Literature DB >> 34870781

Chemical risk governance: Exploring stakeholder participation in Canada, the USA, and the EU.

R G van der Vegt1, Steven Maguire2,3, Doug Crump4, Markus Hecker5,6, Niladri Basu7, Gordon M Hickey7.   

Abstract

Hazardous chemicals are one of the greatest environmental challenges facing our planet, testing governments in the face of economic and social development. Chemical risks are often complex systemic risks, which require particular governance processes, stakeholder participation mechanisms, and communication procedures to manage. In this article we explore how such processes, mechanisms, and procedures could offer more effective pathways for international chemical risk assessment and management. Combining document analysis with 69 key informant interviews and four focus groups with experts from across government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and industry in Canada, the USA and Europe (n = 24), the results highlight the importance of increasing stakeholder participation and risk communication in existing chemical risk assessment and management frameworks. Similarities and differences between the three jurisdictions are discussed with a view to inform future risk governance strategies. The contemporary insights are of relevance to decision-makers seeking to improve the effectiveness of chemical risk governance in practice.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA); Chemicals Management Plan (CMP); Ecotoxicology; Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH); Regulatory science; Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34870781      PMCID: PMC9110598          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01671-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   6.943


  13 in total

1.  Understanding wicked problems: a key to advancing environmental health promotion.

Authors:  Marshall W Kreuter; Christopher De Rosa; Elizabeth H Howze; Grant T Baldwin
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-08

2.  REACH--the new European chemicals law.

Authors:  Uwe Lahl; Katrin Anne Hawxwell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  REACH: next step to a sound chemicals management.

Authors:  Arnold Van der Wielen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process.

Authors:  B Fischhoff
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Coping with complexity in baltic sea risk governance: introduction.

Authors:  Michael Gilek; Björn Hassler; Anna-Maria Jönsson; Mikael Karlsson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  EcoToxChip: A next-generation toxicogenomics tool for chemical prioritization and environmental management.

Authors:  Niladri Basu; Doug Crump; Jessica Head; Gordon Hickey; Natacha Hogan; Steve Maguire; Jianguo Xia; Markus Hecker
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 7.  The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Richard Fuller; Nereus J R Acosta; Olusoji Adeyi; Robert Arnold; Niladri Nil Basu; Abdoulaye Bibi Baldé; Roberto Bertollini; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Jo Ivey Boufford; Patrick N Breysse; Thomas Chiles; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Awa M Coll-Seck; Maureen L Cropper; Julius Fobil; Valentin Fuster; Michael Greenstone; Andy Haines; David Hanrahan; David Hunter; Mukesh Khare; Alan Krupnick; Bruce Lanphear; Bindu Lohani; Keith Martin; Karen V Mathiasen; Maureen A McTeer; Christopher J L Murray; Johanita D Ndahimananjara; Frederica Perera; Janez Potočnik; Alexander S Preker; Jairam Ramesh; Johan Rockström; Carlos Salinas; Leona D Samson; Karti Sandilya; Peter D Sly; Kirk R Smith; Achim Steiner; Richard B Stewart; William A Suk; Onno C P van Schayck; Gautam N Yadama; Kandeh Yumkella; Ma Zhong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Factors Affecting the Perception of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in the Ecotoxicology Community.

Authors:  Matthieu Mondou; Gordon M Hickey; Hm Tuihedur Rahman; Steve Maguire; Guillaume Pain; Doug Crump; Markus Hecker; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 9.  The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act.

Authors:  Sheldon Krimsky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Drivers of and Obstacles to the Adoption of Toxicogenomics for Chemical Risk Assessment: Insights from Social Science Perspectives.

Authors:  Guillaume Pain; Gordon Hickey; Matthieu Mondou; Doug Crump; Markus Hecker; Niladri Basu; Steven Maguire
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.