Minerals are formed by organisms in all of the kingdoms of life. Mineral formation pathways all involve uptake of ions from the environment, transport of ions by cells, sometimes temporary storage, and ultimately deposition in or outside of the cells. Even though the details of how all this is achieved vary enormously, all pathways need to respect both the chemical limitations of ion manipulation, as well as the many "housekeeping" roles of ions in cell functioning. Here we provide a chemical perspective on the biological pathways of biomineralization. Our approach is to compare and contrast the ion pathways involving calcium, phosphate, and carbonate in three very different organisms: the enormously abundant unicellular marine coccolithophores, the well investigated sea urchin larval model for single crystal formation, and the complex pathways used by vertebrates to form their bones. The comparison highlights both common and unique processes. Significantly, phosphate is involved in regulating calcium carbonate deposition and carbonate is involved in regulating calcium phosphate deposition. One often overlooked commonality is that, from uptake to deposition, the solutions involved are usually supersaturated. This therefore requires not only avoiding mineral deposition where it is not needed but also exploiting this saturated state to produce unstable mineral precursors that can be conveniently stored, redissolved, and manipulated into diverse shapes and upon deposition transformed into more ordered and hence often functional final deposits.
Minerals are formed by organisms in all of the kingdoms of life. Mineral formation pathways all involve uptake of ions from the environment, transport of ions by cells, sometimes temporary storage, and ultimately deposition in or outside of the cells. Even though the details of how all this is achieved vary enormously, all pathways need to respect both the chemical limitations of ion manipulation, as well as the many "housekeeping" roles of ions in cell functioning. Here we provide a chemical perspective on the biological pathways of biomineralization. Our approach is to compare and contrast the ion pathways involving calcium, phosphate, and carbonate in three very different organisms: the enormously abundant unicellular marine coccolithophores, the well investigated sea urchin larval model for single crystal formation, and the complex pathways used by vertebrates to form their bones. The comparison highlights both common and unique processes. Significantly, phosphate is involved in regulating calcium carbonate deposition and carbonate is involved in regulating calcium phosphate deposition. One often overlooked commonality is that, from uptake to deposition, the solutions involved are usually supersaturated. This therefore requires not only avoiding mineral deposition where it is not needed but also exploiting this saturated state to produce unstable mineral precursors that can be conveniently stored, redissolved, and manipulated into diverse shapes and upon deposition transformed into more ordered and hence often functional final deposits.
Many organisms form minerals for a wide
variety of functions. This
process of biomineralization involves many different minerals. About
half of these minerals contain calcium, including the abundantly formed
calcium carbonates (mainly calcite and aragonite, but also the less
abundant vaterite and hydrated species). The predominant mineral of
the vertebrate skeleton is the calcium phosphate mineral called carbonate
hydroxyapatite. Nevertheless, all vertebrates also form calcium carbonate
as part of their gravity and sound reception detectors.[1] Calcium, carbonate, and phosphate are also integral
components of the metabolism of every cell, serving fundamental roles
in signal transduction and protein activity.[2] Here, we provide some aspects of the uptake, transport, and deposition
of these ions in biology from a chemical perspective. We do bear in
mind the insightful adage that “biology is chemistry with a
history”.[3] This implies that we
should be well aware that we cannot solve biological mysteries without
considering chemistry. On the other hand, biology developed abilities
during evolution to manipulate chemistry seemingly almost at will,
in order to form minerals. These minerals are formed at the appropriate
locations, at the correct time and rate, and with appropriate atomic
order.The ultimate source of ions is from the environment in
which the
organism lives. The process of biological mineral deposition can be
divided into stages: ions must reach the tissue, combine at some stage
with their counterions, achieve supersaturation of the salt solute,
and finally precipitate as a solid phase. Whichever way the ions reach
the mineral deposition site, be it from blood, seawater, or other
media, these ions are concentrated by orders of magnitude when they
are transformed from their dissolved state to the solid mineral. The
calcium concentration is 10 mM in seawater, 1 mM in freshwater, and
27 M in calcite. The calcium concentration in vertebrate blood is
1–2 mM[4] and in carbonate hydroxyapatite
is 31 M. Therefore, all the calcium contained in 2.7 × 103 mL of seawater is needed to deposit 1 cm3 of calcite
and all the calcium contained in 3 × 104 mL of blood
is needed to deposit 1 cm3 of carbonate hydroxyapatite.
At the same time, individual cells need to maintain their calcium
signaling capability by reducing the calcium concentration in their
cytosol to 100–200 nM. A major question therefore is: how do
mineralizing organisms balance all these different requirements?The calcite, aragonite, and carbonate hydroxyapatite that many
organisms use for forming their mineralized tissues have very low
solubilities. Seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcite and
aragonite,[5] and blood is supersaturated
with respect to carbonate hydroxyapatite.[6] There is thus a need to not only induce crystallization at the site
of mineralization but also prevent precipitation where and when it
is not desired. Moreover, ions are often temporarily stored.[1] These ions should be stored in a state that enables
them to be easily mobilized, namely, more soluble. In contrast, ions
that are deposited in the final mineralized tissue product need to
be in a solid state that produces a functional material. This is usually
in the more dense crystalline state, but in some cases the mature
mineral is in a disordered state. How is all this achieved?A simple assumption is that the calcium and carbonate pathways
are tailored to the needs of calcium carbonate depositors and the
calcium and phosphate pathways to the needs of calcium phosphate depositors.
The more we learn, however, the more we realize that this simple assumption
is often violated. Many calcium carbonate depositors are manipulating
aspects of their pathways with phosphate, and many calcium phosphate
depositors are manipulating aspects of their system with carbonate.[7] Yet another complication is that there may well
be several complementary and/or redundant ion uptake, transport, storage
and deposition pathways. Redundancy is a common phenomenon in biology.
