Literature DB >> 34860637

Time to Pay Attention? Information Search Explains Amplified Framing Effects Under Time Pressure.

Ian D Roberts1, Yi Yang Teoh2, Cendri A Hutcherson1,3.   

Abstract

Decades of research have established the ubiquity and importance of choice biases, such as the framing effect, yet why these seemingly irrational behaviors occur remains unknown. A prominent dual-system account maintains that alternate framings bias choices because of the unchecked influence of quick, affective processes, and findings that time pressure increases the framing effect have provided compelling support. Here, we present a novel alternative account of magnified framing biases under time pressure that emphasizes shifts in early visual attention and strategic adaptations in the decision-making process. In a preregistered direct replication (N = 40 adult undergraduates), we found that time constraints produced strong shifts in visual attention toward reward-predictive cues that, when combined with truncated information search, amplified the framing effect. Our results suggest that an attention-guided, strategic information-sampling process may be sufficient to explain prior results and raise challenges for using time pressure to support some dual-system accounts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive; attention; decision making; dual systems; eye tracking; framing effect; heuristics; open data; open materials; preregistered; risk taking; time pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34860637      PMCID: PMC8985223          DOI: 10.1177/09567976211026983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  38 in total

1.  Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy; Patrick Carter; Edward Blair
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2001-07

3.  Attentional mechanisms in learned predictiveness.

Authors:  Chris J Mitchell; Oren Griffiths; Joyce Seetoo; Peter F Lovibond
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-02-27

4.  Framing effects in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Sunghan Kim; David Goldstein; Lynn Hasher; Rose T Zacks
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Lisa Guo; Jennifer S Trueblood; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-02-01

6.  What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; Jonathan A Fugelsang; Derek J Koehler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Two Is Not Always Better Than One: A Critical Evaluation of Two-System Theories.

Authors:  Gideon Keren; Yaacov Schul
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11

8.  A dynamic dual process model of risky decision making.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.

Authors:  Jonathan Peirce; Jeremy R Gray; Sol Simpson; Michael MacAskill; Richard Höchenberger; Hiroyuki Sogo; Erik Kastman; Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02

10.  Eye Movements in Risky Choice.

Authors:  Neil Stewart; Frouke Hermens; William J Matthews
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2015-01-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses.

Authors:  Marc Wyszynski; Adele Diederich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.