| Literature DB >> 34870886 |
Chensen Li1,2, Alastair K Harrison3, Yuchao Liu4, Zhennan Zhao1, Cheng Zeng4, Fernando B Dias3, Zhongjie Ren1, Shouke Yan1,4, Martin R Bryce2.
Abstract
The mechanism of thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) in dendrimers is not clear. We report that fully-conjugated or fully-nonconjugated structures cause unwanted degenerate excited states due to multiple identical dendrons, which limit their TADF efficiency. We have synthesized asymmetrical "half-dendronized" and "half-dendronized-half-encapsulated" emitters. By eliminating degenerate excited states, the triplet locally excited state is ≥0.3 eV above the lowest triplet charge-transfer state, assuring a solely thermal equilibrium route for an effective spin-flip process. The isolated encapsulating tricarbazole unit can protect the TADF unit, reducing nonradiative decay and enhancing TADF performance. Non-doped solution-processed devices reach a high external quantum efficiency (EQEmax ) of 24.0 % (65.9 cd A-1 , 59.2 lm W-1 ) with CIE coordinates of (0.24, 0.45) with a low efficiency roll-off and EQEs of 23.6 % and 21.3 % at 100 and 500 cd m-2 .Entities:
Keywords: Asymmetric; Degenerate excited states; Dendrimer; Non-doped; TADF
Year: 2022 PMID: 34870886 PMCID: PMC9306820 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202115140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Figure 1Molecular structures and excited states of fully‐conjugated and fully‐nonconjugated symmetrical dendrimers CzDMAC‐DPS and TCz‐DPS, and asymmetrical half‐dendronized DCz‐DPS‐Cz and DCz‐DPS‐TCz.
Figure 2Frontier orbital distributions and NTO analysis of CzDMAC‐DPS, TCz‐DPS, DCz‐DPS‐Cz, and DCz‐DPS‐TCz.
Figure 3Single‐crystal structure and packing diagrams of DCz‐DPS‐TCz.
Figure 4UV/Vis absorption and PL spectra in a) toluene solution and b) neat films of the two compounds. c) Phosphorescence spectra collected at 77 K of neat films of DCz‐DPS‐Cz and DCz‐DPS‐TCz. d) PL spectra in toluene, chloroform, acetone, and dichloromethane (DCM) solutions of DCz‐DPS‐Cz and the corresponding Lippert–Mataga plot of the two emitters (inset). e) PL spectra of DCz‐DPS‐Cz in water/THF mixtures with different fractions of water; the inset is fluorescent images of 0.9 and 0.1 water/THF solution mixtures under UV light irradiation. f) Plots of PLQYs in different ratios of the two emitters in doped PMMA films. All the PL spectra were excited at 355 nm.
Summary of photophysical data for DCz‐DPS‐Cz and DCz‐DPS‐TCz.
|
Emitter |
|
|
HOMO [eV][c] |
LUMO [eV][d] |
τPF
|
τDF
|
|
S1/T1 [eV][g] |
Δ |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
498/494 |
3.37 |
−5.20 |
−1.83 |
34/21 |
1.51/79 |
85/88 |
2.97/3.00 |
0.03 |
2.6 |
2.00 |
|
|
500/500 |
3.37 |
−5.22 |
−1.85 |
22/17 |
1.43/83 |
90/96 |
2.97/3.00 |
0.03 |
3.0 |
1.35 |
[a] The peak values of PL spectra measured in dilute toluene and neat films at room temperature, respectively. [b] Optical energy gap (E g) deduced from the absorption onset in toluene. [c] Calculated according to the equation E HOMO=−(E (onset, o+4.8) by CV. [d] Calculated according to the equation LUMO=HOMO+E g. [e] The lifetime and ratio of prompt and delayed fluorescence component. [f] Absolute PL quantum yield in toluene solution and in thin films, respectively, determined by a calibrated integrating sphere in degassed conditions; error ±2 %. [g] Singlet and triplet energies were determined from the onset wavelength of fluorescence at RT and phosphorescence at 77 K in neat films. [h] Singlet–triplet energy gap and ΔE ST=S1‐T1. [i] The rate constant of reverse intersystem crossing calculated from k RISC=ΦPL/(τ DF×(1−ΦDF)). [j] The nonradiative decay rate of triplet exciton calculated from =(1−ΦDF)/τ DF.
Figure 5PL decays in degassed and oxygenated toluene solution of a) DCz‐DPS‐Cz and b) DCz‐DPS‐TCz. c) PL spectra in degassed and oxygenated toluene solution of DCz‐DPS‐Cz. d) PL decays in neat films of DCz‐DPS‐Cz. e,f) Dependence of DF intensity with excitation power and PL spectra of DCz‐DPS‐Cz (0.2–77.8 μJ) in neat films. These PL transient spectra were collected at 500 nm with 355 nm excitation.
Figure 6a) Current density‐voltage‐luminance curves. b) Current efficiency‐luminance‐power efficiency curves. c) External quantum efficiency versus luminance curves of the devices. Inset: energy‐level diagrams and structures of OLED devices. d) The current state‐of‐the‐art EQE for phosphorescent and TADF macromolecular (dendrimer and polymer) non‐doped OLEDs, versus λmaxEL.
EL properties of solution‐processed non‐doped devices.
|
Device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
498 |
3.1 |
62.0 |
51.6 |
23.3/22.9/18.7 |
(0.23, 0.42) |
|
|
500 |
3.0 |
65.9 |
59.2 |
24.0/23.6/21.3 |
(0.24, 0.45) |
[a] The peak value of electroluminescence. [b] Turn‐on voltage at 1 cd m−2. [c] Maximum current efficiency. [d] Maximum power efficiency. [e] Maximum external quantum efficiency and external quantum efficiency at 100 cd m−2 and 500 cd m−2. [f] Coordinates of Commission Internationale de l’éclairage.