Despite all this complexity, the biological processes involved in
manipulating calcium, carbonate, and phosphate and their corresponding
biogenic minerals must obey the rules of thermodynamics (although
often heavily influenced by kinetics) that determine the properties
of these ions in solution and in a solid state.The strategy
we use in this Perspective is to first compare and
contrast the ion pathways in three test cases. We chose calcite deposition
in coccolithophores since these single celled organisms produce approximately
half of the calcium carbonate deposits in the oceans.[8] Coccolithophores are thus very efficient and very successful
calcifiers. We chose spicule deposition in sea urchin larvae, because
sea urchins are easily amenable to fertilization in the laboratory
and therefore the process of mineral formation has been studied in
detail.[9] Finally, we chose to examine the
pathways leading to carbonate hydroxyapatite deposition by vertebrates
to form their bones. This pathway is probably the most widely investigated
but also possibly the most complicated.In the discussion, we
try to identify possible common underlying
processes used in all three systems, in the hope that at least some
may also apply to other biomineralizing systems. In order to facilitate
comparisons of such different systems, we divide the pathways into
three stages: uptake and transport to the site of mineral formation,
roles of the cells responsible for mineral formation, and processes
involved in mineral deposition and maturation.
Test Cases
Coccoliths
Coccoliths are mineralized scales that are
produced intracellularly by coccolithophores, a group of marine unicellular
algae.[10] Each coccolith is an ordered array
of calcite crystals and contains organic macromolecules (Figure A, B). The formation
of the coccolith occurs inside a specialized organelle (the coccolith
vesicle) and starts with the assembly of an organic base plate.[11] Calcite crystals start to grow on this substrate,
and when the coccolith is mature, it is exocytosed to the cell surface
(Figure C, D).[12] The crystals adopt a wide range of morphologies
and architectures that are species-specific and their formation is
under the strict control of the cell.[10,13]
Figure 1
Formation of
coccoliths. (A,B) SEM images of Coccolithus
braarudii coccoliths. The diploid life stage forms intricate
crystal morphologies (A), while the haploid stage forms simple rhombohedral
crystals (B). (C–F) Cellular anatomy of Pleurochrysis
carterae. (C, D) Sections in fixed cells show in (C) the
various cell organelles (Chl., chloroplast; Nu., nucleus; magenta
arrowheads indicate coccolith vesicles), and a high magnification
image shows in (D) a coccolith vesicle (blue arrowheads indicate the
crystals, yellow arrowhead indicates the organic base plate). Reprinted
with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (E) 3D rendering of a cryo-fixed
cell. The inset shows the vacuole (light brown) filled with Ca–P-rich
bodies (red) and coccoliths (blue). (F) 3D rendering of a live cell
using confocal microscopy, showing several dense intracellular pools
stained with DAPI (red); chloroplasts are in green. Reprinted with
permission from ref (18). Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Formation of
coccoliths. (A,B) SEM images of Coccolithus
braarudii coccoliths. The diploid life stage forms intricate
crystal morphologies (A), while the haploid stage forms simple rhombohedral
crystals (B). (C–F) Cellular anatomy of Pleurochrysis
carterae. (C, D) Sections in fixed cells show in (C) the
various cell organelles (Chl., chloroplast; Nu., nucleus; magenta
arrowheads indicate coccolith vesicles), and a high magnification
image shows in (D) a coccolith vesicle (blue arrowheads indicate the
crystals, yellow arrowhead indicates the organic base plate). Reprinted
with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (E) 3D rendering of a cryo-fixed
cell. The inset shows the vacuole (light brown) filled with Ca–P-rich
bodies (red) and coccoliths (blue). (F) 3D rendering of a live cell
using confocal microscopy, showing several dense intracellular pools
stained with DAPI (red); chloroplasts are in green. Reprinted with
permission from ref (18). Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.The calcite crystals of coccoliths are very small, less than a
micrometer in their thinnest dimension. Despite their small size,
these calcite crystals show a high degree of crystallinity and contain
very small concentrations of impurities and chemical substitutions.[14] Their chemical purity, and specifically the
very low levels of Mg substitution in the calcite lattice,[15] demonstrate that many of the ions in seawater
are excluded during the deposition process.
Uptake and Transport
The building blocks for coccolith
crystallization are ions in solution that the cell extracts from the
surrounding seawater. The chemical composition of modern seawater
is dominated by Na+, Cl–, Mg2+, and SO42–, whereas Ca2+ and bicarbonate (HCO3–) are less abundant
with concentrations of ∼10 and ∼2 mM, respectively.
