Literature DB >> 34870569

Pyrolysis processing of PFAS-impacted biosolids, a pilot study.

Eben D Thoma1, Robert S Wright1, Ingrid George1, Max Krause2, Dario Presezzi3, Valentino Villa3, William Preston4, Parik Deshmukh5, Phil Kauppi6, Peter G Zemek6.   

Abstract

Concentrations of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present in wastewater treatment biosolids are a growing concern. Pyrolysis is a thermal treatment technology for biosolids that can produce a useful biochar product with reduced levels of PFAS and other contaminants. In August 2020, a limited-scope study investigated target PFAS removal of a commercial pyrolysis system processing biosolid with the analysis of 41 target PFAS compounds in biosolids and biochar performed by two independent laboratories. The concentrations of 21 detected target compounds in the input biosolids ranged between approximately 2 µg/kg and 85 µg/kg. No PFAS compounds were detected in the biochar. The PFAS concentrations in the biochar were assumed to equal the compounds' minimum detection limits (MDLs). The pyrolysis system's target PFAS removal efficiencies (REs) were estimated to range between >81.3% and >99.9% (mean >97.4%) with the lowest REs being associated with the lowest detected PFAS concentrations and the highest MDLs. No information on non-target PFAS compounds in influent or effluent media or products of incomplete combustion was considered. Selected gaseous emissions were measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry to provide additional information on air emissions after process controls. This limited-scope study indicated that additional research to further understand this process is warranted.Implications: Development of alternative approaches to manage PFAS-impacted biosolids is of emerging international importance. A commercially operating biosolid pyrolysis process was shown to lower target PFAS levels in produced biochar. Additional research is warranted to understand all potential PFAS transformation emission routes and optimal air pollution emissions control strategies for this technology class.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34870569      PMCID: PMC9128340          DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2021.2009935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.636


  25 in total

1.  Survey of organic wastewater contaminants in biosolids destined for land application.

Authors:  Chad A Kinney; Edward T Furlong; Steven D Zaugg; Mark R Burkhard; Stephen L Werner; Jeffery D Cahill; Gretchen R Jorgensen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Occurrence and fate of perfluorochemicals in soil following the land application of municipal biosolids.

Authors:  Jennifer G Sepulvado; Andrea C Blaine; Lakhwinder S Hundal; Christopher P Higgins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Polyfluorinated compounds: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Andrew B Lindstrom; Mark J Strynar; E Laurence Libelo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Quantitative determination of fluorochemicals in municipal landfill leachates.

Authors:  Carin A Huset; Morton A Barlaz; Douglas F Barofsky; Jennifer A Field
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Leachate emissions of short- and long-chain per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFASs) from various Norwegian landfills.

Authors:  Heidi Knutsen; Trond Mæhlum; Ketil Haarstad; Gøril Aasen Slinde; Hans Peter H Arp
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.238

6.  Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in consumer products in Norway - a pilot study.

Authors:  Dorte Herzke; Elisabeth Olsson; Stefan Posner
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater: Significance of unknown precursors, manufacturing shifts, and likely AFFF impacts.

Authors:  Erika F Houtz; Rebecca Sutton; June-Soo Park; Margaret Sedlak
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  PFOS and PFC releases and associated pollution from a PFC production plant in Minnesota (USA).

Authors:  Fardin Oliaei; Don Kriens; Roland Weber; Alan Watson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins.

Authors:  Robert C Buck; James Franklin; Urs Berger; Jason M Conder; Ian T Cousins; Pim de Voogt; Allan Astrup Jensen; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Scott A Mabury; Stefan P J van Leeuwen
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 10.  Biochar from Biosolids Pyrolysis: A Review.

Authors:  Jorge Paz-Ferreiro; Aurora Nieto; Ana Méndez; Matthew Peter James Askeland; Gabriel Gascó
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  High-temperature technology survey and comparison among incineration, pyrolysis, and gasification systems for water resource recovery facilities.

Authors:  Lloyd J Winchell; John J Ross; Dominic A Brose; Thaís B Pluth; Xavier Fonoll; John W Norton; Katherine Y Bell
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.306

Review 2.  Pyrolysis and gasification at water resource recovery facilities: Status of the industry.

Authors:  Lloyd J Winchell; John J Ross; Dominic A Brose; Thaís B Pluth; Xavier Fonoll; John W Norton; Katherine Y Bell
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.306

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.