Literature DB >> 34877692

Biomechanical and musculoskeletal changes after flexor tenotomy to reduce the risk of diabetic neuropathic toe ulcer recurrence.

Marieke A Mens1, Jaap J van Netten2, Tessa E Busch-Westbroek2, Sicco A Bus2, Geert J Streekstra3, Ruud H H Wellenberg1, Mario Maas1, Max Nieuwdorp4, Sjoerd A S Stufkens5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of flexor tenotomy in patients with diabetes on barefoot plantar pressure, toe joint angles and ulcer recurrence during patient follow-up.
METHODS: Patients with a history of ulceration on the toe apex were included. They underwent minimally invasive needle flexor tenotomy by an experienced musculoskeletal surgeon. Dynamic barefoot plantar pressure measurements and static weight-bearing radiographs were taken before and 2-4 weeks after the procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent flexor tenotomy on 50 toes in 19 feet. There was a mean follow-up time of 11.4 months. No ulcer recurrence occurred during follow-up. Mean barefoot plantar pressure was assessed on 34 toes and decreased significantly after the procedure by a mean 279 kPa (95% CI: 204-353; p < 0.001). Metatarsophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joint angles were assessed on nine toes and all decreased significantly (by 7° [95% CI: 4-9; p < 0.001], 19° [95% CI: 11-26; p < 0.001] and 28° [95% CI: 13-44; p = 0.003], respectively).
CONCLUSION: These observations show a beneficial effect of flexor tenotomy on biomechanical and musculoskeletal outcomes in the toes, without ulcer recurrence.
© 2021 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes complications; diabetic foot; diabetic neuropathies; hammer toe syndrome; tenotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34877692      PMCID: PMC9299875          DOI: 10.1111/dme.14761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.213


Minimally invasive needle flexor tenotomy is a promising surgical technique for preventing diabetic ulcer recurrence at the apex of the toes in patients with toe deformity. This study investigated the biomechanical and musculoskeletal changes after this operation. Barefoot plantar pressure and toe joint angles both decrease significantly after the flexor tenotomy. Additionally, there were no recurring ulcers on the operated toes. Thus, this study provides additional substantiation of considering flexor tenotomy in this patient population.

INTRODUCTION

Toe ulcers frequently develop in people with diabetes‐related peripheral neuropathy, especially in the case of toe deformity. , These ulcers negatively impact quality of life and can lead to amputations, which may be prevented with proper preventive measures. , , , Common deformities concern a hyperextension of the metatarsal phalangeal joint (MTPJ) and a hyperflexion of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints (PIPJ and DIPJ). These deformities often result in increased mechanical pressure underneath the apex of the toes, increasing the likelihood of ulceration. To prevent ulcer recurrence, international guidelines recommend to consider a digital flexor tenotomy. , , However, this recommendation is based on low quality of evidence. The only evidence available has been obtained from selected participants in seven retrospective cohort studies, showing 0%–20% ulcer recurrence in a total 231 participants during a mean follow‐up period of 11–31 months. Despite the limited evidence, the rationale for surgical eligibility lies in the presumed biomechanical effect, and the limited likelihood for harms associated with this minimally invasive procedure. It is suggested to establish a lasting off‐loading effect of the toes, with people not requiring medical devices such as toe orthoses for off‐loading. Further, it can be performed in the out‐patient clinic, with no need for generalised anaesthesia or subsequent immobilisation and a low risk of complications. However, biomechanical and musculoskeletal changes following tenotomy, suggested as causative mechanisms for the clinical outcomes, have never been investigated. In our clinic, we obtained biomechanical and musculoskeletal outcomes before and after this procedure as part of regular clinical care. This provided the unique opportunity to quantify changes in outcomes in a controlled pre–post study design. As such, we aimed to investigate the effect of flexor tenotomy in participants with diabetes on barefoot plantar pressures, toe joint angles and ulcer recurrence during follow‐up.