Bicarbonate ions are the main carbonate species that are taken into
the cell.[16] Inside the cell, carbon utilization
is divided between the need of CO2 for photosynthesis and
the need of carbonate ions (CO32–) for
calcification.[16] Even though these two
processes are not functionally coupled, they represent two important
requirements for carbon that need to be regulated by the cell in order
to maintain homeostasis.Ion transport from seawater to the
coccolith vesicle is a highly selective process. Ion selectivity is
mediated by various proteins that function as ion channels and pumps
in the cell membrane. These complexes allow the passage of ionic species
according to their molecular affinity to the transport machinery.[17] At this initial stage, the cell discriminates
against the prevailing Mg2+ ions in seawater in favor of
calcium and creates a chemical composition inside the cell that is
very different from seawater. Another important ion transport process
is the expulsion of excess protons, formed during calcite precipitation,
back to the environment.[8] Calcium, bicarbonate,
and proton transport pathways are part of the metabolism and signal
transduction of every living cell, and the cellular machineries that
evolved for homeostatic transport pathways may or may not be the same
pathways used for mineralization. Importantly, direct uptake of seawater
by endocytosis is not involved in coccolith formation,[18] even though it is common in other biomineralization
processes.[19] This is demonstrated by the
fact that small molecules with an affinity for calcium such as calcein,
which cannot pass through membranes due to their charge, are not incorporated
into coccolith calcite.[18]
Intracellular
Ion Trafficking
The trafficking of ions
for mineral formation inside this single celled organism is much more
complex than previously assumed. The simplest scenario, often taken
as a default in the absence of alternatives, is to think of the cell
interior as an intermediate ion pool that transports ions to the terminal
ion pool, the vesicle in which the coccolith is formed. In several
studies, this assumption was extended to include additional ion pools
within the cell that participate in the transport systems.[8] These were usually carbon pools, such as the
chloroplast, that affect carbonate speciation within the cell.The trafficking of calcium is challenging for any eukaryotic cell,
because of the need to maintain the concentration of Ca2+ in the cytoplasm at the sub-micromolar scale in order to avoid cytotoxic
phenomena. Coccolithophores may circumvent this limitation by maintaining
various intracellular compartments that store dense phases with high
concentrations of calcium. One such compartment is a vacuole-like
organelle that contains spherical condensates unexpectedly comprising
primarily calcium and phosphorus and, not as would be expected, calcium
and carbonate (Figure E,F). The concentration of calcium in these dense phases can reach
∼10 M. The exact chemical form of the phosphorus is not clear,
but some indirect indications suggest that these are mainly polyphosphates.[7b,18] These anatomical and chemical characteristics are reminiscent of
acidocalcisomes, ion-rich organelles present in various organisms,
most of which do not form any minerals.[21] A second class of calcium-rich organelles in coccolithophores are
compartments that contain various membranes, vesicles, and other cellular
content.[22] These ion-rich compartments
have distinct anatomical properties and are characterized by a diverse
chemical composition that can contain multiple elements such as Na,
Mg, P, S, and Ca.[22]Currently, we
do not know the physiological roles of either of
these ion-containing compartments. It was shown that under some conditions
calcium can travel from these intracellular stores to the calcite
crystals of the coccoliths,[23] but other
evidence shows that these compartments do not change in number, size,
or abundance as a function of calcification activity.[18] Therefore, the most accurate way to describe the current
state of knowledge is that the coccolithophore cell contains several
dense mineral phases (the coccolith vesicle, Ca–P-rich bodies,
ion-rich compartments), which presumably maintain a complex net of
interactions and may have diverse sets of functions. The compartmentalization
into distinct pools within the cell allows flexibility in the use
of calcium and carbonate extracted from seawater. Some of these pools
may act as storage for calcium and phosphate, while others may transfer
material for the formation of coccoliths.
Coccolith Formation
The calcite crystals of the coccolith
nucleate and grow inside the confined environment of the coccolith
vesicle (Figure D).
The morphologies of the crystals are very diverse between species
and between life stages. The morphologies range from the thermodynamically
preferred rhombohedral habit of calcite to highly irregular and anisotropic
structures (Figure A, B). Even in the more complicated shapes, it is usually possible
to recognize some crystallographic facets.[14] Importantly, the morphology at the nanometer scale of the crystal
surfaces is smooth, lacking the granular texture that characterizes
crystals formed via an intermediate amorphous phase.[24] Recent native-state imaging of coccolith formation showed
that precursor phases dissolve inside the coccolith vesicle, giving
way to a process that is predominantly ion-by-ion growth and does
not involve an amorphous calcium carbonate precursor phase.[25]Nevertheless, the crystallization process
involves conditions that are different from crystal nucleation and
growth in bulk solution in vitro. Macromolecules play important roles
in the confined environment of the coccolith vesicle. Charged polysaccharides
complex calcium ions and transport them to the site of crystallization.[26] Interactions between these polysaccharides and
the organic base plate direct crystal nucleation to specific sites
where dense polymer-calcium phases are formed.[26,27] These chemical interactions between inorganic ions, soluble macromolecules,
and insoluble organic scaffolds can direct the chemistry of this system
to favor nucleation and growth of the calcite crystals under controlled
conditions.
Sea Urchin Larval Spicules
Sea urchin
larvae build
a calcitic skeleton consisting of two ∼70 μm long and
∼3 μm thick spicules with convoluted morphology (Figure A,B). Interestingly,
the fundamental characteristics of the spicule morphology remained
essentially unchanged in sea urchin species over hundreds of millions
of years.[28] Spicule formation occurs inside
a continuous membrane-bound volume (syncytium) that is formed by the
fusion of cell membranes from specialized primary mesenchymal cells
(PMCs), the cells that control spicule formation and mineralization.[29] Each spicule diffracts X-rays or electrons as
a slightly disordered single crystal of Mg-containing calcite, assuming
the formula Ca(1– MgCO3.[30] The
spicule mineral contains 3–5 mol % Mg2+ ions,[30c,31] causing a minor reduction in the calcite crystallographic unit cell
dimensions and an increase of 1.5% in solubility (log Ksp = −8.35) relative to pure calcite
(log Ksp = −8.48).[32] The reduction in the calcite cell dimensions
indicates that at least part of the Mg ions substitute for Ca ions
in the crystal lattice. The initially formed triradiate spicule, however,
comprises 90% amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) and 10% calcite and
in its mature stage still contains >40% ACC.[33] The ACC may accommodate more Mg relative to crystalline
calcite,
and thus, it may be expected that the Mg distribution is not homogeneous.[34]
Figure 2
Mineral deposition process
in sea urchin larvae. (A) Light micrographs
of a live larva of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus taken 41 h after fertilization (hpf) (top image); image at the bottom:
the same larva observed under polarized light, showing the crystalline
nature of the spicules. (B) SEM micrograph of an isolated spicule
from Litechinus pictus larva. The spicule is pseudocolored
yellow to facilitate observation. (C) Confocal fluorescence image
of a 46hpf larva developed continuously in calcein-labeled seawater.
Note that the spicule (S) is fully labeled. Many intracellular vesicles
are also fluorescent, indicating uptake by endocytosis of seawater.
(D) Cryo-FIB-SEM micrograph of a high-pressure frozen 40hpf larva.
The cyan vesicle is open toward the body cavity (blastocoel), which
is filled with a seawater-like solution. BF, blastocoel fluid; CM,
cell membrane; N, nucleus. (E) Segmentation of cryo-FIB-SEM serial
milling and block face imaging stack acquired from 40hpf high-pressure
frozen larva. The segmentation shows the syncytium enveloping the
spicule. A vesicle (green arrow) is depositing onto the growing spicule.
