Literature DB >> 28406376

Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making.

Lisa Guo1, Jennifer S Trueblood2, Adele Diederich3.   

Abstract

Every day, people face snap decisions when time is a limiting factor. In addition, the way a problem is presented can influence people's choices, which creates what are known as framing effects. In this research, we explored how time pressure interacts with framing effects in risky decision making. Specifically, does time pressure strengthen or weaken framing effects? On one hand, research has suggested that framing effects evolve through the deliberation process, growing larger with time. On the other hand, dual-process theory attributes framing effects to an intuitive, emotional system that responds automatically to stimuli. In our experiments, participants made decisions about gambles framed in terms of either gains or losses, and time pressure was manipulated across blocks. Results showed increased framing effects under time pressure in both hypothetical and incentivized choices, which supports the dual-process hypothesis that these effects arise from a fast, intuitive system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual-process theory; framing effects; open data; risky decision making; time pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28406376     DOI: 10.1177/0956797616689092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Time to Pay Attention? Information Search Explains Amplified Framing Effects Under Time Pressure.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Yi Yang Teoh; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-03

3.  Non-parametric mixture modeling of cognitive psychological data: A new method to disentangle hidden strategies.

Authors:  Kim Archambeau; Joaquina Couto; Leendert Van Maanen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-11

4.  Computational mechanisms for context-based behavioral interventions: A large-scale analysis.

Authors:  Wenjia Joyce Zhao; Aoife Coady; Sudeep Bhatia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Gamble for the needy! Does identifiability enhances donation?

Authors:  Marc Wyszynski; Adele Diederich; Ilana Ritov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How Cues of Being Watched Promote Risk Seeking in Fund Investment in Older Adults.

Authors:  Meijia Li; Huamao Peng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-12

7.  Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses.

Authors:  Marc Wyszynski; Adele Diederich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.