METHODS

We consecutively included all participants who were eligible and thus underwent flexor tendon tenotomy to help prevent recurrent ulceration. Selection criteria concerned a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy, non‐rigid toe deformity, a healed ulcer and abundant callus on one or more toe apices. All surgical procedures were performed by one orthopaedic surgeon specialised in the foot and ankle (SASS). Before and 2–4 weeks after the procedure, barefoot plantar pressure during walking was measured using a pressure‐sensitive plate (EMED‐X, Novel GmbH, Munich, Germany) and weight‐bearing radiographs were acquired. For plantar pressure, a two‐step protocol with four trials per foot was used, which provides reliable pressure data with the minimum amount of steps necessary. Walking speed was self‐selected. Primary outcome was the difference in peak plantar pressure at the hallux, digitus 2 or digitus 3 pre‐ and post‐surgery, using analysis‐software provided by the manufacturer; the average of pressure over the four measurements across trials were used as outcome. Assessing barefoot plantar pressure in digitus 4 and 5 was not possible due to limitations of the analysis‐software. A sub‐analysis of barefoot plantar pressure of one toe per participant was conducted to limit bias in the conclusions drawn from using multiple toes and feet per participant. We selected the toe with the highest plantar pressure before the flexor tenotomy for this sub‐analysis. For radiographs, primary outcome was the difference in the angle of the MTPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ of digitus 2 pre‐ and post‐surgery, as determined by drawing centre lines of the metatarsal and phalanges using IMPAX (Agfa IMPAX 6) by a researcher (MAM) and checked by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (MM). This method of measuring joint angles in the toes has proven reliable on MRI. Only digitus 2 was suitable for radiographic assessment, because overlap of the toes made measurements on the other toes inaccurate or sometimes impossible. As part of regular care, participants had frequent check‐ups after the procedure to identify recurring ulcers and complications. Ethical approval was waived in accordance with Dutch law by the medical ethical committee of our institute (W21_080#21.090) on the grounds that no changes were made to the normal procedure in the clinic. Oral informed consent was obtained from all participants for the procedure, data analysis and reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 14 participants underwent flexor tenotomy on a total of 50 deformed toes in 19 feet, between November 2019 and December 2020 (Table 1). This included 16 digits 4 and 5, thus 34 toes were used for barefoot plantar pressure analysis. Barefoot plantar pressures decreased with a statistically significant 279 kPa (95% CI: 204–353 kPa, p < 0.001; Table 2; Figure 1), and the decrease was seen at all anatomical locations (Table 2). When analysing only one toe per participant, there was a statistically significant reduction in plantar pressure of 398 kPa (95% CI: 285–511 kPa, p < 0.001; Table 2). MTPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ angles decreased with a statistically significant 7° (95% CI: 2°–9°; p < 0.001), 19° (95% CI: 11°–26°; p < 0.001) and 28° (95% CI: 13°–44°; p = 0.003; Table 2; Figure 1), respectively. On average, participants’ most recent foot ulcer took 3 months to heal, and participants were ulcer‐free for 3 months at the moment of surgery (Table 1). The most recent ulcer was not necessarily on one of the treated toes.
TABLE 1

Demographics at baseline

Demographics
Participants N = 14
Sex (men/women)10/4
Age (years)68 ± 10
Diabetes typeType 1: 14% (n = 3); Type 2: 86% (n = 11)
Diabetes duration (years)13 ± 11
Peripheral artery disease* 50% (n = 7)
Most recent foot ulcer
Location: Hallux/dig 2/3/421% (n = 3)/36% (n = 5)/29% (n = 4)/14% (n = 2)
Healing time (weeks)14 ± 16
Time between healing and surgery (weeks)14 ± 28
Treated feet N = 19
Left/right/both7% (n = 1); 57% (n = 8); 36% (n = 5)
Treated toes N = 50
Hallux/dig2/3/4/54% (n = 2)/38% (n = 17)/30% (n = 15)/18% (n = 9)/14% (n = 7)

Data are mean ± SD, percentage (%) or n (number of participants or digits).

Peripheral artery disease was never critically ischemic (i.e. toe pressure <30 mmHg or ankle‐brachial index <0.5), since this is a contraindication for flexor tendon tenotomy.