Reprinted and modified with permission from (41). Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
(F) Segmentation of cryo-soft X-ray tomography of a PMC taken from
36hpf larva. The colored particles are Ca-rich particles. Cytoplasm
and other cellular vesicles and organelles are gray.
Mineral deposition process
in sea urchin larvae. (A) Light micrographs
of a live larva of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus taken 41 h after fertilization (hpf) (top image); image at the bottom:
the same larva observed under polarized light, showing the crystalline
nature of the spicules. (B) SEM micrograph of an isolated spicule
from Litechinus pictus larva. The spicule is pseudocolored
yellow to facilitate observation. (C) Confocal fluorescence image
of a 46hpf larva developed continuously in calcein-labeled seawater.
Note that the spicule (S) is fully labeled. Many intracellular vesicles
are also fluorescent, indicating uptake by endocytosis of seawater.
(D) Cryo-FIB-SEM micrograph of a high-pressure frozen 40hpf larva.
The cyan vesicle is open toward the body cavity (blastocoel), which
is filled with a seawater-like solution. BF, blastocoel fluid; CM,
cell membrane; N, nucleus. (E) Segmentation of cryo-FIB-SEM serial
milling and block face imaging stack acquired from 40hpf high-pressure
frozen larva. The segmentation shows the syncytium enveloping the
spicule. A vesicle (green arrow) is depositing onto the growing spicule.
Reprinted and modified with permission from (41). Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
(F) Segmentation of cryo-soft X-ray tomography of a PMC taken from
36hpf larva. The colored particles are Ca-rich particles. Cytoplasm
and other cellular vesicles and organelles are gray.The source of calcium ions for
spicule formation is seawater.[35] Carbonate
either comes exogenously from seawater or is produced endogenously
through oxidative processing by the cells during respiration.[36] Seawater enters the internal cavity of the sea
urchin embryo, the blastocoel, which has a composition very similar
to that of seawater.[37] From the blastocoel,
the ions enter the cells. When the seawater is spiked with the water-soluble
and membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye calcein, all the cells, including
both PMCs and the epithelial cells delimiting the larva, become fluorescent[19a,38] (Figure C). The
forming spicule emits fluorescence as well. The presence of calcein
inside the cells indicates endocytosis of seawater, meaning that the
calcein molecules are internalized together with the seawater in which
they are dissolved.[19b] Cryo-electron microscopy
imaging showed that vesicles and vacuoles with diameters of 2 μm
or even more are present within a PMC.[19a] Some of the vacuoles have small openings to the blastocoel and could
therefore take up seawater (Figure D). Some of these vacuoles are connected into networks
of vesicles of variable sizes, ranging from few hundreds of nanometers
to 1 μm. Thus, seawater and its contents can be distributed
within this vacuolar network around the PMC. Calcium transport inside
the cell and cell organelles may in part be mediated by calcium channels
and/or calcium pumps. Calcium pumps are responsible mainly for the
active transport of calcium out of the cell, but they are involved
also in the uptake of calcium, especially in mitochondria.[39] It does appear, however, that most of the calcium,
if not all, originates from endocytosis.
Intracellular Ion Trafficking
Particles of amorphous
calcium carbonate (ACC) form within intracellular vesicles in the
PMCs.[40] These ACC particles are eventually
transferred to the syncytium and from there to the growing spicule[41] (Figure E). Kahil et al. mapped the distribution of states and the
concentrations of calcium in particles within PMCs that can be detected
by cryo-soft X-ray spectroscopy.[40b] There
are around 200 Ca-containing particles in one cell (Figure F). The size of the Ca-containing
particles ranges from 100 to 500 nm, and the Ca concentration inside
the particles ranges from 1 to 15 M. The chemical environment of the
Ca ions ranges in a continuum from calcium in a concentrated water
solution to calcium in anhydrous ACC. The particles may be occluded
individually inside a vesicle, or there may be multiple particles
in one vesicle. Kahil et al. surmise that calcium from seawater concentrates
gradually inside the vesicle, until particles of ACC precipitate.Several other processes must, however, be performed before the ACC
particles condense and move to the spicule. In seawater, the ratio
of Ca to Mg is 1:5, and in the spicule mineral the Mg content is 5
mol %. In seawater, Na and Cl dominate and they are practically absent
from the spicule mineral. This means that a major part of the Mg ions
and all Na and Cl ions must be removed from the Ca-containing vesicles.
How this occurs is not known, but Mg, Na, and Cl can conceivably be
released into the cytosol environment as free or complexed ions and/or
trafficked outside the cell by transporters.[42] Magnesium is involved in the regulation of several cellular functions,
and major fluxes of Mg ions in either direction occur across the plasma
membrane.[43] But how cells regulate Mg2+ homeostasis and transport is far from clear.[44] Na and Cl ions are mainly involved in osmotic
pressure regulation. Sodium ions exchange with potassium ions, whose
concentration is in turn regulated through potassium ion channels.
Chloride ions also exit cellular membranes through selective chloride
channels.[45]The calcium counterion
in the mineral phase, carbonate, is present
in seawater at 0.3 mM concentration, which combined with the calcium
concentration already exceeds calcite or ACC solubility.[46] This means that calcium carbonate mineral in
theory can precipitate from the endocytosed water using only the Ca
and carbonate ions that are there, provided that nucleation inhibitors
such as Mg have already been removed. Even more carbonate ions become
available, if the ten-times more abundant bicarbonate ions transform
into carbonate, with subsequent release of protons. PMCs use Na+/H+ exchange mechanisms to control cellular pH
homeostasis during maintenance of the skeleton.[36b] Recently, a new transporter was identified, which mediates
the exit of protons from the cell.[47] It
is not clear whether the same transporter also mediates exit of protons
from the mineralizing vesicles. The enzyme carbonic anhydrase catalyzes
the transformation of carbonic acid into protons and bicarbonate ions.
