Literature DB >> 34860346

Integrating water quality index, GIS and multivariate statistical techniques towards a better understanding of drinking water quality.

Adil Masood1, Mohammad Aslam2, Quoc Bao Pham3, Warish Khan4, Sarfaraz Masood5.   

Abstract

Groundwater is considered as an imperative component of the accessible water assets across the world. Due to urbanization, industrialization and intensive farming practices, the groundwater resources have been exposed to large-scale depletion and quality degradation. The prime objective of this study was to evaluate the groundwater quality for drinking purposes in Mewat district of Haryana, India. For this purpose, twenty-five groundwater samples were collected from hand pumps and tube wells spread over the entire district. Samples were analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), total hardness (TH), turbidity, total alkalinity (TA), cations and anions in the laboratory using the standard methods. Two different water quality indices (weighted arithmetic water quality index and entropy weighted water quality index) were computed to characterize the groundwater quality of the study area. Ordinary Kriging technique was applied to generate spatial distribution map of the WQIs. Four semivariogram models, i.e. circular, spherical, exponential and Gaussian were used and found to be the best fit for analyzing the spatial variability in terms of weighted arithmetic index (GWQI) and entropy weighted water quality index (EWQI). Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA) and discriminant analysis (DA) were applied to provide additional scientific insights into the information content of the groundwater quality data available for this study. The interpretation of WQI analysis based on GWQI and EWQI reveals that 64% of the samples belong to the "poor" to "very poor" bracket. The result for the semivariogram modeling also shows that Gaussian model obtains the best fit for both EWQI and GWQI dataset. HCA classified 25 sampling locations into three main clusters of similar groundwater characteristics. DA validated these clusters and identified a total of three significant variables (pH, EC and Cl) by adopting stepwise method. The application of PCA resulted in three factors explaining 69.81% of the total variance. These factors reveal how processes like rock water interaction, urban waste discharge and mineral dissolution affect the groundwater quality.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discriminant analysis; Entropy; Hierarchical cluster analysis; Kriging; Principal component analysis; Semivariogram

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34860346      PMCID: PMC8989949          DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17594-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   5.190


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of water quality indices for coastal water.

Authors:  A K Gupta; S K Gupta; Rashmi S Patil
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.269

2.  Evaluation of groundwater quality in and around Peenya industrial area of Bangalore, South India using GIS techniques.

Authors:  Anitha Pius; Charmaine Jerome; Nagaraja Sharma
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Natural and anthropogenic factors affecting the groundwater quality in the Nandong karst underground river system in Yunan, China.

Authors:  Yongjun Jiang; Yuexia Wu; Chris Groves; Daoxian Yuan; Pat Kambesis
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Assessment of water quality of polluted lake using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study.

Authors:  T G Kazi; M B Arain; M K Jamali; N Jalbani; H I Afridi; R A Sarfraz; J A Baig; Abdul Q Shah
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Hydrogeochemistry and Water Quality Index in the Assessment of Groundwater Quality for Drinking Uses.

Authors:  Asit Kumar Batabyal; Surajit Chakraborty
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.946

6.  Prediction modeling of potentially toxic elements' hydrogeopollution using an integrated Q-mode HCs and ANNs machine learning approach in SE Nigeria.

Authors:  Johnbosco C Egbueri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade.

Authors:  Carole Dalin; Yoshihide Wada; Thomas Kastner; Michael J Puma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey).

Authors:  Şehnaz Şener; Erhan Şener; Ayşen Davraz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Hydrogeochemical characterization and evaluation of groundwater quality in Kangayam taluk, Tirupur district, Tamil Nadu, India, using GIS techniques.

Authors:  Sakthivel Duraisamy; Vennila Govindhaswamy; Karunanidhi Duraisamy; Srinivasamoorthy Krishinaraj; Anand Balasubramanian; Subramani Thirumalaisamy
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Characterizing groundwater quality ranks for drinking purposes in Sylhet district, Bangladesh, using entropy method, spatial autocorrelation index, and geostatistics.

Authors:  Abu Reza Md Towfiqul Islam; Nasir Ahmed; Md Bodrud-Doza; Ronghao Chu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.