TABLE 2

Biomechanical and musculoskeletal outcomes before and after flexor tenotomy

Outcomes
Pre‐tenotomyPost‐tenotomyMean difference (95% CI) p‐valueCohen's d
Barefoot plantar pressure (kPa)
All analysed toes (n = 34)432 ± 258153 ± 100279 (204; 353)<0.0011.3
Hallux (n = 2)773 ± 228354 ± 73419 (NA)NA1.4
Digitus 2 (= 17)515 ± 264175 ± 101340 (220; 459)<0.0011.5
Digitus 3 (= 15)292 ± 158101 ± 45191 (105; 276)<0.0011.2
Digitus with highest pressure pre‐tenotomy (n = 14)593 ± 222195 ± 95398 (285; 511)<0.0012.0
Digitus 2 joint angle (°)
MTPJ (n = 9)31 ± 924 ± 107 (4; 9)<0.0011.8
PIPJ (n = 9)48 ± 2329 ± 1719 (11; 26)<0.0011.7
DIPJ (n = 9)51 ± 822 ± 2328 (13; 44)0.0031.4

Data are mean ± SD or n (number of participants or digits); to test for significance (p‐value) a dependent samples t‐test was used; to test for effect size within‐subject Cohen's d was calculated (https://memory.psych.mun.ca/models/stats/effect_size.shtml).

Abbreviations: DIPJ, distal interphalangeal joint; MTPJ, metatarsal phalangeal joint; NA, not applicable, due to having only 2 operated halluces; PIPJ, proximal interphalangeal joint.

FIGURE 1

Barefoot plantar pressure from one step and radiograph of the right foot of a participant before and after flexor tenotomy on digitus 2, 3, 4 and 5. Barefoot plantar pressure underneath the apex of digitus 2 was 565 kPa before flexor tenotomy and 146 kPa after flexor tenotomy. DIPJ angle of digitus 2 was 49.2° before flexor tenotomy and 30.8° after flexor tenotomy

Demographics at baseline Data are mean ± SD, percentage (%) or n (number of participants or digits). Peripheral artery disease was never critically ischemic (i.e. toe pressure <30 mmHg or ankle‐brachial index <0.5), since this is a contraindication for flexor tendon tenotomy. Biomechanical and musculoskeletal outcomes before and after flexor tenotomy Data are mean ± SD or n (number of participants or digits); to test for significance (p‐value) a dependent samples t‐test was used; to test for effect size within‐subject Cohen's d was calculated (https://memory.psych.mun.ca/models/stats/effect_size.shtml). Abbreviations: DIPJ, distal interphalangeal joint; MTPJ, metatarsal phalangeal joint; NA, not applicable, due to having only 2 operated halluces; PIPJ, proximal interphalangeal joint. Barefoot plantar pressure from one step and radiograph of the right foot of a participant before and after flexor tenotomy on digitus 2, 3, 4 and 5. Barefoot plantar pressure underneath the apex of digitus 2 was 565 kPa before flexor tenotomy and 146 kPa after flexor tenotomy. DIPJ angle of digitus 2 was 49.2° before flexor tenotomy and 30.8° after flexor tenotomy Before surgery, nine participants were wearing custom‐made insoles worn in custom‐made shoes, two participants wore custom‐made insoles in pre‐fabricated extra‐depth shoes, three used inlays in pre‐fabricated shoes. After 6 months of follow‐up all participants wore custom‐made insoles in either custom‐made shoes or pre‐fabricated extra‐depth shoes. Concerning orthoses, seven wore orthoses before the surgery, they all stopped wearing them on the treated toe(s) after the procedure. During a mean follow‐up period of 11.4 months (SD:4; range: 2–19), no ulcer recurrences were observed, one foot complication was found (persisting MTPJ hyperextension) and one patient died 2 months after the tenotomy, unrelated to the surgery.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to assess the effect of minimally invasive needle flexor tenotomy in participants with diabetes on barefoot plantar pressure, toe joint angles and ulcer recurrence during follow‐up. Our findings show a large off‐loading effect, with >50% pressure reduction at the toe apex, in line with the hypothesised causative mechanism of this minimally invasive surgery in ulcer prevention. The radiological data demonstrate the musculoskeletal changes that show the mechanism behind the pressure reduction. There was no ulcer recurrence among the participants after almost a year, which is remarkable considering the high recurrence rates of ulcers in the first year after healing. Clinical outcomes are in line with current evidence on the benefit of this surgery for the prevention of ulcer recurrence. Five of the seven patients wearing orthoses on toes with deformity before the surgery stopped wearing them afterwards. This was to be expected, because the surgery is supposed to diminish the severity of the deformity. Patients not needing to wear their orthosis after surgery reflects this positive change in the toe. In this study, the participants used specialised orthopaedic footwear for off‐loading in addition to the surgical intervention and continued to wear this after the procedure. It is advised that patients keep using off‐loading measures considering the available evidence about its benefits. , However, there should be an assessment of footwear after this procedure has been performed because of the alterations in lesser toe barefoot pressure. Participants of our study had regular checks of the in‐shoe pressure to monitor if changes in footwear were needed. A strength of our study is the use of objective biomechanical and musculoskeletal tests to demonstrate the causative factors of off‐loading with flexor tenotomy. A limitation was the overlap of toes on radiographs. As a result, we could only investigate musculoskeletal changes in digitus 2. This can be resolved by using three‐dimensional imaging. Analysing barefoot pressure separately for digitus 4 and 5 was not possible. However, the visual rendition of the barefoot pressure showed similar effects of the surgery for these toes as for the hallux and digitus 2 and 3. Improved software could solve the limitations on assessing barefoot pressure on digitus 4 and 5. Another limitation was that radiographs both before and after the flexor tenotomy were available for nine of the 17 operated digits 2. This was mainly because radiographs were not always routinely performed in the clinic both before and after the procedure. In addition, some images were not suitable for the measurements, for example because the toes were not in the field‐of‐view or because the lateral view was not available. While including 14 participants could be seen as a limitation, these participants represent a total 34 analysed toes; more importantly the large, consistent and statistically significant differences found on the primary biomechanical and musculoskeletal outcomes indicate that including a larger group of participants would have resulted in similar findings. In conclusion, these observations provide first‐ever quantitative demonstrations of the effect of flexor tenotomy on plantar pressure reduction and joint angle decreases (i.e. improvement) in the toes of people with diabetes. Very low ulcer recurrence was found. Future randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these outcomes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None to disclose.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life among adults living with diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saneh Khunkaew; Ritin Fernandez; Jenny Sim
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot.