Three carbonic anhydrase enzymes specific to PMCs, have been identified.[48] It is likely that carbonic anhydrase contributes
to the regulation of carbonate homeostasis, shifting the equilibrium
in the direction of carbonate production, when protons are removed.
Additional sources of carbonate may be carbonate transporters from
the blastocoel, or synthesis from the oxygen processed during respiration
in the mitochondria.
Mineralized Tissue Formation
Even
though each spicule
is a single calcite crystal,[30a−30c] more than one calcite nucleation
site exists inside the syncytium in the first stages of spicule deposition.[49] The different nucleation sites compete with
each other, until only one nucleation site prevails. A calcite crystal
forms with distinct morphology and grows into a planar triradiate
spicule. The arms of the triradiate spicule extend along the a* crystallographic axes of calcite, and the calcite c axis is perpendicular to the triradiate spicule. In a
later stage, the crystal elongates along the c axis,
giving rise to the body rod, and subsequently to the other rods, which
complete the convoluted spicule morphology (Figure B).[50] How the
relation between the crystallographic directions of calcite and the
directions of growth of the spicule inside the syncytium is controlled
and regulated by the cells is one of the unsolved mysteries of sea
urchin larval spicule growth.[51]Amorphous
calcium carbonate particles, formed inside the PMC cells, are extruded
into the syncytium (Figure E). Here, they attach both to the rod extremities to elongate
the growing spicule and along the length of the rods to thicken them.
Once the newly extruded particles join with the already crystallizing
spicule, they crystallize by secondary nucleation in a manner akin
to percolation.[52] Before and during this
stage, considerable amounts of water must still be eliminated from
the particles, because crystalline calcite does not contain lattice
water. Not all the particles, however, crystallize,[33,53] and the intimate coexistence of the crystalline and amorphous material
probably contributes to reducing spicule brittleness and increasing
spicule flexibility.[54]An additional
parameter contributing to structuring the spicule
is the glycoproteins composing the organic matrix of the spicule.
There is little organic material inside the spicule (0.05% of mineral),
and this includes about 50 proteins that have been identified, and
form the protein matrix of the spicule.[55] These proteins are most probably responsible for many characteristics
of the mature spicule, including the nucleation site, the growth into
the complex morphology, and contribute to the mechanical properties.
Little however is known about the protein functions.[56]
Vertebrate Bone
The mineralized
collagen fibril is
the building block of bone (Figure A).[57] The plate-shaped crystals
are aligned in layers across the fibril, and as the fibrils themselves
are aligned, the overall structure is layered (Figure B). The collagen fibrils can be arranged
in different ways to form different bone types.[58] Bone is thus a composite of mainly organized arrays of
Type I collagen fibrils impregnated and surrounded by plate-shaped
crystals of carbonate hydroxyapatite, whose average composition for
one specific bone is (Ca8.54Mg0.25Na0.38)[(PO4)4.99(CO3)1.01](OH)0.99.[59] The crystals are about 250
× 500 × 2–4 nm in dimensions[1] (Figure B). In bone
mineral, carbonate constitutes about 4–6% by weight.[60] Carbonate plays a crucial role in the mineral
formation processes, such as the determination of crystal shapes and
the stability of the crystals.[61]
Figure 3
(A) SEM image
of fractured baboon tibia after removal of the organic
matrix using sodium hypochlorite. Note the plate-shaped crystals organized
in layers. (B) TEM image of an isolated mineralized collagen fibril
extracted mechanically from turkey tendon. The banding is due to the
presence of more plate-shaped crystals in the gap region of the collagen
fibril as compared to the overlap region. (C) Cryo-SEM image of the
fracture surface of an embryonic chicken bone showing in green the
distribution of mineral (based on the BSE image of the same area).
Note the presence of vesicles containing mineral particles inside
the cell (arrows).
(A) SEM image
of fractured baboon tibia after removal of the organic
matrix using sodium hypochlorite. Note the plate-shaped crystals organized
in layers. (B) TEM image of an isolated mineralized collagen fibril
extracted mechanically from turkey tendon. The banding is due to the
presence of more plate-shaped crystals in the gap region of the collagen
fibril as compared to the overlap region. (C) Cryo-SEM image of the
fracture surface of an embryonic chicken bone showing in green the
distribution of mineral (based on the BSE image of the same area).
Note the presence of vesicles containing mineral particles inside
the cell (arrows).There are clearly parallel
and/or alternative calcium, phosphate
and carbonate pathways involved in the formation of bone mineral.
This complexity/redundancy in part may reflect the fact that bone
formation is a relatively well investigated system. The complexity
may also be a strategy that is tailored to meet different requirements,
such as rapid surface thickening of bone, especially during early
development, versus maintenance of mature bone by remodeling.[62] Furthermore, there are pathways that are specific
to one process, such as bone elongation in the growth plate, or pathways
that are responsible for producing hyper-mineralized bones.[63] It is therefore challenging to identify common
underlying ion pathways in bone formation.The ultimate source of ions for
bone mineralization is the environment, i.e., the food and ions in
water for aquatic vertebrates and food and drinking water for terrestrial
vertebrates. Uptake of ions occurs in the intestinal tract. These
ions are transferred in solution through the walls of the tract into
the vasculature.[64] Many fish deposit amorphous
calcium carbonate in their intestinal tracts, often in large quantities.[65] It has been suggested that the amorphous phase
is produced in order to store precipitated CaCO3 temporarily
in the intestine.[65b,66] Many herbivores form spherulites
of calcium carbonate in their intestinal tracts.[67] So these fish and herbivores are able to extract more calcium
and carbonate in their intestines than they need for their metabolic
purposes and for skeleton formation.Calcium, carbonate, and
phosphate are transported in the vasculature. Most mammalian biofluids
(blood serum, saliva, etc.) are supersaturated with respect to carbonate
hydroxyapatite, and when a precipitate forms, the phase that forms
is amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP).[6b] An interesting observation reported by Neuman and Neuman is that
“an isolated sample of blood or serum can ‘hold’
considerably greater quantities of calcium and phosphate than occur
normally.”[6a] This is presumably
due to the fact that many of these ions are bound to charged molecules
and macromolecules, and especially phosphopeptides that form a stable
complex with ACP.[6b] Holt et al. suggest
that this allows most biofluids to remain stable near physiological
pH, even though they are supersaturated with respect to carbonate
hydroxyapatite. This in turn enables hard and soft tissues to coexist.
