| Literature DB >> 34859103 |
Jiao Ran1, Xiao Bai1, Rurong Wang1, Xuehan Li1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a low-dose perioperative infusion of Dex reduces early POCD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34859103 PMCID: PMC8632391 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8652028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Enrolment flowchart.
Characteristics and intraoperative variables.
| Dex group ( | NS group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 59.00 ± 7.72 | 62.08 ± 7.51 | 0.08 |
| Sex (male, %) | 29 (55.77%) | 31 (62.00%) | 0.52 |
| BMI | 23.83 ± 2.54 | 23.83 ± 2.54 | 0.93 |
| Educational level | |||
| Primary | 7 (13.46%) | 5 (10.00%) | 0.71 |
| Junior high school | 12 (23.08%) | 15 (30.00%) | |
| Senior high school | 14 (26.92%) | 12 (24.00%) | |
| College degree | 19 (36.54%) | 18 (36.00%) | |
| TICS-m score (baseline) | 34.27 ± 3.79 | 32.84 ± 2.85 | 0.14 |
| Smoking history | 11 (21.15%) | 16 (32.00%) | 0.22 |
| Drinking history | 5 (9.62%) | 9 (18.00%) | 0.22 |
| Coronary heart disease | 0 (0.00%) | 3 (6.00%) | 0.11 |
| Hypertension | 7 (13.46%) | 15 (30.00%) | 0.04 |
| Diabetes | 2 (3.85%) | 7 (14.00%) | 0.09 |
| Prolonged rSO2 desaturation∗ | 0 [0.00-0.79] | 0.02 [0.00-5.12] | 0.27 |
| Oxygenation index | |||
| T0 | 396.34 ± 54.54 | 409.9 ± 64.71 | 0.36 |
| T1 | 396.00 [323.75-494.25] | 401.00 [361.00-442.00] | 0.86 |
| T2 | 152.42 ± 69.82 | 174.30 ± 81.91 | 0.22 |
| T3 | 321.26 ± 103.84 | 314.95 ± 105.87 | 0.80 |
| Anesthesia duration (min) | 174.49 ± 50.18 | 162.51 ± 42.58 | 0.27 |
| Surgery duration (min) | 106.76 ± 52.07 | 102.75 ± 34.98 | 0.69 |
| OLV/artificial pneumothorax duration (min) | 80.0 [65.0-99.5] | 87.0 [69.0-112.2] | 0.44 |
| Length of stay (day) | 15.26 ± 3.77 | 17.69 ± 5.09 | 0.02 |
| The total hospital cost | 52458.71 ± 10649.30 | 57269.03 ± 9269.98 | 0.04 |
BMI: body mass index; TICS-m: Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified; OLV: one lung ventilation; ∗rSO2 area under the curve (AUC) of desaturation below 20% of baseline or AUC of desaturation below 50% absolute value [21].
The incidence of POCD.
| Dex group ( | NS group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence ( | 19 (36.54%) | 16 (32.00%) | 0.63 |
RBANS scores in both groups.
| Preoperation | Postoperation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dex group | NS group |
| Dex group | NS group |
| |
| List learning | 22.92 ± 4.82 | 22.38 ± 3.87 | 0.53 | 27.65 ± 5.08 | 27.22 ± 4.84 | 0.66 |
| Story memory | 12.92 ± 4.47 | 13.08 ± 3.85 | 0.85 | 15.54 ± 4.75 | 16.02 ± 4.24 | 0.59 |
| Figure copy | 15.29 ± 2.84 | 14.64 ± 3.00 | 0.27 | 14.02 ± 2.85 | 13.78 ± 2.76 | 0.67 |
| Line orientation | 15.65 ± 2.92 | 14.98 ± 2.87 | 0.24 | 15.62 ± 3.11 | 15.52 ± 2.76 | 0.87 |
| Picture naming | 9.33 ± 1.04 | 9.14 ± 1.13 | 0.39 | 9.42 ± 0.87 | 9.42 ± 0.86 | 0.99 |
| Semantic fluency | 19.42 ± 3.67 | 19.14 ± 4.50 | 0.73 | 19.35 ± 3.38 | 18.10 ± 3.82 | 0.08 |
| Digit span | 12.60 ± 2.58 | 11.98 ± 2.79 | 0.25 | 12.52 ± 2.59 | 11.50 ± 2.79 | 0.06 |
| Coding | 36.83 ± 9.34 | 33.50 ± 9.70 | 0.08 | 35.94 ± 10.44 | 33.74 ± 10.22 | 0.29 |
| List recall | 3.85 ± 2.35 | 4.00 ± 2.46 | 0.75 | 6.04 ± 2.44 | 5.34 ± 2.75 | 0.18 |
| List recognition | 18.83 ± 2.12 | 18.86 ± 1.78 | 0.93 | 19.23 ± 1.69 | 19.24 ± 1.36 | 0.98 |
| Story recall | 6.71 ± 2.23 | 6.48 ± 2.60 | 0.63 | 8.02 ± 2.46 | 7.34 ± 3.01 | 0.22 |
| Figure recall | 11.79 ± 3.71 | 11.02 ± 4.19 | 0.33 | 12.44 ± 3.58 | 11.76 ± 4.19 | 0.38 |
The TICS-m scores between both groups.
| Group | Time |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | Postoperative 7 days | Postoperative 1 month | Interactive effect | Time effect | Intervention effect | |
| Dex group | 34.05 ± 4.06 | 33.69 ± 4.11 | 34.97 ± 3.54 | 0.74 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| NS group | 32.85 ± 2.81 | 32.26 ± 3.29 | 33.18 ± 4.29 | |||
Figure 2Tics-m score in both groups.
Figure 3Tics-m score at different times.
Figure 4The VAS score after surgery at rest and activity in both groups. #P < 0.05, compared with the NS group.
Figure 5The ADL score in both groups 7 days and 1 month after surgery.