Authors:  Sicco A Bus; Antony de Lange
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of home foot temperature monitoring, patient education or offloading footwear on the incidence of diabetes-related foot ulcers.

Authors:  C Alahakoon; M Fernando; C Galappaththy; E O Matthews; P Lazzarini; J V Moxon; J Golledge
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Amputation trends for patients with lower extremity ulcers due to diabetes and peripheral artery disease using statewide data.

Authors:  Misty D Humphries; Ann Brunson; Chin-Shang Li; Joy Melnikow; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).

Authors:  Sicco A Bus; Lawrence A Lavery; Matilde Monteiro-Soares; Anne Rasmussen; Anita Raspovic; Isabel C N Sacco; Jaap J van Netten
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.876

6.  A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable.

Authors:  Sicco A Bus; Jaap J van Netten
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  Prevention of foot ulcers in the at-risk patient with diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jaap J van Netten; Anita Raspovic; Lawrence A Lavery; Matilde Monteiro-Soares; Anne Rasmussen; Isabel C N Sacco; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 4.876

8.  Outpatient percutaneous flexor tenotomies for management of diabetic claw toe deformities with ulcers: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Eran Tamir; Ann-Marie McLaren; Anirudh Gadgil; Timothy R Daniels
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Predictors of barefoot plantar pressure during walking in patients with diabetes, peripheral neuropathy and a history of ulceration.

Authors:  Ruth Barn; Roelof Waaijman; Frans Nollet; James Woodburn; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biomechanical and musculoskeletal changes after flexor tenotomy to reduce the risk of diabetic neuropathic toe ulcer recurrence.

Authors:  Marieke A Mens; Jaap J van Netten; Tessa E Busch-Westbroek; Sicco A Bus; Geert J Streekstra; Ruud H H Wellenberg; Mario Maas; Max Nieuwdorp; Sjoerd A S Stufkens
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.213

View more
  1 in total

1.  Biomechanical and musculoskeletal changes after flexor tenotomy to reduce the risk of diabetic neuropathic toe ulcer recurrence.

Authors:  Marieke A Mens; Jaap J van Netten; Tessa E Busch-Westbroek; Sicco A Bus; Geert J Streekstra; Ruud H H Wellenberg; Mario Maas; Max Nieuwdorp; Sjoerd A S Stufkens
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.213

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.