| Literature DB >> 34879075 |
Dikla Perez1, Yael Steinhart2, Amir Grinstein3,4, Meike Morren4.
Abstract
Consumers often make decisions that reflect either personal or social identities. In many cases, such decisions are made along a sequence. Our research introduces a central factor that influences consumers' likelihood of expressing a consistent identity type along a sequence of decisions: the extent to which their usage of the product involved in the first decision is expected to be observable by others (the product's expected visibility). A field experiment, and four lab studies, coupled with an internal meta-analysis, show that when the product involved in the first decision has high (as opposed to low) expected visibility, consumers are more likely to make a subsequent decision that is consistent with the first. Results show that self-presentation mediates this effect, and suggest that low integration between the identities involved in the decisions might attenuate it. Our findings offer implications for identity research and practical implications for marketers seeking to develop products and design communications that encourage consistent (or inconsistent) behavior.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34879075 PMCID: PMC8654224 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1High- vs. low-expected visibility manipulation (Experiment 3).
The effect of expected visibility conditions (High vs. Low) and integration between identities on consistent behavior (Experiment 4).
| Identity expression in the second decision | |
|---|---|
| Intercept | -2.06 |
| Product visibility | 1.18 |
| Identity integration | -0.15 (0.16) |
| Product visibility× identity integration belongingness | 0.57 |
| Coxsnell | 0.466 |
Notes: In the regression reported in the table, the change in tendency toward consistency (reflected via identity expression in the second decision) is the dependent variable. As for the predictors, integration between identities is a continuous variable that takes values from 1 to 7 and is mean-centered; product visibility is a dummy variable (0 –low visibility, 1 –high visibility). Entries in the table represent unstandardized coefficients. Standard errors are reported in parentheses.
* p < .1,
** p < .05.
Fig 2Floodlight analysis: The moderating role of identity integration (Experiment 3).
Notes: The graph was drawn on the basis of a "floodlight" analysis (Disatnik and Steinhart 2015; Spiller, Fitzsimons, Lynch Jr, and McClelland 2013) of the effect of identity integration on tendency toward consistent behavior. Confidence bands are also presented, and the Johnson-Neyman points are obtained at identity integration = 5.57 (p = .05).
Experiments included in the internal meta-analysis.
| Experiment | N | Statistics | Value | r | LCI | UCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment 1 | 179 | Chi | 4.55 | .16 | .15 | .17 |
| Experiment 2 | 78 | Chi | 4.10 | .23 | .21 | .25 |
| Experiment 3 | 154 | Chi | 3.39 | .15 | .14 | .16 |
| Experiment 4 | 50 | Chi | 3.63 | .27 | .24 | .30 |
| Experiment 5—social | 52 | Chi | 2.70 | .23 | .19 | .26 |
| Experiment 5—personal | 50 | Chi | 2.34 | .22 | .18 | .25 |
| Total | 563 | .187 | .17 | .20 |
* Chi-square tests were run on the 2×2 table of expected visibility of the consumed product (low versus high) with consistency (consistent choices versus inconsistent choices). The t-test examined the mean difference on a preference rating between two groups subjected to manipulations of expected visibility of the consumed product involved in the first decision (low versus high).
** Sample-size-weighted average correlation between expected visibility of the consumed product involved in the first decision and choices displaying consistent behavior.
Fig 3Effect sizes of the internal meta-analysis.
Review of previous research: Products/behaviors used to examine consistency in sequential decisions.
| Research article | Products/behaviors involved in a first decision | Products/behaviors involved in a second decision | Type of behavior | Average rating of the expected visibility of the product involved in the first decision across two expert judges (1 = low visibility, 7 = high visibility) | Average rating of the expected visibility of the product involved in the second decision across two expert judges (1 = low visibility, 7 = high visibility) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Well-known brand or private label CD player | Well-known brand or private label microwave | Inconsistent | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Drolet (2002) | Well-known brand or private label color TV | Well-known brand or private label CD player | Inconsistent | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Well-known brand or private label batteries | Well-known brand or private label toaster | Inconsistent | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| Well-known brand or private label toaster | Well-known brand or private label microwave | Inconsistent | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| Well-known brand or private label cereal | Well-known brand or private label aspirin | Inconsistent | 2.00 | 1.50 | |
| Well-known brand or private label swabs | Well-known brand or private label aspirin | Inconsistent | 2.00 | 1.50 | |
| Well-known brand or private label soda | Well-known brand or private label aspirin | Inconsistent | 2.00 | 1.50 | |
| Well-known brand or private label sugar | Well-known brand or private label aspirin | Inconsistent | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
|
| Spend three hours a week teaching children in a homeless shelter | Purchase designer jeans | Inconsistent | 3.50 | 6.50 |
| Khan and Dhar (2006) [ | |||||
| Donate $100 to charity (online) | Purchase sunglasses | Inconsistent | 1.50 | 7.00 | |
|
| Wear a hat on a bright sunny afternoon | Use sunscreen | Consistent | 6.50 | 2.00 |
| Fishbach, Dhar, and Zhang (2006) | Have a light lunch | Have a light dinner | Consistent | 6.50 | 6.50 |
| Work out in a gym | Eat healthily | Consistent | 7.00 | 2.00 | |
|
| Light bulb | Key chain | Consistent | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Dhar, Huber, and Khan (2007) | Pen | Key chain | Consistent | 5.50 | 2.00 |
| Car | Key chain | Consistent | 7.00 | 2.00 | |
|
| Purchase a photo under charitable-giving promotion | Purchase merchandise as a gift for someone else | Consistent | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Gneezy et al. (2012) | |||||
|
| Purchase a high-price ticket for a baseball game | Purchase a high-price beer at a baseball game | Consistent | 4.50 | 6.00 |
| Dhar and Simonson (1999) | |||||
| Dinner at a nice restaurant. Eat tasty but unhealthy New York steak | Eat a tasty but unhealthy chocolate cake | Consistent | 5.50 | 5.50 | |
|
| Answer a few questions for a survey | Allow five-six men to come into one’s house to classify the household’s products for two hours as part of a survey | Consistent | 1.50 | 4.00 |
| Freedman and Fraser (1966) | |||||
| Put a small sign in the window to make citizens more aware of the need to drive carefully | Put a large sign in the front yard to make citizens more aware of the need to drive carefully | Consistent | 7.00 | 7.00 |