal Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2021
Authors: Jordyn M Tipsword; Jazmin L Brown-Iannuzzi; Alyssa C Jones; Jessica Flores; Christal L Badour Journal: Violence Against Women Date: 2021-02-18
Authors: Claire M Bird; E Kate Webb; Andrew T Schramm; Lucas Torres; Christine Larson; Terri A deRoon-Cassini Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2021-03-14
Authors: Yara Mekawi; Madison W Silverstein; Aisha Walker; Martha Ishiekwene; Sierra Carter; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Jennifer S Stevens; Abigail Powers Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2022-03-10
Authors: Jennifer B Weggen; Ashley M Darling; Aaron S Autler; Austin C Hogwood; Kevin P Decker; Brandon Imthurn; Gina M Tuzzolo; Ryan S Garten Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 3.210