| Literature DB >> 34880904 |
Samuel B Anyona1,2, Evans Raballah2,3, Qiuying Cheng4, Ivy Hurwitz4, Caroline Ndege2, Elly Munde2,5, Walter Otieno6, Philip D Seidenberg7, Kristan A Schneider8, Christophe G Lambert4, Benjamin H McMahon9, Collins Ouma2,10, Douglas J Perkins2,4.
Abstract
Background: Malaria remains one of the leading global causes of childhood morbidity and mortality. In holoendemic Plasmodium falciparum transmission regions, such as western Kenya, severe malarial anemia [SMA, hemoglobin (Hb) < 6.0 g/dl] is the primary form of severe disease. Ubiquitination is essential for regulating intracellular processes involved in innate and adaptive immunity. Although dysregulation in ubiquitin molecular processes is central to the pathogenesis of multiple human diseases, the expression patterns of ubiquitination genes in SMA remain unexplored.Entities:
Keywords: Plasmodium falciparum; differential gene expression; malarial anemia; ubiquitin proteasome system; ubiquitination
Year: 2021 PMID: 34880904 PMCID: PMC8646022 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.764759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of the study participants.
| Characteristics | Total | M | SMA (Hb <6.0 g/dl) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants ( | 44 | 23 | 21 | |
| Sex, | ||||
| Male | 22 (50.0) | 15 (65.25) | 7 (33.3) | 0.069 |
| Female | 22 (50.0) | 8 (34.8) | 14 (66.7) | |
| Age, months | 22.4 (20.81) | 25.0 (21.4) | 19.7 (18.0) | 0.681 |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 5.4 (3.1) | 5.2 (3.5) | 5.8 (3.2) | 0.184 |
| Admission temperature, °C | 37.0 (1.5) | 37.9 (1.9) | 37.5 (1.6) |
|
|
| ||||
| Hemoglobin, g/dl | 9.4 (5.8) | 10.4 (1.4) | 4.8 (1.6) | NA |
| Hematocrit, % | 28.9 (18.6) | 33.9 (4.0) | 15.2 (4.5) |
|
| Red blood cells, × 106/µl | 3.9 (2.5) | 4.7 (0.8) | 2.2 (0.8) |
|
| Red cell distribution width | 18.7 (3.5) | 17.7 (2.8) | 20.1 (5.4) |
|
| Mean corpuscular volume, fL | 71.9 (9.2) | 70.2 (11.1) | 73.0 (9.3) | 0.503 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, pg | 22.1 (4.2) | 21.8 (4.5) | 22.6 (3.7) | 0.953 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, g/L | 31.3 (2.2) | 31.8 (2.2) | 31.1 (2.9) | 0.165 |
| Platelets, ×103/µl | 118.0 (158.2) | 104.0 (156.0) | 125.0 (162.0) | 0.869 |
| Mean platelet volume, fL | 8.1 (2.3) | 7.9 (2.5) | 8.4 (1.8) | 0.716 |
| Platelet distribution width | 16.8 (1.7) | 16.2 (1.3) | 17.4 (1.2) | 0.016 |
| White blood cell, ×103/µl | 12.2 (8.0) | 11.7 (5.3) | 15.5 (12.4) | 0.086 |
| Lymphocytes, ×103/µl | 4.2 (3.8) | 4.0 (2.2) | 5.1 (7.2) | 0.022 |
| Monocytes, ×103/µl | 0.9 (1.1) | 0.9 (0.8) | 1.2 (1.2) | 0.352 |
| Neutrophils, ×103/µl | 5.5 (3.2) | 6.8 (1.2) | 4.0 (1.0) | 0.050 |
| Granulocytes, ×103/µl | 7.2 (6.7) | 6.9 (4.7) | 9.3 (7.7) | 0.520 |
|
| ||||
| Parasite density, MPS/µl | 5,497 (11,498) | 3,481 (5,324) | 7,705 (15,598) | 0.250 |
Data are the median (interquartile range; IQR) unless otherwise noted. Children (n = 44) presenting with malaria at SCRH were recruited. Based on hemoglobin (Hb) levels, children were categorized into either mild malarial anemia (MlMA; Hb ≥9.0 g/dl, n = 23) or severe malarial anemia (SMA; Hb <6.0 g/dl, n = 21).
Fisher’s exact test with exact p-values for homogeneity was performed.
The Mann-Whitney-U test was used to compare the MlMA and SMA groups.
Group means were compared by a two-sided two Student’s t-test. Significant p-values after multiple test correction using the Bonferroni-Holm method (familywise error rate 0.050) are shown in bold. Abbreviations: MPS-malaria parasites presented as mean (standard deviation).
