Literature DB >> 31411188

Leachate emissions of short- and long-chain per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFASs) from various Norwegian landfills.

Heidi Knutsen1, Trond Mæhlum2, Ketil Haarstad2, Gøril Aasen Slinde1, Hans Peter H Arp3.   

Abstract

Restrictions on the use of long-chain per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFASs) has led to substitutions with short-chain PFASs. This study investigated the presence of four short-chain PFASs and twenty-four long-chain PFASs in leachate and sediment from ten Norwegian landfills, including one site in Svalbard, to assess whether short-chain PFASs are more dominant in leachate. PFASs were detected in all sites. Short-chain PFASs were major contributors to the total PFAS leachate concentrations in six of ten landfills, though not in Svalbard. In sediment, long-chain PFASs such as perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and PFOS-precursors were dominant. Short-chain PFAS leachate concentrations ranged from 68 to 6800 ng L-1 (mean: 980 ± 1800; median: 360 ng L-1), whereas long-chain concentrations ranged from 140 to 2900 ng L-1 (mean: 530 ± 730; median: 290 ng L-1). Sediment concentrations, which contained mainly long-chain PFASs, ranged from 8.5 to 120 μg kg-1 (mean: 47 ± 36; median: 41 μg kg-1). National release from Norwegian landfills to the environment was estimated to be 17 ± 29 kg per year (median: 6.3 kg per year), which is in the same range as national emissions from the US, China and Germany after normalizing the data to a per capita emission factor (3.2 ± 5.5 mg per person per year). Results from this study are compared with previous and current studies in other countries, indicating a general trend that short-chain PFASs are dominating over long-chain PFASs in landfill leachate emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31411188     DOI: 10.1039/c9em00170k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  3 in total

1.  Pyrolysis processing of PFAS-impacted biosolids, a pilot study.

Authors:  Eben D Thoma; Robert S Wright; Ingrid George; Max Krause; Dario Presezzi; Valentino Villa; William Preston; Parik Deshmukh; Phil Kauppi; Peter G Zemek
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.636

Review 2.  Remediation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize or to degrade?

Authors:  Nanthi Bolan; Binoy Sarkar; Yubo Yan; Qiao Li; Hasintha Wijesekara; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Daniel C W Tsang; Marina Schauerte; Julian Bosch; Hendrik Noll; Yong Sik Ok; Kirk Scheckel; Jurate Kumpiene; Kapish Gobindlal; Melanie Kah; Jonathan Sperry; M B Kirkham; Hailong Wang; Yiu Fai Tsang; Deyi Hou; Jörg Rinklebe
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Transcriptomic response of Gordonia sp. strain NB4-1Y when provided with 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonamidoalkyl betaine or 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate as sole sulfur source.

Authors:  Eric M Bottos; Ebtihal Y Al-Shabib; Dayton M J Shaw; Breanne M McAmmond; Aditi Sharma; Danae M Suchan; Andrew D S Cameron; Jonathan D Van Hamme
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.