Literature DB >> 3485968

The effective intensity of Coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation is gravitoinertial force dependent: implications for space motion sickness.

J R Lackner, A Graybiel.   

Abstract

Coriolis, cross-coupled angular acceleration stimulation readily induces motion sickness under terrestrial conditions. Nevertheless, the Skylab astronauts, when tested with such stimulation in-flight, were insusceptible even though each had been susceptible pre-flight. It is unclear whether this decreased susceptibility was the consequence of in-flight adaptation or in part the result of immediate changes in sensory-motor and vestibulo-motor function that occur during exposure to microgravity conditions. To evaluate this issue, we have tested individuals both in the high and low force phases of parabolic flight maneuvers using constant levels of Coriolis, cross-coupled stimulation. Our findings indicate that 1.) subjects are less susceptible when tested in 0 G than +2 Gz; 2.) the perceived intensity and provocativeness of Coriolis stimulation decreases in 0 G and increases in +2 Gz relative to +1 Gz baseline values; and 3.) changes in the apparent intensity of Coriolis stimulation occur virtually immediately when background gravitoinertial force level is varied. These findings explain in large part why the Skylab astronauts were refractory to motion sickness during Coriolis stimulation in-flight. The general implications for space motion sickness are discussed.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3485968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  13 in total

1.  Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR).

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Sofronis Sofroniou; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The relation of motion sickness to the spatial-temporal properties of velocity storage.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Cardiovascular deconditioning in microgravity: some possible countermeasures.

Authors:  G Antonutto; P E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Labyrinthine lesions and motion sickness susceptibility.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Space motion sickness.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul Dizio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cross-coupling vestibular stimulation: motion sickness and the vestibulo-sympathetic reflex.

Authors:  Fausto Romano; Nicoletta Caramia; Dominik Straumann; Eugene Nalivaiko; Giovanni Bertolini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  A New Vestibular Stimulation Mode for Motion Sickness With Emphatic Analysis of Pica.

Authors:  Zhi-Hao Zhang; Li-Peng Liu; Yan Fang; Xiao-Cheng Wang; Wei Wang; Ying-Shing Chan; Lu Wang; Hui Li; Yun-Qing Li; Fu-Xing Zhang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Sarah M Harmon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The effects of gravitoinertial force level and head movements on post-rotational nystagmus and illusory after-rotation.

Authors:  P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.