Blood is replete with potent crystal nucleation inhibitors that prevent
precipitation, such as Matrix Gla Protein (MGP),[68] fetuin-A,[69] and polyphosphate.[70] Removal of these inhibitors results in catastrophic
ectopic mineral formation. Vertebrates have thus evolved a widespread
system of inhibitors that have to be removed at the site of mineral
deposition in order to enable skeletal formation (see below).Vertebrates use the mineral in many of their bones as a reservoir
to maintain ion homeostasis (reviewed in ref (71)). The short-term maintenance
of calcium and phosphate concentrations in the serum is achieved via
the cells embedded in bone and the thin channels that connect them
(the osteocyte-canalicular system).[72] The
long-term maintenance of calcium and phosphate levels is by removal
of small volumes of bone by osteoclasts and deposition of new bone
by osteoblasts in the remodeling process.Another strategy used
for preventing ectopic mineralization is
to transport solid mineral in the blood within membrane-bound vesicles,
as was observed in chick embryos.[73] Such
membrane-bound vesicles were only observed in sparse amounts in the
growth plates of 9 week old mice.[74] The
structure of these mineral containing vesicles in blood serum and
in osteoblasts and osteoclasts is very similar, namely, small mineral
particles in a relatively large vesicle[73,75] (Figure C). This raises the
possibility that these mineral-containing vesicles are derived from
bone that has been removed by osteoclasts and the vesicles with their
mineral particles are transported to the osteoblasts in the blood
serum.
Intra- and Intercellular Ion and Mineral Trafficking for Bone
Formation and Resorption
Osteoblasts are responsible for
bone extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and mineralization. The
osteoblasts presumably receive ions and mineral from the vasculature.[76] These ions are temporarily stored within the
cell in various organelles, including the membrane-rich endoplasmic
reticulum and the mitochondria. Solid mineral deposits are frequently
observed in mitochondria.[77] Vesicles containing
small granules of mineral have also been identified in osteoblasts[75b,78] (Figure C). Some
of these vesicles are closely associated with the mitochondria.[79] The mineral phase within these vesicles is disordered
calcium phosphate (ACP).[75b]Some
of the intracellular ions in osteoblasts are used for maintaining
homeostasis within the cells, whereas most of the soluble ions are
transported into the mineralizing ECM. In some cases, a solid ACP
phase is transferred into the mineralizing ECM.[80] A third route for transferring ions into the mineralizing
ECM is via the budding of vesicles that have the capability of taking
up soluble ions from the extracellular environment and depositing
them as an amorphous phase.[81] These are
the so-called matrix vesicles.[82] As not
all mineralizing tissues seem to have solid mineral particles or produce
matrix vesicles, we infer that the major intracellular pathways for
mineralization involve dissolved and/or bound ions of phosphate, calcium
and carbonate.In zebrafish tail bone formation, Akiva et al.
observed that the
vast majority of cells present around the forming tail bone do not
have intracellular mineral particles.[83] Furthermore, the cells maintain a thin space between them that is
continuous between the artery and the forming bone.[84] Akiva et al. therefore raised the possibility that ions
in solution or ions bound to other molecules may be transported directly
from the vasculature to the site of bone mineral formation without
entering cells.During long bone elongation, hypertrophic cartilage
forming cells
(chondrocytes) produce an extracellular collagen and proteoglycan
rich matrix. This matrix mineralizes at some distance from the cell
surface.[85] The hypertrophic chondrocytes
do not form any intracellular solid mineral.[85b] It is therefore inferred that the source of the ions for cartilage
mineralization is directly from the blood vessels.[74,85b]The preformed organic
matrix of bone is dominated by fibrils composed of Type I collagen
molecules. The first mineral that is deposited in this matrix forms
isolated islets of amorphous ACP[86] (Figure C), which in osteoblast
cell cultures is carbonate rich.[61b] In
the zebrafish tail fin, these islets of ACP are located between fibrils.[80] The mineral subsequently penetrates into the
fibrils where crystals of carbonate hydroxyapatite are nucleated and
grow first in the gap zone as needles.[87] The crystals then become plate-shaped and subsequently penetrate
into the overlap zones.[88] In many bones,
crystals are also observed to be arranged on and/or close to the surface
of the fibrils.[89]There are many
other macromolecules (proteins, proteoglycans and glycoproteins) in
this matrix, but not inside the collagen fibrils. There is an intricate
interplay between the Type I collagen structure and the local ionic
strength that is controlled mostly by the proteoglycans.[90] For example, in the preformed matrix of the
continuously forming incisor of a rodent, the proteoglycan assemblage
and the collagen fibril morphology changes from close to the cell
surface to the mineralization front.[91] In
parallel the collagen fibril structure changes, as evidenced by an
increase in the fibril diameter, and a change in the axial repeat
structure (D-banding) from 67 to 71 nm.[92] The deposition of the initial mineral in the organic matrix takes
place in these extended and swollen fibrils. It is conceivable that
these structural changes facilitate the ACP penetration into the fibril
gap zones. It has also been observed that the C-terminal ends of the
fibrils promote the infiltration of the mineral, and the charged residues
in the gap and overlap regions induce crystallization of the amorphous
phase.[93] Another implication of this process
is that the formation of crystalline carbonate hydroxyapatite has
to initially be prevented outside the collagen fibril, and this requires
the presence of crystal inhibiting molecules, such as fetuin or pyrophosphate.[94]
Discussion
At
first sight, the test cases described above may give the impression
that evolution gave rise to diverse systems, where each organism uses
a very specific set of tools and pathways to form minerals. In some
aspects, such as the protein complexes, the functional macromolecules
and even the mineral composition, this is correct. The three test
cases do however share common traits, such as forming intracellular
mineral deposits isolated from their environments by membranes, manipulating
solutions that are saturated with respect to calcium carbonate and/or
calcium phosphate, and the involvement of different ions, such as
carbonate in phosphate minerals and polyphosphate in carbonate minerals.
