| Literature DB >> 34858530 |
Kyle Korth1, Scott Bolam2, Ellen Leiferman1, Thomas Crenshaw3, Michael Dray4, Haemish A Crawford5, Maegen Wallace6, Matthew A Halanski6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the histological healing and radiographic effects of tendons transferred to ossified or unossified bone using different tendon fixation techniques.Entities:
Keywords: animal model; cartilage; clubfoot; tendon transfer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34858530 PMCID: PMC8582610 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Fig. 1Illustration of tendon transfer techniques performed in this study. Matching osseous transfers were also performed through the ossified calcaneal body (not shown).
Histological grading scheme utilized in assessing tendon transfer healing
| Grade | Collagen fibre density | Collagen fibre orientation | Bone-tendon interface | Vascularity | Inflammation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | None | None | 0% to 24% interdigitation | Abundant vascular network | Abundant inflammatory cells |
| 1 | Low | Disorganized fibres | 25% to 49% interdigitation | Moderate vascular network | Moderate inflammatory cells |
| 2 | Medium | Moderate alignment | 50% to 75% interdigitation | Minimal vascular network | Minimal inflammatory cells |
| 3 | High | Highly aligned | > 75% interdigitation | No vascular network | No inflammatory cells |
Fig. 2Representative examples of each of the radiographic scores utilized for samples in this study.
Individual histological scoring of the transferred entheses
| Group | Sample | Density | Orientation | Bone-tendon interface | Vascularity | Inflammation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| I | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| III | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
|
| I | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| III | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
|
| I | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| III | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
|
| I | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 |
| II | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | |
| III | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
|
| I | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| III | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
|
| I | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| II | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| III | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
Fig. 3Histological examples of good and poor histological healing. The poor healing samples (left in each pair) demonstrate low collagen fibre density, disorganized alignment, poor inter-digitation and abundant vascularity, whereas the good healing samples demonstrated moderate-high collagen fibre alignment, medium fibre density, good inter-digitation and minimal vascularity.
Average healing score for each cohort
| Group | Mean combined histological score (range) |
|---|---|
| Anchor-bone (n = 3) | 5.7 (5 to 7) |
| Anchor-cartilage (n = 3) | 5.7 (3 to 8) |
| Suture-bone (n = 3) | 7.3 (5 to 9) |
| Suture-cartilage (n = 3) | 10.3 (8 to 12) |
| Tunnel-bone (n = 3) | 9.3 (8 to 11) |
| Tunnel-cartilage (n = 3) | 10.3 (10 to 11) |
Fig. 4Representative summary of the histological findings for each cohort. Images at 100X, top pair Hematoxylin/Eosin, bottom pair Masson’s Trichrome. Bone transfer site shown above apophyseal cartilage insertion site in each column for each fixation method (T, tendon; B, bone; A, apophyseal cartilage). Suture anchor (left column): tendon to bone (top) exhibited disorganized fibre orientation with poor (< 25%) inter-digitation at the bone-tendon interface and abundant vascularization. Tendon to cartilage (bottom) exhibited disorganized fibre orientation with poor (< 25%) inter-digitation at the bone-tendon interface and abundant vascularization. Suture fixation (middle column): tendon to bone (top) exhibited medium-good (25% to 100%) inter-digitation at the bone-tendon interface, however, disorganized fibre orientation with low-medium collagen fibre density whereas tendon to cartilage (bottom). The group exhibited medium-good (25% to 100%) inter-digitation at the cartilage-tendon interface with medium collagen and moderate orientation scores in the tendon. Tendon tunnel (right column): tendon to bone (top) exhibited good (50% to 74%) inter-digitation at bone-tendon interface with moderate alignment and medium collagen density as did tendon to cartilage (bottom) where the group exhibited grade 2 (50% to 74%) interdigitation bone-cartilage interface with moderate alignment and medium-high collagen density.
Detailed radiographic scores of the calcaneal apophysis. Individual and overall radiographic scoring. The mode for each reader’s triplicate measurements are shown for each sample
| Group | Sample | Rater 1 | Rater 2 | Rater 3 | Rater 4 | Rater 5 | Overall mode | Percentage agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anchor-bone | I | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 80 | |
| III | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Anchor-cartilage | I | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| II | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 100 | |
| III | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Suture-bone | I | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| II | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
| III | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 80 | |
| Suture-cartilage | I | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| II | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 80 | |
| III | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 80 | |
| Tunnel-bone | I | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 80 |
| II | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
| III | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
| Tunnel-cartilage | I | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 80 | |
| III | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 60 |