Katharine Julia Hurry1, Dilhara Karunaratne2, Suzanne Westley3, Alessandra Booth4, Keith C R B Ramesar5, Ting Ting Zhang6, Michael Williams1, David C Howlett1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Sussex, East Sussex. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Broomfield, England. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, England. 4. Queen Mary University, London Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom. 5. Histopathology Department, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Sussex, East Sussex. 6. Brighton and Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Accurate diagnosis of parotid neoplasia is a key to determine the most appropriate patient management choice, including the need for surgery. This review provides an update of the literature on current practice and outcomes of parotid tissue sampling techniques, with an emphasis on ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB) and comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). METHODS: A literature review of EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted. RESULTS: USCB has higher sensitivity, specificity and lower non-diagnostic rates than optimized FNAC. It also has a significantly higher sensitivity for the detection of malignancy. Significant complications post-USCB are uncommon, with only one reported case of tumour seeding and no cases of permanent facial nerve dysfunction. The technique is less operator-dependent than FNAC, with less reported variation in results between institutions. CONCLUSIONS: USCB can be considered as the optimum tool of choice for the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia. This would particularly be the case in centres utilizing FNAC with high non-diagnostic rates or reduced diagnostic accuracy when compared to USCB published data, or in centres establishing a new service. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: An update of the role and outcomes of USCB in the diagnosis of parotid gland pathologies.Research shows that USCB preforms better than FNAC, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, particularly in the case of malignant neoplasia.Complications following USCB were found to be higher than that of FNAC; however, no long-term major complications following either method have been reported in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: Accurate diagnosis of parotid neoplasia is a key to determine the most appropriate patient management choice, including the need for surgery. This review provides an update of the literature on current practice and outcomes of parotid tissue sampling techniques, with an emphasis on ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB) and comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). METHODS: A literature review of EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted. RESULTS: USCB has higher sensitivity, specificity and lower non-diagnostic rates than optimized FNAC. It also has a significantly higher sensitivity for the detection of malignancy. Significant complications post-USCB are uncommon, with only one reported case of tumour seeding and no cases of permanent facial nerve dysfunction. The technique is less operator-dependent than FNAC, with less reported variation in results between institutions. CONCLUSIONS: USCB can be considered as the optimum tool of choice for the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia. This would particularly be the case in centres utilizing FNAC with high non-diagnostic rates or reduced diagnostic accuracy when compared to USCB published data, or in centres establishing a new service. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: An update of the role and outcomes of USCB in the diagnosis of parotid gland pathologies.Research shows that USCB preforms better than FNAC, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, particularly in the case of malignant neoplasia.Complications following USCB were found to be higher than that of FNAC; however, no long-term major complications following either method have been reported in the literature.
Authors: Lucie Dostalova; David Kalfert; Alzbeta Jechova; Vladimir Koucky; Stepan Novak; Martin Kuchar; Michal Zabrodsky; Daniela Novakova Kodetova; Marie Ludvikova; Ivana Kholova; Jan Plzak Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: T Cuenca-Jimenez; Z Chia; A Desai; A Moody; K Ramesar; R Grace; D C Howlett Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.789