Significantly, the chemical nature of the mineralization process imposes
the same set of physical limitations on each of the biological systems.
By integrating the chemical processes and the properties of the chemical
phases, we can derive some insights into the pathways, which evolved
to circumvent the chemical constraints that would prevent the material
from fulfilling its biological function. These points are schematically
illustrated in Figure .
Figure 4
Schematic illustration showing the three common processes that
make up ion pathways in the biomineralization of coccolithophores,
sea urchin larvae, and vertebrate bone. These pathways involve ion
uptake, cellular manipulation and deposition of the mature mineral
phase. The Y-axis shows the approximate calcium concentration
ranges in which these three processes operate. The solid lines indicate
known processes and dotted lines indicate putative ones. Question
marks highlight yet uncharacterized stages in the pathway. Note the
enormous calcium concentration range for mineralizing cells. Irrespective
of whether the mature mineral phase is a carbonate or phosphate mineral,
the ion pathways all involve calcium, carbonate and phosphate as is
schematically illustrated by the blend of colors for the different
ions.
Schematic illustration showing the three common processes that
make up ion pathways in the biomineralization of coccolithophores,
sea urchin larvae, and vertebrate bone. These pathways involve ion
uptake, cellular manipulation and deposition of the mature mineral
phase. The Y-axis shows the approximate calcium concentration
ranges in which these three processes operate. The solid lines indicate
known processes and dotted lines indicate putative ones. Question
marks highlight yet uncharacterized stages in the pathway. Note the
enormous calcium concentration range for mineralizing cells. Irrespective
of whether the mature mineral phase is a carbonate or phosphate mineral,
the ion pathways all involve calcium, carbonate and phosphate as is
schematically illustrated by the blend of colors for the different
ions.A starting point is to consider
the nature of the fluids involved
in biomineralization and their common solution chemistry properties.
A common trend that can be deduced from the test cases is that most,
if not all, the aqueous solutions are supersaturated with respect
to at least one of the relevant mineral phases. In vertebrates, the
intestinal tract, the blood, the extracellular space in forming bone,
and the environment within the collagen fibrils are all supersaturated
with respect to at least one phase of calcium phosphate.[4c,95] Seawater is supersaturated with respect to calcite,[5] and so is presumably the extracellular space of the sea
urchin larval spicule and the coccolith vesicle, where calcite precipitates.
It is therefore interesting to consider that one of the main chemical
properties that needs to be controlled along the crystallization pathway
is the inhibition of nucleation of unwanted mineral phases prior to
the precipitation at the final site. In vertebrates, many macromolecules
that inhibit nucleation in vivo have been identified.[68,69,76] It would not be surprising if
analogous nucleation inhibiting systems involving macromolecules are
active in sea urchins and coccolithophores.[96] There are many examples of proteins that inhibit nucleation in vitro.[93,97]It seems that the common chemical mechanism for inhibiting
nucleation
from seawater and body fluid solutions is the presence of ionic inhibitors,
which operate on the kinetics of the crystallization rather than on
the thermodynamics, making the formation of crystal nuclei improbable.
A good example is the high concentration of Mg ions in seawater that
prevents nucleation of calcium carbonate.[5] Mg may have a similar role in the blood serum. It is interesting
to note that many pathological minerals found in humans contain Mg,[98] indicating that Mg is a priori present and when
uncontrolled precipitation occurs Mg is incorporated into the ectopic
solid phase. Solutions rich in many nucleation-inhibiting chemical
species make it possible to achieve high degrees of supersaturation
and molecular crowding. These are also the conditions that favor the
initial formation of amorphous phases rather than the more stable
crystalline phases (Ostwald’s Rule of Stages[99]). Accordingly, the common biological strategy of using
intermediate amorphous phases as precursors for mineral formation,
may well have evolved from the common need of organisms to prevent
ectopic nucleation, and by so doing facilitate the formation of metastable
solutions.One fundamental enigmatic issue for all three test
cases is understanding
the factors that control the ordered nucleation of the final mineral
phases. Nucleation does not occur just because of removal of inhibitory
factors, but is rather controlled in space, in time and along the
sequence of events. In several cases in biomineralization, acidic
macromolecules adsorbed on a nucleating surface were shown to induce
oriented nucleation of crystals by virtue of their complementarity
to ionic motifs on specific crystal planes.[100] Interestingly, the same complementarity may lead to inhibition of
crystal nucleation or growth when the macromolecules are not immobilized
on the nucleating surface,[97b,101] providing further
protection against ectopic nucleation.In all three test cases
examined here, some kind of dense amorphous
phases were observed, even though the Ca-rich bodies within coccolithophores
are intracellular storage sites that do not participate directly in
the crystallization process. For sea urchin larval spicules and bone,
the crystallization mechanisms by which the mature crystalline phase
is formed involve a direct solid-state transformation of an amorphous
precursor, whereas for coccoliths the process includes ion-by-ion
crystal growth. In principle, any intermediate between ion-by-ion
crystal growth and crystallization from an amorphous precursor is
conceivable, and there are probably processes in biomineralization
covering the whole range between the two options.[102] In the sea urchin, the ACC granules crystallize by secondary
nucleation from one original oriented crystal located in the center
of the triradiate spicule.[97d,103] During bone formation,
ACP particles penetrate the collagen fibril and give rise to the much
smaller oriented carbonate hydroxyapatite crystals nucleated within
the collagen fibrils. The charged residues in the gap zone of collagen
may be the nucleating agents, in the absence of an additional nucleating
protein.[104] The coccolith crystals nucleate
in close proximity to an organic substrate and grow inside the coccolith
vesicle in a process that resembles ion-by-ion growth.[10]A general principle in biologically controlled
crystallization
is that biology achieves control over phase transitions by reducing
extreme jumps in energy levels. Nucleation is defined as a critical
phenomenon, which occurs catastrophically at high supersaturation,
once the activation energy barrier is overcome. By controlling the
chemical environment of the nucleation sites through compartmentalization
and control over pH and/or by introducing inhibitors and catalysts,
the energy barriers are reduced, creating smoother energy landscapes.
