| Literature DB >> 34877692 |
Marieke A Mens1, Jaap J van Netten2, Tessa E Busch-Westbroek2, Sicco A Bus2, Geert J Streekstra3, Ruud H H Wellenberg1, Mario Maas1, Max Nieuwdorp4, Sjoerd A S Stufkens5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of flexor tenotomy in patients with diabetes on barefoot plantar pressure, toe joint angles and ulcer recurrence during patient follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes complications; diabetic foot; diabetic neuropathies; hammer toe syndrome; tenotomy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34877692 PMCID: PMC9299875 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabet Med ISSN: 0742-3071 Impact factor: 4.213
Demographics at baseline
| Demographics | |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Sex (men/women) | 10/4 |
| Age (years) | 68 ± 10 |
| Diabetes type | Type 1: 14% ( |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 13 ± 11 |
| Peripheral artery disease | 50% ( |
| Most recent foot ulcer | |
| Location: Hallux/dig 2/3/4 | 21% ( |
| Healing time (weeks) | 14 ± 16 |
| Time between healing and surgery (weeks) | 14 ± 28 |
| Treated feet |
|
| Left/right/both | 7% ( |
| Treated toes |
|
| Hallux/dig2/3/4/5 | 4% ( |
Data are mean ± SD, percentage (%) or n (number of participants or digits).
Peripheral artery disease was never critically ischemic (i.e. toe pressure <30 mmHg or ankle‐brachial index <0.5), since this is a contraindication for flexor tendon tenotomy.
Biomechanical and musculoskeletal outcomes before and after flexor tenotomy
| Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre‐tenotomy | Post‐tenotomy | Mean difference (95% CI) |
| Cohen's d | |
| Barefoot plantar pressure (kPa) | |||||
| All analysed toes ( | 432 ± 258 | 153 ± 100 | 279 (204; 353) | <0.001 | 1.3 |
| Hallux ( | 773 ± 228 | 354 ± 73 | 419 (NA) | NA | 1.4 |
| Digitus 2 ( | 515 ± 264 | 175 ± 101 | 340 (220; 459) | <0.001 | 1.5 |
| Digitus 3 ( | 292 ± 158 | 101 ± 45 | 191 (105; 276) | <0.001 | 1.2 |
| Digitus with highest pressure pre‐tenotomy ( | 593 ± 222 | 195 ± 95 | 398 (285; 511) | <0.001 | 2.0 |
| Digitus 2 joint angle (°) | |||||
| MTPJ ( | 31 ± 9 | 24 ± 10 | 7 (4; 9) | <0.001 | 1.8 |
| PIPJ ( | 48 ± 23 | 29 ± 17 | 19 (11; 26) | <0.001 | 1.7 |
| DIPJ ( | 51 ± 8 | 22 ± 23 | 28 (13; 44) | 0.003 | 1.4 |
Data are mean ± SD or n (number of participants or digits); to test for significance (p‐value) a dependent samples t‐test was used; to test for effect size within‐subject Cohen's d was calculated (https://memory.psych.mun.ca/models/stats/effect_size.shtml).
Abbreviations: DIPJ, distal interphalangeal joint; MTPJ, metatarsal phalangeal joint; NA, not applicable, due to having only 2 operated halluces; PIPJ, proximal interphalangeal joint.
FIGURE 1Barefoot plantar pressure from one step and radiograph of the right foot of a participant before and after flexor tenotomy on digitus 2, 3, 4 and 5. Barefoot plantar pressure underneath the apex of digitus 2 was 565 kPa before flexor tenotomy and 146 kPa after flexor tenotomy. DIPJ angle of digitus 2 was 49.2° before flexor tenotomy and 30.8° after flexor tenotomy