| Literature DB >> 34864156 |
William D Chey1, Jason R Baker1, Lydia Watts1, Adrienne Harris2, Eric D Shah3.
Abstract
Functional constipation (FC) is one of the most frequently encountered gastrointestinal conditions in practice.1 Practice guidelines universally recommend that patients with typical constipation symptoms and no alarm features be treated empirically with dietary/lifestyle interventions and laxative therapy.2,3 Unfortunately, by the time a patient reaches a gastroenterologist, these treatments frequently have already been tried. Anorectal function testing (anorectal manometry [ARM] and balloon expulsion test [BET]) is the next best step in management guidelines in this all-too-common scenario, because treatment can then be targeted toward pelvic floor dysfunction or colon transit abnormalities. Unfortunately, more than 95% of patients continue to take only over-the-counter laxatives and receive empirical dietary advice, whereas fewer than 2% undergo physiologic evaluation to ascertain the cause of their symptoms.4 Indeed, more than 90% of patients desire more effective treatment options. These observations call into question the wisdom of a management strategy that fails to recognize the intrinsic diversity of the constipation universe and reinforces the misguided "one size fits all" empirical treatment strategy.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34864156 PMCID: PMC9160215 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 1542-3565 Impact factor: 13.576