This is a general concept in biology, which is clearly relevant in
biomineralization.The presence of various intermediate mineral
phases in organisms
that employ different crystallization pathways suggests that crystallization
via an amorphous precursor is not necessarily a linear process of
sequential phase transitions that ultimately form the mature mineral.
It appears to be more complex and flexible, as dense intracellular
and extracellular mineral phases can serve diverse functions, from
storage or removal to crystallization. This attribute is shared by
all three test cases. Different dense mineral phases are present in
the coccolithophore cell and involve polyphosphate complexes, whereas
the final product is calcium carbonate. This situation is similar
in sea urchin larval PMC cells, where some new evidence indicates
that relatively large amounts of phosphate ions may contribute to
the ACC phase stability. In the vertebrates, the variety of dense
mineral phases produced, with carbonates in the calcium phosphate
minerals and possibly phosphates in the carbonate minerals, may point
to different functions for these minerals. One example is the formation
of a disordered precursor phase with a Ca/P ratio of around 1.[105] Other examples include the formation of amorphous
calcium carbonate in the intestinal tract of fish and calcite in the
vestibulary system.[65]An important
compositional change that is shared by all three cases
is the need to exclude from the initial amorphous phases chemical
species that are abundant in the mother solutions and are absent or
almost absent in the mature mineral phase. The most abundant component
of mother solutions is water, and the transient amorphous phases are
still highly hydrated. Mg ions, and especially sodium and chloride
ions, which are abundant in seawater, are a minor constituent in coccolith
and sea urchin calcite. How this is achieved is not clear at all.
Also some macromolecules that interact with the mineral ions in intermediate
stages need to be excluded, for example, polyphosphates that complex
calcium in coccolithophores and fetuin, pyrophosphate, and polyphosphate
in vertebrates. Here, the marked differences between the test cases
may point to important disparities. The calcite of coccoliths is very
pure, both in terms of inorganic and macromolecular impurities. This
may result either from a very selective transport process into the
coccolith vesicle, or from the chemical process of mainly ion-by-ion
growth that more easily enables exclusion of impurities. On the other
hand, the sea urchin spicule calcite contains about 0.1% by weight
macromolecules and can incorporate approximately 5 mol % MgCO3. This may stem from the direct incorporation of solution
that originates from seawater and the solid-state transformation of
the amorphous precursor phase. Pokroy et al.[106] have demonstrated the presence of high and low Mg calcite phases
in echinoderm skeletal elements that are thought to have been formed
by spinodal decomposition.From the biological side of the crystallization
process, cells
need to maintain homeostasis and this imposes chemical constraints.
For example, the concentration of free calcium in the cytoplasm cannot
exceed the micromolar level. Some organisms solve this problem by
enabling the formation of calcified minerals via extracellular transport
routes, as may occur in some bone formation processes. Another option
is to keep the intracellular Ca-rich phases compartmentalized along
the crystallization pathway, as occurs in all three test cases. It
is still unclear how coccolithophores maintain the needed flux of
calcium, as the coccolith vesicle is intracellular and not in direct
contact with any seawater-derived solution. Since intracellular ion-rich
phases can be found in all three cases, as well as in many other organisms,
some of which do not form any kind of minerals, it seems that the
ability to concentrate ions inside a cell is rooted deep in evolution
and represents a common feature of many organisms.
Concluding Comment
Organisms build mineralized materials with unique mechanical-structural
properties and architectures, often with a hierarchical complexity
well above that of our most advanced synthetic materials. In most
cases, we do not know how this is achieved, to the point that it may
appear that biology bends the rules of chemistry and thermodynamics
to achieve what it does. This is obviously not true. Only recently
are we starting to understand some of the rules of the game, as well
as some of the fundamental problems that biology is faced with when
building mineralized materials starting from relatively dilute ion
solutions.We understand that even though biology cannot bend
the rules of
chemistry, it can put chemistry at the service of biomineralization
by manipulating the environment, the conditions, the components, and
the kinetics of the system. The rules and problems that we identify
here may apply to many more mineralization processes than the three
test cases examined here.Were we to try to understand the ion
pathways that organisms evolved
for uptake, transport, and deposition of calcium, carbonate, and phosphate
ions, using only the tools of synthetic chemistry, we would inevitably
fail. The only way to really understand these complex pathways is
to always keep in mind that indeed biology is chemistry with a history.[3]
Authors: Julia Mahamid; Barbara Aichmayer; Eyal Shimoni; Roy Ziblat; Chenghao Li; Stefan Siegel; Oskar Paris; Peter Fratzl; Steve Weiner; Lia Addadi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fabio Nudelman; Koen Pieterse; Anne George; Paul H H Bomans; Heiner Friedrich; Laura J Brylka; Peter A J Hilbers; Gijsbertus de With; Nico A J M Sommerdijk Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Keren Kahil; Neta Varsano; Andrea Sorrentino; Eva Pereiro; Peter Rez; Steve Weiner; Lia Addadi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yuval Kadan; Fergus Tollervey; Neta Varsano; Julia Mahamid; Assaf Gal Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pupa U P A Gilbert; Kristin D Bergmann; Nicholas Boekelheide; Sylvie Tambutté; Tali Mass; Frédéric Marin; Jess F Adkins; Jonathan Erez; Benjamin Gilbert; Vanessa Knutson; Marjorie Cantine; Javier Ortega Hernández; Andrew H Knoll Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 14.136