FIGURE 1Comparison of ubiquitination gene expression levels. Children (n = 44), with mild malarial anemia (MlMA; Hb ≥9.0 g/dl, n = 23) and severe malarial anemia (SMA; Hb <6.0 g/dl, n = 21) were enrolled into the study. Gene expression profiles were measured using the Human Ubiquitylation Pathway RT2 Profiler PCR Array kit. Geometric mean was used as a normalization factor, and data standardized using five housekeeping genes [Actin, beta (ACTB), Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1) and Ribosomal protein, large, P0 (RPLPO)]. Data were analyzed by the ΔΔ method (2−ΔΔ) (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001), using the RT2 Profiler PCR Array Data Analysis Webportal (Qiagen, United States). Fold regulation set at 1.5, and p ≤ 0.050. (A). The Volcano Plot shows gene expression changes that plots the log base 2 of each gene fold change value on the x-axis versus the negative log base 10 of each genes p-value on the y-axis. The center vertical line indicates unchanged gene expression, while the two outer vertical lines indicate the selected fold regulation threshold, with the data points right of the solid line indicating upregulated genes and those to the left representing downregulated genes. p-values were calculated using the student’s t-test of the triplicate raw CT values. (B). Heat map showing the graphical and color-coded representation of fold regulation data between MlMA and SMA groups overlaid onto the PCR array plate layout. The yellow color represents the average magnitude of gene expression. The brightest red represents the smallest value, and the brightest green represents the highest value. (C). Cluster gram of non-supervised hierarchical clustering of the entire dataset showing a heat map with dendrograms indicating co-regulated genes across the clinical groups. The black color represents the average magnitude of gene expression. The brightest green represents the smallest value, and the brightest red represents the highest value. Similarities of genes across the PCR array was calculated using a correlation coefficient between 2 dimensional profiles.
FIGURE 2Differentially expressed gene enrichment analysis of the top scored process networks. Relationship between differentially expressed ubiquitination genes (p ≤ 0.050) in the case (SMA; n = 21) and control (MlMA; n = 23) groups was determined using enrichment analysis to identify process networks on MetaCore™. Additional enrichment analysis for same differentially expressed genes (p ≤ 0.050) was done using canonical pathway modeling to map out associated subnetwork processes. (A). Ubiquitin-Proteasomal Proteolysis (FDR, p = 7.049 × 10−11) process network that encompassed 8 of the 15 genes that were significantly dysregulated. The blue-shaded circles show down-regulated genes and the red-shaded circles are up-regulated genes, all from the ubiquitination panel. (B). The sub-network [CFTR, Proteasome (20S core), CHIP, RBP-J kappa (CBF1), c-Jun, p = 1.610 × 10−41] contains 11 seed nodes (genes with p < 0.050 for differential expression between SMA and MlMA) and 31 total nodes. (C). The sub-network (p53, NF-kB, UBE2E3, MDM2, SUMO-1, p = 1.460 × 10−32) contains 8 seed nodes and 13 total nodes.
Sub-networks of the pathway gene enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes between SMA and MlMA groups.
| Sub-network | Gene ontology processes | Total | Seed | z Score | g Score |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTR, Proteasome (20S core), CHIP, RBP-J kappa (CBF1), c-Jun | Proteasomal protein catabolic process (45.2%; | 31 | 11 | 267.04 | 267.04 |
|
| Protein catabolic process (54.8%; | ||||||
| Proteolysis involved in cellular protein catabolic process (51.6%; | ||||||
| Cellular protein catabolic process (51.6%; | ||||||
| Ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (48.4%; | ||||||
| p53, NF-kB, UBE2E3, MDM2, SUMO-1 | Protein modification by small protein conjugation or removal (92.3%; | 13 | 8 | 299.92 | 299.92 |
|
| Protein modification by small protein conjugation (76.9%; | ||||||
| Protein polyubiquitination (61.5%; | ||||||
| Protein ubiquitination (69.2%; | ||||||
| Proteolysis (76.9%; | ||||||
| Synphilin 1, Alpha-synuclein, Septin 5 (CDC-REL1), GPR37, MJD (ataxin-3) | Dopamine metabolic process (30.8%; | 13 | 2 | 74.96 | 74.96 |
|
| Catechol-containing compound metabolic process (30.8%; | ||||||
| Catecholamine metabolic process (30.8%; | ||||||
| Cellular biogenic amine metabolic process (30.8%; | ||||||
| Cellular amine metabolic process (30.8%; | ||||||
Enrichment analyses were performed by canonical pathway modeling for the differentially expressed genes (p < 0.050) between the case (SMA) and control (MlMA) groups using MetaCore™. Top-ranked gene ontology (GO) processes associated with each subnetwork are shown. Significant p-values are shown in bold.