Literature DB >> 34881481

External validation and comparison of risk score models in pediatric heart transplants.

Alia Dani1, Justin S Heidel1, Tingting Qiu2, Yin Zhang2, Yizhao Ni2, Md Monir Hossain2, Clifford Chin3, David L S Morales1, Bin Huang2, Farhan Zafar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric heart transplant (PHT) patients have the highest waitlist mortality of solid organ transplants, yet more than 40% of viable hearts are unutilized. A tool for risk prediction could impact these outcomes. This study aimed to compare and validate the PHT risk score models (RSMs) in the literature.
METHODS: The literature was reviewed to identify RSMs published. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was used to validate the published models identified in a pediatric cohort (<18 years) transplanted between 2017 and 2019 and compared against the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) 2021 model. Primary outcome was post-transplant 1-year mortality. Odds ratios were obtained to evaluate the association between risk score groups and 1-year mortality. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the RSM scores on their goodness-of-fit, using Delong's test.
RESULTS: Six recipient and one donor RSMs published between 2008 and 2021 were included in the analysis. The validation cohort included 1,003 PHT. Low-risk groups had a significantly better survival than high-risk groups as predicted by Choudhry (OR = 4.59, 95% CI [2.36-8.93]) and Fraser III (3.17 [1.43-7.05]) models. Choudhry's and SRTR models achieved the best overall performance (AUC = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively). When adjusted for CHD and ventricular assist device support, all models reported better predictability [AUC > 0.6]. Choudhry (AUC = 0.69) and SRTR (AUC = 0.71) remained the best predicting RSMs even after adjustment.
CONCLUSION: Although the RSMs by SRTR and Choudhry provided the best prediction for 1-year mortality, none demonstrated a strong (AUC ≥ 0.8) concordance statistic. All published studies lacked advanced analytical approaches and were derived from an inherently limited dataset.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1-year mortality; pediatric heart transplantation; risk score models

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34881481      PMCID: PMC9157612          DOI: 10.1111/petr.14204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  21 in total

1.  A risk-prediction model for in-hospital mortality after heart transplantation in US children.

Authors:  C S Almond; K Gauvreau; C E Canter; S K Rajagopal; G E Piercey; T P Singh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  A Recipient Risk Prediction Tool for Short-term Mortality After Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Swati Choudhry; Yunfei Wang; Susan W Denfield; Antonio G Cabrera; Jack F Price; Hari P Tunuguntla; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Charles E Canter; William J Dreyer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Pondering Higher-Risk Pediatric Heart Donors: Can We Use More?

Authors:  Kyle W Riggs; Benjamin J Kroslowitz; Clifford Chin; Farhan Zafar; David L S Morales
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Pediatric Heart Donor Assessment Tool (PH-DAT): A novel donor risk scoring system to predict 1-year mortality in pediatric heart transplantation.

Authors:  Farhan Zafar; Robert D Jaquiss; Christopher S Almond; Angela Lorts; Clifford Chin; Raheel Rizwan; Roosevelt Bryant; James S Tweddell; David L S Morales
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  The Number of Refusals for Donor Organ Quality Does Not Impact Heart Transplant Outcomes in Children.

Authors:  Raheel Rizwan; Farhan Zafar; Roosevelt Bryant; James S Tweddell; Angela Lorts; Clifford Chin; David L Morales
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Children's Heart Assessment Tool for Transplantation (CHAT) Score: A Novel Risk Score Predicts Survival After Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Charles D Fraser; Joshua C Grimm; Xun Zhou; Cecillia Lui; Kate Giuliano; Alejandro Suarez-Pierre; Todd C Crawford; J Trent Magruder; Narutoshi Hibino; Luca A Vricella
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2019-05

7.  MELD-XI Score Predicts Early Mortality in Patients After Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Joshua C Grimm; Ashish S Shah; J Trent Magruder; Arman Kilic; Vicente Valero; Samuel P Dungan; Ryan J Tedford; Stuart D Russell; Glenn J R Whitman; Christopher M Sciortino
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Calculated PRA (CPRA): the new measure of sensitization for transplant candidates.

Authors:  J M Cecka
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Developing Statistical Models to Assess Transplant Outcomes Using National Registries: The Process in the United States.

Authors:  Jon J Snyder; Nicholas Salkowski; S Joseph Kim; David Zaun; Hui Xiong; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Measuring transplant center performance: The goals are not controversial but the methods and consequences can be.

Authors:  Colleen Jay; Jesse D Schold
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.